| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hai Phong
|
19 | 79% | 58% | 53% | 47% | 37% | 21% | 16% | 10 |
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
19 | 74% | 58% | 53% | 37% | 26% | 16% | 16% | 9.53 |
| 3 |
Nam Dinh
|
19 | 58% | 47% | 42% | 32% | 16% | 11% | 5% | 9.1 |
| 4 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
19 | 58% | 53% | 47% | 37% | 21% | 16% | 11% | 8.85 |
| 5 |
Binh Duong
|
19 | 63% | 53% | 42% | 21% | 11% | 5% | 5% | 8.58 |
| 6 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
19 | 58% | 47% | 42% | 26% | 21% | 11% | 5% | 8.53 |
| 7 |
Phu Dong
|
19 | 58% | 42% | 32% | 16% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 8.45 |
| 8 |
Viettel
|
19 | 63% | 26% | 21% | 16% | 16% | 5% | 5% | 8.05 |
| 9 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 10 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
19 | 68% | 32% | 26% | 21% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 7.9 |
| 11 |
Da Nang
|
19 | 53% | 47% | 37% | 32% | 21% | 11% | 0% | 7.68 |
| 12 |
PVF-CAND
|
19 | 47% | 21% | 16% | 16% | 11% | 11% | 5% | 7.67 |
| 13 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
19 | 37% | 16% | 16% | 16% | 5% | 5% | 0% | 7.37 |
| 14 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
19 | 47% | 26% | 26% | 16% | 11% | 11% | 5% | 7.26 |
| 15 |
Hà Nội II
|
19 | 37% | 21% | 11% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 0% | 7.26 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hai Phong
|
10 | 80% | 70% | 60% | 50% | 50% | 20% | 10% | 10.3 |
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
10 | 70% | 50% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 20% | 20% | 9.4 |
| 3 |
Nam Dinh
|
10 | 60% | 50% | 50% | 40% | 20% | 10% | 0% | 9.2 |
| 4 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
10 | 70% | 60% | 50% | 30% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 9.2 |
| 5 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
9 | 67% | 56% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 9 |
| 6 |
Viettel
|
10 | 70% | 30% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 8.8 |
| 7 |
Phu Dong
|
9 | 67% | 44% | 44% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.5 |
| 8 |
Binh Duong
|
9 | 56% | 56% | 44% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 8.33 |
| 9 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 10 |
PVF-CAND
|
10 | 50% | 30% | 20% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 0% | 7.7 |
| 11 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
9 | 44% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.67 |
| 12 |
Da Nang
|
9 | 44% | 44% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 7.34 |
| 13 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
9 | 33% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 7.22 |
| 14 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
10 | 50% | 10% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.7 |
| 15 |
Hà Nội II
|
9 | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.55 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hai Phong
|
9 | 78% | 44% | 44% | 44% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 9.67 |
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
9 | 78% | 67% | 56% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 9.67 |
| 3 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
9 | 89% | 56% | 44% | 44% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 9.23 |
| 4 |
Nam Dinh
|
9 | 56% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 9 |
| 5 |
Binh Duong
|
10 | 70% | 50% | 40% | 20% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 8.8 |
| 6 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
10 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 10% | 8.7 |
| 7 |
Phu Dong
|
10 | 50% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 8.4 |
| 8 |
Da Nang
|
10 | 60% | 50% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 0% | 8 |
| 9 |
Hà Nội II
|
10 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 0% | 7.9 |
| 10 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
9 | 44% | 33% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 7.78 |
| 11 |
PVF-CAND
|
9 | 44% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 7.63 |
| 12 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
10 | 60% | 30% | 30% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 0% | 7.3 |
| 13 |
Viettel
|
9 | 56% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 7.22 |
| 14 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
10 | 30% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 0% | 7.1 |
| 15 |
Quang Nam
|
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
19 | 89% | 84% | 58% | 47% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 5.79 |
| 3 |
Viettel
|
19 | 89% | 74% | 58% | 47% | 32% | 16% | 5% | 5.26 |
| 4 |
Nam Dinh
|
19 | 95% | 68% | 58% | 42% | 26% | 16% | 11% | 5.21 |
| 5 |
Hai Phong
|
19 | 84% | 63% | 37% | 37% | 26% | 21% | 5% | 4.84 |
| 6 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
19 | 63% | 58% | 42% | 32% | 21% | 16% | 16% | 4.42 |
| 7 |
Phu Dong
|
19 | 74% | 58% | 42% | 26% | 21% | 11% | 5% | 4.39 |
| 8 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
19 | 79% | 63% | 37% | 21% | 16% | 5% | 5% | 4.11 |
| 9 |
Hà Nội II
|
19 | 79% | 63% | 37% | 16% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 4.05 |
| 10 |
Binh Duong
|
19 | 68% | 53% | 37% | 16% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 3.74 |
| 11 |
PVF-CAND
|
19 | 53% | 37% | 16% | 11% | 11% | 5% | 5% | 3.61 |
| 12 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
19 | 42% | 42% | 37% | 32% | 16% | 5% | 0% | 3.32 |
| 13 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
19 | 63% | 42% | 26% | 16% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 3.16 |
| 14 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
19 | 53% | 37% | 26% | 16% | 11% | 5% | 5% | 3.16 |
| 15 |
Da Nang
|
19 | 68% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.05 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
10 | 90% | 80% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 5.5 |
| 3 |
Nam Dinh
|
10 | 100% | 70% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 10% | 5.2 |
| 4 |
Viettel
|
10 | 90% | 70% | 70% | 50% | 30% | 10% | 0% | 5.2 |
| 5 |
Hai Phong
|
10 | 90% | 60% | 30% | 30% | 20% | 20% | 10% | 4.9 |
| 6 |
Phu Dong
|
9 | 67% | 44% | 44% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 4.5 |
| 7 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
9 | 56% | 44% | 33% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 4.44 |
| 8 |
Hà Nội II
|
9 | 78% | 78% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 4.22 |
| 9 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
10 | 80% | 70% | 30% | 30% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 4.1 |
| 10 |
Binh Duong
|
9 | 67% | 44% | 33% | 33% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 11 |
PVF-CAND
|
10 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 4 |
| 12 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
9 | 56% | 56% | 56% | 44% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 3.89 |
| 13 |
Da Nang
|
9 | 89% | 44% | 33% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.78 |
| 14 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
9 | 67% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 15 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
10 | 60% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 2.8 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
9 | 89% | 89% | 67% | 56% | 44% | 44% | 11% | 6.11 |
| 3 |
Viettel
|
9 | 89% | 78% | 44% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 5.33 |
| 4 |
Nam Dinh
|
9 | 89% | 67% | 56% | 44% | 33% | 11% | 11% | 5.22 |
| 5 |
Hai Phong
|
9 | 78% | 67% | 44% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 0% | 4.78 |
| 6 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
10 | 70% | 70% | 50% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 4.4 |
| 7 |
Phu Dong
|
10 | 80% | 70% | 40% | 30% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 4.3 |
| 8 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
9 | 78% | 56% | 44% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 4.11 |
| 9 |
Hà Nội II
|
10 | 80% | 50% | 40% | 10% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 3.9 |
| 10 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
9 | 67% | 56% | 33% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.56 |
| 11 |
Binh Duong
|
10 | 70% | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.5 |
| 12 |
PVF-CAND
|
9 | 44% | 33% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 3.13 |
| 13 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
10 | 30% | 30% | 20% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 0% | 2.8 |
| 14 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
10 | 40% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 2.7 |
| 15 |
Da Nang
|
10 | 50% | 30% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.4 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 3 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
19 | 84% | 74% | 58% | 32% | 26% | 21% | 16% | 5.53 |
| 4 |
Hai Phong
|
19 | 84% | 74% | 42% | 37% | 26% | 21% | 16% | 5.16 |
| 5 |
Binh Duong
|
19 | 84% | 68% | 53% | 47% | 26% | 11% | 0% | 4.84 |
| 6 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
19 | 84% | 68% | 58% | 32% | 16% | 11% | 5% | 4.74 |
| 7 |
Da Nang
|
19 | 63% | 58% | 53% | 42% | 42% | 21% | 11% | 4.63 |
| 8 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
19 | 79% | 58% | 47% | 37% | 26% | 11% | 5% | 4.42 |
| 9 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
19 | 84% | 58% | 37% | 26% | 16% | 5% | 5% | 4.21 |
| 10 |
Phu Dong
|
19 | 63% | 58% | 32% | 16% | 11% | 11% | 5% | 4.06 |
| 11 |
PVF-CAND
|
19 | 68% | 58% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 4.06 |
| 12 |
Nam Dinh
|
19 | 74% | 42% | 32% | 21% | 21% | 5% | 0% | 3.89 |
| 13 |
Ha Noi
|
19 | 63% | 53% | 32% | 16% | 11% | 5% | 0% | 3.74 |
| 14 |
Hà Nội II
|
19 | 63% | 47% | 21% | 16% | 5% | 5% | 0% | 3.21 |
| 15 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
19 | 58% | 32% | 16% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.84 |
| 16 |
Viettel
|
19 | 47% | 32% | 16% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 2.79 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 3 |
Hai Phong
|
10 | 80% | 70% | 50% | 40% | 40% | 30% | 20% | 5.4 |
| 4 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
9 | 89% | 78% | 56% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 5.11 |
| 5 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
10 | 90% | 70% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 5.1 |
| 6 |
Binh Duong
|
9 | 67% | 56% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 22% | 0% | 4.33 |
| 7 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
9 | 78% | 56% | 33% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 4 |
| 8 |
Nam Dinh
|
10 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 30% | 30% | 10% | 0% | 4 |
| 9 |
Phu Dong
|
9 | 67% | 67% | 44% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 10 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
10 | 80% | 60% | 50% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.9 |
| 11 |
Ha Noi
|
10 | 70% | 60% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 0% | 3.9 |
| 12 |
PVF-CAND
|
10 | 50% | 50% | 40% | 40% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 3.7 |
| 13 |
Viettel
|
10 | 70% | 50% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 3.6 |
| 14 |
Da Nang
|
9 | 56% | 44% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 11% | 0% | 3.56 |
| 15 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
9 | 44% | 44% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.78 |
| 16 |
Hà Nội II
|
9 | 44% | 33% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
10 | 80% | 70% | 60% | 30% | 30% | 30% | 20% | 5.9 |
| 3 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
9 | 89% | 78% | 67% | 56% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 5.67 |
| 4 |
Da Nang
|
10 | 70% | 70% | 70% | 50% | 50% | 30% | 20% | 5.6 |
| 5 |
Binh Duong
|
10 | 100% | 80% | 70% | 60% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 5.3 |
| 6 |
Hai Phong
|
9 | 89% | 78% | 33% | 33% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 4.89 |
| 7 |
PVF-CAND
|
9 | 89% | 67% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 4.5 |
| 8 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
10 | 90% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 4.4 |
| 9 |
Phu Dong
|
10 | 60% | 50% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 10% | 4.1 |
| 10 |
Hà Nội II
|
10 | 80% | 60% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 0% | 4 |
| 11 |
Nam Dinh
|
9 | 89% | 44% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 3.78 |
| 12 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
9 | 67% | 44% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 13 |
Ha Noi
|
9 | 56% | 44% | 33% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 3.56 |
| 14 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
10 | 70% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.9 |
| 15 |
Viettel
|
9 | 22% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.89 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
Corner Statistics for Phu Dong: Averages, Trends, and Betting Numbers
On this page, you’ll find detailed corner statistics for Phu Dong across the 2025/26 season, with data designed to support corner betting analysis.
At the top of the table, you can switch competitions to compare corner averages from other tournaments and identify the best betting angles.
Phu Dong Corner Averages (Vietnam V League 1)
As shown at the top of the page, the corner averages for Phu Dong provide a clear snapshot of the team’s corner trends. Below, we break down the numbers in a practical and easy-to-use format for betting purposes.
Here are the key corner statistics and averages for Phu Dong, based on the most up-to-date data from the V.League 1:
Matches involving Phu Dong average 8.45 total corners per game, combining corners won, and corners conceded - an important metric for over and under corner bets.
31.58% of matches featuring Phu Dong in this competition finished with over 9.5 corners, highlighting strong potential for high-corner markets.
On average, Phu Dong records 4.39 corners per match in their favour, showing how frequently the team applies attacking pressure.
In 26.32% of games, Phu Dong registered 5 or more corners, a useful benchmark for team corner lines.
Defensively, Phu Dong concedes an average of 4.06 corners per match, which can be valuable when evaluating opponent corner totals.
This section also allows you to analyse corner averages for Phu Dong in home and away matches, along with over and under rates for corners for and against - key factors when refining corner betting strategies.
Corner Betting Insights
Beyond presenting all corner averages for Phu Dong, APWin also provides dedicated resources for users who focus on corner betting.
You’ll find a specialised section for under corner predictions and another entirely focused on over corner bets, helping you identify value based on statistical trends.
Frequently Asked Questions
Below are the most common questions from users looking to understand corner betting data for this team.
What is the average number of corners for Phu Dong?
According to the data, Phu Dong averages 4.39 corners in their favor per match.
On average, how many corners are there in Phu Dong matches?
In the V.League 1, matches involving Phu Dong average 8.45 total corners per game.