Football statistics for Ramón y Cajal
Team Info
Season
Country
2019/20
Spain
Competition
Both Teams to Score
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Pontellas |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 2 |
Urraca |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 3 |
Barquereño |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 4 |
Tolosa |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 5 |
El Álamo |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 6 |
Andratx |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 7 |
Peña Azagresa |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 8 |
Comillas |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 9 |
Fraga |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 10 |
Intercity |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 11 |
El Palmar |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 12 |
Melilla CD |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 13 |
Pedroñeras |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 14 |
Gran Tarajal |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 15 |
Atlético Porcuna |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 16 |
Antoniano |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 17 |
Becerril Campos |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 18 |
FC Andorra |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 19 |
Lobón |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 20 |
Ramón y Cajal |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 21 |
Villarreal |
5 | 2 | 40% |
| 22 |
Sevilla |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 23 |
Las Palmas |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 24 |
Deportivo Alavés |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 25 |
Leganés |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 26 |
SD Eibar |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 27 |
Espanyol |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 28 |
Celta de Vigo |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 29 |
Granada CF |
7 | 5 | 71% |
| 30 |
Málaga CF |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 31 |
Betis |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 32 |
Athletic Bilbao |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 33 |
Deportivo La Coruña |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 34 |
Osasuna |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 35 |
Sporting Gijón |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 36 |
Real Sociedad |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 37 |
Rayo Vallecano |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 38 |
Levante UD |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 39 |
Getafe |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 40 |
Córdoba |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 41 |
Elche |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 42 |
Almería |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 43 |
Real Valladolid |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 44 |
Mallorca |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 45 |
Real Zaragoza |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 46 |
Mirandés |
7 | 6 | 86% |
| 47 |
SD Huesca |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 48 |
AD Alcorcón |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 49 |
Gimnàstic de Tarragona |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 50 |
CD Lugo |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Pontellas |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 2 |
Urraca |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 3 |
Barquereño |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 4 |
Tolosa |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 5 |
El Álamo |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 6 |
Andratx |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 7 |
Peña Azagresa |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 8 |
Comillas |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 9 |
Fraga |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 10 |
Intercity |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 11 |
El Palmar |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 12 |
Melilla CD |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 13 |
Pedroñeras |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 14 |
Gran Tarajal |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 15 |
Atlético Porcuna |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 16 |
Antoniano |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 17 |
Becerril Campos |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 18 |
FC Andorra |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 19 |
Lobón |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 20 |
Ramón y Cajal |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 21 |
Villarreal |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 22 |
Sevilla |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 23 |
Las Palmas |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 24 |
Deportivo Alavés |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 25 |
Leganés |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 26 |
SD Eibar |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 27 |
Espanyol |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 28 |
Celta de Vigo |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 29 |
Granada CF |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 30 |
Málaga CF |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 31 |
Betis |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 32 |
Athletic Bilbao |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 33 |
Deportivo La Coruña |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 34 |
Osasuna |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 35 |
Sporting Gijón |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 36 |
Real Sociedad |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 37 |
Rayo Vallecano |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 38 |
Levante UD |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 39 |
Getafe |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 40 |
Córdoba |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 41 |
Elche |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 42 |
Almería |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 43 |
Real Valladolid |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 44 |
Mallorca |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 45 |
Real Zaragoza |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 46 |
Mirandés |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 47 |
SD Huesca |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 48 |
AD Alcorcón |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 49 |
Gimnàstic de Tarragona |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 50 |
CD Lugo |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Pontellas |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 2 |
Urraca |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 3 |
Barquereño |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 4 |
Tolosa |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 5 |
El Álamo |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 6 |
Andratx |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 7 |
Peña Azagresa |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 8 |
Comillas |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 9 |
Fraga |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 10 |
Intercity |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 11 |
El Palmar |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 12 |
Melilla CD |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 13 |
Pedroñeras |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 14 |
Gran Tarajal |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 15 |
Atlético Porcuna |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 16 |
Antoniano |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 17 |
Becerril Campos |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 18 |
FC Andorra |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 19 |
Lobón |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 20 |
Ramón y Cajal |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 21 |
Villarreal |
5 | 2 | 40% |
| 22 |
Sevilla |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 23 |
Las Palmas |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 24 |
Deportivo Alavés |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 25 |
Leganés |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 26 |
SD Eibar |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 27 |
Espanyol |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 28 |
Celta de Vigo |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 29 |
Granada CF |
5 | 3 | 60% |
| 30 |
Málaga CF |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 31 |
Betis |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 32 |
Athletic Bilbao |
5 | 3 | 60% |
| 33 |
Deportivo La Coruña |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 34 |
Osasuna |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 35 |
Sporting Gijón |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 36 |
Real Sociedad |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 37 |
Rayo Vallecano |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 38 |
Levante UD |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 39 |
Getafe |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 40 |
Córdoba |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 41 |
Elche |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 42 |
Almería |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 43 |
Real Valladolid |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 44 |
Mallorca |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 45 |
Real Zaragoza |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 46 |
Mirandés |
3 | 3 | 100% |
| 47 |
SD Huesca |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 48 |
AD Alcorcón |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 49 |
Gimnàstic de Tarragona |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 50 |
CD Lugo |
1 | 1 | 100% |
Ramón y Cajal BTTS matches in the season
The both teams scoring stat is the number of times a team has both scored and conceded a goal in a match. This stat is helpful in determining whether a match has the potential to be a high-scoring affair.
And in Ramón y Cajal’s case, their BTTS statistics in the Copa del Rey 2019/2020 provide some interesting insights about their offence and defence. Here are the relevant BTTS stats on Ramón y Cajal in the competition:
- In 1 matches to date, Ramón y Cajal has scored and conceded in the same game 1 times
- In terms of percentage, Ramón y Cajal has had both teams score in 100% of their matches in Copa del Rey.
You can also see Ramón y Cajal’s BTTS stats filtered in terms of where they play, whether it’s at home or away, as well as overall, for a more comprehensive view of the stat all season long.