11.06.2022 - 17:00
Stadium: Estádio Adauto Moraes
Finished
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Santa Cruz | 18 | 11% | 6% | 6% |
2 | Paraná | 18 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
3 | Icasa | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 | Oeste | 16 | 6% | 6% | 0% |
5 | América RN | 24 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | ASA | 20 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
7 | Moto Club MA | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 | Caxias | 20 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
9 | Brasiliense | 16 | 25% | 6% | 6% |
10 | Rio Branco | 18 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
11 | Portuguesa RJ | 20 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
12 | Ceilândia | 14 | 14% | 7% | 7% |
13 | Caldense | 14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
14 | Globo | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 | Sergipe | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 | São Raimundo RR | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 | Anápolis | 16 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
18 | Trem | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 | Juazeirense | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 | Sousa | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
21 | URT | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
22 | São Bernardo | 22 | 5% | 5% | 0% |
23 | Tocantinópolis | 20 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
24 | Náutico RR | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
25 | Jacuipense | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
26 | Ferroviária | 14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
27 | Santo André | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
28 | Noroeste | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
29 | Inter de Limeira | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
30 | Cianorte | 14 | 14% | 14% | 7% |
31 | Iporá | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
32 | 4 de Julho | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
33 | Nova Iguaçu | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
34 | Aimoré | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
35 | Bahia de Feira | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
36 | Lagarto | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
37 | São Luiz | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
38 | São Raimundo AM | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
39 | Tuna Luso | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
40 | Marcílio Dias | 14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
41 | Atlético Alagoinhas | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
42 | Próspera Criciuma | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
43 | Juventus SC | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
44 | Cascavel FC | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
45 | Grêmio Anápolis | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
46 | Afogados | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
47 | Humaitá | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
48 | CEOV Operário | 16 | 13% | 13% | 6% |
49 | Castanhal | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
50 | Porto Velho | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Inter de Limeira | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 | Cianorte | 14 | 14% | 7% | 0% |
3 | Iporá | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 | 4 de Julho | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 | Nova Iguaçu | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | Aimoré | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 | Nova Venécia | 18 | 6% | 0% | 0% |
8 | Sousa | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 | URT | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 | São Bernardo | 22 | 5% | 5% | 0% |
11 | Tocantinópolis | 20 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 | Náutico RR | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 | Jacuipense | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 | Ferroviária | 14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
15 | Santo André | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 | Noroeste | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 | Bahia de Feira | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 | Lagarto | 18 | 6% | 0% | 0% |
19 | São Luiz | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 | São Raimundo AM | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
21 | Tuna Luso | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
22 | Marcílio Dias | 14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
23 | Atlético Alagoinhas | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
24 | Próspera Criciuma | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
25 | Juventus SC | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
26 | CSE | 14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
27 | Amazonas | 22 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
28 | Juventude MA | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
29 | São Paulo Crystal | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
30 | Pouso Alegre | 24 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
31 | Azuriz | 16 | 6% | 0% | 0% |
32 | Caxias | 20 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
33 | Pérolas Negras | 14 | 29% | 21% | 7% |
34 | Acao Cuiaba | 14 | 21% | 7% | 7% |
35 | Fluminense PI | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
36 | Santa Cruz | 18 | 6% | 6% | 0% |
37 | Paraná | 18 | 6% | 0% | 0% |
38 | Icasa | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
39 | Oeste | 16 | 6% | 6% | 0% |
40 | América RN | 24 | 4% | 0% | 0% |
41 | ASA | 20 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
42 | Moto Club MA | 18 | 6% | 0% | 0% |
43 | Brasiliense | 16 | 25% | 0% | 0% |
44 | Rio Branco | 18 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
45 | Portuguesa RJ | 20 | 5% | 5% | 0% |
46 | Ceilândia | 14 | 14% | 7% | 0% |
47 | Caldense | 14 | 14% | 0% | 0% |
48 | Globo | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
49 | Sergipe | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
50 | São Raimundo RR | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Santa Cruz | 18 | 11% | 11% | 11% |
2 | Paraná | 18 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
3 | Icasa | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 | Oeste | 16 | 6% | 0% | 0% |
5 | América RN | 24 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | ASA | 20 | 5% | 5% | 0% |
7 | Moto Club MA | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 | Caxias | 20 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
9 | Brasiliense | 16 | 25% | 6% | 6% |
10 | Rio Branco | 18 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
11 | Portuguesa RJ | 20 | 5% | 5% | 0% |
12 | Ceilândia | 14 | 14% | 7% | 0% |
13 | Caldense | 14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
14 | Globo | 14 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
15 | Sergipe | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 | São Raimundo RR | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 | Anápolis | 16 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
18 | Trem | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 | Juazeirense | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 | Sousa | 16 | 6% | 0% | 0% |
21 | URT | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
22 | São Bernardo | 22 | 5% | 0% | 0% |
23 | Tocantinópolis | 20 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
24 | Náutico RR | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
25 | Jacuipense | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
26 | Ferroviária | 14 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
27 | Santo André | 14 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
28 | Noroeste | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
29 | Inter de Limeira | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
30 | Cianorte | 14 | 14% | 14% | 0% |
31 | Iporá | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
32 | 4 de Julho | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
33 | Nova Iguaçu | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
34 | Aimoré | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
35 | Bahia de Feira | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
36 | Lagarto | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
37 | São Luiz | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
38 | São Raimundo AM | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
39 | Tuna Luso | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
40 | Marcílio Dias | 14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
41 | Atlético Alagoinhas | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
42 | Próspera Criciuma | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
43 | Juventus SC | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
44 | Cascavel FC | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
45 | Grêmio Anápolis | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
46 | Afogados | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
47 | Humaitá | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
48 | CEOV Operário | 16 | 13% | 6% | 0% |
49 | Castanhal | 14 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
50 | Porto Velho | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Check out all the card statistics for Juazeirense vs Lagarto here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
Card statistics for Juazeirense vs Lagarto bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the Serie D, just check out the table above.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.