Orange County SC 2 - 2 Penn FC
04.08.2013 - 02:30
Stadium : Titan Stadium (Fullerton, California)
Finished
Cards
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Orlando City | 29 | 31% | 21% | 10% |
| 2 | Penn FC | 27 | 33% | 22% | 11% |
| 3 |  Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 27 | 19% | 11% | 7% |
| 4 |  Charleston Battery | 28 | 36% | 18% | 11% |
| 5 |  Richmond Kickers | 28 | 18% | 7% | 4% |
| 6 | Orange County SC | 27 | 44% | 22% | 7% |
| 7 |  Rochester Rhinos | 26 | 38% | 19% | 15% |
| 8 |  Wilmington Hammerheads | 26 | 38% | 27% | 15% |
| 9 |  Charlotte Eagles | 29 | 14% | 14% | 3% |
| 10 |  Dayton Dutch Lions | 27 | 37% | 15% | 7% |
| 11 |  Antigua Barracuda F.C. | 26 | 19% | 19% | 8% |
| 12 |  Phoenix FC | 26 | 46% | 38% | 19% |
| 13 |  VSI Tampa Bay | 26 | 42% | 27% | 4% |
| 14 |  Seattle Sounders Res. | 12 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 15 |  Chivas USA Res. | 12 | 25% | 17% | 0% |
| 16 |  Colorado Rapids Res. | 14 | 29% | 21% | 0% |
| 17 |  Real Salt Lake Res. | 14 | 43% | 29% | 14% |
| 18 |  Montreal Impact Res. | 11 | 9% | 9% | 9% |
| 19 |  New York RB Res. | 12 | 8% | 8% | 0% |
| 20 |  Chicago Fire Res. | 13 | 38% | 23% | 8% |
| 21 |  Dallas Res. | 13 | 15% | 8% | 8% |
| 22 |  SJ Earthquakes Res. | 10 | 30% | 0% | 0% |
| 23 |  LA Galaxy Res. | 10 | 40% | 20% | 0% |
| 24 |  Portland Timbers Res. | 14 | 43% | 14% | 7% |
| 25 |  Whitecaps Res. | 10 | 10% | 0% | 0% |
| 26 |  Houston Dynamo Res. | 9 | 11% | 0% | 0% |
| 27 |  Columbus Crew Res. | 14 | 36% | 21% | 7% |
| 28 |  Toronto Res. | 8 | 25% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orlando City | 29 | 21% | 3% | 0% |
| 2 | Penn FC | 27 | 26% | 7% | 7% |
| 3 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 27 | 33% | 11% | 4% |
| 4 | Charleston Battery | 28 | 54% | 14% | 7% |
| 5 | Richmond Kickers | 28 | 21% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 | Orange County SC | 27 | 56% | 30% | 7% |
| 7 | Rochester Rhinos | 26 | 42% | 23% | 12% |
| 8 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 26 | 58% | 27% | 23% |
| 9 | Charlotte Eagles | 29 | 24% | 7% | 3% |
| 10 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 27 | 48% | 22% | 4% |
| 11 | Antigua Barracuda F.C. | 26 | 42% | 15% | 15% |
| 12 | Phoenix FC | 26 | 58% | 38% | 8% |
| 13 | VSI Tampa Bay | 26 | 38% | 19% | 4% |
| 14 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 12 | 25% | 0% | 0% |
| 15 | Chivas USA Res. | 12 | 50% | 33% | 8% |
| 16 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 14 | 29% | 7% | 0% |
| 17 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 14 | 43% | 29% | 21% |
| 18 | Montreal Impact Res. | 11 | 36% | 9% | 0% |
| 19 | New York RB Res. | 12 | 17% | 8% | 8% |
| 20 | Chicago Fire Res. | 13 | 54% | 31% | 31% |
| 21 | Dallas Res. | 13 | 23% | 8% | 0% |
| 22 | SJ Earthquakes Res. | 10 | 30% | 0% | 0% |
| 23 | LA Galaxy Res. | 10 | 30% | 0% | 0% |
| 24 | Portland Timbers Res. | 14 | 43% | 7% | 7% |
| 25 | Whitecaps Res. | 10 | 40% | 10% | 0% |
| 26 | Houston Dynamo Res. | 9 | 33% | 0% | 0% |
| 27 | Columbus Crew Res. | 14 | 50% | 21% | 0% |
| 28 | Toronto Res. | 8 | 38% | 38% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orlando City | 29 | 62% | 34% | 21% |
| 2 | Penn FC | 27 | 41% | 26% | 15% |
| 3 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 27 | 41% | 19% | 4% |
| 4 | Charleston Battery | 28 | 43% | 18% | 4% |
| 5 | Richmond Kickers | 28 | 43% | 14% | 4% |
| 6 | Orange County SC | 27 | 41% | 15% | 4% |
| 7 | Rochester Rhinos | 26 | 38% | 19% | 4% |
| 8 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 26 | 31% | 12% | 8% |
| 9 | Charlotte Eagles | 29 | 31% | 10% | 7% |
| 10 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 27 | 41% | 11% | 0% |
| 11 | Antigua Barracuda F.C. | 26 | 19% | 12% | 4% |
| 12 | Phoenix FC | 26 | 62% | 23% | 12% |
| 13 | VSI Tampa Bay | 26 | 54% | 15% | 8% |
| 14 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 12 | 8% | 8% | 0% |
| 15 | Chivas USA Res. | 12 | 17% | 0% | 0% |
| 16 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 14 | 36% | 21% | 14% |
| 17 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 14 | 36% | 7% | 7% |
| 18 | Montreal Impact Res. | 11 | 27% | 18% | 0% |
| 19 | New York RB Res. | 12 | 17% | 0% | 0% |
| 20 | Chicago Fire Res. | 13 | 31% | 15% | 0% |
| 21 | Dallas Res. | 13 | 31% | 15% | 15% |
| 22 | SJ Earthquakes Res. | 10 | 30% | 0% | 0% |
| 23 | LA Galaxy Res. | 10 | 60% | 30% | 20% |
| 24 | Portland Timbers Res. | 14 | 36% | 14% | 7% |
| 25 | Whitecaps Res. | 10 | 40% | 0% | 0% |
| 26 | Houston Dynamo Res. | 9 | 44% | 0% | 0% |
| 27 | Columbus Crew Res. | 14 | 43% | 29% | 14% |
| 28 | Toronto Res. | 8 | 25% | 0% | 0% |
Check out all the card statistics for Orange County SC vs Penn FC here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
- Orange County SC has played 27 matches in the USL Championship and has received more than 1.5 cards (yellow and red) in 56% of those matches. They have also received over 2.5 bookings in 30% of matches and over 3.5 cards in 7% of matches.
- Meanwhile, Penn FC has, in 27 matches to date, had more than 1.5 bookings in 26% of their matches. They have had over 2.5 cards in 7% of matches and have seen more than 3.5 cards in 7% of matches.
Card statistics for Orange County SC vs Penn FC bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the USL Championship, just check out the table above.