Season
2022
Country
Australia
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Queensland Lions | 12 | 83% |
2 | Olympic | 11 | 73% |
3 | Eastern Suburbs Brisbane | 10 | 70% |
4 | Brisbane City | 11 | 55% |
5 | Brisbane Roar II | 11 | 45% |
6 | Gold Coast United FC | 11 | 45% |
7 | Sunshine Coast Wanderers | 11 | 45% |
8 | Capalaba | 13 | 38% |
9 | Peninsula Power | 13 | 38% |
10 | Logan Lightning | 10 | 30% |
11 | Gold Coast Knights | 10 | 30% |
12 | Moreton Bay United Jets | 11 | 27% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Queensland Lions | 6 | 83% |
2 | Olympic | 7 | 71% |
3 | Sunshine Coast Wanderers | 5 | 60% |
4 | Gold Coast United FC | 5 | 60% |
5 | Peninsula Power | 8 | 50% |
6 | Brisbane Roar II | 4 | 50% |
7 | Capalaba | 7 | 43% |
8 | Brisbane City | 5 | 40% |
9 | Eastern Suburbs Brisbane | 3 | 33% |
10 | Logan Lightning | 6 | 33% |
11 | Gold Coast Knights | 4 | 25% |
12 | Moreton Bay United Jets | 7 | 14% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Eastern Suburbs Brisbane | 7 | 86% |
2 | Queensland Lions | 6 | 83% |
3 | Olympic | 4 | 75% |
4 | Brisbane City | 6 | 67% |
5 | Moreton Bay United Jets | 4 | 50% |
6 | Brisbane Roar II | 7 | 43% |
7 | Capalaba | 6 | 33% |
8 | Gold Coast Knights | 6 | 33% |
9 | Gold Coast United FC | 6 | 33% |
10 | Sunshine Coast Wanderers | 6 | 33% |
11 | Logan Lightning | 4 | 25% |
12 | Peninsula Power | 5 | 20% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Logan Lightning | 10 | 70% |
2 | Gold Coast Knights | 10 | 70% |
3 | Moreton Bay United Jets | 11 | 64% |
4 | Capalaba | 13 | 62% |
5 | Peninsula Power | 13 | 62% |
6 | Gold Coast United FC | 11 | 55% |
7 | Brisbane Roar II | 11 | 45% |
8 | Brisbane City | 11 | 45% |
9 | Sunshine Coast Wanderers | 11 | 45% |
10 | Eastern Suburbs Brisbane | 10 | 30% |
11 | Olympic | 11 | 18% |
12 | Queensland Lions | 12 | 17% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Gold Coast Knights | 4 | 75% |
2 | Moreton Bay United Jets | 7 | 71% |
3 | Eastern Suburbs Brisbane | 3 | 67% |
4 | Logan Lightning | 6 | 67% |
5 | Brisbane City | 5 | 60% |
6 | Capalaba | 7 | 57% |
7 | Brisbane Roar II | 4 | 50% |
8 | Peninsula Power | 8 | 50% |
9 | Gold Coast United FC | 5 | 40% |
10 | Sunshine Coast Wanderers | 5 | 40% |
11 | Queensland Lions | 6 | 17% |
12 | Olympic | 7 | 14% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Peninsula Power | 5 | 80% |
2 | Logan Lightning | 4 | 75% |
3 | Capalaba | 6 | 67% |
4 | Gold Coast Knights | 6 | 67% |
5 | Gold Coast United FC | 6 | 67% |
6 | Moreton Bay United Jets | 4 | 50% |
7 | Sunshine Coast Wanderers | 6 | 50% |
8 | Brisbane Roar II | 7 | 43% |
9 | Brisbane City | 6 | 33% |
10 | Olympic | 4 | 25% |
11 | Queensland Lions | 6 | 17% |
12 | Eastern Suburbs Brisbane | 7 | 14% |
This section of the APWin football statistics platform shows the times in which Logan Lightning scored before the opponent as well as the times in which they conceded the first goal of the match in the Queensland NPL 2022.
Through this stat, we can see whether Logan Lightning is often the one in charge of matches and gets ahead most of the time, or if they are the ones playing catchup.
In the Queensland NPL, Logan Lightning has scored before the opponent in 30% of the games played. On the other hand, the percentage of times they have conceded the first goal is 70%.
This data helps give a clearer view of Logan Lightning’s habits on both offence and defence.
If the percentage of scoring first is high, it likely points to Logan Lightning being the more aggressive of the two sides with more control of the match. And if the percentage of conceding the first goal is higher, then it points to a club that is not among the best and has some defensive deficiencies.
If you want to dive even deeper into this statistic, you can also use the filters to see the score first/concede first rates in home and away games during the season.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.