Season
Country
Stadium
2025/26
Asia
King Abdullah Sports City
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Johor Darul Ta'zim |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 |
![]() Melbourne City FC |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 |
![]() Machida Zelvia |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 |
![]() Sanfrecce Hiroshima |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 |
![]() Vissel Kobe |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 |
![]() Bangkok United |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 |
![]() Buriram United |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 |
![]() Gangwon |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 |
![]() FC Seoul |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Ulsan |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 |
![]() Al Duhail |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 |
![]() Al Gharafa |
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
15 |
![]() Al Sadd |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
16 |
![]() Shabab Al Ahli Dubai |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 |
![]() Al Wahda |
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
18 |
![]() Al Sharjah |
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
19 |
![]() Al Ahli |
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
20 |
![]() Al Hilal |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
21 |
![]() Al Ittihad |
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
22 |
![]() Tractor Sazi |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
23 |
![]() Nasaf |
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
24 |
![]() Sepahan |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
25 |
![]() Al Shorta |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
26 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Johor Darul Ta'zim |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 |
![]() Melbourne City FC |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 |
![]() Machida Zelvia |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 |
![]() Sanfrecce Hiroshima |
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
7 |
![]() Vissel Kobe |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 |
![]() Bangkok United |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 |
![]() Buriram United |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 |
![]() Gangwon |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 |
![]() FC Seoul |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Ulsan |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 |
![]() Al Duhail |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
14 |
![]() Al Gharafa |
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
15 |
![]() Al Sadd |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 |
![]() Shabab Al Ahli Dubai |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 |
![]() Al Wahda |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
18 |
![]() Al Sharjah |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
19 |
![]() Al Ahli |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
20 |
![]() Al Hilal |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
21 |
![]() Al Ittihad |
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
22 |
![]() Tractor Sazi |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
23 |
![]() Nasaf |
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
24 |
![]() Sepahan |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
25 |
![]() Al Shorta |
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
26 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Johor Darul Ta'zim |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 |
![]() Melbourne City FC |
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
3 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 |
![]() Machida Zelvia |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 |
![]() Sanfrecce Hiroshima |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 |
![]() Vissel Kobe |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 |
![]() Bangkok United |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
9 |
![]() Buriram United |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 |
![]() Gangwon |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 |
![]() FC Seoul |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Ulsan |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 |
![]() Al Duhail |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 |
![]() Al Gharafa |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
15 |
![]() Al Sadd |
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
16 |
![]() Shabab Al Ahli Dubai |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 |
![]() Al Wahda |
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
18 |
![]() Al Sharjah |
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
19 |
![]() Al Ahli |
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
20 |
![]() Al Hilal |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
21 |
![]() Al Ittihad |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
22 |
![]() Tractor Sazi |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
23 |
![]() Nasaf |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
24 |
![]() Sepahan |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
25 |
![]() Al Shorta |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
26 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Nadi Al-Sha'ab’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 100% of their games played so far in the AFC Champions League 2025/2026.
And on the other side of the ball, Al Ittihad’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 100% of their AFC Champions League matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Al Ittihad this season in the AFC Champions League:
You can follow the Nadi Al-Sha'ab’s card situation in ACL all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.