PVF-CAND Team Logo

PVF-CAND corners per game

Team Info

Season

Country

Venue

2025/26

Vietnam

PVF Stadium

Corners

# Team MP Over 7.5 Over 8.5 Over 9.5 Over 10.5 Over 11.5 Over 12.5 Over 13.5 Average
1
Hai Phong logo Hai Phong
11 82 % 64 % 55 % 45 % 36 % 27 % 27 % 10.55
2
Nam Dinh logo Nam Dinh
10 70 % 60 % 60 % 40 % 20 % 20 % 10 % 10.1
3
Hoang Anh Gia Lai logo Hoang Anh Gia Lai
10 60 % 50 % 40 % 40 % 20 % 20 % 20 % 9.1
4
Ha Noi logo Ha Noi
11 73 % 45 % 36 % 27 % 18 % 18 % 18 % 9
5
Binh Duong logo Binh Duong
11 73 % 55 % 45 % 27 % 9 % 9 % 9 % 8.91
6
Phu Dong logo Phu Dong
11 64 % 45 % 36 % 27 % 18 % 18 % 18 % 8.9
7
Da Nang logo Da Nang
11 64 % 55 % 36 % 36 % 27 % 18 % 0 % 8.73
8
PVF-CAND logo PVF-CAND
11 64 % 18 % 18 % 18 % 9 % 9 % 0 % 8.09
9
Quang Nam logo Quang Nam
1 100 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 8
10
Song Lam Nghe An logo Song Lam Nghe An
11 64 % 27 % 18 % 18 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 7.81
11
Công An Nhân Dân logo Công An Nhân Dân
9 44 % 22 % 22 % 11 % 11 % 11 % 11 % 7.55
12
Ho Chi Minh City logo Ho Chi Minh City
11 55 % 36 % 27 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 7.45
13
Viettel logo Viettel
10 70 % 10 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 7.4
14
Hà Nội II logo Hà Nội II
11 45 % 27 % 9 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 7.18
15
FLC Thanh Hoa logo FLC Thanh Hoa
10 20 % 10 % 10 % 10 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 6.7
# Team MP Over 7.5 Over 8.5 Over 9.5 Over 10.5 Over 11.5 Over 12.5 Over 13.5 Average
1
Hoang Anh Gia Lai logo Hoang Anh Gia Lai
5 80 % 60 % 40 % 40 % 20 % 20 % 20 % 10.2
2
Ha Noi logo Ha Noi
5 80 % 40 % 40 % 40 % 40 % 40 % 40 % 10.2
3
Hai Phong logo Hai Phong
6 83 % 67 % 50 % 33 % 33 % 17 % 17 % 10.17
4
Nam Dinh logo Nam Dinh
6 67 % 67 % 67 % 50 % 17 % 17 % 0 % 9.84
5
Binh Duong logo Binh Duong
5 60 % 60 % 60 % 40 % 20 % 20 % 20 % 9
6
PVF-CAND logo PVF-CAND
6 67 % 33 % 33 % 33 % 17 % 17 % 0 % 8.5
7
Viettel logo Viettel
4 100 % 25 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 8.25
8
Phu Dong logo Phu Dong
5 60 % 40 % 40 % 20 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 8
9
Quang Nam logo Quang Nam
1 100 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 8
10
Ho Chi Minh City logo Ho Chi Minh City
6 67 % 50 % 33 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 7.83
11
Công An Nhân Dân logo Công An Nhân Dân
6 33 % 17 % 17 % 17 % 17 % 17 % 17 % 7.67
12
FLC Thanh Hoa logo FLC Thanh Hoa
4 25 % 25 % 25 % 25 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 7.25
13
Song Lam Nghe An logo Song Lam Nghe An
6 50 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 7.16
14
Da Nang logo Da Nang
5 40 % 40 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 6.8
15
Hà Nội II logo Hà Nội II
5 40 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 6.4
# Team MP Over 7.5 Over 8.5 Over 9.5 Over 10.5 Over 11.5 Over 12.5 Over 13.5 Average
1
Hai Phong logo Hai Phong
5 80 % 60 % 60 % 60 % 40 % 40 % 40 % 11
2
Nam Dinh logo Nam Dinh
4 75 % 50 % 50 % 25 % 25 % 25 % 25 % 10.5
3
Da Nang logo Da Nang
6 83 % 67 % 67 % 67 % 50 % 33 % 0 % 10.33
4
Phu Dong logo Phu Dong
6 67 % 50 % 33 % 33 % 33 % 33 % 33 % 9.67
5
Binh Duong logo Binh Duong
6 83 % 50 % 33 % 17 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 8.83
6
Song Lam Nghe An logo Song Lam Nghe An
5 80 % 60 % 40 % 40 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 8.6
7
Hoang Anh Gia Lai logo Hoang Anh Gia Lai
5 40 % 40 % 40 % 40 % 20 % 20 % 20 % 8
8
Ha Noi logo Ha Noi
6 67 % 50 % 33 % 17 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 8
9
Hà Nội II logo Hà Nội II
6 50 % 50 % 17 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 7.84
10
PVF-CAND logo PVF-CAND
5 60 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 7.6
11
Công An Nhân Dân logo Công An Nhân Dân
3 67 % 33 % 33 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 7.33
12
Ho Chi Minh City logo Ho Chi Minh City
5 40 % 20 % 20 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 7
13
Viettel logo Viettel
6 50 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 6.84
14
FLC Thanh Hoa logo FLC Thanh Hoa
6 17 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 6.34
15
Quang Nam logo Quang Nam
0 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0
# Team MP Over 2.5 Over 3.5 Over 4.5 Over 5.5 Over 6.5 Over 7.5 Over 8.5 Average
2
Ha Noi logo Ha Noi
11 91% 91% 55% 45% 36% 36% 9% 6.09
3
Hai Phong logo Hai Phong
11 100% 73% 45% 45% 36% 27% 9% 5.64
4
Nam Dinh logo Nam Dinh
10 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 20% 20% 5.6
5
Viettel logo Viettel
10 100% 80% 50% 30% 20% 0% 0% 4.8
6
Phu Dong logo Phu Dong
11 82% 64% 45% 27% 18% 9% 9% 4.45
7
Binh Duong logo Binh Duong
11 82% 64% 55% 27% 18% 0% 0% 4.36
8
Công An Nhân Dân logo Công An Nhân Dân
9 56% 44% 44% 33% 22% 11% 11% 4.11
9
Hà Nội II logo Hà Nội II
11 82% 55% 27% 18% 18% 0% 0% 4
10
PVF-CAND logo PVF-CAND
11 64% 45% 18% 9% 9% 9% 9% 4
11
Song Lam Nghe An logo Song Lam Nghe An
11 73% 36% 27% 27% 9% 0% 0% 3.36
12
Ho Chi Minh City logo Ho Chi Minh City
11 73% 55% 27% 9% 0% 0% 0% 3.27
13
Hoang Anh Gia Lai logo Hoang Anh Gia Lai
10 40% 40% 40% 30% 10% 0% 0% 3.2
14
FLC Thanh Hoa logo FLC Thanh Hoa
10 50% 50% 30% 10% 10% 0% 0% 3.1
15
Da Nang logo Da Nang
11 64% 36% 18% 9% 0% 0% 0% 2.82
16
Quang Nam logo Quang Nam
1 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2
# Team MP Over 2.5 Over 3.5 Over 4.5 Over 5.5 Over 6.5 Over 7.5 Over 8.5 Average
2
Ha Noi logo Ha Noi
5 100% 100% 60% 40% 40% 40% 20% 7
3
Hai Phong logo Hai Phong
6 100% 67% 50% 50% 33% 33% 17% 6
4
Nam Dinh logo Nam Dinh
6 100% 67% 50% 33% 17% 17% 17% 5.17
5
Binh Duong logo Binh Duong
5 80% 60% 60% 60% 40% 0% 0% 5
6
Viettel logo Viettel
4 100% 75% 75% 25% 25% 0% 0% 5
7
PVF-CAND logo PVF-CAND
6 67% 50% 33% 17% 17% 17% 17% 4.83
8
FLC Thanh Hoa logo FLC Thanh Hoa
4 75% 75% 50% 25% 25% 0% 0% 4.5
9
Phu Dong logo Phu Dong
5 80% 40% 40% 20% 20% 20% 20% 4.2
10
Hoang Anh Gia Lai logo Hoang Anh Gia Lai
5 60% 60% 60% 40% 20% 0% 0% 4
11
Công An Nhân Dân logo Công An Nhân Dân
6 50% 33% 33% 33% 17% 17% 17% 4
12
Da Nang logo Da Nang
5 80% 40% 40% 20% 0% 0% 0% 3.8
13
Hà Nội II logo Hà Nội II
5 60% 60% 20% 20% 20% 0% 0% 3.8
14
Song Lam Nghe An logo Song Lam Nghe An
6 83% 33% 17% 17% 17% 0% 0% 3.33
15
Ho Chi Minh City logo Ho Chi Minh City
6 67% 67% 17% 17% 0% 0% 0% 3.33
16
Quang Nam logo Quang Nam
1 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2
# Team MP Over 2.5 Over 3.5 Over 4.5 Over 5.5 Over 6.5 Over 7.5 Over 8.5 Average
2
Nam Dinh logo Nam Dinh
4 100% 100% 75% 50% 25% 25% 25% 6.25
3
Ha Noi logo Ha Noi
6 83% 83% 50% 50% 33% 33% 0% 5.33
4
Hai Phong logo Hai Phong
5 100% 80% 40% 40% 40% 20% 0% 5.2
5
Viettel logo Viettel
6 100% 83% 33% 33% 17% 0% 0% 4.67
6
Phu Dong logo Phu Dong
6 83% 83% 50% 33% 17% 0% 0% 4.67
7
Công An Nhân Dân logo Công An Nhân Dân
3 67% 67% 67% 33% 33% 0% 0% 4.33
8
Hà Nội II logo Hà Nội II
6 100% 50% 33% 17% 17% 0% 0% 4.17
9
Binh Duong logo Binh Duong
6 83% 67% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3.83
10
Song Lam Nghe An logo Song Lam Nghe An
5 60% 40% 40% 40% 0% 0% 0% 3.4
11
Ho Chi Minh City logo Ho Chi Minh City
5 80% 40% 40% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3.2
12
PVF-CAND logo PVF-CAND
5 60% 40% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3
13
Hoang Anh Gia Lai logo Hoang Anh Gia Lai
5 20% 20% 20% 20% 0% 0% 0% 2.4
14
FLC Thanh Hoa logo FLC Thanh Hoa
6 33% 33% 17% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2.17
15
Da Nang logo Da Nang
6 50% 33% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2
16
Quang Nam logo Quang Nam
0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0
# Team MP Over 2.5 Over 3.5 Over 4.5 Over 5.5 Over 6.5 Over 7.5 Over 8.5 Average
2
Quang Nam logo Quang Nam
1 100% 100% 100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 6
3
Da Nang logo Da Nang
11 82% 73% 64% 55% 55% 27% 18% 5.91
4
Hoang Anh Gia Lai logo Hoang Anh Gia Lai
10 90% 70% 60% 40% 30% 20% 20% 5.9
5
Hai Phong logo Hai Phong
11 91% 82% 36% 27% 18% 9% 9% 4.91
6
Binh Duong logo Binh Duong
11 91% 64% 45% 36% 18% 9% 0% 4.55
7
Nam Dinh logo Nam Dinh
10 80% 50% 40% 40% 40% 10% 0% 4.5
8
Song Lam Nghe An logo Song Lam Nghe An
11 82% 64% 55% 18% 9% 9% 9% 4.45
9
Phu Dong logo Phu Dong
11 73% 73% 36% 18% 18% 18% 9% 4.45
10
Ho Chi Minh City logo Ho Chi Minh City
11 73% 64% 45% 36% 18% 9% 0% 4.18
11
PVF-CAND logo PVF-CAND
11 73% 73% 45% 36% 0% 0% 0% 4.09
12
FLC Thanh Hoa logo FLC Thanh Hoa
10 80% 50% 20% 20% 20% 0% 0% 3.6
13
Công An Nhân Dân logo Công An Nhân Dân
9 78% 44% 22% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3.44
14
Hà Nội II logo Hà Nội II
11 73% 45% 27% 18% 0% 0% 0% 3.18
15
Ha Noi logo Ha Noi
11 45% 27% 18% 9% 0% 0% 0% 2.91
16
Viettel logo Viettel
10 50% 30% 20% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2.6
# Team MP Over 2.5 Over 3.5 Over 4.5 Over 5.5 Over 6.5 Over 7.5 Over 8.5 Average
2
Hoang Anh Gia Lai logo Hoang Anh Gia Lai
5 100% 80% 80% 60% 40% 20% 20% 6.2
3
Quang Nam logo Quang Nam
1 100% 100% 100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 6
4
Nam Dinh logo Nam Dinh
6 67% 50% 50% 50% 50% 17% 0% 4.67
5
Ho Chi Minh City logo Ho Chi Minh City
6 83% 67% 33% 33% 17% 17% 0% 4.5
6
Hai Phong logo Hai Phong
6 83% 67% 33% 17% 17% 0% 0% 4.17
7
Binh Duong logo Binh Duong
5 80% 60% 20% 20% 20% 20% 0% 4
8
Song Lam Nghe An logo Song Lam Nghe An
6 83% 67% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3.83
9
Phu Dong logo Phu Dong
5 80% 80% 40% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3.8
10
Công An Nhân Dân logo Công An Nhân Dân
6 67% 67% 33% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3.67
11
PVF-CAND logo PVF-CAND
6 50% 50% 50% 50% 0% 0% 0% 3.67
12
Viettel logo Viettel
4 75% 50% 25% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3.25
13
Ha Noi logo Ha Noi
5 60% 40% 20% 20% 0% 0% 0% 3.2
14
Da Nang logo Da Nang
5 60% 40% 20% 20% 20% 0% 0% 3
15
FLC Thanh Hoa logo FLC Thanh Hoa
4 75% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2.75
16
Hà Nội II logo Hà Nội II
5 60% 40% 20% 20% 0% 0% 0% 2.6
# Team MP Over 2.5 Over 3.5 Over 4.5 Over 5.5 Over 6.5 Over 7.5 Over 8.5 Average
2
Da Nang logo Da Nang
6 100% 100% 100% 83% 83% 50% 33% 8.33
3
Hai Phong logo Hai Phong
5 100% 100% 40% 40% 20% 20% 20% 5.8
4
Hoang Anh Gia Lai logo Hoang Anh Gia Lai
5 80% 60% 40% 20% 20% 20% 20% 5.6
5
Song Lam Nghe An logo Song Lam Nghe An
5 80% 60% 60% 40% 20% 20% 20% 5.2
6
Binh Duong logo Binh Duong
6 100% 67% 67% 50% 17% 0% 0% 5
7
Phu Dong logo Phu Dong
6 67% 67% 33% 33% 33% 33% 17% 5
8
PVF-CAND logo PVF-CAND
5 100% 100% 40% 20% 0% 0% 0% 4.6
9
Nam Dinh logo Nam Dinh
4 100% 50% 25% 25% 25% 0% 0% 4.25
10
FLC Thanh Hoa logo FLC Thanh Hoa
6 83% 50% 33% 33% 33% 0% 0% 4.17
11
Ho Chi Minh City logo Ho Chi Minh City
5 60% 60% 60% 40% 20% 0% 0% 3.8
12
Hà Nội II logo Hà Nội II
6 83% 50% 33% 17% 0% 0% 0% 3.67
13
Công An Nhân Dân logo Công An Nhân Dân
3 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3
14
Ha Noi logo Ha Noi
6 33% 17% 17% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2.67
15
Viettel logo Viettel
6 33% 17% 17% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2.17
16
Quang Nam logo Quang Nam
0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0

PVF-CAND corner statistics

The number of corner kicks a team takes and surrenders provides insight into a team’s attacking ambition during games. It can also display their defensive strategy and how much they are allowing their opponents to attack.

Here are the PVF-CAND’s main corner kick numbers and averages in the Vietnam V League 1:

  • PVF-CAND games have an average of 8.09 corners (between corners won and awarded to the opponent).
  • 18% of PVF-CAND’s matches in this championship have had more than 9.5 corners.
  • PVF-CAND has an average of 4 corners won per game this season.
  • On 9% of occasions, PVF-CAND had 5 or more corners in their favour in their games.
  • Regarding corners given up, PVF-CAND usually concedes an average of 4.09 corners per match.

You can also check out PVF-CAND’s average number of corners during home and away games, along with the over/under rates for corners for and against, for additional information.

And at APWin, you can also check out corner statistics daily and find which matches around the world are most likely to see a lot of corners.