# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Overall |
---|
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Overall |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Mineros de Zacatecas |
42 | 17 | 40% |
2 |
![]() Juárez |
40 | 14 | 35% |
3 |
![]() Dorados |
46 | 13 | 28% |
4 |
![]() Atlante |
40 | 13 | 33% |
5 |
![]() Celaya |
38 | 12 | 32% |
6 |
![]() Zacatepec Siglo XXI |
38 | 12 | 32% |
7 |
![]() Murciélagos |
34 | 11 | 32% |
8 |
![]() Potros UAEM |
38 | 11 | 29% |
9 |
![]() Cimarrones de Sonora |
38 | 11 | 29% |
10 |
![]() Tampico Madero |
34 | 11 | 32% |
11 |
![]() Alebrijes de Oaxaca |
38 | 11 | 29% |
12 |
![]() Lobos BUAP |
42 | 9 | 21% |
13 |
![]() Correcaminos UAT |
34 | 9 | 26% |
14 |
![]() Leones Negros de la Universidad de Guadalajara |
34 | 7 | 21% |
15 |
![]() Atlético Zacatepec |
34 | 7 | 21% |
16 |
![]() Venados |
34 | 7 | 21% |
17 |
![]() Cafetaleros de Tapachula |
34 | 7 | 21% |
18 |
![]() Loros UdeC |
34 | 4 | 12% |
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Home |
---|
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Home |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Mineros de Zacatecas |
21 | 12 | 57% |
2 |
![]() Dorados |
23 | 10 | 43% |
3 |
![]() Potros UAEM |
19 | 8 | 42% |
4 |
![]() Alebrijes de Oaxaca |
19 | 8 | 42% |
5 |
![]() Celaya |
19 | 8 | 42% |
6 |
![]() Atlante |
20 | 7 | 35% |
7 |
![]() Cimarrones de Sonora |
19 | 7 | 37% |
8 |
![]() Juárez |
20 | 7 | 35% |
9 |
![]() Tampico Madero |
17 | 7 | 41% |
10 |
![]() Lobos BUAP |
21 | 6 | 29% |
11 |
![]() Murciélagos |
17 | 6 | 35% |
12 |
![]() Venados |
17 | 6 | 35% |
13 |
![]() Correcaminos UAT |
17 | 6 | 35% |
14 |
![]() Cafetaleros de Tapachula |
17 | 6 | 35% |
15 |
![]() Zacatepec Siglo XXI |
19 | 6 | 32% |
16 |
![]() Leones Negros de la Universidad de Guadalajara |
17 | 4 | 24% |
17 |
![]() Loros UdeC |
17 | 4 | 24% |
18 |
![]() Atlético Zacatepec |
17 | 3 | 18% |
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Away |
---|
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Juárez |
20 | 7 | 35% |
2 |
![]() Atlante |
20 | 6 | 30% |
3 |
![]() Zacatepec Siglo XXI |
19 | 6 | 32% |
4 |
![]() Murciélagos |
17 | 5 | 29% |
5 |
![]() Mineros de Zacatecas |
21 | 5 | 24% |
6 |
![]() Atlético Zacatepec |
17 | 4 | 24% |
7 |
![]() Cimarrones de Sonora |
19 | 4 | 21% |
8 |
![]() Tampico Madero |
17 | 4 | 24% |
9 |
![]() Celaya |
19 | 4 | 21% |
10 |
![]() Lobos BUAP |
21 | 3 | 14% |
11 |
![]() Dorados |
23 | 3 | 13% |
12 |
![]() Leones Negros de la Universidad de Guadalajara |
17 | 3 | 18% |
13 |
![]() Potros UAEM |
19 | 3 | 16% |
14 |
![]() Correcaminos UAT |
17 | 3 | 18% |
15 |
![]() Alebrijes de Oaxaca |
19 | 3 | 16% |
16 |
![]() Venados |
17 | 1 | 6% |
17 |
![]() Cafetaleros de Tapachula |
17 | 1 | 6% |
18 |
![]() Loros UdeC |
17 | 0 | 0% |
The number of clean sheets, or matches a team has without conceding a single goal, in a competition is a strong indicator of how well their defence is playing. The more times a team can completely keep their opponents from scoring, the more likely it is the team’s actual ability rather than just random chance.
We keep track of all the clean sheet information here, and these are the stats for Venados vs Juárez:
If both clubs have a high rate of keeping clean sheets, then there’s a decent chance of seeing a low-scoring battle between two strong defensive clubs. But for matches between clubs with low rates of clean sheets, then it’s fair to expect a goal or two.
Search
Most Popular search
No results found
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.