Season
Country
2025
USA
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Louisville City |
21 | 70% |
| 2 |
North Carolina FC |
18 | 60% |
| 3 |
New Mexico United |
18 | 60% |
| 4 |
Sacramento Republic |
17 | 57% |
| 5 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
17 | 57% |
| 6 |
Charleston Battery |
17 | 57% |
| 7 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
16 | 53% |
| 8 |
Indy Eleven |
16 | 53% |
| 9 |
Oakland Roots |
15 | 50% |
| 10 |
Orange County |
15 | 50% |
| 11 |
El Paso Locomotive |
14 | 47% |
| 12 |
Phoenix Rising |
14 | 47% |
| 13 |
Hartford Athletic |
13 | 43% |
| 14 |
Miami FC II |
13 | 43% |
| 15 |
Colorado Springs |
13 | 43% |
| 16 |
Detroit City FC |
13 | 43% |
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
North Carolina FC |
11 | 73% |
| 2 |
Charleston Battery |
11 | 73% |
| 3 |
Louisville City |
11 | 73% |
| 4 |
New Mexico United |
10 | 67% |
| 5 |
Orange County |
10 | 67% |
| 6 |
Sacramento Republic |
9 | 60% |
| 7 |
Indy Eleven |
9 | 60% |
| 8 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
9 | 60% |
| 9 |
Colorado Springs |
9 | 60% |
| 10 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
9 | 60% |
| 11 |
Detroit City FC |
8 | 53% |
| 12 |
El Paso Locomotive |
8 | 53% |
| 13 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 47% |
| 14 |
San Antonio |
7 | 47% |
| 15 |
Lexington |
7 | 47% |
| 16 |
Phoenix Rising |
7 | 47% |
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Louisville City |
10 | 67% |
| 2 |
Sacramento Republic |
8 | 53% |
| 3 |
Oakland Roots |
8 | 53% |
| 4 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
8 | 53% |
| 5 |
New Mexico United |
8 | 53% |
| 6 |
Hartford Athletic |
7 | 47% |
| 7 |
Miami FC II |
7 | 47% |
| 8 |
Indy Eleven |
7 | 47% |
| 9 |
Phoenix Rising |
7 | 47% |
| 10 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
7 | 47% |
| 11 |
North Carolina FC |
7 | 47% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Las Vegas Lights |
21 | 70% |
| 2 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
21 | 70% |
| 3 |
Birmingham Legion |
20 | 66% |
| 4 |
Rhode Island |
19 | 63% |
| 5 |
Monterey Bay |
19 | 63% |
| 6 |
San Antonio |
19 | 63% |
| 7 |
Loudoun United |
19 | 63% |
| 8 |
Lexington |
18 | 60% |
| 9 |
Detroit City FC |
17 | 56% |
| 10 |
Hartford Athletic |
17 | 56% |
| 11 |
Colorado Springs |
17 | 56% |
| 12 |
Miami FC II |
17 | 56% |
| 13 |
Phoenix Rising |
16 | 53% |
| 14 |
El Paso Locomotive |
16 | 53% |
| 15 |
Orange County |
15 | 50% |
| 16 |
Oakland Roots |
15 | 50% |
| 17 |
Indy Eleven |
14 | 46% |
| 18 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
14 | 46% |
| 19 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
13 | 43% |
| 20 |
Charleston Battery |
13 | 43% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Birmingham Legion |
11 | 73% |
| 2 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
10 | 66% |
| 3 |
Loudoun United |
10 | 66% |
| 4 |
Rhode Island |
10 | 66% |
| 5 |
Miami FC II |
9 | 60% |
| 6 |
Las Vegas Lights |
9 | 60% |
| 7 |
Monterey Bay |
9 | 60% |
| 8 |
Hartford Athletic |
9 | 60% |
| 9 |
Oakland Roots |
8 | 53% |
| 10 |
Lexington |
8 | 53% |
| 11 |
Phoenix Rising |
8 | 53% |
| 12 |
San Antonio |
8 | 53% |
| 13 |
El Paso Locomotive |
7 | 46% |
| 14 |
Detroit City FC |
7 | 46% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Las Vegas Lights |
12 | 80% |
| 2 |
Colorado Springs |
11 | 73% |
| 3 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
11 | 73% |
| 4 |
San Antonio |
11 | 73% |
| 5 |
Lexington |
10 | 66% |
| 6 |
Monterey Bay |
10 | 66% |
| 7 |
Detroit City FC |
10 | 66% |
| 8 |
Orange County |
10 | 66% |
| 9 |
Loudoun United |
9 | 60% |
| 10 |
Birmingham Legion |
9 | 60% |
| 11 |
Rhode Island |
9 | 60% |
| 12 |
El Paso Locomotive |
9 | 60% |
| 13 |
Charleston Battery |
9 | 60% |
| 14 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
8 | 53% |
| 15 |
Hartford Athletic |
8 | 53% |
| 16 |
Miami FC II |
8 | 53% |
| 17 |
Phoenix Rising |
8 | 53% |
| 18 |
North Carolina FC |
8 | 53% |
| 19 |
Indy Eleven |
8 | 53% |
| 20 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 46% |
| 21 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
7 | 46% |
| 22 |
Sacramento Republic |
7 | 46% |
| 23 |
New Mexico United |
7 | 46% |
This section of the APWin football statistics platform shows the times in which Miami FC II scored before the opponent as well as the times in which they conceded the first goal of the match in the USL Championship 2025.
Through this stat, we can see whether Miami FC II is often the one in charge of matches and gets ahead most of the time, or if they are the ones playing catchup.
In the USL Championship, Miami FC II has scored before the opponent in 43% of the games played. On the other hand, the percentage of times they have conceded the first goal is 56%.
This data helps give a clearer view of Miami FC II’s habits on both offence and defence.
If the percentage of scoring first is high, it likely points to Miami FC II being the more aggressive of the two sides with more control of the match. And if the percentage of conceding the first goal is higher, then it points to a club that is not among the best and has some defensive deficiencies.
If you want to dive even deeper into this statistic, you can also use the filters to see the score first/concede first rates in home and away games during the season.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.