15.04.2022 - 10:00
Stadium: Stadium Sultan Ibrahim Larkin (Iskandar Puteri (Nusajaya))
Finished
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Johor Darul Ta'zim | 7 | 43% | 29% | 29% |
2 | Melbourne City FC | 6 | 33% | 33% | 0% |
3 | Sydney FC | 7 | 43% | 0% | 0% |
4 | Melbourne Victory FC | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
5 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 6 | 17% | 17% | 17% |
6 | Shanghai SIPG | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 | Shandong Luneng | 6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 | Yokohama F. Marinos | 7 | 43% | 14% | 0% |
9 | Urawa Reds | 9 | 44% | 22% | 0% |
10 | Vissel Kobe | 7 | 43% | 14% | 14% |
11 | Kawasaki Frontale | 6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 | Port FC | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 | Bangkok Glass | 8 | 38% | 38% | 0% |
14 | Chiangrai United | 4 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
15 | Buriram United | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
16 | Kitchee | 5 | 60% | 40% | 40% |
17 | Home United | 6 | 17% | 0% | 0% |
18 | Ceres | 6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 | Kaya | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 | Daegu | 8 | 50% | 13% | 0% |
21 | Ulsan | 7 | 14% | 14% | 14% |
22 | Jeonbuk Motors | 9 | 44% | 33% | 11% |
23 | Jeonnam Dragons | 6 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
24 | Hoang Anh Gia Lai | 6 | 33% | 0% | 0% |
25 | Al Duhail | 6 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
26 | Al Gharafa | 6 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
27 | Al Rayyan | 6 | 83% | 67% | 33% |
28 | Al Sadd | 6 | 50% | 33% | 33% |
29 | Shabab Al Ahli Dubai | 6 | 33% | 17% | 17% |
30 | Al Jazira | 6 | 33% | 17% | 17% |
31 | Al Sharjah | 7 | 86% | 86% | 43% |
32 | Bani Yas | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
33 | Al Hilal | 6 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
34 | Al Shabab | 6 | 33% | 33% | 17% |
35 | Al Faisaly | 6 | 17% | 0% | 0% |
36 | Al Taawon | 7 | 71% | 57% | 57% |
37 | Mumbai City | 6 | 33% | 33% | 17% |
38 | Al Wihdat | 6 | 33% | 17% | 17% |
39 | Pakhtakor | 6 | 83% | 67% | 67% |
40 | Nasaf | 7 | 29% | 14% | 14% |
41 | Foolad | 6 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
42 | Sepahan | 6 | 50% | 33% | 33% |
43 | Al Quwa Al Jawiya | 6 | 67% | 50% | 17% |
44 | Istiqlol | 6 | 67% | 50% | 0% |
45 | Al Zawra'a | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
46 | Al Jaish | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
47 | Ahal | 6 | 67% | 50% | 50% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Johor Darul Ta'zim | 7 | 71% | 29% | 14% |
2 | Melbourne City FC | 6 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
3 | Sydney FC | 7 | 43% | 0% | 0% |
4 | Melbourne Victory FC | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
5 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 6 | 50% | 33% | 17% |
6 | Shanghai SIPG | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 | Shandong Luneng | 6 | 33% | 0% | 0% |
8 | Yokohama F. Marinos | 7 | 57% | 29% | 0% |
9 | Urawa Reds | 9 | 22% | 11% | 0% |
10 | Vissel Kobe | 7 | 57% | 29% | 14% |
11 | Kawasaki Frontale | 6 | 17% | 17% | 0% |
12 | Port FC | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
13 | Bangkok Glass | 8 | 63% | 25% | 0% |
14 | Chiangrai United | 4 | 100% | 75% | 50% |
15 | Buriram United | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
16 | Kitchee | 5 | 60% | 20% | 0% |
17 | Home United | 6 | 33% | 17% | 0% |
18 | Ceres | 6 | 33% | 33% | 0% |
19 | Kaya | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 | Daegu | 8 | 50% | 25% | 13% |
21 | Ulsan | 7 | 14% | 14% | 0% |
22 | Jeonbuk Motors | 9 | 67% | 0% | 0% |
23 | Jeonnam Dragons | 6 | 50% | 17% | 0% |
24 | Hoang Anh Gia Lai | 6 | 33% | 0% | 0% |
25 | Al Duhail | 6 | 50% | 0% | 0% |
26 | Al Gharafa | 6 | 67% | 50% | 17% |
27 | Al Rayyan | 6 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
28 | Al Sadd | 6 | 83% | 17% | 17% |
29 | Shabab Al Ahli Dubai | 6 | 67% | 17% | 17% |
30 | Al Jazira | 6 | 33% | 17% | 0% |
31 | Al Sharjah | 7 | 100% | 86% | 43% |
32 | Bani Yas | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
33 | Al Hilal | 6 | 33% | 17% | 0% |
34 | Al Shabab | 6 | 50% | 17% | 0% |
35 | Al Faisaly | 6 | 33% | 0% | 0% |
36 | Al Taawon | 7 | 71% | 29% | 14% |
37 | Mumbai City | 6 | 83% | 33% | 17% |
38 | Al Wihdat | 6 | 67% | 17% | 17% |
39 | Pakhtakor | 6 | 83% | 67% | 33% |
40 | Nasaf | 7 | 43% | 14% | 0% |
41 | Foolad | 6 | 67% | 67% | 17% |
42 | Sepahan | 6 | 50% | 50% | 17% |
43 | Al Quwa Al Jawiya | 6 | 67% | 50% | 17% |
44 | Istiqlol | 6 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
45 | Al Zawra'a | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
46 | Al Jaish | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
47 | Ahal | 6 | 83% | 67% | 33% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Johor Darul Ta'zim | 7 | 43% | 43% | 14% |
2 | Melbourne City FC | 6 | 50% | 33% | 0% |
3 | Sydney FC | 7 | 57% | 14% | 0% |
4 | Melbourne Victory FC | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
5 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 6 | 17% | 0% | 0% |
6 | Shanghai SIPG | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 | Shandong Luneng | 6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 | Yokohama F. Marinos | 7 | 43% | 0% | 0% |
9 | Urawa Reds | 9 | 67% | 22% | 22% |
10 | Vissel Kobe | 7 | 57% | 14% | 0% |
11 | Kawasaki Frontale | 6 | 50% | 0% | 0% |
12 | Port FC | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 | Bangkok Glass | 8 | 50% | 13% | 0% |
14 | Chiangrai United | 4 | 50% | 25% | 0% |
15 | Buriram United | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
16 | Kitchee | 5 | 80% | 60% | 40% |
17 | Home United | 6 | 17% | 17% | 0% |
18 | Ceres | 6 | 17% | 0% | 0% |
19 | Kaya | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 | Daegu | 8 | 63% | 13% | 0% |
21 | Ulsan | 7 | 43% | 43% | 0% |
22 | Jeonbuk Motors | 9 | 44% | 33% | 11% |
23 | Jeonnam Dragons | 6 | 83% | 67% | 0% |
24 | Hoang Anh Gia Lai | 6 | 83% | 0% | 0% |
25 | Al Duhail | 6 | 67% | 33% | 33% |
26 | Al Gharafa | 6 | 83% | 67% | 50% |
27 | Al Rayyan | 6 | 83% | 83% | 17% |
28 | Al Sadd | 6 | 67% | 33% | 17% |
29 | Shabab Al Ahli Dubai | 6 | 33% | 17% | 0% |
30 | Al Jazira | 6 | 67% | 17% | 17% |
31 | Al Sharjah | 7 | 71% | 29% | 0% |
32 | Bani Yas | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
33 | Al Hilal | 6 | 67% | 33% | 17% |
34 | Al Shabab | 6 | 67% | 50% | 17% |
35 | Al Faisaly | 6 | 67% | 0% | 0% |
36 | Al Taawon | 7 | 71% | 57% | 43% |
37 | Mumbai City | 6 | 33% | 17% | 0% |
38 | Al Wihdat | 6 | 33% | 0% | 0% |
39 | Pakhtakor | 6 | 67% | 50% | 0% |
40 | Nasaf | 7 | 71% | 14% | 14% |
41 | Foolad | 6 | 100% | 67% | 33% |
42 | Sepahan | 6 | 67% | 17% | 0% |
43 | Al Quwa Al Jawiya | 6 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
44 | Istiqlol | 6 | 50% | 33% | 17% |
45 | Al Zawra'a | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
46 | Al Jaish | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
47 | Ahal | 6 | 67% | 50% | 0% |
Check out all the card statistics for Johor Darul Ta'zim vs Guangzhou Evergrande here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
Card statistics for Johor Darul Ta'zim vs Guangzhou Evergrande bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the ACL, just check out the table above.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.