Season
Country
Venue
2026/27
Vietnam
Thiên Trường Stadium
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hai Phong
|
2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 11 |
| 2 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
2 | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 10 |
| 3 |
Hà Nội II
|
2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10 |
| 4 |
Bình Phước
|
2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.5 |
| 5 |
Bắc Ninh
|
2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9 |
| 6 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9 |
| 7 |
Ha Noi
|
2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.5 |
| 8 |
Phu Dong
|
2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.5 |
| 9 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.5 |
| 10 |
Nam Dinh
|
2 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 11 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.5 |
| 12 |
Viettel
|
2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7 |
| 13 |
Da Nang
|
2 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7 |
| 14 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.5 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 12 |
| 2 |
Bắc Ninh
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 11 |
| 3 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 11 |
| 4 |
Hai Phong
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10 |
| 5 |
Bình Phước
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10 |
| 6 |
Ha Noi
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10 |
| 7 |
Hà Nội II
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9 |
| 8 |
Nam Dinh
|
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 9 |
Da Nang
|
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 10 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7 |
| 11 |
Phu Dong
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7 |
| 12 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7 |
| 13 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 14 |
Viettel
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hai Phong
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 12 |
| 2 |
Hà Nội II
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 11 |
| 3 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 11 |
| 4 |
Phu Dong
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10 |
| 5 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10 |
| 6 |
Viettel
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10 |
| 7 |
Bình Phước
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9 |
| 8 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 9 |
Nam Dinh
|
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 10 |
Bắc Ninh
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7 |
| 11 |
Ha Noi
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7 |
| 12 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7 |
| 13 |
Da Nang
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 14 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 6.5 |
| 3 |
Phu Dong
|
2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 6.5 |
| 4 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 6 |
| 5 |
Bình Phước
|
2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 6 |
| 6 |
Da Nang
|
2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 5.5 |
| 7 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
2 | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 5.5 |
| 8 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5 |
| 9 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 4 |
| 10 |
Viettel
|
2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.5 |
| 11 |
Hai Phong
|
2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 12 |
Nam Dinh
|
2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.5 |
| 13 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| 14 |
Hà Nội II
|
2 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| 15 |
Bắc Ninh
|
2 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 8 |
| 3 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 8 |
| 4 |
Da Nang
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 7 |
| 5 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 6 |
Ha Noi
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 7 |
Phu Dong
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5 |
| 8 |
Bình Phước
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 9 |
Nam Dinh
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 10 |
Bắc Ninh
|
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 11 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| 12 |
Hai Phong
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| 13 |
Viettel
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1 |
| 14 |
Hà Nội II
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1 |
| 15 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 8 |
| 3 |
Bình Phước
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 8 |
| 4 |
Phu Dong
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 8 |
| 5 |
Ha Noi
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 7 |
| 6 |
Viettel
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 7 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 8 |
Hai Phong
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 9 |
Da Nang
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 10 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 11 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 12 |
Hà Nội II
|
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 13 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| 14 |
Nam Dinh
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1 |
| 15 |
Bắc Ninh
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Hai Phong
|
2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 8 |
| 3 |
Hà Nội II
|
2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 8 |
| 4 |
Bắc Ninh
|
2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 7 |
| 5 |
Nam Dinh
|
2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 5.5 |
| 6 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
2 | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 5 |
| 7 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.5 |
| 8 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 9 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.5 |
| 10 |
Bình Phước
|
2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.5 |
| 11 |
Viettel
|
2 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.5 |
| 12 |
Ha Noi
|
2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| 13 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
2 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| 14 |
Phu Dong
|
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| 15 |
Da Nang
|
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.5 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Hai Phong
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 8 |
| 3 |
Hà Nội II
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 8 |
| 4 |
Bắc Ninh
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 8 |
| 5 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 7 |
| 6 |
Bình Phước
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 7 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 8 |
Ha Noi
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 9 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 10 |
Nam Dinh
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 11 |
Viettel
|
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 12 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 13 |
Phu Dong
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| 14 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1 |
| 15 |
Da Nang
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Hai Phong
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 8 |
| 3 |
Hà Nội II
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 8 |
| 4 |
Nam Dinh
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 7 |
| 5 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 6 |
Bắc Ninh
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 7 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5 |
| 8 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 9 |
Viettel
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 10 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 11 |
Da Nang
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| 12 |
Phu Dong
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| 13 |
Bình Phước
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1 |
| 14 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1 |
| 15 |
Ha Noi
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
On this page, you’ll find detailed corner statistics for Nam Dinh across the 2026/27 season, with data designed to support corner betting analysis.
At the top of the table, you can switch competitions to compare corner averages from other tournaments and identify the best betting angles.
As shown at the top of the page, the corner averages for Nam Dinh provide a clear snapshot of the team’s corner trends. Below, we break down the numbers in a practical and easy-to-use format for betting purposes.
Here are the key corner statistics and averages for Nam Dinh, based on the most up-to-date data from the V.League 1:
Matches involving Nam Dinh average 8 total corners per game, combining corners won, and corners conceded - an important metric for over and under corner bets.
0% of matches featuring Nam Dinh in this competition finished with over 9.5 corners, highlighting strong potential for high-corner markets.
On average, Nam Dinh records 2.5 corners per match in their favour, showing how frequently the team applies attacking pressure.
In 0% of games, Nam Dinh registered 5 or more corners, a useful benchmark for team corner lines.
Defensively, Nam Dinh concedes an average of 5.5 corners per match, which can be valuable when evaluating opponent corner totals.
This section also allows you to analyse corner averages for Nam Dinh in home and away matches, along with over and under rates for corners for and against - key factors when refining corner betting strategies.
Beyond presenting all corner averages for Nam Dinh, APWin also provides dedicated resources for users who focus on corner betting.
You’ll find a specialised section for under corner predictions and another entirely focused on over corner bets, helping you identify value based on statistical trends.
Below are the most common questions from users looking to understand corner betting data for this team.
According to the data, Nam Dinh averages 2.5 corners in their favor per match.
In the V.League 1, matches involving Nam Dinh average 8 total corners per game.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.