Tianjin Teda 1 - 1 Wuhan Three Towns
04.06.2023 - 11:35
Stadium : Tianjin Olympic Center Stadium (Tianjin)
Finished
Corners
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Nantong Zhiyun | 30 | 77% | 77% | 60% | 47% | 40% | 37% | 23% | 10.93 |
| 2 | Tianjin Teda | 30 | 80% | 67% | 57% | 47% | 37% | 27% | 10% | 10.17 |
| 3 |  Meizhou Hakka | 30 | 80% | 70% | 57% | 47% | 27% | 23% | 17% | 10.1 |
| 4 |  Hangzhou | 30 | 77% | 67% | 53% | 40% | 30% | 23% | 20% | 10 |
| 5 |  Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 30 | 77% | 70% | 53% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 17% | 9.94 |
| 6 |  Beijing Guoan | 30 | 77% | 60% | 53% | 40% | 37% | 17% | 10% | 9.77 |
| 7 |  Dalian Yifang | 30 | 77% | 60% | 43% | 37% | 30% | 20% | 13% | 9.57 |
| 8 |  Shanghai SIPG | 30 | 67% | 53% | 47% | 40% | 23% | 20% | 10% | 9.3 |
| 9 |  Henan Jianye | 30 | 67% | 57% | 40% | 33% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 9.2 |
| 10 |  Qingdao Jonoon | 30 | 77% | 57% | 40% | 27% | 13% | 10% | 10% | 9.14 |
| 11 |  Chengdu Better City FC | 30 | 60% | 50% | 37% | 27% | 20% | 10% | 7% | 9.03 |
| 12 |  Shenzhen | 30 | 73% | 50% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 10% | 7% | 8.84 |
| 13 |  Shandong Luneng | 30 | 70% | 67% | 53% | 27% | 17% | 7% | 3% | 8.8 |
| 14 | Wuhan Three Towns | 30 | 67% | 50% | 27% | 27% | 20% | 17% | 10% | 8.73 |
| 15 |  Shanghai Shenhua | 30 | 60% | 53% | 40% | 33% | 23% | 17% | 3% | 8.6 |
| 16 |  Changchun Yatai | 30 | 57% | 47% | 33% | 30% | 20% | 17% | 10% | 8.56 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nantong Zhiyun | 15 | 80% | 80% | 60% | 47% | 47% | 40% | 20% | 11.34 |
| 2 | Tianjin Teda | 15 | 67% | 60% | 60% | 47% | 33% | 27% | 7% | 9.87 |
| 3 | Meizhou Hakka | 15 | 80% | 67% | 53% | 53% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 9.94 |
| 4 | Hangzhou | 15 | 80% | 67% | 53% | 40% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 10.2 |
| 5 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 15 | 73% | 67% | 67% | 47% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 10.66 |
| 6 | Beijing Guoan | 15 | 80% | 67% | 60% | 47% | 47% | 20% | 13% | 10.2 |
| 7 | Dalian Yifang | 15 | 80% | 67% | 47% | 47% | 40% | 20% | 13% | 9.93 |
| 8 | Shanghai SIPG | 15 | 73% | 53% | 47% | 40% | 20% | 13% | 13% | 9.66 |
| 9 | Henan Jianye | 15 | 53% | 53% | 40% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 13% | 8.6 |
| 10 | Qingdao Jonoon | 15 | 60% | 47% | 27% | 27% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 8.46 |
| 11 | Chengdu Better City FC | 15 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 27% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 9.06 |
| 12 | Shenzhen | 15 | 87% | 53% | 47% | 13% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 9.2 |
| 13 | Shandong Luneng | 15 | 67% | 60% | 40% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.26 |
| 14 | Wuhan Three Towns | 15 | 73% | 60% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 9.2 |
| 15 | Shanghai Shenhua | 15 | 67% | 67% | 47% | 33% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 8.73 |
| 16 | Changchun Yatai | 15 | 40% | 27% | 20% | 20% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 7.33 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nantong Zhiyun | 15 | 73% | 73% | 60% | 47% | 33% | 33% | 27% | 10.53 |
| 2 | Tianjin Teda | 15 | 93% | 73% | 53% | 47% | 40% | 27% | 13% | 10.46 |
| 3 | Meizhou Hakka | 15 | 80% | 73% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 10.27 |
| 4 | Hangzhou | 15 | 73% | 67% | 53% | 40% | 33% | 20% | 13% | 9.8 |
| 5 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 15 | 80% | 73% | 40% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 9.2 |
| 6 | Beijing Guoan | 15 | 73% | 53% | 47% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 9.34 |
| 7 | Dalian Yifang | 15 | 73% | 53% | 40% | 27% | 20% | 20% | 13% | 9.2 |
| 8 | Shanghai SIPG | 15 | 60% | 53% | 47% | 40% | 27% | 27% | 7% | 8.93 |
| 9 | Henan Jianye | 15 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 33% | 13% | 7% | 9.8 |
| 10 | Qingdao Jonoon | 15 | 93% | 67% | 53% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 9.8 |
| 11 | Chengdu Better City FC | 15 | 40% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 13% | 9 |
| 12 | Shenzhen | 15 | 60% | 47% | 33% | 27% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 8.46 |
| 13 | Shandong Luneng | 15 | 73% | 73% | 67% | 40% | 33% | 13% | 7% | 9.33 |
| 14 | Wuhan Three Towns | 15 | 60% | 40% | 27% | 27% | 13% | 13% | 7% | 8.26 |
| 15 | Shanghai Shenhua | 15 | 53% | 40% | 33% | 33% | 27% | 27% | 7% | 8.46 |
| 16 | Changchun Yatai | 15 | 73% | 67% | 47% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 9.8 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 30 | 87% | 70% | 47% | 30% | 20% | 13% | 13% | 4.87 |
| 2 | Shanghai SIPG | 30 | 87% | 80% | 63% | 53% | 47% | 23% | 13% | 5.87 |
| 3 | Henan Jianye | 30 | 70% | 53% | 30% | 17% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 4.13 |
| 4 | Hangzhou | 30 | 87% | 60% | 50% | 37% | 23% | 17% | 13% | 5 |
| 5 | Beijing Guoan | 30 | 83% | 73% | 63% | 63% | 47% | 30% | 17% | 6.1 |
| 6 | Changchun Yatai | 30 | 67% | 53% | 43% | 13% | 10% | 3% | 0% | 3.53 |
| 7 | Shandong Luneng | 30 | 90% | 77% | 63% | 50% | 40% | 33% | 13% | 5.77 |
| 8 | Shanghai Shenhua | 30 | 73% | 53% | 33% | 23% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3.77 |
| 9 | Tianjin Teda | 30 | 73% | 67% | 57% | 40% | 27% | 17% | 7% | 4.97 |
| 10 | Dalian Yifang | 30 | 73% | 50% | 40% | 33% | 17% | 7% | 0% | 4.1 |
| 11 | Shenzhen | 30 | 50% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 7% | 7% | 3.07 |
| 12 | Meizhou Hakka | 30 | 80% | 60% | 53% | 47% | 27% | 17% | 13% | 4.97 |
| 13 | Qingdao Jonoon | 30 | 73% | 53% | 30% | 23% | 7% | 3% | 0% | 3.87 |
| 14 | Nantong Zhiyun | 30 | 87% | 70% | 57% | 53% | 40% | 20% | 13% | 5.6 |
| 15 | Wuhan Three Towns | 30 | 87% | 67% | 43% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 0% | 4.5 |
| 16 | Chengdu Better City FC | 30 | 87% | 83% | 70% | 53% | 27% | 13% | 3% | 5.23 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 15 | 80% | 80% | 53% | 40% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 5.53 |
| 2 | Shanghai SIPG | 15 | 93% | 93% | 80% | 67% | 60% | 27% | 13% | 6.73 |
| 3 | Henan Jianye | 15 | 60% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 4.33 |
| 4 | Hangzhou | 15 | 93% | 60% | 47% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 13% | 4.93 |
| 5 | Beijing Guoan | 15 | 87% | 80% | 73% | 73% | 47% | 27% | 13% | 6.33 |
| 6 | Changchun Yatai | 15 | 67% | 53% | 40% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 3.4 |
| 7 | Shandong Luneng | 15 | 93% | 80% | 53% | 33% | 33% | 20% | 7% | 5.13 |
| 8 | Shanghai Shenhua | 15 | 67% | 60% | 40% | 33% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 9 | Tianjin Teda | 15 | 73% | 73% | 67% | 53% | 40% | 27% | 13% | 5.8 |
| 10 | Dalian Yifang | 15 | 67% | 47% | 47% | 40% | 27% | 13% | 0% | 4.2 |
| 11 | Shenzhen | 15 | 53% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 3.6 |
| 12 | Meizhou Hakka | 15 | 80% | 60% | 60% | 60% | 33% | 13% | 13% | 5.27 |
| 13 | Qingdao Jonoon | 15 | 67% | 40% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 3.73 |
| 14 | Nantong Zhiyun | 15 | 93% | 73% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 27% | 6.67 |
| 15 | Wuhan Three Towns | 15 | 87% | 80% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 0% | 4.47 |
| 16 | Chengdu Better City FC | 15 | 93% | 93% | 80% | 67% | 40% | 20% | 7% | 5.93 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 15 | 93% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 4.2 |
| 2 | Shanghai SIPG | 15 | 80% | 67% | 47% | 40% | 33% | 20% | 13% | 5 |
| 3 | Henan Jianye | 15 | 80% | 67% | 27% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 3.93 |
| 4 | Hangzhou | 15 | 80% | 60% | 53% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 13% | 5.07 |
| 5 | Beijing Guoan | 15 | 80% | 67% | 53% | 53% | 47% | 33% | 20% | 5.87 |
| 6 | Changchun Yatai | 15 | 67% | 53% | 47% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 7 | Shandong Luneng | 15 | 87% | 73% | 73% | 67% | 47% | 47% | 20% | 6.4 |
| 8 | Shanghai Shenhua | 15 | 80% | 47% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 3.53 |
| 9 | Tianjin Teda | 15 | 73% | 60% | 47% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 4.13 |
| 10 | Dalian Yifang | 15 | 80% | 53% | 33% | 27% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 11 | Shenzhen | 15 | 47% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 2.53 |
| 12 | Meizhou Hakka | 15 | 80% | 60% | 47% | 33% | 20% | 20% | 13% | 4.67 |
| 13 | Qingdao Jonoon | 15 | 80% | 67% | 33% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 14 | Nantong Zhiyun | 15 | 80% | 67% | 53% | 47% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 4.53 |
| 15 | Wuhan Three Towns | 15 | 87% | 53% | 53% | 40% | 33% | 7% | 0% | 4.53 |
| 16 | Chengdu Better City FC | 15 | 80% | 73% | 60% | 40% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 4.53 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 30 | 83% | 77% | 63% | 40% | 23% | 10% | 7% | 5.07 |
| 2 | Shanghai SIPG | 30 | 63% | 40% | 30% | 17% | 10% | 3% | 3% | 3.43 |
| 3 | Henan Jianye | 30 | 90% | 63% | 50% | 30% | 30% | 17% | 10% | 5.07 |
| 4 | Hangzhou | 30 | 87% | 73% | 63% | 47% | 27% | 10% | 3% | 5 |
| 5 | Beijing Guoan | 30 | 60% | 43% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 3% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 6 | Changchun Yatai | 30 | 83% | 63% | 47% | 43% | 27% | 20% | 17% | 5.03 |
| 7 | Shandong Luneng | 30 | 57% | 37% | 20% | 10% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3.03 |
| 8 | Shanghai Shenhua | 30 | 80% | 67% | 47% | 40% | 30% | 27% | 7% | 4.83 |
| 9 | Tianjin Teda | 30 | 87% | 63% | 53% | 47% | 30% | 27% | 13% | 5.2 |
| 10 | Dalian Yifang | 30 | 83% | 77% | 60% | 50% | 37% | 17% | 10% | 5.47 |
| 11 | Shenzhen | 30 | 90% | 77% | 67% | 53% | 33% | 23% | 13% | 5.77 |
| 12 | Meizhou Hakka | 30 | 77% | 67% | 50% | 47% | 43% | 20% | 7% | 5.13 |
| 13 | Qingdao Jonoon | 30 | 93% | 77% | 57% | 40% | 23% | 10% | 10% | 5.27 |
| 14 | Nantong Zhiyun | 30 | 83% | 63% | 57% | 47% | 37% | 20% | 13% | 5.33 |
| 15 | Wuhan Three Towns | 30 | 73% | 63% | 47% | 27% | 13% | 10% | 7% | 4.23 |
| 16 | Chengdu Better City FC | 30 | 63% | 50% | 20% | 17% | 13% | 7% | 3% | 3.8 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 15 | 80% | 73% | 53% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 13% | 5.13 |
| 2 | Shanghai SIPG | 15 | 53% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 2.93 |
| 3 | Henan Jianye | 15 | 87% | 47% | 40% | 13% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 4.27 |
| 4 | Hangzhou | 15 | 87% | 80% | 73% | 47% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 5.27 |
| 5 | Beijing Guoan | 15 | 67% | 47% | 40% | 33% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3.87 |
| 6 | Changchun Yatai | 15 | 73% | 60% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 3.93 |
| 7 | Shandong Luneng | 15 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.13 |
| 8 | Shanghai Shenhua | 15 | 73% | 73% | 47% | 40% | 27% | 27% | 0% | 4.73 |
| 9 | Tianjin Teda | 15 | 80% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 4.07 |
| 10 | Dalian Yifang | 15 | 87% | 80% | 60% | 47% | 40% | 20% | 13% | 5.73 |
| 11 | Shenzhen | 15 | 93% | 73% | 73% | 67% | 33% | 20% | 7% | 5.6 |
| 12 | Meizhou Hakka | 15 | 73% | 67% | 47% | 47% | 40% | 20% | 7% | 4.67 |
| 13 | Qingdao Jonoon | 15 | 93% | 60% | 40% | 27% | 27% | 7% | 7% | 4.73 |
| 14 | Nantong Zhiyun | 15 | 93% | 60% | 47% | 33% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 4.67 |
| 15 | Wuhan Three Towns | 15 | 87% | 80% | 53% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 4.73 |
| 16 | Chengdu Better City FC | 15 | 60% | 47% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 3.13 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 15 | 87% | 80% | 73% | 40% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 5 |
| 2 | Shanghai SIPG | 15 | 73% | 47% | 33% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 3.93 |
| 3 | Henan Jianye | 15 | 93% | 80% | 60% | 47% | 47% | 27% | 13% | 5.87 |
| 4 | Hangzhou | 15 | 87% | 67% | 53% | 47% | 27% | 7% | 0% | 4.73 |
| 5 | Beijing Guoan | 15 | 53% | 40% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 3.47 |
| 6 | Changchun Yatai | 15 | 93% | 67% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 6.13 |
| 7 | Shandong Luneng | 15 | 47% | 40% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 2.93 |
| 8 | Shanghai Shenhua | 15 | 87% | 60% | 47% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 4.93 |
| 9 | Tianjin Teda | 15 | 93% | 87% | 73% | 67% | 47% | 47% | 20% | 6.33 |
| 10 | Dalian Yifang | 15 | 80% | 73% | 60% | 53% | 33% | 13% | 7% | 5.2 |
| 11 | Shenzhen | 15 | 87% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 5.93 |
| 12 | Meizhou Hakka | 15 | 80% | 67% | 53% | 47% | 47% | 20% | 7% | 5.6 |
| 13 | Qingdao Jonoon | 15 | 93% | 93% | 73% | 53% | 20% | 13% | 13% | 5.8 |
| 14 | Nantong Zhiyun | 15 | 73% | 67% | 67% | 60% | 53% | 27% | 20% | 6 |
| 15 | Wuhan Three Towns | 15 | 60% | 47% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 3.73 |
| 16 | Chengdu Better City FC | 15 | 67% | 53% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 4.47 |
The average number of corners for Tianjin Teda vs Wuhan Three Towns can greatly help your analysis of the match, as it can point to the attacking tendencies of both teams over the course of the campaign.
Matches involving Tianjin Teda have averaged 10.17 corners per match during this Chinese Super League campaign. They have taken 4.97 corners per match, while they concede an average of 5.2 to their opponents.
As for their upcoming opponent, Wuhan Three Towns, their corner stats are the following:
- Average number of corners in matches involving Wuhan Three Towns: 8.73
- Average number of corners in favour: 4.5
- Average number of corners conceded: 4.23
Corners can be a valuable statistic to look into when looking at a particular match like Tianjin Teda vs Wuhan Three Towns. Examining the average number of corners helps measure the offensive intent of both teams since being on the opposition half of the pitch increases the chances of winning more corners.
Corners conceded stats can also shed more light on a team’s defence and how they can capably prevent their opponents from having the ball in dangerous areas on the pitch.