Hangzhou Corners Per Game
Team Info
Season
Country
Venue
2026
China
Yellow Dragon Sports Center
Competition
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Sichuan Jiuniu
|
19 | 100% | 84% | 68% | 58% | 58% | 32% | 32% | 11.69 |
| 2 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
18 | 83% | 78% | 67% | 61% | 56% | 44% | 28% | 11.5 |
| 3 |
Dalian Zhixing
|
18 | 89% | 72% | 61% | 50% | 44% | 33% | 28% | 11 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan
|
18 | 83% | 78% | 61% | 50% | 50% | 28% | 17% | 10.72 |
| 5 |
Chengdu Better City FC
|
19 | 79% | 63% | 47% | 47% | 47% | 37% | 26% | 10.63 |
| 6 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
18 | 89% | 67% | 44% | 28% | 28% | 28% | 22% | 10.39 |
| 7 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long
|
19 | 79% | 63% | 53% | 47% | 37% | 26% | 21% | 10.27 |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda
|
18 | 67% | 56% | 33% | 28% | 28% | 28% | 28% | 10.16 |
| 9 |
Hangzhou
|
19 | 74% | 63% | 47% | 37% | 37% | 26% | 21% | 10.06 |
| 10 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
18 | 67% | 56% | 50% | 39% | 33% | 22% | 17% | 10 |
| 11 |
Shandong Luneng
|
19 | 79% | 68% | 47% | 42% | 37% | 16% | 11% | 9.95 |
| 12 |
Henan Jianye
|
18 | 72% | 50% | 39% | 33% | 33% | 28% | 17% | 9.94 |
| 13 |
Yunnan Yukun
|
19 | 74% | 58% | 47% | 32% | 32% | 26% | 16% | 9.89 |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island
|
19 | 79% | 58% | 42% | 32% | 26% | 21% | 16% | 9.79 |
| 15 |
Qingdao Jonoon
|
19 | 68% | 58% | 53% | 42% | 37% | 21% | 11% | 9.53 |
| 16 |
Shenyang Urban
|
18 | 83% | 56% | 39% | 22% | 22% | 17% | 6% | 9.16 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
8 | 100% | 88% | 75% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 38% | 12.01 |
| 2 |
Hangzhou
|
9 | 100% | 89% | 56% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 11.33 |
| 3 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
10 | 80% | 70% | 70% | 70% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 11.3 |
| 4 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
8 | 63% | 63% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 38% | 38% | 11.26 |
| 5 |
Sichuan Jiuniu
|
10 | 100% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 10.7 |
| 6 |
Chengdu Better City FC
|
9 | 67% | 56% | 44% | 44% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 10.55 |
| 7 |
Beijing Guoan
|
10 | 80% | 70% | 50% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 10% | 10.2 |
| 8 |
Henan Jianye
|
9 | 78% | 44% | 44% | 33% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 10.11 |
| 9 |
Dalian Zhixing
|
10 | 90% | 70% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 10% | 10 |
| 10 |
Yunnan Yukun
|
9 | 67% | 56% | 44% | 44% | 44% | 33% | 11% | 10 |
| 11 |
Shandong Luneng
|
9 | 78% | 67% | 44% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 9.78 |
| 12 |
Qingdao Jonoon
|
9 | 67% | 67% | 56% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 9.77 |
| 13 |
Qingdao Youth Island
|
10 | 80% | 60% | 50% | 30% | 30% | 20% | 20% | 9.7 |
| 14 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long
|
10 | 70% | 50% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 9.6 |
| 15 |
Tianjin Teda
|
9 | 67% | 44% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 9.33 |
| 16 |
Shenyang Urban
|
9 | 78% | 56% | 44% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 11% | 9.33 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Sichuan Jiuniu
|
9 | 100% | 89% | 78% | 78% | 78% | 44% | 44% | 12.78 |
| 2 |
Dalian Zhixing
|
8 | 88% | 75% | 75% | 63% | 63% | 63% | 50% | 12.26 |
| 3 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
8 | 88% | 88% | 63% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 38% | 11.75 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan
|
8 | 88% | 88% | 75% | 63% | 63% | 38% | 25% | 11.38 |
| 5 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long
|
9 | 89% | 78% | 67% | 56% | 33% | 33% | 22% | 11 |
| 6 |
Tianjin Teda
|
9 | 67% | 67% | 44% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 11 |
| 7 |
Chengdu Better City FC
|
10 | 90% | 70% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 10.7 |
| 8 |
Shandong Luneng
|
10 | 80% | 70% | 50% | 40% | 40% | 10% | 10% | 10.1 |
| 9 |
Qingdao Youth Island
|
9 | 78% | 56% | 33% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 9.89 |
| 10 |
Yunnan Yukun
|
10 | 80% | 60% | 50% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 9.8 |
| 11 |
Henan Jianye
|
9 | 67% | 56% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 11% | 9.78 |
| 12 |
Qingdao Jonoon
|
10 | 70% | 50% | 50% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 10% | 9.3 |
| 13 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
10 | 80% | 50% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 9.1 |
| 14 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
10 | 70% | 50% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 0% | 9 |
| 15 |
Shenyang Urban
|
9 | 89% | 56% | 33% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 9 |
| 16 |
Hangzhou
|
10 | 50% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 10% | 8.9 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Beijing Guoan
|
18 | 83% | 83% | 67% | 67% | 61% | 44% | 28% | 6.89 |
| 3 |
Chengdu Better City FC
|
19 | 95% | 95% | 68% | 53% | 42% | 37% | 32% | 6.89 |
| 4 |
Dalian Zhixing
|
18 | 89% | 83% | 78% | 78% | 44% | 22% | 11% | 6.28 |
| 5 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
18 | 94% | 72% | 56% | 50% | 44% | 28% | 28% | 5.94 |
| 6 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
18 | 83% | 72% | 56% | 39% | 28% | 22% | 22% | 5.61 |
| 7 |
Henan Jianye
|
18 | 78% | 72% | 50% | 39% | 28% | 22% | 22% | 5.33 |
| 8 |
Hangzhou
|
19 | 79% | 74% | 68% | 42% | 32% | 21% | 21% | 5.32 |
| 9 |
Sichuan Jiuniu
|
19 | 89% | 79% | 53% | 37% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 5.16 |
| 10 |
Yunnan Yukun
|
19 | 89% | 68% | 53% | 37% | 16% | 16% | 11% | 5.05 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
18 | 83% | 67% | 56% | 39% | 11% | 6% | 6% | 4.78 |
| 12 |
Shandong Luneng
|
19 | 84% | 68% | 47% | 32% | 11% | 5% | 5% | 4.42 |
| 13 |
Tianjin Teda
|
18 | 72% | 39% | 33% | 28% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 4.33 |
| 14 |
Qingdao Jonoon
|
19 | 68% | 58% | 37% | 32% | 26% | 16% | 5% | 4.32 |
| 15 |
Shenyang Urban
|
18 | 83% | 67% | 33% | 28% | 22% | 6% | 0% | 4.22 |
| 16 |
Qingdao Youth Island
|
19 | 79% | 42% | 37% | 37% | 26% | 5% | 0% | 4.16 |
| 17 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long
|
19 | 63% | 47% | 21% | 21% | 11% | 5% | 5% | 3.74 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
10 | 100% | 90% | 80% | 70% | 70% | 40% | 40% | 7.3 |
| 3 |
Chengdu Better City FC
|
9 | 89% | 89% | 67% | 56% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 7.22 |
| 4 |
Hangzhou
|
9 | 100% | 100% | 89% | 67% | 44% | 44% | 44% | 7 |
| 5 |
Beijing Guoan
|
10 | 80% | 80% | 60% | 60% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 7 |
| 6 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
8 | 100% | 88% | 63% | 38% | 38% | 38% | 38% | 6.88 |
| 7 |
Henan Jianye
|
9 | 89% | 89% | 56% | 56% | 44% | 33% | 33% | 6.67 |
| 8 |
Dalian Zhixing
|
10 | 90% | 80% | 80% | 80% | 50% | 30% | 10% | 6.6 |
| 9 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
8 | 100% | 88% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 5.88 |
| 10 |
Yunnan Yukun
|
9 | 100% | 89% | 78% | 44% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 5.78 |
| 11 |
Sichuan Jiuniu
|
10 | 90% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 10% | 5.5 |
| 12 |
Shandong Luneng
|
9 | 89% | 78% | 56% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 5 |
| 13 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long
|
10 | 70% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 4.7 |
| 14 |
Qingdao Jonoon
|
9 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 11% | 0% | 4.33 |
| 15 |
Qingdao Youth Island
|
10 | 80% | 50% | 40% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 0% | 4.3 |
| 16 |
Shenyang Urban
|
9 | 89% | 67% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 4.11 |
| 17 |
Tianjin Teda
|
9 | 67% | 44% | 33% | 33% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 3.89 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Beijing Guoan
|
8 | 88% | 88% | 75% | 75% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 6.75 |
| 3 |
Chengdu Better City FC
|
10 | 100% | 100% | 70% | 50% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 6.6 |
| 4 |
Dalian Zhixing
|
8 | 88% | 88% | 75% | 75% | 38% | 13% | 13% | 5.88 |
| 5 |
Tianjin Teda
|
9 | 78% | 33% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 4.78 |
| 6 |
Sichuan Jiuniu
|
9 | 89% | 78% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 4.78 |
| 7 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
10 | 70% | 60% | 50% | 40% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 4.6 |
| 8 |
Yunnan Yukun
|
10 | 80% | 50% | 30% | 30% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 4.4 |
| 9 |
Shenyang Urban
|
9 | 78% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 11% | 0% | 4.33 |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon
|
10 | 70% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 20% | 20% | 10% | 4.3 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
8 | 88% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 4.25 |
| 12 |
Henan Jianye
|
9 | 67% | 56% | 44% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 4 |
| 13 |
Qingdao Youth Island
|
9 | 78% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 14 |
Shandong Luneng
|
10 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 30% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.9 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
10 | 70% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.9 |
| 16 |
Hangzhou
|
10 | 60% | 50% | 50% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 3.8 |
| 17 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long
|
9 | 56% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Sichuan Jiuniu
|
19 | 89% | 79% | 74% | 63% | 53% | 37% | 26% | 6.53 |
| 3 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long
|
19 | 74% | 68% | 63% | 58% | 53% | 47% | 26% | 6.53 |
| 4 |
Tianjin Teda
|
18 | 89% | 83% | 67% | 44% | 28% | 17% | 17% | 5.83 |
| 5 |
Qingdao Youth Island
|
19 | 100% | 79% | 68% | 47% | 32% | 11% | 11% | 5.63 |
| 6 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
18 | 94% | 72% | 44% | 44% | 39% | 17% | 17% | 5.61 |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
18 | 89% | 83% | 56% | 44% | 28% | 22% | 17% | 5.56 |
| 8 |
Shandong Luneng
|
19 | 89% | 74% | 53% | 37% | 21% | 21% | 16% | 5.53 |
| 9 |
Qingdao Jonoon
|
19 | 89% | 79% | 58% | 42% | 26% | 16% | 16% | 5.21 |
| 10 |
Shenyang Urban
|
18 | 72% | 56% | 44% | 44% | 28% | 28% | 28% | 4.94 |
| 11 |
Yunnan Yukun
|
19 | 74% | 68% | 42% | 37% | 26% | 16% | 5% | 4.84 |
| 12 |
Hangzhou
|
19 | 79% | 68% | 53% | 47% | 32% | 5% | 5% | 4.74 |
| 13 |
Dalian Zhixing
|
18 | 72% | 67% | 50% | 39% | 28% | 11% | 6% | 4.72 |
| 14 |
Henan Jianye
|
18 | 83% | 61% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 11% | 4.61 |
| 15 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
18 | 78% | 61% | 44% | 44% | 17% | 6% | 0% | 4.39 |
| 16 |
Beijing Guoan
|
18 | 72% | 50% | 33% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 3.83 |
| 17 |
Chengdu Better City FC
|
19 | 68% | 37% | 26% | 16% | 16% | 11% | 5% | 3.74 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
8 | 100% | 88% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 6.13 |
| 3 |
Tianjin Teda
|
9 | 89% | 78% | 67% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 5.44 |
| 4 |
Qingdao Jonoon
|
9 | 100% | 78% | 67% | 44% | 33% | 11% | 11% | 5.44 |
| 5 |
Qingdao Youth Island
|
10 | 100% | 70% | 60% | 50% | 40% | 10% | 10% | 5.4 |
| 6 |
Shenyang Urban
|
9 | 67% | 56% | 44% | 44% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 5.22 |
| 7 |
Sichuan Jiuniu
|
10 | 90% | 70% | 60% | 50% | 40% | 20% | 10% | 5.2 |
| 8 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long
|
10 | 60% | 50% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 30% | 10% | 4.9 |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng
|
9 | 78% | 56% | 33% | 33% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 4.78 |
| 10 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
8 | 88% | 63% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 4.38 |
| 11 |
Hangzhou
|
9 | 78% | 56% | 44% | 44% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 4.33 |
| 12 |
Yunnan Yukun
|
9 | 67% | 56% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 4.22 |
| 13 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
10 | 80% | 80% | 30% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 14 |
Henan Jianye
|
9 | 78% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.44 |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing
|
10 | 50% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.4 |
| 16 |
Chengdu Better City FC
|
9 | 67% | 33% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 3.33 |
| 17 |
Beijing Guoan
|
10 | 50% | 40% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 3.2 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long
|
9 | 89% | 89% | 78% | 78% | 78% | 67% | 44% | 8.33 |
| 3 |
Sichuan Jiuniu
|
9 | 89% | 89% | 89% | 78% | 67% | 56% | 44% | 8 |
| 4 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
8 | 100% | 88% | 88% | 88% | 63% | 50% | 38% | 7.5 |
| 5 |
Dalian Zhixing
|
8 | 100% | 100% | 63% | 63% | 63% | 25% | 13% | 6.38 |
| 6 |
Tianjin Teda
|
9 | 89% | 89% | 67% | 44% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 6.22 |
| 7 |
Shandong Luneng
|
10 | 100% | 90% | 70% | 40% | 30% | 30% | 20% | 6.2 |
| 8 |
Qingdao Youth Island
|
9 | 100% | 89% | 78% | 44% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 5.89 |
| 9 |
Henan Jianye
|
9 | 89% | 89% | 44% | 44% | 33% | 33% | 22% | 5.78 |
| 10 |
Yunnan Yukun
|
10 | 80% | 80% | 40% | 40% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 5.4 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
10 | 90% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 10% | 5.2 |
| 12 |
Hangzhou
|
10 | 80% | 80% | 60% | 50% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 5.1 |
| 13 |
Qingdao Jonoon
|
10 | 80% | 80% | 50% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 5 |
| 14 |
Shenyang Urban
|
9 | 78% | 56% | 44% | 44% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 4.67 |
| 15 |
Beijing Guoan
|
8 | 100% | 63% | 50% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 4.63 |
| 16 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
10 | 70% | 60% | 50% | 50% | 20% | 10% | 0% | 4.4 |
| 17 |
Chengdu Better City FC
|
10 | 70% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 4.1 |
Corner Statistics for Hangzhou: Averages, Trends, and Betting Numbers
On this page, you’ll find detailed corner statistics for Hangzhou across the 2026 season, with data designed to support corner betting analysis.
At the top of the table, you can switch competitions to compare corner averages from other tournaments and identify the best betting angles.
Hangzhou Corner Averages (Chinese Super League)
As shown at the top of the page, the corner averages for Hangzhou provide a clear snapshot of the team’s corner trends. Below, we break down the numbers in a practical and easy-to-use format for betting purposes.
Here are the key corner statistics and averages for Hangzhou, based on the most up-to-date data from the Chinese Super League:
Matches involving Hangzhou average 10.06 total corners per game, combining corners won, and corners conceded - an important metric for over and under corner bets.
47.37% of matches featuring Hangzhou in this competition finished with over 9.5 corners, highlighting strong potential for high-corner markets.
On average, Hangzhou records 5.32 corners per match in their favour, showing how frequently the team applies attacking pressure.
In 42.11% of games, Hangzhou registered 5 or more corners, a useful benchmark for team corner lines.
Defensively, Hangzhou concedes an average of 4.74 corners per match, which can be valuable when evaluating opponent corner totals.
This section also allows you to analyse corner averages for Hangzhou in home and away matches, along with over and under rates for corners for and against - key factors when refining corner betting strategies.
Corner Betting Insights
Beyond presenting all corner averages for Hangzhou, APWin also provides dedicated resources for users who focus on corner betting.
You’ll find a specialised section for under corner predictions and another entirely focused on over corner bets, helping you identify value based on statistical trends.
Frequently Asked Questions
Below are the most common questions from users looking to understand corner betting data for this team.
What is the average number of corners for Hangzhou?
According to the data, Hangzhou averages 5.32 corners in their favor per match.
On average, how many corners are there in Hangzhou matches?
In the Chinese Super League, matches involving Hangzhou average 10.06 total corners per game.