Oakland Roots 0 - 1 Sacramento Republic
04.05.2025 - 19:00
Finished
Match Scoring / Conceding First
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
New Mexico United |
11 | 69% |
| 2 |
Louisville City |
12 | 67% |
| 3 |
Indy Eleven |
11 | 65% |
| 4 |
North Carolina FC |
11 | 65% |
| 5 |
Charleston Battery |
11 | 61% |
| 6 |
Miami FC II |
10 | 59% |
| 7 |
Sacramento Republic |
9 | 53% |
| 8 |
El Paso Locomotive |
9 | 53% |
| 9 |
Orange County SC |
8 | 50% |
| 10 |
Phoenix Rising |
9 | 50% |
| 11 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
8 | 47% |
| 12 |
Detroit City FC |
8 | 47% |
| 13 |
Colorado Springs |
8 | 47% |
| 14 |
San Antonio |
8 | 47% |
| 15 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
8 | 44% |
| 16 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 41% |
| 17 |
Monterey Bay |
7 | 39% |
| 18 |
Lexington |
7 | 39% |
| 19 |
Loudoun United |
6 | 33% |
| 20 |
Las Vegas Lights |
6 | 33% |
| 21 |
Hartford Athletic |
5 | 31% |
| 22 |
Rhode Island |
5 | 28% |
| 23 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
4 | 24% |
| 24 |
Birmingham Legion |
4 | 21% |
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
North Carolina FC |
8 | 100% |
| 2 |
Orange County SC |
7 | 78% |
| 3 |
New Mexico United |
5 | 71% |
| 4 |
Colorado Springs |
5 | 71% |
| 5 |
Louisville City |
6 | 67% |
| 6 |
Charleston Battery |
6 | 67% |
| 7 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
6 | 67% |
| 8 |
El Paso Locomotive |
5 | 63% |
| 9 |
Miami FC II |
6 | 60% |
| 10 |
San Antonio |
6 | 60% |
| 11 |
Indy Eleven |
6 | 60% |
| 12 |
Detroit City FC |
4 | 57% |
| 13 |
Las Vegas Lights |
5 | 50% |
| 14 |
Phoenix Rising |
4 | 50% |
| 15 |
Monterey Bay |
4 | 50% |
| 16 |
Lexington |
4 | 44% |
| 17 |
Sacramento Republic |
4 | 44% |
| 18 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
3 | 33% |
| 19 |
Hartford Athletic |
3 | 33% |
| 20 |
Loudoun United |
3 | 33% |
| 21 |
Oakland Roots |
3 | 33% |
| 22 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
2 | 29% |
| 23 |
Birmingham Legion |
2 | 20% |
| 24 |
Rhode Island |
1 | 13% |
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Indy Eleven |
5 | 71% |
| 2 |
New Mexico United |
6 | 67% |
| 3 |
Louisville City |
6 | 67% |
| 4 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
5 | 63% |
| 5 |
Sacramento Republic |
5 | 63% |
| 6 |
Miami FC II |
4 | 57% |
| 7 |
Charleston Battery |
5 | 56% |
| 8 |
Oakland Roots |
4 | 50% |
| 9 |
Phoenix Rising |
5 | 50% |
| 10 |
El Paso Locomotive |
4 | 44% |
| 11 |
Detroit City FC |
4 | 40% |
| 12 |
Rhode Island |
4 | 40% |
| 13 |
Loudoun United |
3 | 33% |
| 14 |
Lexington |
3 | 33% |
| 15 |
North Carolina FC |
3 | 33% |
| 16 |
Colorado Springs |
3 | 30% |
| 17 |
Monterey Bay |
3 | 30% |
| 18 |
Hartford Athletic |
2 | 29% |
| 19 |
San Antonio |
2 | 29% |
| 20 |
Birmingham Legion |
2 | 22% |
| 21 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
2 | 22% |
| 22 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
2 | 20% |
| 23 |
Orange County SC |
1 | 14% |
| 24 |
Las Vegas Lights |
1 | 13% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Birmingham Legion |
15 | 78% |
| 2 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
13 | 76% |
| 3 |
Rhode Island |
13 | 72% |
| 4 |
Hartford Athletic |
11 | 68% |
| 5 |
Loudoun United |
12 | 66% |
| 6 |
Las Vegas Lights |
12 | 66% |
| 7 |
Monterey Bay |
11 | 61% |
| 8 |
Lexington |
11 | 61% |
| 9 |
Oakland Roots |
10 | 58% |
| 10 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
10 | 55% |
| 11 |
Colorado Springs |
9 | 52% |
| 12 |
San Antonio |
9 | 52% |
| 13 |
Detroit City FC |
9 | 52% |
| 14 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
9 | 52% |
| 15 |
Orange County SC |
8 | 50% |
| 16 |
Phoenix Rising |
9 | 50% |
| 17 |
Sacramento Republic |
8 | 47% |
| 18 |
El Paso Locomotive |
8 | 47% |
| 19 |
Miami FC II |
7 | 41% |
| 20 |
Charleston Battery |
7 | 38% |
| 21 |
Indy Eleven |
6 | 35% |
| 22 |
North Carolina FC |
6 | 35% |
| 23 |
Louisville City |
6 | 33% |
| 24 |
New Mexico United |
5 | 31% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Rhode Island |
7 | 87% |
| 2 |
Birmingham Legion |
8 | 80% |
| 3 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
5 | 71% |
| 4 |
Loudoun United |
6 | 66% |
| 5 |
Hartford Athletic |
6 | 66% |
| 6 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 66% |
| 7 |
Oakland Roots |
6 | 66% |
| 8 |
Lexington |
5 | 55% |
| 9 |
Sacramento Republic |
5 | 55% |
| 10 |
Las Vegas Lights |
5 | 50% |
| 11 |
Monterey Bay |
4 | 50% |
| 12 |
Phoenix Rising |
4 | 50% |
| 13 |
Detroit City FC |
3 | 42% |
| 14 |
San Antonio |
4 | 40% |
| 15 |
Indy Eleven |
4 | 40% |
| 16 |
Miami FC II |
4 | 40% |
| 17 |
El Paso Locomotive |
3 | 37% |
| 18 |
Louisville City |
3 | 33% |
| 19 |
Charleston Battery |
3 | 33% |
| 20 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
3 | 33% |
| 21 |
New Mexico United |
2 | 28% |
| 22 |
Colorado Springs |
2 | 28% |
| 23 |
Orange County SC |
2 | 22% |
| 24 |
North Carolina FC |
0 | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Las Vegas Lights |
7 | 87% |
| 2 |
Orange County SC |
6 | 85% |
| 3 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
8 | 80% |
| 4 |
Birmingham Legion |
7 | 77% |
| 5 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
7 | 77% |
| 6 |
Hartford Athletic |
5 | 71% |
| 7 |
San Antonio |
5 | 71% |
| 8 |
Colorado Springs |
7 | 70% |
| 9 |
Monterey Bay |
7 | 70% |
| 10 |
Loudoun United |
6 | 66% |
| 11 |
Lexington |
6 | 66% |
| 12 |
North Carolina FC |
6 | 66% |
| 13 |
Rhode Island |
6 | 60% |
| 14 |
Detroit City FC |
6 | 60% |
| 15 |
El Paso Locomotive |
5 | 55% |
| 16 |
Oakland Roots |
4 | 50% |
| 17 |
Phoenix Rising |
5 | 50% |
| 18 |
Charleston Battery |
4 | 44% |
| 19 |
Miami FC II |
3 | 42% |
| 20 |
Sacramento Republic |
3 | 37% |
| 21 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
3 | 37% |
| 22 |
New Mexico United |
3 | 33% |
| 23 |
Louisville City |
3 | 33% |
| 24 |
Indy Eleven |
2 | 28% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Oakland Roots and Sacramento Republic in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Oakland Roots has come out and scored the first goal in 41% of the matches they have played so far in the USL Championship. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 58% of matches.
Meanwhile, Sacramento Republic comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 53% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 47% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in USL Championship.