Football statistics for Houston Dynamo Res.
Team Info
Season
2013
Country
USA
Competition
Cards
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Orlando City | 29 | 31% | 21% | 10% |
| 2 |  Penn FC | 27 | 33% | 22% | 11% |
| 3 |  Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 27 | 19% | 11% | 7% |
| 4 |  Charleston Battery | 28 | 36% | 18% | 11% |
| 5 |  Richmond Kickers | 28 | 18% | 7% | 4% |
| 6 |  Orange County SC | 27 | 44% | 22% | 7% |
| 7 |  Rochester Rhinos | 26 | 38% | 19% | 15% |
| 8 |  Wilmington Hammerheads | 26 | 38% | 27% | 15% |
| 9 |  Charlotte Eagles | 29 | 14% | 14% | 3% |
| 10 |  Dayton Dutch Lions | 27 | 37% | 15% | 7% |
| 11 |  Antigua Barracuda F.C. | 26 | 19% | 19% | 8% |
| 12 |  Phoenix FC | 26 | 46% | 38% | 19% |
| 13 |  VSI Tampa Bay | 26 | 42% | 27% | 4% |
| 14 |  Seattle Sounders Res. | 12 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 15 |  Chivas USA Res. | 12 | 25% | 17% | 0% |
| 16 |  Colorado Rapids Res. | 14 | 29% | 21% | 0% |
| 17 |  Real Salt Lake Res. | 14 | 43% | 29% | 14% |
| 18 |  Montreal Impact Res. | 11 | 9% | 9% | 9% |
| 19 |  New York RB Res. | 12 | 8% | 8% | 0% |
| 20 |  Chicago Fire Res. | 13 | 38% | 23% | 8% |
| 21 |  Dallas Res. | 13 | 15% | 8% | 8% |
| 22 |  SJ Earthquakes Res. | 10 | 30% | 0% | 0% |
| 23 |  LA Galaxy Res. | 10 | 40% | 20% | 0% |
| 24 |  Portland Timbers Res. | 14 | 43% | 14% | 7% |
| 25 |  Whitecaps Res. | 10 | 10% | 0% | 0% |
| 26 | Houston Dynamo Res. | 9 | 11% | 0% | 0% |
| 27 |  Columbus Crew Res. | 14 | 36% | 21% | 7% |
| 28 |  Toronto Res. | 8 | 25% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orlando City | 29 | 21% | 3% | 0% |
| 2 | Penn FC | 27 | 26% | 7% | 7% |
| 3 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 27 | 33% | 11% | 4% |
| 4 | Charleston Battery | 28 | 54% | 14% | 7% |
| 5 | Richmond Kickers | 28 | 21% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 | Orange County SC | 27 | 56% | 30% | 7% |
| 7 | Rochester Rhinos | 26 | 42% | 23% | 12% |
| 8 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 26 | 58% | 27% | 23% |
| 9 | Charlotte Eagles | 29 | 24% | 7% | 3% |
| 10 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 27 | 48% | 22% | 4% |
| 11 | Antigua Barracuda F.C. | 26 | 42% | 15% | 15% |
| 12 | Phoenix FC | 26 | 58% | 38% | 8% |
| 13 | VSI Tampa Bay | 26 | 38% | 19% | 4% |
| 14 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 12 | 25% | 0% | 0% |
| 15 | Chivas USA Res. | 12 | 50% | 33% | 8% |
| 16 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 14 | 29% | 7% | 0% |
| 17 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 14 | 43% | 29% | 21% |
| 18 | Montreal Impact Res. | 11 | 36% | 9% | 0% |
| 19 | New York RB Res. | 12 | 17% | 8% | 8% |
| 20 | Chicago Fire Res. | 13 | 54% | 31% | 31% |
| 21 | Dallas Res. | 13 | 23% | 8% | 0% |
| 22 | SJ Earthquakes Res. | 10 | 30% | 0% | 0% |
| 23 | LA Galaxy Res. | 10 | 30% | 0% | 0% |
| 24 | Portland Timbers Res. | 14 | 43% | 7% | 7% |
| 25 | Whitecaps Res. | 10 | 40% | 10% | 0% |
| 26 | Houston Dynamo Res. | 9 | 33% | 0% | 0% |
| 27 | Columbus Crew Res. | 14 | 50% | 21% | 0% |
| 28 | Toronto Res. | 8 | 38% | 38% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orlando City | 29 | 62% | 34% | 21% |
| 2 | Penn FC | 27 | 41% | 26% | 15% |
| 3 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 27 | 41% | 19% | 4% |
| 4 | Charleston Battery | 28 | 43% | 18% | 4% |
| 5 | Richmond Kickers | 28 | 43% | 14% | 4% |
| 6 | Orange County SC | 27 | 41% | 15% | 4% |
| 7 | Rochester Rhinos | 26 | 38% | 19% | 4% |
| 8 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 26 | 31% | 12% | 8% |
| 9 | Charlotte Eagles | 29 | 31% | 10% | 7% |
| 10 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 27 | 41% | 11% | 0% |
| 11 | Antigua Barracuda F.C. | 26 | 19% | 12% | 4% |
| 12 | Phoenix FC | 26 | 62% | 23% | 12% |
| 13 | VSI Tampa Bay | 26 | 54% | 15% | 8% |
| 14 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 12 | 8% | 8% | 0% |
| 15 | Chivas USA Res. | 12 | 17% | 0% | 0% |
| 16 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 14 | 36% | 21% | 14% |
| 17 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 14 | 36% | 7% | 7% |
| 18 | Montreal Impact Res. | 11 | 27% | 18% | 0% |
| 19 | New York RB Res. | 12 | 17% | 0% | 0% |
| 20 | Chicago Fire Res. | 13 | 31% | 15% | 0% |
| 21 | Dallas Res. | 13 | 31% | 15% | 15% |
| 22 | SJ Earthquakes Res. | 10 | 30% | 0% | 0% |
| 23 | LA Galaxy Res. | 10 | 60% | 30% | 20% |
| 24 | Portland Timbers Res. | 14 | 36% | 14% | 7% |
| 25 | Whitecaps Res. | 10 | 40% | 0% | 0% |
| 26 | Houston Dynamo Res. | 9 | 44% | 0% | 0% |
| 27 | Columbus Crew Res. | 14 | 43% | 29% | 14% |
| 28 | Toronto Res. | 8 | 25% | 0% | 0% |
Houston Dynamo Res. card statistics
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Houston Dynamo Res.’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 0% of their games played so far in the USL Championship 2013.
And on the other side of the ball, Houston Dynamo Res.’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 44% of their USL Championship matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Houston Dynamo Res. this season in the USL Championship:
- Overall, matches involving Houston Dynamo Res. have had 4 or more cards 11% of the time (those are cards given to both Houston Dynamo Res. and their opponents).
- In terms of Fair Play, Houston Dynamo Res. is in 27th place in the competition.
You can follow the Houston Dynamo Res.’s card situation in USL Championship all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.