Football statistics for EC São José
Team Info
Season
Country
Venue
2025
Brazil
Estádio do Passo d'Areia
Competition
2nd Half
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Santa Cruz |
24 | 7 | 11 | 6 | 12 | 10 | +2 | 32 | 1.33 |
| 2 |
Portuguesa-SP |
16 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 11 | 8 | +3 | 26 | 1.63 |
| 3 |
Joinville |
16 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 24 | 1.5 |
| 4 |
América RN |
20 | 6 | 12 | 2 | 16 | 9 | +7 | 30 | 1.5 |
| 5 |
Sampaio Corrêa |
16 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 5 | +3 | 24 | 1.5 |
| 6 |
Luverdense |
16 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 9 | +1 | 23 | 1.44 |
| 7 |
ASA |
20 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 18 | 7 | +11 | 32 | 1.6 |
| 8 |
GE Brasil |
14 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 16 | 1.14 |
| 9 |
Águia de Marabá |
14 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 12 | 6 | +6 | 23 | 1.64 |
| 10 |
Treze-PB |
14 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 13 | 0.93 |
| 11 |
Ceilândia |
18 | 10 | 3 | 5 | 16 | 9 | +7 | 33 | 1.83 |
| 12 |
Maranhão |
22 | 9 | 8 | 5 | 14 | 9 | +5 | 35 | 1.59 |
| 13 |
Parnahyba |
14 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 16 | 1.14 |
| 14 |
Sergipe |
16 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 12 | 7 | +5 | 26 | 1.63 |
| 15 |
EC São José |
16 | 3 | 9 | 4 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 18 | 1.13 |
| 16 |
Trem |
14 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 12 | 16 | -4 | 15 | 1.07 |
| 17 |
Altos |
18 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 14 | 12 | +2 | 26 | 1.44 |
| 18 |
Juazeirense |
16 | 4 | 9 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 21 | 1.31 |
| 19 |
Sousa |
14 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 13 | 0.93 |
| 20 |
Central SC |
18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 14 | 5 | +9 | 36 | 2 |
| 21 |
Boavista SC |
14 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 9 | 0.64 |
| 22 |
Aparecidense |
18 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 20 | 16 | +4 | 28 | 1.56 |
| 23 |
Tocantinópolis |
14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 19 | 1.36 |
| 24 |
Goianésia |
14 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 12 | 0.86 |
| 25 |
Imperatriz |
18 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 20 | 1.11 |
| 26 |
Rio Branco-ES |
18 | 6 | 10 | 2 | 12 | 4 | +8 | 28 | 1.56 |
| 27 |
Operário-MT |
13 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 9 | 0.69 |
| 28 |
Água Santa |
16 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 13 | 10 | +3 | 22 | 1.38 |
| 29 |
Monte Azul |
13 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 15 | 1.15 |
| 30 |
Inter de Limeira |
22 | 10 | 9 | 3 | 16 | 7 | +9 | 39 | 1.77 |
| 31 |
Ferroviário |
16 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 15 | 0.94 |
| 32 |
Cianorte |
20 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 11 | 10 | +1 | 26 | 1.3 |
| 33 |
Nova Iguaçu |
14 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 10 | 7 | +3 | 22 | 1.57 |
| 34 |
Uberlândia |
14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 12 | 11 | +1 | 20 | 1.43 |
| 35 |
Manaus |
16 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 16 | 10 | +6 | 26 | 1.63 |
| 36 |
Lagarto |
16 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 15 | 1 |
| 37 |
EC São Luiz |
14 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 15 | 1.07 |
| 38 |
Horizonte |
14 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 8 | 7 | +1 | 19 | 1.36 |
| 39 |
Mixto |
18 | 5 | 10 | 3 | 11 | 7 | +4 | 25 | 1.39 |
| 40 |
Santa Cruz-RN |
14 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 15 | 1.07 |
| 41 |
Barra FC |
24 | 14 | 7 | 3 | 23 | 9 | +14 | 49 | 2.04 |
| 42 |
Tuna Luso |
16 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 14 | 7 | +7 | 28 | 1.75 |
| 43 |
Independência |
16 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 16 | 15 | +1 | 24 | 1.5 |
| 44 |
Marcílio Dias |
16 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 9 | +2 | 22 | 1.38 |
| 45 |
FC Cascavel |
16 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 24 | 1.5 |
| 46 |
Jequié |
14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 19 | 1.36 |
| 47 |
Iguatu |
14 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 15 | 1.07 |
| 48 |
Goiânia |
14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 17 | 1.21 |
| 49 |
Humaitá |
14 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 22 | -15 | 8 | 0.57 |
| 50 |
Capital Brasilia |
14 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 16 | 1.14 |
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Santa Cruz |
12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 18 | 1.5 |
| 2 |
Portuguesa-SP |
8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 4 | +2 | 14 | 1.75 |
| 3 |
Joinville |
8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 4 | +3 | 16 | 2 |
| 4 |
América RN |
10 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 10 | 3 | +7 | 18 | 1.8 |
| 5 |
Sampaio Corrêa |
8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 2 | +4 | 15 | 1.88 |
| 6 |
Luverdense |
8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 1 | +6 | 16 | 2 |
| 7 |
ASA |
10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 11 | 5 | +6 | 16 | 1.6 |
| 8 |
GE Brasil |
7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4 | +1 | 9 | 1.29 |
| 9 |
Águia de Marabá |
7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 1 | +6 | 15 | 2.14 |
| 10 |
Treze-PB |
7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 5 | 0.71 |
| 11 |
Ceilândia |
9 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 1 | +9 | 24 | 2.67 |
| 12 |
Maranhão |
11 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 6 | +4 | 20 | 1.82 |
| 13 |
Parnahyba |
7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 4 | +3 | 14 | 2 |
| 14 |
Sergipe |
8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 2 | +5 | 17 | 2.13 |
| 15 |
EC São José |
8 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 8 | 1 |
| 16 |
Trem |
7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 7 | 1 |
| 17 |
Altos |
9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 12 | 1.33 |
| 18 |
Juazeirense |
8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 5 | +1 | 13 | 1.63 |
| 19 |
Sousa |
7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 10 | 1.43 |
| 20 |
Central SC |
9 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 3 | +4 | 17 | 1.89 |
| 21 |
Boavista SC |
7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 7 | 1 |
| 22 |
Aparecidense |
9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 14 | 7 | +7 | 16 | 1.78 |
| 23 |
Tocantinópolis |
7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | +2 | 12 | 1.71 |
| 24 |
Goianésia |
7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 8 | 1.14 |
| 25 |
Imperatriz |
9 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 13 | 1.44 |
| 26 |
Rio Branco-ES |
9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 9 | 1 | +8 | 19 | 2.11 |
| 27 |
Operário-MT |
7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 5 | 0.71 |
| 28 |
Água Santa |
8 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 5 | +2 | 11 | 1.38 |
| 29 |
Monte Azul |
6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 8 | 1.33 |
| 30 |
Inter de Limeira |
11 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 11 | 5 | +6 | 22 | 2 |
| 31 |
Ferroviário |
8 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 10 | 1.25 |
| 32 |
Cianorte |
10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 9 | 2 | +7 | 20 | 2 |
| 33 |
Nova Iguaçu |
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 5 | +1 | 11 | 1.57 |
| 34 |
Uberlândia |
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 11 | 1.57 |
| 35 |
Manaus |
8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 9 | 4 | +5 | 13 | 1.63 |
| 36 |
Lagarto |
8 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 7 | 0.88 |
| 37 |
EC São Luiz |
7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 9 | 1.29 |
| 38 |
Horizonte |
7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 3 | +3 | 12 | 1.71 |
| 39 |
Mixto |
9 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 3 | +2 | 12 | 1.33 |
| 40 |
Santa Cruz-RN |
7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 1.29 |
| 41 |
Barra FC |
12 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 11 | 2 | +9 | 25 | 2.08 |
| 42 |
Tuna Luso |
8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 1 | +10 | 20 | 2.5 |
| 43 |
Independência |
8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 10 | 1.25 |
| 44 |
Marcílio Dias |
8 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 3 | +2 | 11 | 1.38 |
| 45 |
FC Cascavel |
8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 4 | +4 | 18 | 2.25 |
| 46 |
Jequié |
7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 12 | 1.71 |
| 47 |
Iguatu |
7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | +2 | 12 | 1.71 |
| 48 |
Goiânia |
7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 8 | 1.14 |
| 49 |
Humaitá |
7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 4 | 0.57 |
| 50 |
Capital Brasilia |
7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4 | +1 | 9 | 1.29 |
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Santa Cruz |
12 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 14 | 1.17 |
| 2 |
Portuguesa-SP |
8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4 | +1 | 12 | 1.5 |
| 3 |
Joinville |
8 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 8 | 1 |
| 4 |
América RN |
10 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 12 | 1.2 |
| 5 |
Sampaio Corrêa |
8 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 9 | 1.13 |
| 6 |
Luverdense |
8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 7 | 0.88 |
| 7 |
ASA |
10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 2 | +5 | 16 | 1.6 |
| 8 |
GE Brasil |
7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 7 | 1 |
| 9 |
Águia de Marabá |
7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 1.14 |
| 10 |
Treze-PB |
7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 8 | 1.14 |
| 11 |
Ceilândia |
9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 9 | 1 |
| 12 |
Maranhão |
11 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 15 | 1.36 |
| 13 |
Parnahyba |
7 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 2 | 0.29 |
| 14 |
Sergipe |
8 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 9 | 1.13 |
| 15 |
EC São José |
8 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 10 | 1.25 |
| 16 |
Trem |
7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 8 | 1.14 |
| 17 |
Altos |
9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 5 | +2 | 14 | 1.56 |
| 18 |
Juazeirense |
8 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 8 | 1 |
| 19 |
Sousa |
7 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 3 | 0.43 |
| 20 |
Central SC |
9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 2 | +5 | 19 | 2.11 |
| 21 |
Boavista SC |
7 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 8 | -7 | 2 | 0.29 |
| 22 |
Aparecidense |
9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 12 | 1.33 |
| 23 |
Tocantinópolis |
7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 7 | 1 |
| 24 |
Goianésia |
7 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 4 | 0.57 |
| 25 |
Imperatriz |
9 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 7 | 0.78 |
| 26 |
Rio Branco-ES |
9 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 1 |
| 27 |
Operário-MT |
6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 4 | 0.67 |
| 28 |
Água Santa |
8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 5 | +1 | 11 | 1.38 |
| 29 |
Monte Azul |
7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 7 | 1 |
| 30 |
Inter de Limeira |
11 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 2 | +3 | 17 | 1.55 |
| 31 |
Ferroviário |
8 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 5 | 0.63 |
| 32 |
Cianorte |
10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 6 | 0.6 |
| 33 |
Nova Iguaçu |
7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 11 | 1.57 |
| 34 |
Uberlândia |
7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 9 | 1.29 |
| 35 |
Manaus |
8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 6 | +1 | 13 | 1.63 |
| 36 |
Lagarto |
8 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 8 | 1.14 |
| 37 |
EC São Luiz |
7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 6 | 0.86 |
| 38 |
Horizonte |
7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 7 | 1 |
| 39 |
Mixto |
9 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 4 | +2 | 13 | 1.44 |
| 40 |
Santa Cruz-RN |
7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 6 | 0.86 |
| 41 |
Barra FC |
12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 12 | 7 | +5 | 24 | 2 |
| 42 |
Tuna Luso |
8 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 8 | 1 |
| 43 |
Independência |
8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 7 | +1 | 14 | 1.75 |
| 44 |
Marcílio Dias |
8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 11 | 1.38 |
| 45 |
FC Cascavel |
8 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 6 | 0.75 |
| 46 |
Jequié |
7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 7 | 1 |
| 47 |
Iguatu |
7 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 3 | 0.43 |
| 48 |
Goiânia |
7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 5 | +1 | 9 | 1.29 |
| 49 |
Humaitá |
7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 10 | -8 | 4 | 0.57 |
| 50 |
Capital Brasilia |
7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 7 | 1 |
Performance in the 2nd half: EC São José - 2025
The second half of football matches is crucial; it is when most matches are ultimately decided. That is why analysing a team’s performance exclusively in the second half of the match can be useful for evaluating different factors like tactical adaptation, players’ physical conditioning, the effectiveness of a coach’s substitutions or tactical changes, and the team’s overall mentality.
If we take only the second half statistics of EC São José’s games in Serie D 2025 into account, we can see that:
- In 16 games played so far, EC São José has claimed victory in 3, drawn 9 and lost 4.
- And in terms of points per match for the final 45 minutes, EC São José is averaging 1.13.
- If only the second halves of games counted, EC São José would have the 37th best campaign in Brazilian Serie D this season.
Studying statistics exclusively from the second half can help determine if a team can capably perform during what is often the pressure-filled portion of the match, or if they consistently falter under the pressure
So visit this page all season long if you’d like to see the EC São José second half numbers in home games, away games, and overall, during the Serie D 2025.