Season
Country
2020/21
Spain
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
CD Mensajero |
26 | 15 | 58% |
| 2 |
UD San Fernando |
24 | 14 | 58% |
| 3 |
UD Villa de Santa Brígida |
28 | 11 | 39% |
| 4 |
SD Tenisca |
26 | 16 | 62% |
| 5 |
UD Lanzarote |
24 | 11 | 46% |
| 6 |
Unión Viera |
24 | 14 | 58% |
| 7 |
Panadería Pulido |
24 | 12 | 50% |
| 8 |
Santa Úrsula |
26 | 11 | 42% |
| 9 |
Ibarra |
28 | 9 | 32% |
| 10 |
Güímar |
28 | 16 | 57% |
| 11 |
Atlético Tacoronte |
28 | 12 | 43% |
| 12 |
Buzanada |
26 | 13 | 50% |
| 13 |
La Cuadra |
28 | 17 | 61% |
| 14 |
Las Palmas III |
24 | 14 | 58% |
| 15 |
Tenerife II |
26 | 13 | 50% |
| 16 |
Atlético Paso |
26 | 13 | 50% |
| 17 |
Vera |
28 | 8 | 29% |
| 18 |
Gran Tarajal |
24 | 10 | 42% |
| 19 |
Atletico Victoria |
28 | 14 | 50% |
| 20 |
Arucas CF |
28 | 14 | 50% |
| 21 |
Guía |
28 | 17 | 61% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
CD Mensajero |
13 | 8 | 62% |
| 2 |
UD San Fernando |
12 | 7 | 58% |
| 3 |
UD Villa de Santa Brígida |
14 | 4 | 29% |
| 4 |
SD Tenisca |
13 | 9 | 69% |
| 5 |
UD Lanzarote |
12 | 5 | 42% |
| 6 |
Unión Viera |
12 | 7 | 58% |
| 7 |
Panadería Pulido |
12 | 6 | 50% |
| 8 |
Santa Úrsula |
13 | 4 | 31% |
| 9 |
Ibarra |
14 | 5 | 36% |
| 10 |
Güímar |
14 | 8 | 57% |
| 11 |
Atlético Tacoronte |
14 | 8 | 57% |
| 12 |
Buzanada |
13 | 9 | 69% |
| 13 |
La Cuadra |
14 | 9 | 64% |
| 14 |
Las Palmas III |
12 | 8 | 67% |
| 15 |
Tenerife II |
13 | 6 | 46% |
| 16 |
Atlético Paso |
13 | 7 | 54% |
| 17 |
Vera |
14 | 3 | 21% |
| 18 |
Gran Tarajal |
12 | 4 | 33% |
| 19 |
Atletico Victoria |
14 | 7 | 50% |
| 20 |
Arucas CF |
14 | 5 | 36% |
| 21 |
Guía |
14 | 8 | 57% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
CD Mensajero |
13 | 7 | 54% |
| 2 |
UD San Fernando |
12 | 7 | 58% |
| 3 |
UD Villa de Santa Brígida |
14 | 7 | 50% |
| 4 |
SD Tenisca |
13 | 7 | 54% |
| 5 |
UD Lanzarote |
12 | 6 | 50% |
| 6 |
Unión Viera |
12 | 7 | 58% |
| 7 |
Panadería Pulido |
12 | 6 | 50% |
| 8 |
Santa Úrsula |
13 | 7 | 54% |
| 9 |
Ibarra |
14 | 4 | 29% |
| 10 |
Güímar |
14 | 8 | 57% |
| 11 |
Atlético Tacoronte |
14 | 4 | 29% |
| 12 |
Buzanada |
13 | 4 | 31% |
| 13 |
La Cuadra |
14 | 8 | 57% |
| 14 |
Las Palmas III |
12 | 6 | 50% |
| 15 |
Tenerife II |
13 | 7 | 54% |
| 16 |
Atlético Paso |
13 | 6 | 46% |
| 17 |
Vera |
14 | 5 | 36% |
| 18 |
Gran Tarajal |
12 | 6 | 50% |
| 19 |
Atletico Victoria |
14 | 7 | 50% |
| 20 |
Arucas CF |
14 | 9 | 64% |
| 21 |
Guía |
14 | 9 | 64% |
The both teams scoring stat is the number of times a team has both scored and conceded a goal in a match. This stat is helpful in determining whether a match has the potential to be a high-scoring affair.
And in Atlético Tacoronte’s case, their BTTS statistics in the Tercera Group 12 2020/2021 provide some interesting insights about their offence and defence. Here are the relevant BTTS stats on Atlético Tacoronte in the competition:
You can also see Atlético Tacoronte’s BTTS stats filtered in terms of where they play, whether it’s at home or away, as well as overall, for a more comprehensive view of the stat all season long.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.