 
                    Season
Country
2021/22
Spain
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |   Real Jaén CF | 32 | 47% | 47% | 38% | 
| 2 |   CD El Palo | 32 | 53% | 47% | 34% | 
| 3 |   Marbella FC | 32 | 50% | 50% | 44% | 
| 4 |   Almería II | 32 | 47% | 34% | 28% | 
| 5 |   Malaga II | 32 | 50% | 47% | 44% | 
| 6 |   Alhaurín | 32 | 56% | 53% | 47% | 
| 7 |   Huétor Tájar | 32 | 56% | 56% | 44% | 
| 8 |   Juventud Torremolinos | 32 | 50% | 50% | 47% | 
| 9 |   Alhaurino | 32 | 47% | 47% | 34% | 
| 10 |   UD San Pedro | 32 | 38% | 28% | 16% | 
| 11 |   Motril | 32 | 47% | 47% | 41% | 
| 12 |   Torreperogil | 32 | 34% | 28% | 22% | 
| 13 |   Ciudad de Torredonjimeno | 32 | 50% | 47% | 31% | 
| 14 |   Huétor Vega | 32 | 50% | 38% | 31% | 
| 15 |   Atlético Porcuna | 32 | 34% | 28% | 25% | 
| 16 |   Intergym | 32 | 16% | 16% | 16% | 
| 17 |   Torre del Mar | 32 | 44% | 44% | 41% | 
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |   Real Jaén CF | 32 | 41% | 25% | 16% | 
| 2 |   CD El Palo | 32 | 50% | 38% | 25% | 
| 3 |   Marbella FC | 32 | 47% | 38% | 31% | 
| 4 |   Almería II | 32 | 31% | 19% | 13% | 
| 5 |   Malaga II | 32 | 53% | 41% | 25% | 
| 6 |   Alhaurín | 32 | 53% | 47% | 38% | 
| 7 |   Huétor Tájar | 32 | 50% | 38% | 16% | 
| 8 |   Juventud Torremolinos | 32 | 53% | 47% | 38% | 
| 9 |   Alhaurino | 32 | 47% | 38% | 22% | 
| 10 |   UD San Pedro | 32 | 38% | 22% | 19% | 
| 11 |   Motril | 32 | 41% | 38% | 22% | 
| 12 |   Torreperogil | 32 | 31% | 22% | 13% | 
| 13 |   Ciudad de Torredonjimeno | 32 | 53% | 44% | 31% | 
| 14 |   Huétor Vega | 32 | 44% | 19% | 9% | 
| 15 |   Atlético Porcuna | 32 | 34% | 25% | 13% | 
| 16 |   Intergym | 32 | 19% | 16% | 16% | 
| 17 |   Torre del Mar | 32 | 44% | 34% | 25% | 
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |   Real Jaén CF | 32 | 44% | 25% | 22% | 
| 2 |   CD El Palo | 32 | 41% | 25% | 16% | 
| 3 |   Marbella FC | 32 | 53% | 44% | 31% | 
| 4 |   Almería II | 32 | 50% | 38% | 28% | 
| 5 |   Malaga II | 32 | 50% | 41% | 28% | 
| 6 |   Alhaurín | 32 | 50% | 34% | 25% | 
| 7 |   Huétor Tájar | 32 | 63% | 50% | 38% | 
| 8 |   Juventud Torremolinos | 32 | 50% | 38% | 25% | 
| 9 |   Alhaurino | 32 | 44% | 41% | 19% | 
| 10 |   UD San Pedro | 32 | 25% | 13% | 9% | 
| 11 |   Motril | 32 | 47% | 41% | 34% | 
| 12 |   Torreperogil | 32 | 28% | 22% | 19% | 
| 13 |   Ciudad de Torredonjimeno | 32 | 38% | 25% | 19% | 
| 14 |   Huétor Vega | 32 | 50% | 41% | 19% | 
| 15 |   Atlético Porcuna | 32 | 44% | 28% | 13% | 
| 16 |   Intergym | 32 | 9% | 6% | 6% | 
| 17 |   Torre del Mar | 32 | 44% | 38% | 19% | 
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Intergym’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 16% of their games played so far in the Tercera Group 9 2021/2022.
And on the other side of the ball, Intergym’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 9% of their Tercera Group 9 matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Intergym this season in the Tercera Group 9:
You can follow the Intergym’s card situation in Tercera Group 9 all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.