Football statistics for Shan United
Team Info
Season
Country
Venue
2021
Asia
Taunggyi Stadium
Competition
Both Teams to Score
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Johor Darul Ta'zim |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 2 |
Melbourne City |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 3 |
Brisbane Roar |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 4 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
6 | 1 | 17% |
| 5 |
Shanghai SIPG |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 7 |
Cerezo Osaka |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 8 |
Nagoya Grampus |
8 | 3 | 38% |
| 9 |
Gamba Osaka |
6 | 5 | 83% |
| 10 |
Kawasaki Frontale |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 11 |
Ratchaburi |
6 | 0 | 0% |
| 12 |
Port FC |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 13 |
Bangkok Glass |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 14 |
Chiangrai United |
6 | 4 | 67% |
| 15 |
Kitchee |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 16 |
Tampines Rovers |
6 | 1 | 17% |
| 17 |
Ceres |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 18 |
Kaya |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 19 |
Daegu |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 20 |
Pohang Steelers |
10 | 3 | 30% |
| 21 |
Ulsan |
9 | 3 | 33% |
| 22 |
Jeonbuk Motors |
8 | 6 | 75% |
| 23 |
Viettel |
6 | 1 | 17% |
| 24 |
Al-Duhail |
6 | 5 | 83% |
| 25 |
Al Gharafa |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 26 |
Al Rayyan |
6 | 4 | 67% |
| 27 |
Al Sadd |
6 | 4 | 67% |
| 28 |
Al Ain |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 29 |
Shabab Al-Ahli |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 30 |
Al Wahda |
9 | 4 | 44% |
| 31 |
Al-Sharjah |
7 | 4 | 57% |
| 32 |
Al Ahli |
6 | 4 | 67% |
| 33 |
Al Hilal |
10 | 4 | 40% |
| 34 |
Al Nassr |
9 | 6 | 67% |
| 35 |
Al Wahda |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 36 |
Goa |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 37 |
Al Wihdat |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 38 |
Esteghlal |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 39 |
Tractor Sazi |
7 | 1 | 14% |
| 40 |
Pakhtakor |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 41 |
Persepolis |
8 | 3 | 38% |
| 42 |
Shan United |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 43 |
Foolad |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 44 |
AGMK |
7 | 5 | 71% |
| 45 |
Al Quwa Al Jawiya |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 46 |
Istiqlol |
7 | 4 | 57% |
| 47 |
Al Zawra'a |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 48 |
Al Shorta |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Johor Darul Ta'zim |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 2 |
Melbourne City |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 3 |
Brisbane Roar |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 4 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 5 |
Shanghai SIPG |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 7 |
Cerezo Osaka |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 8 |
Nagoya Grampus |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 9 |
Gamba Osaka |
3 | 3 | 100% |
| 10 |
Kawasaki Frontale |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 11 |
Ratchaburi |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 12 |
Port FC |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 13 |
Bangkok Glass |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 14 |
Chiangrai United |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 15 |
Kitchee |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 16 |
Tampines Rovers |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 17 |
Ceres |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 18 |
Kaya |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 19 |
Daegu |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 20 |
Pohang Steelers |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 21 |
Ulsan |
5 | 2 | 40% |
| 22 |
Jeonbuk Motors |
5 | 4 | 80% |
| 23 |
Viettel |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 24 |
Al-Duhail |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 25 |
Al Gharafa |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 26 |
Al Rayyan |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 27 |
Al Sadd |
3 | 3 | 100% |
| 28 |
Al Ain |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 29 |
Shabab Al-Ahli |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 30 |
Al Wahda |
5 | 3 | 60% |
| 31 |
Al-Sharjah |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 32 |
Al Ahli |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 33 |
Al Hilal |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 34 |
Al Nassr |
5 | 3 | 60% |
| 35 |
Al Wahda |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 36 |
Goa |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 37 |
Al Wihdat |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 38 |
Esteghlal |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 39 |
Tractor Sazi |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 40 |
Pakhtakor |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 41 |
Persepolis |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 42 |
Shan United |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 43 |
Foolad |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 44 |
AGMK |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 45 |
Al Quwa Al Jawiya |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 46 |
Istiqlol |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 47 |
Al Zawra'a |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 48 |
Al Shorta |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Johor Darul Ta'zim |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 2 |
Melbourne City |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 3 |
Brisbane Roar |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 4 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 5 |
Shanghai SIPG |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 7 |
Cerezo Osaka |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 8 |
Nagoya Grampus |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 9 |
Gamba Osaka |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 10 |
Kawasaki Frontale |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 11 |
Ratchaburi |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 12 |
Port FC |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 13 |
Bangkok Glass |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 14 |
Chiangrai United |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 15 |
Kitchee |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 16 |
Tampines Rovers |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 17 |
Ceres |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 18 |
Kaya |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 19 |
Daegu |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 20 |
Pohang Steelers |
6 | 1 | 17% |
| 21 |
Ulsan |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 22 |
Jeonbuk Motors |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 23 |
Viettel |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 24 |
Al-Duhail |
3 | 3 | 100% |
| 25 |
Al Gharafa |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 26 |
Al Rayyan |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 27 |
Al Sadd |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 28 |
Al Ain |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 29 |
Shabab Al-Ahli |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 30 |
Al Wahda |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 31 |
Al-Sharjah |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 32 |
Al Ahli |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 33 |
Al Hilal |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 34 |
Al Nassr |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 35 |
Al Wahda |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 36 |
Goa |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 37 |
Al Wihdat |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 38 |
Esteghlal |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 39 |
Tractor Sazi |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 40 |
Pakhtakor |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 41 |
Persepolis |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 42 |
Shan United |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 43 |
Foolad |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 44 |
AGMK |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 45 |
Al Quwa Al Jawiya |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 46 |
Istiqlol |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 47 |
Al Zawra'a |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 48 |
Al Shorta |
3 | 1 | 33% |
Shan United BTTS matches in the season
The both teams scoring stat is the number of times a team has both scored and conceded a goal in a match. This stat is helpful in determining whether a match has the potential to be a high-scoring affair.
And in Shan United’s case, their BTTS statistics in the AFC Champions League 2021 provide some interesting insights about their offence and defence. Here are the relevant BTTS stats on Shan United in the competition:
- In 0 matches to date, Shan United has scored and conceded in the same game 0 times
- In terms of percentage, Shan United has had both teams score in 0% of their matches in Asian Champions League.
You can also see Shan United’s BTTS stats filtered in terms of where they play, whether it’s at home or away, as well as overall, for a more comprehensive view of the stat all season long.