02.05.2014 - 19:00
Stadium: City Stadium
Finished
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Overall |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Orlando City | 29 | 11 | 38% |
2 | Phoenix Rising | 28 | 5 | 18% |
3 | Penn FC | 31 | 5 | 16% |
4 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 28 | 6 | 21% |
5 | OKC Energy | 28 | 10 | 36% |
6 | LA Galaxy II | 30 | 7 | 23% |
7 | Sacramento Republic | 31 | 10 | 32% |
8 | Charleston Battery | 29 | 11 | 38% |
9 | Richmond Kickers | 30 | 7 | 23% |
10 | Orange County SC | 28 | 4 | 14% |
11 | Rochester Rhinos | 29 | 12 | 41% |
12 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 29 | 10 | 34% |
13 | Charlotte Eagles | 28 | 6 | 21% |
14 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 28 | 3 | 11% |
15 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 7 | 2 | 29% |
16 | Chivas USA Res. | 7 | 1 | 14% |
17 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 6 | 0 | 0% |
18 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 7 | 3 | 43% |
19 | Montreal Impact Res. | 8 | 2 | 25% |
20 | New York RB Res. | 8 | 2 | 25% |
21 | Chicago Fire Res. | 9 | 3 | 33% |
22 | Dallas Res. | 8 | 3 | 38% |
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Home |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Orlando City | 15 | 6 | 40% |
2 | Phoenix Rising | 14 | 3 | 21% |
3 | Penn FC | 14 | 2 | 14% |
4 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 14 | 4 | 29% |
5 | OKC Energy | 14 | 6 | 43% |
6 | LA Galaxy II | 15 | 2 | 13% |
7 | Sacramento Republic | 17 | 6 | 35% |
8 | Charleston Battery | 14 | 5 | 36% |
9 | Richmond Kickers | 16 | 5 | 31% |
10 | Orange County SC | 14 | 1 | 7% |
11 | Rochester Rhinos | 14 | 7 | 50% |
12 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 14 | 6 | 43% |
13 | Charlotte Eagles | 14 | 2 | 14% |
14 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 14 | 0 | 0% |
15 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 4 | 1 | 25% |
16 | Chivas USA Res. | 3 | 0 | 0% |
17 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 2 | 0 | 0% |
18 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 4 | 2 | 50% |
19 | Montreal Impact Res. | 4 | 1 | 25% |
20 | New York RB Res. | 3 | 2 | 67% |
21 | Chicago Fire Res. | 5 | 2 | 40% |
22 | Dallas Res. | 5 | 3 | 60% |
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Orlando City | 14 | 5 | 36% |
2 | Phoenix Rising | 14 | 2 | 14% |
3 | Penn FC | 17 | 3 | 18% |
4 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 14 | 2 | 14% |
5 | OKC Energy | 14 | 4 | 29% |
6 | LA Galaxy II | 15 | 5 | 33% |
7 | Sacramento Republic | 14 | 4 | 29% |
8 | Charleston Battery | 15 | 6 | 40% |
9 | Richmond Kickers | 14 | 2 | 14% |
10 | Orange County SC | 14 | 3 | 21% |
11 | Rochester Rhinos | 15 | 5 | 33% |
12 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 15 | 4 | 27% |
13 | Charlotte Eagles | 14 | 4 | 29% |
14 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 14 | 3 | 21% |
15 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 3 | 1 | 33% |
16 | Chivas USA Res. | 4 | 1 | 25% |
17 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 4 | 0 | 0% |
18 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 3 | 1 | 33% |
19 | Montreal Impact Res. | 4 | 1 | 25% |
20 | New York RB Res. | 5 | 0 | 0% |
21 | Chicago Fire Res. | 4 | 1 | 25% |
22 | Dallas Res. | 3 | 0 | 0% |
The number of clean sheets, or matches a team has without conceding a single goal, in a competition is a strong indicator of how well their defence is playing. The more times a team can completely keep their opponents from scoring, the more likely it is the team’s actual ability rather than just random chance.
We keep track of all the clean sheet information here, and these are the stats for Richmond Kickers vs Rochester Rhinos:
If both clubs have a high rate of keeping clean sheets, then there’s a decent chance of seeing a low-scoring battle between two strong defensive clubs. But for matches between clubs with low rates of clean sheets, then it’s fair to expect a goal or two.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.