PVF-CAND Corners Per Game

Team Info

Season

Country

Venue

2025/26

Vietnam

PVF Stadium

Competition

Vietnam

V.League 1

Summary Matches Corners Stats Top Scorers & Assists Squads

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Hai Phong	13	85%	69%	62%	54%	38%	23%	23%	10.69
2	Nam Dinh	12	67%	58%	58%	42%	25%	17%	8%	9.92
3	Ha Noi	13	77%	54%	46%	31%	15%	15%	15%	9.23
4	Hoang Anh Gia Lai	13	62%	54%	46%	31%	15%	15%	15%	8.7
5	Phu Dong	13	62%	46%	38%	23%	15%	15%	15%	8.69
6	Binh Duong	13	62%	46%	38%	23%	8%	8%	8%	8.46
7	Song Lam Nghe An	13	69%	38%	31%	23%	8%	0%	0%	8.31
8	Viettel	12	75%	25%	17%	17%	17%	0%	0%	8.17
9	Da Nang	12	58%	50%	33%	33%	25%	8%	0%	8.08
10	Quang Nam	1	100%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	8
11	PVF-CAND	13	54%	15%	15%	15%	8%	8%	0%	7.77
12	Hà Nội II	13	46%	31%	15%	8%	8%	8%	0%	7.61
13	Công An Nhân Dân	11	45%	27%	27%	9%	9%	9%	9%	7.54
14	Ho Chi Minh City	13	46%	31%	23%	0%	0%	0%	0%	7.31
15	FLC Thanh Hoa	12	17%	8%	8%	8%	0%	0%	0%	6.58

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Hai Phong	7	86%	71%	57%	43%	43%	14%	14%	10.43
2	Ha Noi	6	83%	50%	50%	50%	33%	33%	33%	10.33
3	Nam Dinh	7	71%	71%	71%	57%	29%	14%	0%	10.14
4	Hoang Anh Gia Lai	7	71%	57%	43%	29%	14%	14%	14%	9
5	Viettel	5	100%	40%	20%	20%	20%	0%	0%	9
6	Binh Duong	6	50%	50%	50%	33%	17%	17%	17%	8.34
7	Phu Dong	6	67%	50%	50%	17%	0%	0%	0%	8.33
8	PVF-CAND	7	57%	29%	29%	29%	14%	14%	0%	8.28
9	Quang Nam	1	100%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	8
10	Ho Chi Minh City	7	57%	43%	29%	0%	0%	0%	0%	7.58
11	Song Lam Nghe An	7	57%	14%	14%	0%	0%	0%	0%	7.57
12	Công An Nhân Dân	7	29%	14%	14%	14%	14%	14%	14%	7.29
13	FLC Thanh Hoa	5	20%	20%	20%	20%	0%	0%	0%	7
14	Da Nang	5	40%	40%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	6.8
15	Hà Nội II	6	33%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	6.5

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Hai Phong	6	83%	67%	67%	67%	33%	33%	33%	11
2	Nam Dinh	5	60%	40%	40%	20%	20%	20%	20%	9.6
3	Song Lam Nghe An	6	83%	67%	50%	50%	17%	0%	0%	9.17
4	Phu Dong	7	57%	43%	29%	29%	29%	29%	29%	9
5	Da Nang	7	71%	57%	57%	57%	43%	14%	0%	9
6	Hà Nội II	7	57%	57%	29%	14%	14%	14%	0%	8.58
7	Binh Duong	7	71%	43%	29%	14%	0%	0%	0%	8.57
8	Hoang Anh Gia Lai	6	50%	50%	50%	33%	17%	17%	17%	8.33
9	Ha Noi	7	71%	57%	43%	14%	0%	0%	0%	8.29
10	Công An Nhân Dân	4	75%	50%	50%	0%	0%	0%	0%	8
11	Viettel	7	57%	14%	14%	14%	14%	0%	0%	7.57
12	PVF-CAND	6	50%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	7.16
13	Ho Chi Minh City	6	33%	17%	17%	0%	0%	0%	0%	7
14	FLC Thanh Hoa	7	14%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	6.29
15	Quang Nam	0	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Ha Noi	13	92%	85%	54%	38%	31%	31%	8%	5.77
3	Hai Phong	13	92%	69%	46%	46%	38%	31%	8%	5.54
4	Nam Dinh	12	100%	75%	58%	42%	25%	25%	17%	5.5
5	Viettel	12	100%	83%	58%	42%	33%	17%	8%	5.5
6	Phu Dong	13	77%	62%	46%	31%	23%	15%	8%	4.46
7	Hà Nội II	13	85%	62%	38%	23%	15%	0%	0%	4.23
8	Công An Nhân Dân	11	64%	55%	36%	27%	18%	9%	9%	4.09
9	Binh Duong	13	77%	54%	46%	23%	15%	0%	0%	4
10	PVF-CAND	13	62%	38%	15%	8%	8%	8%	8%	3.77
11	Song Lam Nghe An	13	77%	46%	31%	23%	8%	0%	0%	3.54
12	Ho Chi Minh City	13	77%	54%	23%	8%	0%	0%	0%	3.31
13	FLC Thanh Hoa	12	58%	42%	25%	8%	8%	0%	0%	3.08
14	Hoang Anh Gia Lai	13	38%	38%	38%	31%	8%	0%	0%	3.08
15	Da Nang	12	58%	33%	17%	8%	0%	0%	0%	2.75
16	Quang Nam	1	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Ha Noi	6	100%	83%	50%	33%	33%	33%	17%	6.33
3	Viettel	5	100%	80%	80%	40%	40%	20%	0%	5.6
4	Hai Phong	7	86%	57%	43%	43%	29%	29%	14%	5.43
5	Nam Dinh	7	100%	71%	57%	43%	29%	29%	14%	5.43
6	Phu Dong	6	83%	50%	50%	33%	33%	33%	17%	4.83
7	Binh Duong	6	83%	50%	50%	50%	33%	0%	0%	4.67
8	PVF-CAND	7	71%	43%	29%	14%	14%	14%	14%	4.57
9	FLC Thanh Hoa	5	80%	60%	40%	20%	20%	0%	0%	4.2
10	Hà Nội II	6	67%	67%	33%	33%	17%	0%	0%	4.17
11	Công An Nhân Dân	7	57%	43%	29%	29%	14%	14%	14%	4
12	Da Nang	5	80%	40%	40%	20%	0%	0%	0%	3.8
13	Hoang Anh Gia Lai	7	57%	57%	57%	43%	14%	0%	0%	3.71
14	Song Lam Nghe An	7	86%	43%	29%	14%	14%	0%	0%	3.57
15	Ho Chi Minh City	7	71%	57%	14%	14%	0%	0%	0%	3.29
16	Quang Nam	1	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Hai Phong	6	100%	83%	50%	50%	50%	33%	0%	5.67
3	Nam Dinh	5	100%	80%	60%	40%	20%	20%	20%	5.6
4	Viettel	7	100%	86%	43%	43%	29%	14%	14%	5.43
5	Ha Noi	7	86%	86%	57%	43%	29%	29%	0%	5.29
6	Hà Nội II	7	100%	57%	43%	14%	14%	0%	0%	4.29
7	Công An Nhân Dân	4	75%	75%	50%	25%	25%	0%	0%	4.25
8	Phu Dong	7	71%	71%	43%	29%	14%	0%	0%	4.14
9	Song Lam Nghe An	6	67%	50%	33%	33%	0%	0%	0%	3.5
10	Binh Duong	7	71%	57%	43%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3.43
11	Ho Chi Minh City	6	83%	50%	33%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3.33
12	PVF-CAND	6	50%	33%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.83
13	Hoang Anh Gia Lai	6	17%	17%	17%	17%	0%	0%	0%	2.33
14	FLC Thanh Hoa	7	43%	29%	14%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.29
15	Da Nang	7	43%	29%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2
16	Quang Nam	0	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Quang Nam	1	100%	100%	100%	100%	0%	0%	0%	6
3	Hoang Anh Gia Lai	13	85%	69%	54%	38%	31%	23%	15%	5.62
4	Da Nang	12	75%	67%	58%	50%	50%	25%	17%	5.33
5	Hai Phong	13	92%	77%	38%	31%	23%	15%	15%	5.15
6	Song Lam Nghe An	13	85%	69%	62%	23%	15%	15%	8%	4.77
7	Binh Duong	13	85%	62%	46%	38%	15%	8%	0%	4.46
8	Nam Dinh	12	83%	50%	42%	33%	33%	8%	0%	4.42
9	Phu Dong	13	69%	69%	31%	15%	15%	15%	8%	4.23
10	Ho Chi Minh City	13	77%	54%	38%	31%	15%	8%	0%	4
11	PVF-CAND	13	77%	69%	38%	31%	0%	0%	0%	4
12	FLC Thanh Hoa	12	83%	42%	17%	17%	17%	0%	0%	3.5
13	Ha Noi	13	54%	38%	31%	15%	8%	8%	0%	3.46
14	Công An Nhân Dân	11	73%	45%	27%	9%	0%	0%	0%	3.45
15	Hà Nội II	13	69%	46%	31%	23%	8%	8%	0%	3.38
16	Viettel	12	50%	33%	17%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.67

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Quang Nam	1	100%	100%	100%	100%	0%	0%	0%	6
3	Hoang Anh Gia Lai	7	86%	71%	57%	43%	29%	14%	14%	5.29
4	Hai Phong	7	86%	71%	43%	29%	29%	14%	14%	5
5	Nam Dinh	7	71%	57%	57%	43%	43%	14%	0%	4.71
6	Ho Chi Minh City	7	86%	57%	29%	29%	14%	14%	0%	4.29
7	Song Lam Nghe An	7	86%	71%	57%	0%	0%	0%	0%	4
8	Ha Noi	6	67%	50%	33%	33%	17%	17%	0%	4
9	PVF-CAND	7	57%	57%	43%	43%	0%	0%	0%	3.71
10	Binh Duong	6	67%	50%	17%	17%	17%	17%	0%	3.67
11	Phu Dong	6	67%	67%	33%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3.5
12	Viettel	5	80%	60%	20%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3.4
13	Công An Nhân Dân	7	57%	57%	29%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3.29
14	Da Nang	5	60%	40%	20%	20%	20%	0%	0%	3
15	FLC Thanh Hoa	5	80%	40%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.8
16	Hà Nội II	6	50%	33%	17%	17%	0%	0%	0%	2.33

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Da Nang	7	86%	86%	86%	71%	71%	43%	29%	7
3	Hoang Anh Gia Lai	6	83%	67%	50%	33%	33%	33%	17%	6
4	Song Lam Nghe An	6	83%	67%	67%	50%	33%	33%	17%	5.67
5	Hai Phong	6	100%	83%	33%	33%	17%	17%	17%	5.33
6	Binh Duong	7	100%	71%	71%	57%	14%	0%	0%	5.14
7	Phu Dong	7	71%	71%	29%	29%	29%	29%	14%	4.86
8	PVF-CAND	6	100%	83%	33%	17%	0%	0%	0%	4.33
9	Hà Nội II	7	86%	57%	43%	29%	14%	14%	0%	4.29
10	FLC Thanh Hoa	7	86%	43%	29%	29%	29%	0%	0%	4
11	Nam Dinh	5	100%	40%	20%	20%	20%	0%	0%	4
12	Công An Nhân Dân	4	100%	25%	25%	25%	0%	0%	0%	3.75
13	Ho Chi Minh City	6	67%	50%	50%	33%	17%	0%	0%	3.67
14	Ha Noi	7	43%	29%	29%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3
15	Viettel	7	29%	14%	14%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.14
16	Quang Nam	0	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0

Corner Statistics for PVF-CAND: Averages, Trends, and Betting Numbers

On this page, you’ll find detailed corner statistics for PVF-CAND across the 2025/26 season, with data designed to support corner betting analysis.

At the top of the table, you can switch competitions to compare corner averages from other tournaments and identify the best betting angles.

PVF-CAND Corner Averages (Vietnam V League 1)

As shown at the top of the page, the corner averages for PVF-CAND provide a clear snapshot of the team’s corner trends. Below, we break down the numbers in a practical and easy-to-use format for betting purposes.

Here are the key corner statistics and averages for PVF-CAND, based on the most up-to-date data from the V.League 1:

Matches involving PVF-CAND average 7.77 total corners per game, combining corners won, and corners conceded - an important metric for over and under corner bets.
15.38% of matches featuring PVF-CAND in this competition finished with over 9.5 corners, highlighting strong potential for high-corner markets.
On average, PVF-CAND records 3.77 corners per match in their favour, showing how frequently the team applies attacking pressure.
In 7.69% of games, PVF-CAND registered 5 or more corners, a useful benchmark for team corner lines.
Defensively, PVF-CAND concedes an average of 4 corners per match, which can be valuable when evaluating opponent corner totals.

This section also allows you to analyse corner averages for PVF-CAND in home and away matches, along with over and under rates for corners for and against - key factors when refining corner betting strategies.

Corner Betting Insights

Beyond presenting all corner averages for PVF-CAND, APWin also provides dedicated resources for users who focus on corner betting.

You’ll find a specialised section for under corner predictions and another entirely focused on over corner bets, helping you identify value based on statistical trends.

Frequently Asked Questions

Below are the most common questions from users looking to understand corner betting data for this team.

What is the average number of corners for PVF-CAND?

According to the data, PVF-CAND averages 3.77 corners in their favor per match.

On average, how many corners are there in PVF-CAND matches?

In the V.League 1, matches involving PVF-CAND average 7.77 total corners per game.