Season
2014
Country
USA
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Orlando City | 29 | 15 | 52% |
2 | Phoenix Rising | 28 | 16 | 57% |
3 | Penn FC | 31 | 20 | 65% |
4 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 28 | 15 | 54% |
5 | OKC Energy | 28 | 10 | 36% |
6 | LA Galaxy II | 30 | 20 | 67% |
7 | Sacramento Republic | 31 | 19 | 61% |
8 | Charleston Battery | 29 | 12 | 41% |
9 | Richmond Kickers | 30 | 22 | 73% |
10 | Orange County SC | 28 | 15 | 54% |
11 | Rochester Rhinos | 29 | 11 | 38% |
12 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 29 | 13 | 45% |
13 | Charlotte Eagles | 28 | 16 | 57% |
14 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 28 | 16 | 57% |
15 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 7 | 4 | 57% |
16 | Chivas USA Res. | 7 | 4 | 57% |
17 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 6 | 5 | 83% |
18 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 7 | 3 | 43% |
19 | Montreal Impact Res. | 8 | 3 | 38% |
20 | New York RB Res. | 8 | 5 | 63% |
21 | Chicago Fire Res. | 9 | 5 | 56% |
22 | Dallas Res. | 8 | 3 | 38% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Orlando City | 15 | 8 | 53% |
2 | Phoenix Rising | 14 | 8 | 57% |
3 | Penn FC | 14 | 9 | 64% |
4 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 14 | 7 | 50% |
5 | OKC Energy | 14 | 4 | 29% |
6 | LA Galaxy II | 15 | 12 | 80% |
7 | Sacramento Republic | 17 | 11 | 65% |
8 | Charleston Battery | 14 | 8 | 57% |
9 | Richmond Kickers | 16 | 11 | 69% |
10 | Orange County SC | 14 | 8 | 57% |
11 | Rochester Rhinos | 14 | 3 | 21% |
12 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 14 | 7 | 50% |
13 | Charlotte Eagles | 14 | 8 | 57% |
14 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 14 | 8 | 57% |
15 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 4 | 2 | 50% |
16 | Chivas USA Res. | 3 | 2 | 67% |
17 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 2 | 2 | 100% |
18 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 4 | 2 | 50% |
19 | Montreal Impact Res. | 4 | 2 | 50% |
20 | New York RB Res. | 3 | 1 | 33% |
21 | Chicago Fire Res. | 5 | 2 | 40% |
22 | Dallas Res. | 5 | 1 | 20% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Orlando City | 14 | 7 | 50% |
2 | Phoenix Rising | 14 | 8 | 57% |
3 | Penn FC | 17 | 11 | 65% |
4 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 14 | 8 | 57% |
5 | OKC Energy | 14 | 6 | 43% |
6 | LA Galaxy II | 15 | 8 | 53% |
7 | Sacramento Republic | 14 | 8 | 57% |
8 | Charleston Battery | 15 | 4 | 27% |
9 | Richmond Kickers | 14 | 11 | 79% |
10 | Orange County SC | 14 | 7 | 50% |
11 | Rochester Rhinos | 15 | 8 | 53% |
12 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 15 | 6 | 40% |
13 | Charlotte Eagles | 14 | 8 | 57% |
14 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 14 | 8 | 57% |
15 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 3 | 2 | 67% |
16 | Chivas USA Res. | 4 | 2 | 50% |
17 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 4 | 3 | 75% |
18 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 3 | 1 | 33% |
19 | Montreal Impact Res. | 4 | 1 | 25% |
20 | New York RB Res. | 5 | 4 | 80% |
21 | Chicago Fire Res. | 4 | 3 | 75% |
22 | Dallas Res. | 3 | 2 | 67% |
The both teams scoring stat is the number of times a team has both scored and conceded a goal in a match. This stat is helpful in determining whether a match has the potential to be a high-scoring affair.
And in Real Salt Lake Res.’s case, their BTTS statistics in the USL Championship 2014 provide some interesting insights about their offence and defence. Here are the relevant BTTS stats on Real Salt Lake Res. in the competition:
You can also see Real Salt Lake Res.’s BTTS stats filtered in terms of where they play, whether it’s at home or away, as well as overall, for a more comprehensive view of the stat all season long.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.