# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Real Murcia |
18 | 12 | 67% |
2 |
![]() UCAM Murcia CF |
18 | 11 | 61% |
3 |
![]() Recreativo de Huelva |
18 | 11 | 61% |
4 |
![]() CF Lorca Deportiva |
18 | 10 | 56% |
5 |
![]() Córdoba |
18 | 9 | 50% |
6 |
![]() Marbella FC |
18 | 9 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Yeclano Deportivo |
18 | 9 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Tamaraceite |
18 | 9 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Sevilla II |
18 | 8 | 44% |
10 |
![]() Granada II |
18 | 8 | 44% |
11 |
![]() Real Betis II |
18 | 8 | 44% |
12 |
![]() Algeciras CF |
18 | 8 | 44% |
13 |
![]() San Fernando CD |
18 | 8 | 44% |
14 |
![]() CD Marino |
18 | 8 | 44% |
15 |
![]() Cádiz II |
18 | 8 | 44% |
16 |
![]() Linense |
18 | 7 | 39% |
17 |
![]() El Ejido |
18 | 7 | 39% |
18 |
![]() Las Palmas II |
18 | 6 | 33% |
19 |
![]() Atlético Sanluqueño CF |
18 | 6 | 33% |
20 |
![]() Linares Deportivo |
18 | 4 | 22% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Córdoba |
9 | 6 | 67% |
2 |
![]() UCAM Murcia CF |
9 | 6 | 67% |
3 |
![]() Las Palmas II |
9 | 6 | 67% |
4 |
![]() CF Lorca Deportiva |
9 | 6 | 67% |
5 |
![]() Yeclano Deportivo |
9 | 6 | 67% |
6 |
![]() Cádiz II |
9 | 6 | 67% |
7 |
![]() Real Murcia |
9 | 5 | 56% |
8 |
![]() Algeciras CF |
9 | 5 | 56% |
9 |
![]() Recreativo de Huelva |
9 | 4 | 44% |
10 |
![]() Granada II |
9 | 4 | 44% |
11 |
![]() Marbella FC |
9 | 4 | 44% |
12 |
![]() Atlético Sanluqueño CF |
9 | 4 | 44% |
13 |
![]() Tamaraceite |
9 | 4 | 44% |
14 |
![]() Sevilla II |
9 | 3 | 33% |
15 |
![]() Real Betis II |
9 | 3 | 33% |
16 |
![]() San Fernando CD |
9 | 3 | 33% |
17 |
![]() El Ejido |
9 | 3 | 33% |
18 |
![]() Linense |
9 | 2 | 22% |
19 |
![]() CD Marino |
9 | 2 | 22% |
20 |
![]() Linares Deportivo |
9 | 1 | 11% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Recreativo de Huelva |
9 | 7 | 78% |
2 |
![]() Real Murcia |
9 | 7 | 78% |
3 |
![]() CD Marino |
9 | 6 | 67% |
4 |
![]() Sevilla II |
9 | 5 | 56% |
5 |
![]() UCAM Murcia CF |
9 | 5 | 56% |
6 |
![]() Real Betis II |
9 | 5 | 56% |
7 |
![]() Marbella FC |
9 | 5 | 56% |
8 |
![]() Linense |
9 | 5 | 56% |
9 |
![]() San Fernando CD |
9 | 5 | 56% |
10 |
![]() Tamaraceite |
9 | 5 | 56% |
11 |
![]() Granada II |
9 | 4 | 44% |
12 |
![]() El Ejido |
9 | 4 | 44% |
13 |
![]() CF Lorca Deportiva |
9 | 4 | 44% |
14 |
![]() Córdoba |
9 | 3 | 33% |
15 |
![]() Algeciras CF |
9 | 3 | 33% |
16 |
![]() Linares Deportivo |
9 | 3 | 33% |
17 |
![]() Yeclano Deportivo |
9 | 3 | 33% |
18 |
![]() Atlético Sanluqueño CF |
9 | 2 | 22% |
19 |
![]() Cádiz II |
9 | 2 | 22% |
20 |
![]() Las Palmas II |
9 | 0 | 0% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Real Murcia and Real Betis II have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Segunda B Group 4.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets
Search
Most Popular search
No results found
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.