Dalian Yifang corners per game

Team Info

Season

Country

Venue

2023

China

Dalian Sports Center

Competition

China

Chinese Super League

Summary Matches Corners Stats Top Scorers & Assists Squads

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Nantong Zhiyun	30	77 %	77 %	60 %	47 %	40 %	37 %	23 %	10.93
2	Tianjin Teda	30	80 %	67 %	57 %	47 %	37 %	27 %	10 %	10.17
3	Meizhou Hakka	30	80 %	70 %	57 %	47 %	27 %	23 %	17 %	10.1
4	Hangzhou	30	77 %	67 %	53 %	40 %	30 %	23 %	20 %	10
5	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	30	77 %	70 %	53 %	33 %	27 %	20 %	17 %	9.94
6	Beijing Guoan	30	77 %	60 %	53 %	40 %	37 %	17 %	10 %	9.77
7	Dalian Yifang	30	77 %	60 %	43 %	37 %	30 %	20 %	13 %	9.57
8	Shanghai SIPG	30	67 %	53 %	47 %	40 %	23 %	20 %	10 %	9.3
9	Henan Jianye	30	67 %	57 %	40 %	33 %	30 %	20 %	10 %	9.2
10	Qingdao Jonoon	30	77 %	57 %	40 %	27 %	13 %	10 %	10 %	9.14
11	Chengdu Better City FC	30	60 %	50 %	37 %	27 %	20 %	10 %	7 %	9.03
12	Shenzhen	30	73 %	50 %	40 %	20 %	20 %	10 %	7 %	8.84
13	Shandong Luneng	30	70 %	67 %	53 %	27 %	17 %	7 %	3 %	8.8
14	Wuhan Three Towns	30	67 %	50 %	27 %	27 %	20 %	17 %	10 %	8.73
15	Shanghai Shenhua	30	60 %	53 %	40 %	33 %	23 %	17 %	3 %	8.6
16	Changchun Yatai	30	57 %	47 %	33 %	30 %	20 %	17 %	10 %	8.56

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Nantong Zhiyun	15	80 %	80 %	60 %	47 %	47 %	40 %	20 %	11.34
2	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	15	73 %	67 %	67 %	47 %	40 %	33 %	27 %	10.66
3	Hangzhou	15	80 %	67 %	53 %	40 %	27 %	27 %	27 %	10.2
4	Beijing Guoan	15	80 %	67 %	60 %	47 %	47 %	20 %	13 %	10.2
5	Meizhou Hakka	15	80 %	67 %	53 %	53 %	33 %	27 %	13 %	9.94
6	Dalian Yifang	15	80 %	67 %	47 %	47 %	40 %	20 %	13 %	9.93
7	Tianjin Teda	15	67 %	60 %	60 %	47 %	33 %	27 %	7 %	9.87
8	Shanghai SIPG	15	73 %	53 %	47 %	40 %	20 %	13 %	13 %	9.66
9	Shenzhen	15	87 %	53 %	47 %	13 %	13 %	7 %	7 %	9.2
10	Wuhan Three Towns	15	73 %	60 %	27 %	27 %	27 %	20 %	13 %	9.2
11	Chengdu Better City FC	15	80 %	60 %	40 %	27 %	20 %	7 %	0 %	9.06
12	Shanghai Shenhua	15	67 %	67 %	47 %	33 %	20 %	7 %	0 %	8.73
13	Henan Jianye	15	53 %	53 %	40 %	27 %	27 %	27 %	13 %	8.6
14	Qingdao Jonoon	15	60 %	47 %	27 %	27 %	13 %	13 %	13 %	8.46
15	Shandong Luneng	15	67 %	60 %	40 %	13 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	8.26
16	Changchun Yatai	15	40 %	27 %	20 %	20 %	7 %	7 %	0 %	7.33

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Nantong Zhiyun	15	73 %	73 %	60 %	47 %	33 %	33 %	27 %	10.53
2	Tianjin Teda	15	93 %	73 %	53 %	47 %	40 %	27 %	13 %	10.46
3	Meizhou Hakka	15	80 %	73 %	60 %	40 %	20 %	20 %	20 %	10.27
4	Hangzhou	15	73 %	67 %	53 %	40 %	33 %	20 %	13 %	9.8
5	Henan Jianye	15	80 %	60 %	40 %	40 %	33 %	13 %	7 %	9.8
6	Qingdao Jonoon	15	93 %	67 %	53 %	27 %	13 %	7 %	7 %	9.8
7	Changchun Yatai	15	73 %	67 %	47 %	40 %	33 %	27 %	20 %	9.8
8	Beijing Guoan	15	73 %	53 %	47 %	33 %	27 %	13 %	7 %	9.34
9	Shandong Luneng	15	73 %	73 %	67 %	40 %	33 %	13 %	7 %	9.33
10	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	15	80 %	73 %	40 %	20 %	13 %	7 %	7 %	9.2
11	Dalian Yifang	15	73 %	53 %	40 %	27 %	20 %	20 %	13 %	9.2
12	Chengdu Better City FC	15	40 %	40 %	33 %	27 %	20 %	13 %	13 %	9
13	Shanghai SIPG	15	60 %	53 %	47 %	40 %	27 %	27 %	7 %	8.93
14	Shenzhen	15	60 %	47 %	33 %	27 %	27 %	13 %	7 %	8.46
15	Shanghai Shenhua	15	53 %	40 %	33 %	33 %	27 %	27 %	7 %	8.46
16	Wuhan Three Towns	15	60 %	40 %	27 %	27 %	13 %	13 %	7 %	8.26

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Beijing Guoan	30	83%	73%	63%	63%	47%	30%	17%	6.1
3	Shanghai SIPG	30	87%	80%	63%	53%	47%	23%	13%	5.87
4	Shandong Luneng	30	90%	77%	63%	50%	40%	33%	13%	5.77
5	Nantong Zhiyun	30	87%	70%	57%	53%	40%	20%	13%	5.6
6	Chengdu Better City FC	30	87%	83%	70%	53%	27%	13%	3%	5.23
7	Hangzhou	30	87%	60%	50%	37%	23%	17%	13%	5
8	Tianjin Teda	30	73%	67%	57%	40%	27%	17%	7%	4.97
9	Meizhou Hakka	30	80%	60%	53%	47%	27%	17%	13%	4.97
10	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	30	87%	70%	47%	30%	20%	13%	13%	4.87
11	Wuhan Three Towns	30	87%	67%	43%	33%	27%	10%	0%	4.5
12	Henan Jianye	30	70%	53%	30%	17%	13%	13%	13%	4.13
13	Dalian Yifang	30	73%	50%	40%	33%	17%	7%	0%	4.1
14	Qingdao Jonoon	30	73%	53%	30%	23%	7%	3%	0%	3.87
15	Shanghai Shenhua	30	73%	53%	33%	23%	13%	0%	0%	3.77
16	Changchun Yatai	30	67%	53%	43%	13%	10%	3%	0%	3.53
17	Shenzhen	30	50%	30%	20%	10%	10%	7%	7%	3.07

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Shanghai SIPG	15	93%	93%	80%	67%	60%	27%	13%	6.73
3	Nantong Zhiyun	15	93%	73%	60%	60%	40%	40%	27%	6.67
4	Beijing Guoan	15	87%	80%	73%	73%	47%	27%	13%	6.33
5	Chengdu Better City FC	15	93%	93%	80%	67%	40%	20%	7%	5.93
6	Tianjin Teda	15	73%	73%	67%	53%	40%	27%	13%	5.8
7	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	15	80%	80%	53%	40%	27%	27%	27%	5.53
8	Meizhou Hakka	15	80%	60%	60%	60%	33%	13%	13%	5.27
9	Shandong Luneng	15	93%	80%	53%	33%	33%	20%	7%	5.13
10	Hangzhou	15	93%	60%	47%	33%	27%	13%	13%	4.93
11	Wuhan Three Towns	15	87%	80%	33%	27%	20%	13%	0%	4.47
12	Henan Jianye	15	60%	40%	33%	27%	20%	20%	20%	4.33
13	Dalian Yifang	15	67%	47%	47%	40%	27%	13%	0%	4.2
14	Shanghai Shenhua	15	67%	60%	40%	33%	20%	0%	0%	4
15	Qingdao Jonoon	15	67%	40%	27%	20%	13%	7%	0%	3.73
16	Shenzhen	15	53%	33%	27%	13%	13%	13%	13%	3.6
17	Changchun Yatai	15	67%	53%	40%	7%	7%	0%	0%	3.4

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Shandong Luneng	15	87%	73%	73%	67%	47%	47%	20%	6.4
3	Beijing Guoan	15	80%	67%	53%	53%	47%	33%	20%	5.87
4	Hangzhou	15	80%	60%	53%	40%	20%	20%	13%	5.07
5	Shanghai SIPG	15	80%	67%	47%	40%	33%	20%	13%	5
6	Meizhou Hakka	15	80%	60%	47%	33%	20%	20%	13%	4.67
7	Nantong Zhiyun	15	80%	67%	53%	47%	40%	0%	0%	4.53
8	Wuhan Three Towns	15	87%	53%	53%	40%	33%	7%	0%	4.53
9	Chengdu Better City FC	15	80%	73%	60%	40%	13%	7%	0%	4.53
10	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	15	93%	60%	40%	20%	13%	0%	0%	4.2
11	Tianjin Teda	15	73%	60%	47%	27%	13%	7%	0%	4.13
12	Dalian Yifang	15	80%	53%	33%	27%	7%	0%	0%	4
13	Qingdao Jonoon	15	80%	67%	33%	27%	0%	0%	0%	4
14	Henan Jianye	15	80%	67%	27%	7%	7%	7%	7%	3.93
15	Changchun Yatai	15	67%	53%	47%	20%	13%	7%	0%	3.67
16	Shanghai Shenhua	15	80%	47%	27%	13%	7%	0%	0%	3.53
17	Shenzhen	15	47%	27%	13%	7%	7%	0%	0%	2.53

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Shenzhen	30	90%	77%	67%	53%	33%	23%	13%	5.77
3	Dalian Yifang	30	83%	77%	60%	50%	37%	17%	10%	5.47
4	Nantong Zhiyun	30	83%	63%	57%	47%	37%	20%	13%	5.33
5	Qingdao Jonoon	30	93%	77%	57%	40%	23%	10%	10%	5.27
6	Tianjin Teda	30	87%	63%	53%	47%	30%	27%	13%	5.2
7	Meizhou Hakka	30	77%	67%	50%	47%	43%	20%	7%	5.13
8	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	30	83%	77%	63%	40%	23%	10%	7%	5.07
9	Henan Jianye	30	90%	63%	50%	30%	30%	17%	10%	5.07
10	Changchun Yatai	30	83%	63%	47%	43%	27%	20%	17%	5.03
11	Hangzhou	30	87%	73%	63%	47%	27%	10%	3%	5
12	Shanghai Shenhua	30	80%	67%	47%	40%	30%	27%	7%	4.83
13	Wuhan Three Towns	30	73%	63%	47%	27%	13%	10%	7%	4.23
14	Chengdu Better City FC	30	63%	50%	20%	17%	13%	7%	3%	3.8
15	Beijing Guoan	30	60%	43%	33%	27%	13%	3%	0%	3.67
16	Shanghai SIPG	30	63%	40%	30%	17%	10%	3%	3%	3.43
17	Shandong Luneng	30	57%	37%	20%	10%	3%	3%	3%	3.03

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Dalian Yifang	15	87%	80%	60%	47%	40%	20%	13%	5.73
3	Shenzhen	15	93%	73%	73%	67%	33%	20%	7%	5.6
4	Hangzhou	15	87%	80%	73%	47%	27%	13%	7%	5.27
5	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	15	80%	73%	53%	40%	20%	20%	13%	5.13
6	Shanghai Shenhua	15	73%	73%	47%	40%	27%	27%	0%	4.73
7	Qingdao Jonoon	15	93%	60%	40%	27%	27%	7%	7%	4.73
8	Wuhan Three Towns	15	87%	80%	53%	27%	20%	13%	7%	4.73
9	Meizhou Hakka	15	73%	67%	47%	47%	40%	20%	7%	4.67
10	Nantong Zhiyun	15	93%	60%	47%	33%	20%	13%	7%	4.67
11	Henan Jianye	15	87%	47%	40%	13%	13%	7%	7%	4.27
12	Tianjin Teda	15	80%	40%	33%	27%	13%	7%	7%	4.07
13	Changchun Yatai	15	73%	60%	33%	27%	13%	7%	7%	3.93
14	Beijing Guoan	15	67%	47%	40%	33%	13%	0%	0%	3.87
15	Shandong Luneng	15	67%	33%	33%	13%	0%	0%	0%	3.13
16	Chengdu Better City FC	15	60%	47%	7%	7%	7%	0%	0%	3.13
17	Shanghai SIPG	15	53%	33%	27%	13%	7%	0%	0%	2.93

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Tianjin Teda	15	93%	87%	73%	67%	47%	47%	20%	6.33
3	Changchun Yatai	15	93%	67%	60%	60%	40%	33%	27%	6.13
4	Nantong Zhiyun	15	73%	67%	67%	60%	53%	27%	20%	6
5	Shenzhen	15	87%	80%	60%	40%	33%	27%	20%	5.93
6	Henan Jianye	15	93%	80%	60%	47%	47%	27%	13%	5.87
7	Qingdao Jonoon	15	93%	93%	73%	53%	20%	13%	13%	5.8
8	Meizhou Hakka	15	80%	67%	53%	47%	47%	20%	7%	5.6
9	Dalian Yifang	15	80%	73%	60%	53%	33%	13%	7%	5.2
10	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	15	87%	80%	73%	40%	27%	0%	0%	5
11	Shanghai Shenhua	15	87%	60%	47%	40%	33%	27%	13%	4.93
12	Hangzhou	15	87%	67%	53%	47%	27%	7%	0%	4.73
13	Chengdu Better City FC	15	67%	53%	33%	27%	20%	13%	7%	4.47
14	Shanghai SIPG	15	73%	47%	33%	20%	13%	7%	7%	3.93
15	Wuhan Three Towns	15	60%	47%	40%	27%	7%	7%	7%	3.73
16	Beijing Guoan	15	53%	40%	27%	20%	13%	7%	0%	3.47
17	Shandong Luneng	15	47%	40%	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	2.93

Dalian Yifang corner statistics

The number of corner kicks a team takes and surrenders provides insight into a team’s attacking ambition during games. It can also display their defensive strategy and how much they are allowing their opponents to attack.

Here are the Dalian Yifang’s main corner kick numbers and averages in the Liga China:

Dalian Yifang games have an average of 9.57 corners (between corners won and awarded to the opponent).
43% of Dalian Yifang’s matches in this championship have had more than 9.5 corners.
Dalian Yifang has an average of 4.1 corners won per game this season.
On 33% of occasions, Dalian Yifang had 5 or more corners in their favour in their games.
Regarding corners given up, Dalian Yifang usually concedes an average of 5.47 corners per match.

You can also check out Dalian Yifang’s average number of corners during home and away games, along with the over/under rates for corners for and against, for additional information.

And at APWin, you can also check out corner statistics daily and find which matches around the world are most likely to see a lot of corners.