Fossano vs Caronnese Both Teams Score Stats

#	Team	MP	BTTS	BTTS%
1	Caronnese	38	21	55%
2	Sestri Levante	38	22	58%
3	Chieri	38	19	50%
4	Sanremo	38	23	61%
5	Gozzano	38	19	50%
6	Legnano	38	23	61%
7	Bra	38	17	45%
8	Borgosesia	38	25	66%
9	Casale	38	21	55%
10	Fossano	38	21	55%
11	Lavagnese	38	23	61%
12	Vado	38	21	55%
13	Folgore Caratese	38	19	50%
14	Castellanzese	38	28	74%
15	Arconatese	38	24	63%
16	Derthona	38	20	53%
17	Saluzzo	38	19	50%
18	Imperia	38	17	45%
19	PDHAE	38	21	55%
20	Città di Varese	38	17	45%

Team

BTTS

BTTS%

Caronnese

55%

Sestri Levante

58%

Chieri

50%

Sanremo

61%

Gozzano

50%

Legnano

61%

Bra

45%

Borgosesia

66%

Casale

55%

Fossano

55%

Lavagnese

61%

Vado

55%

Folgore Caratese

50%

Castellanzese

74%

Arconatese

63%

Derthona

53%

Saluzzo

50%

Imperia

45%

PDHAE

55%

Città di Varese

45%

#	Team	MP	BTTS	BTTS%
1	Caronnese	19	10	53%
2	Sestri Levante	19	10	53%
3	Chieri	19	9	47%
4	Sanremo	19	11	58%
5	Gozzano	19	11	58%
6	Legnano	19	11	58%
7	Bra	19	7	37%
8	Borgosesia	19	12	63%
9	Casale	19	8	42%
10	Fossano	19	9	47%
11	Lavagnese	19	13	68%
12	Vado	19	11	58%
13	Folgore Caratese	19	11	58%
14	Castellanzese	19	15	79%
15	Arconatese	19	14	74%
16	Derthona	19	13	68%
17	Saluzzo	19	11	58%
18	Imperia	19	10	53%
19	PDHAE	19	6	32%
20	Città di Varese	19	8	42%

Team

BTTS

BTTS%

Caronnese

53%

Sestri Levante

53%

Chieri

47%

Sanremo

58%

Gozzano

58%

Legnano

58%

Bra

37%

Borgosesia

63%

Casale

42%

Fossano

47%

Lavagnese

68%

Vado

58%

Folgore Caratese

58%

Castellanzese

79%

Arconatese

74%

Derthona

68%

Saluzzo

58%

Imperia

53%

PDHAE

32%

Città di Varese

42%

#	Team	MP	BTTS	BTTS%
1	Caronnese	19	11	58%
2	Sestri Levante	19	12	63%
3	Chieri	19	10	53%
4	Sanremo	19	12	63%
5	Gozzano	19	8	42%
6	Legnano	19	12	63%
7	Bra	19	10	53%
8	Borgosesia	19	13	68%
9	Casale	19	13	68%
10	Fossano	19	12	63%
11	Lavagnese	19	10	53%
12	Vado	19	10	53%
13	Folgore Caratese	19	8	42%
14	Castellanzese	19	13	68%
15	Arconatese	19	10	53%
16	Derthona	19	7	37%
17	Saluzzo	19	8	42%
18	Imperia	19	7	37%
19	PDHAE	19	15	79%
20	Città di Varese	19	9	47%

Team

BTTS

BTTS%

Caronnese

58%

Sestri Levante

63%

Chieri

53%

Sanremo

63%

Gozzano

42%

Legnano

63%

Bra

53%

Borgosesia

68%

Casale

68%

Fossano

63%

Lavagnese

53%

Vado

53%

Folgore Caratese

42%

Castellanzese

68%

Arconatese

53%

Derthona

37%

Saluzzo

42%

Imperia

37%

PDHAE

79%

Città di Varese

47%

This section shows the statistics on how many times Fossano and Caronnese have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Serie D Group A.

The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.

Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:

In 38 matches played in the Serie D Group A, Fossano has scored and conceded goals in 21 matches. In other words, 55% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 47% at home, while it is 63% away from home.
Meanwhile, Caronnese has scored and conceded in 21 of their 38 matches so far in the Serie D Group A, giving them a BTTS rate of 55%. Both teams have scored in 10 of Caronnese’s 19 home matches, and it has happened 11 times in 19 matches as the away side.

It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.

And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets

Fossano 2 - 2 Caronnese

Both Teams to Score