# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Nottingham Forest |
46 | 29 | 63% |
2 |
![]() Bournemouth |
46 | 28 | 61% |
3 |
![]() Derby County |
49 | 28 | 57% |
4 |
![]() Huddersfield Town |
46 | 28 | 61% |
5 |
![]() Sheffield Wednesday |
46 | 27 | 59% |
6 |
![]() Reading |
46 | 27 | 59% |
7 |
![]() Leicester |
46 | 26 | 57% |
8 |
![]() Watford |
46 | 26 | 57% |
9 |
![]() Ipswich Town |
46 | 26 | 57% |
10 |
![]() Birmingham City |
46 | 25 | 54% |
11 |
![]() Blackburn Rovers |
46 | 25 | 54% |
12 |
![]() Leeds |
46 | 25 | 54% |
13 |
![]() Bolton Wanderers |
46 | 25 | 54% |
14 |
![]() Yeovil Town |
46 | 25 | 54% |
15 |
![]() Millwall |
46 | 24 | 52% |
16 |
![]() Burnley |
46 | 23 | 50% |
17 |
![]() Barnsley |
46 | 23 | 50% |
18 |
![]() Middlesbrough |
46 | 22 | 48% |
19 |
![]() Brighton |
48 | 22 | 46% |
20 |
![]() Queens Park Rangers |
49 | 21 | 43% |
21 |
![]() Blackpool |
46 | 21 | 46% |
22 |
![]() Wigan |
48 | 19 | 40% |
23 |
![]() Doncaster Rovers |
46 | 19 | 41% |
24 |
![]() Charlton Athletic |
46 | 18 | 39% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Ipswich Town |
23 | 16 | 70% |
2 |
![]() Birmingham City |
23 | 15 | 65% |
3 |
![]() Reading |
23 | 15 | 65% |
4 |
![]() Bournemouth |
23 | 14 | 61% |
5 |
![]() Nottingham Forest |
23 | 14 | 61% |
6 |
![]() Leeds |
23 | 14 | 61% |
7 |
![]() Leicester |
23 | 13 | 57% |
8 |
![]() Queens Park Rangers |
24 | 13 | 54% |
9 |
![]() Brighton |
24 | 13 | 54% |
10 |
![]() Derby County |
25 | 13 | 52% |
11 |
![]() Sheffield Wednesday |
23 | 13 | 57% |
12 |
![]() Huddersfield Town |
23 | 13 | 57% |
13 |
![]() Middlesbrough |
23 | 12 | 52% |
14 |
![]() Bolton Wanderers |
23 | 12 | 52% |
15 |
![]() Millwall |
23 | 12 | 52% |
16 |
![]() Barnsley |
23 | 11 | 48% |
17 |
![]() Wigan |
24 | 11 | 46% |
18 |
![]() Yeovil Town |
23 | 11 | 48% |
19 |
![]() Burnley |
23 | 10 | 43% |
20 |
![]() Doncaster Rovers |
23 | 10 | 43% |
21 |
![]() Watford |
23 | 9 | 39% |
22 |
![]() Blackburn Rovers |
23 | 9 | 39% |
23 |
![]() Charlton Athletic |
23 | 9 | 39% |
24 |
![]() Blackpool |
23 | 9 | 39% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Watford |
23 | 17 | 74% |
2 |
![]() Blackburn Rovers |
23 | 16 | 70% |
3 |
![]() Nottingham Forest |
23 | 15 | 65% |
4 |
![]() Derby County |
24 | 15 | 63% |
5 |
![]() Huddersfield Town |
23 | 15 | 65% |
6 |
![]() Bournemouth |
23 | 14 | 61% |
7 |
![]() Sheffield Wednesday |
23 | 14 | 61% |
8 |
![]() Yeovil Town |
23 | 14 | 61% |
9 |
![]() Leicester |
23 | 13 | 57% |
10 |
![]() Burnley |
23 | 13 | 57% |
11 |
![]() Bolton Wanderers |
23 | 13 | 57% |
12 |
![]() Barnsley |
23 | 12 | 52% |
13 |
![]() Reading |
23 | 12 | 52% |
14 |
![]() Blackpool |
23 | 12 | 52% |
15 |
![]() Millwall |
23 | 12 | 52% |
16 |
![]() Leeds |
23 | 11 | 48% |
17 |
![]() Middlesbrough |
23 | 10 | 43% |
18 |
![]() Birmingham City |
23 | 10 | 43% |
19 |
![]() Ipswich Town |
23 | 10 | 43% |
20 |
![]() Brighton |
24 | 9 | 38% |
21 |
![]() Charlton Athletic |
23 | 9 | 39% |
22 |
![]() Doncaster Rovers |
23 | 9 | 39% |
23 |
![]() Queens Park Rangers |
25 | 8 | 32% |
24 |
![]() Wigan |
24 | 8 | 33% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Reading and Bournemouth have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Championship.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets
Search
Most Popular search
No results found
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.