PVF-CAND Corners Per Game
Team Info
Season
Country
Venue
2025/26
Vietnam
PVF Stadium
Competition
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hai Phong
|
17 | 88% | 65% | 59% | 53% | 41% | 24% | 18% | 10.59 |
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
17 | 76% | 59% | 53% | 41% | 29% | 18% | 18% | 9.7 |
| 3 |
Nam Dinh
|
17 | 59% | 47% | 41% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 9.12 |
| 4 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
17 | 65% | 59% | 53% | 41% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 9.11 |
| 5 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
17 | 59% | 47% | 41% | 24% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 8.48 |
| 6 |
Binh Duong
|
17 | 59% | 47% | 41% | 24% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 8.47 |
| 7 |
Phu Dong
|
17 | 59% | 41% | 35% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 12% | 8.42 |
| 8 |
Viettel
|
17 | 71% | 29% | 24% | 18% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 8.29 |
| 9 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
17 | 71% | 35% | 29% | 24% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 8.11 |
| 10 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 11 |
PVF-CAND
|
17 | 53% | 24% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 7.89 |
| 12 |
Da Nang
|
17 | 53% | 47% | 35% | 29% | 24% | 12% | 0% | 7.71 |
| 13 |
Hà Nội II
|
17 | 41% | 24% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 7.47 |
| 14 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
17 | 35% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 7.42 |
| 15 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
17 | 47% | 24% | 24% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 7.11 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hai Phong
|
9 | 89% | 78% | 67% | 56% | 56% | 22% | 11% | 10.89 |
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
8 | 75% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 9.76 |
| 3 |
Viettel
|
8 | 88% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 9.5 |
| 4 |
Nam Dinh
|
9 | 67% | 56% | 56% | 44% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 9.44 |
| 5 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
9 | 67% | 56% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 9 |
| 6 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
9 | 67% | 56% | 44% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 8.78 |
| 7 |
Phu Dong
|
8 | 75% | 50% | 50% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.5 |
| 8 |
Binh Duong
|
8 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 8.25 |
| 9 |
PVF-CAND
|
9 | 56% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 8.11 |
| 10 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 11 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
8 | 38% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.63 |
| 12 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
9 | 33% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 7.22 |
| 13 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
9 | 56% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7 |
| 14 |
Da Nang
|
8 | 38% | 38% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 6.88 |
| 15 |
Hà Nội II
|
8 | 38% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.75 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hai Phong
|
8 | 88% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 10.25 |
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
9 | 78% | 67% | 56% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 9.67 |
| 3 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
8 | 88% | 63% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 9.38 |
| 4 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
8 | 63% | 63% | 63% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 9.25 |
| 5 |
Nam Dinh
|
8 | 50% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 8.75 |
| 6 |
Binh Duong
|
9 | 67% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 8.66 |
| 7 |
Da Nang
|
9 | 67% | 56% | 56% | 44% | 33% | 11% | 0% | 8.44 |
| 8 |
Phu Dong
|
9 | 44% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 8.33 |
| 9 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
8 | 50% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 8.13 |
| 10 |
Hà Nội II
|
9 | 44% | 44% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 8.11 |
| 11 |
PVF-CAND
|
8 | 50% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 7.63 |
| 12 |
Viettel
|
9 | 56% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 7.22 |
| 13 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
9 | 33% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 7.22 |
| 14 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
8 | 63% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.01 |
| 15 |
Quang Nam
|
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
17 | 88% | 82% | 59% | 47% | 41% | 35% | 12% | 5.88 |
| 3 |
Viettel
|
17 | 94% | 76% | 59% | 47% | 35% | 18% | 6% | 5.41 |
| 4 |
Hai Phong
|
17 | 88% | 71% | 41% | 41% | 29% | 24% | 6% | 5.18 |
| 5 |
Nam Dinh
|
17 | 94% | 65% | 53% | 41% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 5.12 |
| 6 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
17 | 65% | 59% | 41% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 4.29 |
| 7 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
17 | 82% | 65% | 41% | 24% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 4.24 |
| 8 |
Phu Dong
|
17 | 76% | 59% | 41% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 4.24 |
| 9 |
Hà Nội II
|
17 | 82% | 65% | 41% | 18% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 4.18 |
| 10 |
Binh Duong
|
17 | 71% | 53% | 41% | 18% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 3.82 |
| 11 |
PVF-CAND
|
17 | 59% | 41% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 3.71 |
| 12 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
17 | 71% | 47% | 29% | 18% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 3.35 |
| 13 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
17 | 41% | 41% | 41% | 35% | 18% | 6% | 0% | 3.35 |
| 14 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
17 | 53% | 35% | 24% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 3.18 |
| 15 |
Da Nang
|
17 | 65% | 35% | 24% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
8 | 88% | 75% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 5.63 |
| 3 |
Viettel
|
8 | 100% | 75% | 75% | 50% | 38% | 13% | 0% | 5.5 |
| 4 |
Nam Dinh
|
9 | 100% | 67% | 56% | 44% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 5.22 |
| 5 |
Hai Phong
|
9 | 89% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 5.11 |
| 6 |
Phu Dong
|
8 | 75% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 4.5 |
| 7 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
9 | 56% | 44% | 33% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 4.44 |
| 8 |
Binh Duong
|
8 | 75% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 4.25 |
| 9 |
Hà Nội II
|
8 | 75% | 75% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 4.25 |
| 10 |
PVF-CAND
|
9 | 67% | 44% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 4.22 |
| 11 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
9 | 78% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 4.11 |
| 12 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
9 | 56% | 56% | 56% | 44% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 3.89 |
| 13 |
Da Nang
|
8 | 88% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.75 |
| 14 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
8 | 63% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3.38 |
| 15 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
9 | 67% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
9 | 89% | 89% | 67% | 56% | 44% | 44% | 11% | 6.11 |
| 3 |
Viettel
|
9 | 89% | 78% | 44% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 5.33 |
| 4 |
Hai Phong
|
8 | 88% | 75% | 50% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 0% | 5.25 |
| 5 |
Nam Dinh
|
8 | 88% | 63% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 5 |
| 6 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
8 | 88% | 63% | 50% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 4.38 |
| 7 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
8 | 75% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 4.13 |
| 8 |
Hà Nội II
|
9 | 89% | 56% | 44% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 4.11 |
| 9 |
Phu Dong
|
9 | 78% | 67% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 10 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
8 | 75% | 63% | 38% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.75 |
| 11 |
Binh Duong
|
9 | 67% | 56% | 44% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.44 |
| 12 |
PVF-CAND
|
8 | 50% | 38% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3.13 |
| 13 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
9 | 44% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 3 |
| 14 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
8 | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 2.75 |
| 15 |
Da Nang
|
9 | 44% | 33% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 3 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
17 | 88% | 76% | 59% | 35% | 29% | 24% | 18% | 5.76 |
| 4 |
Hai Phong
|
17 | 88% | 76% | 47% | 41% | 29% | 24% | 18% | 5.41 |
| 5 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
17 | 82% | 71% | 59% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 4.76 |
| 6 |
Da Nang
|
17 | 65% | 59% | 53% | 41% | 41% | 24% | 12% | 4.71 |
| 7 |
Binh Duong
|
17 | 82% | 65% | 47% | 41% | 24% | 12% | 0% | 4.65 |
| 8 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
17 | 76% | 59% | 47% | 35% | 24% | 6% | 0% | 4.24 |
| 9 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
17 | 88% | 59% | 35% | 24% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 4.24 |
| 10 |
Phu Dong
|
17 | 71% | 65% | 35% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 4.18 |
| 11 |
PVF-CAND
|
17 | 76% | 65% | 41% | 35% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 4.18 |
| 12 |
Nam Dinh
|
17 | 76% | 41% | 35% | 24% | 24% | 6% | 0% | 4 |
| 13 |
Ha Noi
|
17 | 65% | 53% | 35% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 0% | 3.82 |
| 14 |
Hà Nội II
|
17 | 65% | 47% | 24% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 3.29 |
| 15 |
Viettel
|
17 | 47% | 29% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 2.88 |
| 16 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
17 | 59% | 29% | 18% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.82 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 3 |
Hai Phong
|
9 | 89% | 78% | 56% | 44% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 5.78 |
| 4 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
9 | 89% | 78% | 56% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 5.11 |
| 5 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
9 | 89% | 67% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 4.67 |
| 6 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
8 | 88% | 63% | 38% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 4.25 |
| 7 |
Nam Dinh
|
9 | 67% | 44% | 44% | 33% | 33% | 11% | 0% | 4.22 |
| 8 |
Ha Noi
|
8 | 75% | 63% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 4.13 |
| 9 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
9 | 78% | 67% | 56% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 10 |
Binh Duong
|
8 | 63% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 4 |
| 11 |
Viettel
|
8 | 75% | 50% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 4 |
| 12 |
Phu Dong
|
8 | 75% | 75% | 50% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 13 |
PVF-CAND
|
9 | 56% | 56% | 44% | 44% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 3.89 |
| 14 |
Da Nang
|
8 | 50% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 3.13 |
| 15 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
9 | 44% | 44% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.78 |
| 16 |
Hà Nội II
|
8 | 50% | 38% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.5 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
8 | 88% | 75% | 63% | 38% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 6.5 |
| 3 |
Da Nang
|
9 | 78% | 78% | 78% | 56% | 56% | 33% | 22% | 6.11 |
| 4 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
8 | 88% | 75% | 63% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 5.63 |
| 5 |
Binh Duong
|
9 | 100% | 78% | 67% | 56% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 5.22 |
| 6 |
Hai Phong
|
8 | 88% | 75% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 5 |
| 7 |
PVF-CAND
|
8 | 100% | 75% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 4.5 |
| 8 |
Phu Dong
|
9 | 67% | 56% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 4.33 |
| 9 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
9 | 89% | 56% | 33% | 33% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 4.22 |
| 10 |
Hà Nội II
|
9 | 78% | 56% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 4 |
| 11 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
8 | 63% | 50% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 3.75 |
| 12 |
Nam Dinh
|
8 | 88% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3.75 |
| 13 |
Ha Noi
|
9 | 56% | 44% | 33% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 3.56 |
| 14 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
8 | 75% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.88 |
| 15 |
Viettel
|
9 | 22% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.89 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
Corner Statistics for PVF-CAND: Averages, Trends, and Betting Numbers
On this page, you’ll find detailed corner statistics for PVF-CAND across the 2025/26 season, with data designed to support corner betting analysis.
At the top of the table, you can switch competitions to compare corner averages from other tournaments and identify the best betting angles.
PVF-CAND Corner Averages (Vietnam V League 1)
As shown at the top of the page, the corner averages for PVF-CAND provide a clear snapshot of the team’s corner trends. Below, we break down the numbers in a practical and easy-to-use format for betting purposes.
Here are the key corner statistics and averages for PVF-CAND, based on the most up-to-date data from the V.League 1:
Matches involving PVF-CAND average 7.89 total corners per game, combining corners won, and corners conceded - an important metric for over and under corner bets.
17.65% of matches featuring PVF-CAND in this competition finished with over 9.5 corners, highlighting strong potential for high-corner markets.
On average, PVF-CAND records 3.71 corners per match in their favour, showing how frequently the team applies attacking pressure.
In 11.76% of games, PVF-CAND registered 5 or more corners, a useful benchmark for team corner lines.
Defensively, PVF-CAND concedes an average of 4.18 corners per match, which can be valuable when evaluating opponent corner totals.
This section also allows you to analyse corner averages for PVF-CAND in home and away matches, along with over and under rates for corners for and against - key factors when refining corner betting strategies.
Corner Betting Insights
Beyond presenting all corner averages for PVF-CAND, APWin also provides dedicated resources for users who focus on corner betting.
You’ll find a specialised section for under corner predictions and another entirely focused on over corner bets, helping you identify value based on statistical trends.
Frequently Asked Questions
Below are the most common questions from users looking to understand corner betting data for this team.
What is the average number of corners for PVF-CAND?
According to the data, PVF-CAND averages 3.71 corners in their favor per match.
On average, how many corners are there in PVF-CAND matches?
In the V.League 1, matches involving PVF-CAND average 7.89 total corners per game.