Season
2014
Country
USA
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Overall |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Orlando City | 29 | 11 | 38% |
2 | Phoenix Rising | 28 | 5 | 18% |
3 | Penn FC | 31 | 5 | 16% |
4 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 28 | 6 | 21% |
5 | OKC Energy | 28 | 10 | 36% |
6 | LA Galaxy II | 30 | 7 | 23% |
7 | Sacramento Republic | 31 | 10 | 32% |
8 | Charleston Battery | 29 | 11 | 38% |
9 | Richmond Kickers | 30 | 7 | 23% |
10 | Orange County SC | 28 | 4 | 14% |
11 | Rochester Rhinos | 29 | 12 | 41% |
12 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 29 | 10 | 34% |
13 | Charlotte Eagles | 28 | 6 | 21% |
14 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 28 | 3 | 11% |
15 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 7 | 2 | 29% |
16 | Chivas USA Res. | 7 | 1 | 14% |
17 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 6 | 0 | 0% |
18 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 7 | 3 | 43% |
19 | Montreal Impact Res. | 8 | 2 | 25% |
20 | New York RB Res. | 8 | 2 | 25% |
21 | Chicago Fire Res. | 9 | 3 | 33% |
22 | Dallas Res. | 8 | 3 | 38% |
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Home |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Orlando City | 15 | 6 | 40% |
2 | Phoenix Rising | 14 | 3 | 21% |
3 | Penn FC | 14 | 2 | 14% |
4 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 14 | 4 | 29% |
5 | OKC Energy | 14 | 6 | 43% |
6 | LA Galaxy II | 15 | 2 | 13% |
7 | Sacramento Republic | 17 | 6 | 35% |
8 | Charleston Battery | 14 | 5 | 36% |
9 | Richmond Kickers | 16 | 5 | 31% |
10 | Orange County SC | 14 | 1 | 7% |
11 | Rochester Rhinos | 14 | 7 | 50% |
12 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 14 | 6 | 43% |
13 | Charlotte Eagles | 14 | 2 | 14% |
14 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 14 | 0 | 0% |
15 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 4 | 1 | 25% |
16 | Chivas USA Res. | 3 | 0 | 0% |
17 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 2 | 0 | 0% |
18 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 4 | 2 | 50% |
19 | Montreal Impact Res. | 4 | 1 | 25% |
20 | New York RB Res. | 3 | 2 | 67% |
21 | Chicago Fire Res. | 5 | 2 | 40% |
22 | Dallas Res. | 5 | 3 | 60% |
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Orlando City | 14 | 5 | 36% |
2 | Phoenix Rising | 14 | 2 | 14% |
3 | Penn FC | 17 | 3 | 18% |
4 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 14 | 2 | 14% |
5 | OKC Energy | 14 | 4 | 29% |
6 | LA Galaxy II | 15 | 5 | 33% |
7 | Sacramento Republic | 14 | 4 | 29% |
8 | Charleston Battery | 15 | 6 | 40% |
9 | Richmond Kickers | 14 | 2 | 14% |
10 | Orange County SC | 14 | 3 | 21% |
11 | Rochester Rhinos | 15 | 5 | 33% |
12 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 15 | 4 | 27% |
13 | Charlotte Eagles | 14 | 4 | 29% |
14 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 14 | 3 | 21% |
15 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 3 | 1 | 33% |
16 | Chivas USA Res. | 4 | 1 | 25% |
17 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 4 | 0 | 0% |
18 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 3 | 1 | 33% |
19 | Montreal Impact Res. | 4 | 1 | 25% |
20 | New York RB Res. | 5 | 0 | 0% |
21 | Chicago Fire Res. | 4 | 1 | 25% |
22 | Dallas Res. | 3 | 0 | 0% |
Montreal Impact Res.’s clean sheet statistics are key to gauging a team’s defensive performance in the USL Championship 2014. The number of matches a team completely prevents their opponents from scoring helps to make a more accurate evaluation of the defence’s overall ability during the season.
See below some data on the number of games without conceding for Montreal Impact Res. thus far this season:
Visit this page all season long to stay up to date with all of Montreal Impact Res.'s current clean sheet statistics, whether at home, away from home, or overall. Also, check out the latest football trends for today.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.