23.12.2022 - 07:00
Finished
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 17 | 52% | 53% | 50% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 16 | 48% | 29% | 69% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 14 | 42% | 31% | 53% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 18 | 55% | 71% | 38% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 13 | 39% | 38% | 41% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 23 | 70% | 65% | 75% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 26 | 79% | 75% | 82% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 17 | 52% | 35% | 69% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 22 | 67% | 69% | 65% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 19 | 58% | 63% | 53% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 12 | 36% | 31% | 41% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 16 | 48% | 53% | 44% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 21 | 64% | 59% | 69% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 20 | 61% | 59% | 63% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 25 | 76% | 82% | 69% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 17 | 52% | 63% | 41% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 24 | 73% | 81% | 65% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 14 | 42% | 56% | 29% |
# | Team | MP | Over 0.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 28 | 85% | 82% | 88% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 30 | 91% | 82% | 100% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 31 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 31 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 31 | 94% | 94% | 94% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 31 | 94% | 88% | 100% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 33 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 28 | 85% | 82% | 88% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 33 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 31 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 30 | 91% | 94% | 88% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 31 | 94% | 94% | 94% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 32 | 97% | 100% | 94% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 32 | 97% | 94% | 100% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 32 | 97% | 94% | 100% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 29 | 88% | 94% | 82% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 33 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 28 | 85% | 81% | 88% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 21 | 64% | 59% | 69% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 28 | 85% | 76% | 94% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 23 | 70% | 69% | 71% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 25 | 76% | 76% | 75% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 29 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 27 | 82% | 76% | 88% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 28 | 85% | 88% | 82% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 23 | 70% | 59% | 81% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 30 | 91% | 94% | 88% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 26 | 79% | 81% | 76% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 25 | 76% | 75% | 76% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 23 | 70% | 65% | 75% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 32 | 97% | 100% | 94% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 29 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 28 | 85% | 88% | 81% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 20 | 61% | 69% | 53% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 29 | 88% | 94% | 82% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 22 | 67% | 75% | 59% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 9 | 27% | 41% | 13% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 8 | 24% | 6% | 44% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 4 | 12% | 13% | 12% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 8 | 24% | 24% | 25% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 6 | 18% | 6% | 29% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 14 | 42% | 41% | 44% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 19 | 58% | 69% | 47% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 13 | 39% | 24% | 56% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 13 | 39% | 44% | 35% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 7 | 21% | 25% | 18% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 4 | 12% | 0% | 24% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 7 | 21% | 18% | 25% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 9 | 27% | 24% | 31% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 9 | 27% | 18% | 38% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 11 | 33% | 29% | 38% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 8 | 24% | 31% | 18% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 15 | 45% | 69% | 24% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 6 | 18% | 38% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 7 | 21% | 29% | 13% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 7 | 21% | 0% | 44% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 2 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 3 | 9% | 12% | 6% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 4 | 12% | 6% | 18% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 6 | 18% | 18% | 19% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 12 | 36% | 38% | 35% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 8 | 24% | 24% | 25% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 8 | 24% | 25% | 24% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 5 | 15% | 19% | 12% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 2 | 6% | 0% | 12% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 5 | 15% | 6% | 25% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 3 | 9% | 6% | 13% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 6 | 18% | 6% | 31% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 5 | 15% | 12% | 19% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 5 | 15% | 25% | 6% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 9 | 27% | 56% | 0% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 3 | 9% | 19% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 4 | 12% | 18% | 6% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 3 | 9% | 0% | 19% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 1 | 3% | 6% | 0% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 1 | 3% | 6% | 0% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 4 | 12% | 6% | 18% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 2 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 6 | 18% | 25% | 12% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 2 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 4 | 12% | 6% | 18% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 1 | 3% | 6% | 0% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 6% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 6% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 2 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 3 | 9% | 0% | 19% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 3 | 9% | 13% | 6% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 5 | 15% | 31% | 0% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 1 | 3% | 6% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 16 | 48% | 47% | 50% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 17 | 52% | 71% | 31% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 19 | 58% | 69% | 47% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 15 | 45% | 29% | 63% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 20 | 61% | 63% | 59% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 10 | 30% | 35% | 25% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 7 | 21% | 25% | 18% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 16 | 48% | 65% | 31% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 11 | 33% | 31% | 35% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 14 | 42% | 38% | 47% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 21 | 64% | 69% | 59% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 17 | 52% | 47% | 56% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 12 | 36% | 41% | 31% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 13 | 39% | 41% | 38% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 8 | 24% | 18% | 31% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 16 | 48% | 38% | 59% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 9 | 27% | 19% | 35% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 19 | 58% | 44% | 71% |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 5 | 15% | 18% | 13% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 3 | 9% | 18% | 0% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 2 | 6% | 0% | 12% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 2 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 2 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 2 | 6% | 12% | 0% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 5 | 15% | 18% | 13% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 2 | 6% | 0% | 12% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 3 | 9% | 6% | 12% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 2 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 6% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 1 | 3% | 6% | 0% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 1 | 3% | 6% | 0% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 4 | 12% | 6% | 18% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 5 | 15% | 19% | 12% |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 12 | 36% | 41% | 31% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 5 | 15% | 24% | 6% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 10 | 30% | 31% | 29% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 8 | 24% | 24% | 25% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 4 | 12% | 13% | 12% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 6 | 18% | 24% | 13% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 5 | 15% | 13% | 18% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 10 | 30% | 41% | 19% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 3 | 9% | 6% | 12% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 7 | 21% | 19% | 24% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 8 | 24% | 25% | 24% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 10 | 30% | 35% | 25% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 6% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 4 | 12% | 12% | 13% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 5 | 15% | 12% | 19% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 13 | 39% | 31% | 47% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 4 | 12% | 6% | 18% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 11 | 33% | 25% | 41% |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 24 | 73% | 59% | 88% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 25 | 76% | 94% | 56% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 29 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 25 | 76% | 76% | 75% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 27 | 82% | 94% | 71% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 19 | 58% | 59% | 56% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 14 | 42% | 31% | 53% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 20 | 61% | 76% | 44% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 20 | 61% | 56% | 65% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 26 | 79% | 75% | 82% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 29 | 88% | 100% | 76% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 26 | 79% | 82% | 75% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 24 | 73% | 76% | 69% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 24 | 73% | 82% | 63% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 22 | 67% | 71% | 63% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 25 | 76% | 69% | 82% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 18 | 55% | 31% | 76% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 27 | 82% | 63% | 100% |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 26 | 79% | 71% | 88% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 26 | 79% | 100% | 56% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 31 | 94% | 94% | 94% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 30 | 91% | 88% | 94% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 29 | 88% | 94% | 82% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 27 | 82% | 82% | 81% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 21 | 64% | 63% | 65% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 25 | 76% | 76% | 75% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 25 | 76% | 75% | 76% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 28 | 85% | 81% | 88% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 31 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 28 | 85% | 94% | 75% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 30 | 91% | 94% | 88% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 27 | 82% | 94% | 69% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 28 | 85% | 88% | 81% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 28 | 85% | 75% | 94% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 24 | 73% | 44% | 100% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 30 | 91% | 81% | 100% |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 29 | 88% | 82% | 94% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 30 | 91% | 100% | 81% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 32 | 97% | 94% | 100% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 32 | 97% | 94% | 100% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 29 | 88% | 94% | 82% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 31 | 94% | 94% | 94% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 27 | 82% | 75% | 88% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 31 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 29 | 88% | 94% | 82% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 32 | 97% | 94% | 100% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 32 | 97% | 100% | 94% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 32 | 97% | 100% | 94% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 31 | 94% | 94% | 94% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 30 | 91% | 100% | 81% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 33 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 30 | 91% | 88% | 94% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 28 | 85% | 69% | 100% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 32 | 97% | 94% | 100% |
You can check out how often Wuhan Zall and Dalian Yifang matches in the Chinese Super League go over or under a certain number of goals on this page. This is a handy tool to help predict how many goals they could potentially score when they meet in their upcoming match.
Here is an example of what we mean:
85% of Wuhan Zall’s matches in the Chinese Super League have had more than 1.5 goals scored. And when we raise the line of total goals to 2.5, then the rate of matches that go over that number is 76%.
You can also check how many times the total has gone under. In Dalian Yifang’s case, 3% of their matches have seen under 1.5 goals scored. And in terms of matches with under 2.5 goals, the rate is 36%.
You can also see whether Wuhan Zall and Dalian Yifang matches go over or under a total number of goals when playing at home, away, or overall in Chinese Super League.
The over/under goal analysis for Wuhan Zall vs Dalian Yifang offers valuable insights into each club's playing styles as well as a reasonable estimation of goals we could see in the match.
However, predicting the number of goals in a match does not always go the way the math says it will. It’s important to always consider other factors as well in order to get the best chance of making an accurate prediction.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.