Season
Country
Venue
2023
China
Dalian Sports Center
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
30 | 77% | 77% | 60% | 47% | 40% | 37% | 23% | 10.93 |
| 2 |
Tianjin Teda
|
30 | 80% | 67% | 57% | 47% | 37% | 27% | 10% | 10.17 |
| 3 |
Meizhou Hakka
|
30 | 80% | 70% | 57% | 47% | 27% | 23% | 17% | 10.1 |
| 4 |
Hangzhou
|
30 | 77% | 67% | 53% | 40% | 30% | 23% | 20% | 10 |
| 5 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright
|
30 | 77% | 70% | 53% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 17% | 9.94 |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan
|
30 | 77% | 60% | 53% | 40% | 37% | 17% | 10% | 9.77 |
| 7 |
Dalian Yifang
|
30 | 77% | 60% | 43% | 37% | 30% | 20% | 13% | 9.57 |
| 8 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
30 | 67% | 53% | 47% | 40% | 23% | 20% | 10% | 9.3 |
| 9 |
Henan Jianye
|
30 | 67% | 57% | 40% | 33% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 9.2 |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon
|
30 | 77% | 57% | 40% | 27% | 13% | 10% | 10% | 9.14 |
| 11 |
Chengdu Better City FC
|
30 | 60% | 50% | 37% | 27% | 20% | 10% | 7% | 9.03 |
| 12 |
Shenzhen
|
30 | 73% | 50% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 10% | 7% | 8.84 |
| 13 |
Shandong Luneng
|
30 | 70% | 67% | 53% | 27% | 17% | 7% | 3% | 8.8 |
| 14 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
30 | 67% | 50% | 27% | 27% | 20% | 17% | 10% | 8.73 |
| 15 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
30 | 60% | 53% | 40% | 33% | 23% | 17% | 3% | 8.6 |
| 16 |
Changchun Yatai
|
30 | 57% | 47% | 33% | 30% | 20% | 17% | 10% | 8.56 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
15 | 80% | 80% | 60% | 47% | 47% | 40% | 20% | 11.34 |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright
|
15 | 73% | 67% | 67% | 47% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 10.66 |
| 3 |
Hangzhou
|
15 | 80% | 67% | 53% | 40% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 10.2 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan
|
15 | 80% | 67% | 60% | 47% | 47% | 20% | 13% | 10.2 |
| 5 |
Meizhou Hakka
|
15 | 80% | 67% | 53% | 53% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 9.94 |
| 6 |
Dalian Yifang
|
15 | 80% | 67% | 47% | 47% | 40% | 20% | 13% | 9.93 |
| 7 |
Tianjin Teda
|
15 | 67% | 60% | 60% | 47% | 33% | 27% | 7% | 9.87 |
| 8 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
15 | 73% | 53% | 47% | 40% | 20% | 13% | 13% | 9.66 |
| 9 |
Shenzhen
|
15 | 87% | 53% | 47% | 13% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 9.2 |
| 10 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
15 | 73% | 60% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 9.2 |
| 11 |
Chengdu Better City FC
|
15 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 27% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 9.06 |
| 12 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
15 | 67% | 67% | 47% | 33% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 8.73 |
| 13 |
Henan Jianye
|
15 | 53% | 53% | 40% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 13% | 8.6 |
| 14 |
Qingdao Jonoon
|
15 | 60% | 47% | 27% | 27% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 8.46 |
| 15 |
Shandong Luneng
|
15 | 67% | 60% | 40% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.26 |
| 16 |
Changchun Yatai
|
15 | 40% | 27% | 20% | 20% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 7.33 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
15 | 73% | 73% | 60% | 47% | 33% | 33% | 27% | 10.53 |
| 2 |
Tianjin Teda
|
15 | 93% | 73% | 53% | 47% | 40% | 27% | 13% | 10.46 |
| 3 |
Meizhou Hakka
|
15 | 80% | 73% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 10.27 |
| 4 |
Hangzhou
|
15 | 73% | 67% | 53% | 40% | 33% | 20% | 13% | 9.8 |
| 5 |
Henan Jianye
|
15 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 33% | 13% | 7% | 9.8 |
| 6 |
Qingdao Jonoon
|
15 | 93% | 67% | 53% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 9.8 |
| 7 |
Changchun Yatai
|
15 | 73% | 67% | 47% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 9.8 |
| 8 |
Beijing Guoan
|
15 | 73% | 53% | 47% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 9.34 |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng
|
15 | 73% | 73% | 67% | 40% | 33% | 13% | 7% | 9.33 |
| 10 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright
|
15 | 80% | 73% | 40% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 9.2 |
| 11 |
Dalian Yifang
|
15 | 73% | 53% | 40% | 27% | 20% | 20% | 13% | 9.2 |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC
|
15 | 40% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 13% | 9 |
| 13 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
15 | 60% | 53% | 47% | 40% | 27% | 27% | 7% | 8.93 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen
|
15 | 60% | 47% | 33% | 27% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 8.46 |
| 15 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
15 | 53% | 40% | 33% | 33% | 27% | 27% | 7% | 8.46 |
| 16 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
15 | 60% | 40% | 27% | 27% | 13% | 13% | 7% | 8.26 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Beijing Guoan
|
30 | 83% | 73% | 63% | 63% | 47% | 30% | 17% | 6.1 |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
30 | 87% | 80% | 63% | 53% | 47% | 23% | 13% | 5.87 |
| 4 |
Shandong Luneng
|
30 | 90% | 77% | 63% | 50% | 40% | 33% | 13% | 5.77 |
| 5 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
30 | 87% | 70% | 57% | 53% | 40% | 20% | 13% | 5.6 |
| 6 |
Chengdu Better City FC
|
30 | 87% | 83% | 70% | 53% | 27% | 13% | 3% | 5.23 |
| 7 |
Hangzhou
|
30 | 87% | 60% | 50% | 37% | 23% | 17% | 13% | 5 |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda
|
30 | 73% | 67% | 57% | 40% | 27% | 17% | 7% | 4.97 |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka
|
30 | 80% | 60% | 53% | 47% | 27% | 17% | 13% | 4.97 |
| 10 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright
|
30 | 87% | 70% | 47% | 30% | 20% | 13% | 13% | 4.87 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
30 | 87% | 67% | 43% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 0% | 4.5 |
| 12 |
Henan Jianye
|
30 | 70% | 53% | 30% | 17% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 4.13 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang
|
30 | 73% | 50% | 40% | 33% | 17% | 7% | 0% | 4.1 |
| 14 |
Qingdao Jonoon
|
30 | 73% | 53% | 30% | 23% | 7% | 3% | 0% | 3.87 |
| 15 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
30 | 73% | 53% | 33% | 23% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3.77 |
| 16 |
Changchun Yatai
|
30 | 67% | 53% | 43% | 13% | 10% | 3% | 0% | 3.53 |
| 17 |
Shenzhen
|
30 | 50% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 7% | 7% | 3.07 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
15 | 93% | 93% | 80% | 67% | 60% | 27% | 13% | 6.73 |
| 3 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
15 | 93% | 73% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 27% | 6.67 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan
|
15 | 87% | 80% | 73% | 73% | 47% | 27% | 13% | 6.33 |
| 5 |
Chengdu Better City FC
|
15 | 93% | 93% | 80% | 67% | 40% | 20% | 7% | 5.93 |
| 6 |
Tianjin Teda
|
15 | 73% | 73% | 67% | 53% | 40% | 27% | 13% | 5.8 |
| 7 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright
|
15 | 80% | 80% | 53% | 40% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 5.53 |
| 8 |
Meizhou Hakka
|
15 | 80% | 60% | 60% | 60% | 33% | 13% | 13% | 5.27 |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng
|
15 | 93% | 80% | 53% | 33% | 33% | 20% | 7% | 5.13 |
| 10 |
Hangzhou
|
15 | 93% | 60% | 47% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 13% | 4.93 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
15 | 87% | 80% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 0% | 4.47 |
| 12 |
Henan Jianye
|
15 | 60% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 4.33 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang
|
15 | 67% | 47% | 47% | 40% | 27% | 13% | 0% | 4.2 |
| 14 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
15 | 67% | 60% | 40% | 33% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 15 |
Qingdao Jonoon
|
15 | 67% | 40% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 3.73 |
| 16 |
Shenzhen
|
15 | 53% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 3.6 |
| 17 |
Changchun Yatai
|
15 | 67% | 53% | 40% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 3.4 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Shandong Luneng
|
15 | 87% | 73% | 73% | 67% | 47% | 47% | 20% | 6.4 |
| 3 |
Beijing Guoan
|
15 | 80% | 67% | 53% | 53% | 47% | 33% | 20% | 5.87 |
| 4 |
Hangzhou
|
15 | 80% | 60% | 53% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 13% | 5.07 |
| 5 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
15 | 80% | 67% | 47% | 40% | 33% | 20% | 13% | 5 |
| 6 |
Meizhou Hakka
|
15 | 80% | 60% | 47% | 33% | 20% | 20% | 13% | 4.67 |
| 7 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
15 | 80% | 67% | 53% | 47% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 4.53 |
| 8 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
15 | 87% | 53% | 53% | 40% | 33% | 7% | 0% | 4.53 |
| 9 |
Chengdu Better City FC
|
15 | 80% | 73% | 60% | 40% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 4.53 |
| 10 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright
|
15 | 93% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 4.2 |
| 11 |
Tianjin Teda
|
15 | 73% | 60% | 47% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 4.13 |
| 12 |
Dalian Yifang
|
15 | 80% | 53% | 33% | 27% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 13 |
Qingdao Jonoon
|
15 | 80% | 67% | 33% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 14 |
Henan Jianye
|
15 | 80% | 67% | 27% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 3.93 |
| 15 |
Changchun Yatai
|
15 | 67% | 53% | 47% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 16 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
15 | 80% | 47% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 3.53 |
| 17 |
Shenzhen
|
15 | 47% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 2.53 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Shenzhen
|
30 | 90% | 77% | 67% | 53% | 33% | 23% | 13% | 5.77 |
| 3 |
Dalian Yifang
|
30 | 83% | 77% | 60% | 50% | 37% | 17% | 10% | 5.47 |
| 4 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
30 | 83% | 63% | 57% | 47% | 37% | 20% | 13% | 5.33 |
| 5 |
Qingdao Jonoon
|
30 | 93% | 77% | 57% | 40% | 23% | 10% | 10% | 5.27 |
| 6 |
Tianjin Teda
|
30 | 87% | 63% | 53% | 47% | 30% | 27% | 13% | 5.2 |
| 7 |
Meizhou Hakka
|
30 | 77% | 67% | 50% | 47% | 43% | 20% | 7% | 5.13 |
| 8 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright
|
30 | 83% | 77% | 63% | 40% | 23% | 10% | 7% | 5.07 |
| 9 |
Henan Jianye
|
30 | 90% | 63% | 50% | 30% | 30% | 17% | 10% | 5.07 |
| 10 |
Changchun Yatai
|
30 | 83% | 63% | 47% | 43% | 27% | 20% | 17% | 5.03 |
| 11 |
Hangzhou
|
30 | 87% | 73% | 63% | 47% | 27% | 10% | 3% | 5 |
| 12 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
30 | 80% | 67% | 47% | 40% | 30% | 27% | 7% | 4.83 |
| 13 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
30 | 73% | 63% | 47% | 27% | 13% | 10% | 7% | 4.23 |
| 14 |
Chengdu Better City FC
|
30 | 63% | 50% | 20% | 17% | 13% | 7% | 3% | 3.8 |
| 15 |
Beijing Guoan
|
30 | 60% | 43% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 3% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 16 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
30 | 63% | 40% | 30% | 17% | 10% | 3% | 3% | 3.43 |
| 17 |
Shandong Luneng
|
30 | 57% | 37% | 20% | 10% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3.03 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Dalian Yifang
|
15 | 87% | 80% | 60% | 47% | 40% | 20% | 13% | 5.73 |
| 3 |
Shenzhen
|
15 | 93% | 73% | 73% | 67% | 33% | 20% | 7% | 5.6 |
| 4 |
Hangzhou
|
15 | 87% | 80% | 73% | 47% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 5.27 |
| 5 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright
|
15 | 80% | 73% | 53% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 13% | 5.13 |
| 6 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
15 | 73% | 73% | 47% | 40% | 27% | 27% | 0% | 4.73 |
| 7 |
Qingdao Jonoon
|
15 | 93% | 60% | 40% | 27% | 27% | 7% | 7% | 4.73 |
| 8 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
15 | 87% | 80% | 53% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 4.73 |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka
|
15 | 73% | 67% | 47% | 47% | 40% | 20% | 7% | 4.67 |
| 10 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
15 | 93% | 60% | 47% | 33% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 4.67 |
| 11 |
Henan Jianye
|
15 | 87% | 47% | 40% | 13% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 4.27 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda
|
15 | 80% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 4.07 |
| 13 |
Changchun Yatai
|
15 | 73% | 60% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 3.93 |
| 14 |
Beijing Guoan
|
15 | 67% | 47% | 40% | 33% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3.87 |
| 15 |
Shandong Luneng
|
15 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.13 |
| 16 |
Chengdu Better City FC
|
15 | 60% | 47% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 3.13 |
| 17 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
15 | 53% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 2.93 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Tianjin Teda
|
15 | 93% | 87% | 73% | 67% | 47% | 47% | 20% | 6.33 |
| 3 |
Changchun Yatai
|
15 | 93% | 67% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 6.13 |
| 4 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
15 | 73% | 67% | 67% | 60% | 53% | 27% | 20% | 6 |
| 5 |
Shenzhen
|
15 | 87% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 5.93 |
| 6 |
Henan Jianye
|
15 | 93% | 80% | 60% | 47% | 47% | 27% | 13% | 5.87 |
| 7 |
Qingdao Jonoon
|
15 | 93% | 93% | 73% | 53% | 20% | 13% | 13% | 5.8 |
| 8 |
Meizhou Hakka
|
15 | 80% | 67% | 53% | 47% | 47% | 20% | 7% | 5.6 |
| 9 |
Dalian Yifang
|
15 | 80% | 73% | 60% | 53% | 33% | 13% | 7% | 5.2 |
| 10 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright
|
15 | 87% | 80% | 73% | 40% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 5 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
15 | 87% | 60% | 47% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 4.93 |
| 12 |
Hangzhou
|
15 | 87% | 67% | 53% | 47% | 27% | 7% | 0% | 4.73 |
| 13 |
Chengdu Better City FC
|
15 | 67% | 53% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 4.47 |
| 14 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
15 | 73% | 47% | 33% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 3.93 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
15 | 60% | 47% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 3.73 |
| 16 |
Beijing Guoan
|
15 | 53% | 40% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 3.47 |
| 17 |
Shandong Luneng
|
15 | 47% | 40% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 2.93 |
On this page, you’ll find detailed corner statistics for Dalian Yifang across the 2023 season, with data designed to support corner betting analysis.
At the top of the table, you can switch competitions to compare corner averages from other tournaments and identify the best betting angles.
As shown at the top of the page, the corner averages for Dalian Yifang provide a clear snapshot of the team’s corner trends. Below, we break down the numbers in a practical and easy-to-use format for betting purposes.
Here are the key corner statistics and averages for Dalian Yifang, based on the most up-to-date data from the Chinese Super League:
Matches involving Dalian Yifang average 9.57 total corners per game, combining corners won, and corners conceded - an important metric for over and under corner bets.
43.33% of matches featuring Dalian Yifang in this competition finished with over 9.5 corners, highlighting strong potential for high-corner markets.
On average, Dalian Yifang records 4.1 corners per match in their favour, showing how frequently the team applies attacking pressure.
In 33.33% of games, Dalian Yifang registered 5 or more corners, a useful benchmark for team corner lines.
Defensively, Dalian Yifang concedes an average of 5.47 corners per match, which can be valuable when evaluating opponent corner totals.
This section also allows you to analyse corner averages for Dalian Yifang in home and away matches, along with over and under rates for corners for and against - key factors when refining corner betting strategies.
Beyond presenting all corner averages for Dalian Yifang, APWin also provides dedicated resources for users who focus on corner betting.
You’ll find a specialised section for under corner predictions and another entirely focused on over corner bets, helping you identify value based on statistical trends.
Below are the most common questions from users looking to understand corner betting data for this team.
According to the data, Dalian Yifang averages 4.1 corners in their favor per match.
In the Chinese Super League, matches involving Dalian Yifang average 9.57 total corners per game.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.