# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() Entente SSG | 30 | 37% | 27% | 17% |
2 | ![]() Belfort | 30 | 30% | 20% | 20% |
3 | ![]() Épinal | 30 | 23% | 20% | 17% |
4 | ![]() Schiltigheim | 30 | 40% | 23% | 23% |
5 | ![]() St Maur Lusitanos | 30 | 33% | 20% | 13% |
6 | ![]() Fleury 91 | 30 | 43% | 37% | 23% |
7 | ![]() Reims II | 30 | 37% | 20% | 10% |
8 | ![]() Lens II | 30 | 33% | 23% | 13% |
9 | ![]() Sainte Geneviève | 30 | 30% | 23% | 13% |
10 | ![]() Beauvais | 30 | 37% | 33% | 27% |
11 | ![]() Auxerre II | 30 | 27% | 23% | 13% |
12 | ![]() Metz II | 30 | 27% | 17% | 10% |
13 | ![]() Haguenau | 30 | 27% | 27% | 17% |
14 | ![]() Bobigny AC | 30 | 47% | 40% | 33% |
15 | ![]() Olympique St Quentin | 30 | 13% | 10% | 7% |
16 | ![]() Paris 13 Atletico | 30 | 30% | 17% | 10% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() Entente SSG | 30 | 33% | 30% | 13% |
2 | ![]() Belfort | 30 | 33% | 13% | 7% |
3 | ![]() Épinal | 30 | 27% | 20% | 7% |
4 | ![]() Schiltigheim | 30 | 40% | 27% | 17% |
5 | ![]() St Maur Lusitanos | 30 | 40% | 23% | 3% |
6 | ![]() Fleury 91 | 30 | 40% | 37% | 23% |
7 | ![]() Reims II | 30 | 33% | 3% | 0% |
8 | ![]() Lens II | 30 | 37% | 17% | 7% |
9 | ![]() Sainte Geneviève | 30 | 30% | 17% | 10% |
10 | ![]() Beauvais | 30 | 43% | 30% | 17% |
11 | ![]() Auxerre II | 30 | 13% | 3% | 3% |
12 | ![]() Metz II | 30 | 17% | 7% | 7% |
13 | ![]() Haguenau | 30 | 33% | 17% | 10% |
14 | ![]() Bobigny AC | 30 | 47% | 37% | 23% |
15 | ![]() Olympique St Quentin | 30 | 13% | 3% | 0% |
16 | ![]() Paris 13 Atletico | 30 | 27% | 10% | 7% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() Entente SSG | 30 | 33% | 17% | 7% |
2 | ![]() Belfort | 30 | 27% | 20% | 10% |
3 | ![]() Épinal | 30 | 30% | 13% | 10% |
4 | ![]() Schiltigheim | 30 | 30% | 20% | 13% |
5 | ![]() St Maur Lusitanos | 30 | 33% | 10% | 10% |
6 | ![]() Fleury 91 | 30 | 40% | 23% | 7% |
7 | ![]() Reims II | 30 | 47% | 27% | 10% |
8 | ![]() Lens II | 30 | 30% | 20% | 10% |
9 | ![]() Sainte Geneviève | 30 | 27% | 17% | 0% |
10 | ![]() Beauvais | 30 | 30% | 17% | 13% |
11 | ![]() Auxerre II | 30 | 40% | 20% | 17% |
12 | ![]() Metz II | 30 | 33% | 20% | 10% |
13 | ![]() Haguenau | 30 | 27% | 17% | 10% |
14 | ![]() Bobigny AC | 30 | 30% | 23% | 13% |
15 | ![]() Olympique St Quentin | 30 | 20% | 10% | 3% |
16 | ![]() Paris 13 Atletico | 30 | 30% | 20% | 10% |
Check out all the card statistics for Schiltigheim vs St Maur Lusitanos here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
Card statistics for Schiltigheim vs St Maur Lusitanos bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the National 2 Group B, just check out the table above.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.