| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Los Andes |
36 | 17% | 14% | 11% |
| 2 |
Douglas Haig |
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 3 |
Villa San Carlos |
32 | 28% | 22% | 19% |
| 4 |
Colegiales |
32 | 19% | 16% | 13% |
| 5 |
UAI Urquiza |
32 | 19% | 16% | 13% |
| 6 |
Fénix |
32 | 38% | 28% | 6% |
| 7 |
Comunicaciones |
34 | 15% | 15% | 15% |
| 8 |
Talleres Remedios |
34 | 12% | 9% | 6% |
| 9 |
Acassuso |
34 | 12% | 12% | 12% |
| 10 |
Deportivo Armenio |
36 | 14% | 14% | 11% |
| 11 |
Sacachispas |
32 | 16% | 16% | 9% |
| 12 |
San Miguel |
39 | 28% | 26% | 18% |
| 13 |
Ituzaingó |
32 | 19% | 19% | 9% |
| 14 |
Argentino Quilmes |
38 | 34% | 29% | 18% |
| 15 |
Dock Sud |
32 | 19% | 13% | 13% |
| 16 |
Cañuelas |
32 | 22% | 19% | 19% |
| 17 |
Deportivo Merlo |
32 | 16% | 13% | 6% |
| 18 |
Argentino Merlo |
34 | 21% | 15% | 12% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Los Andes |
36 | 14% | 8% | 6% |
| 2 |
Douglas Haig |
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
| 3 |
Villa San Carlos |
32 | 25% | 22% | 9% |
| 4 |
Colegiales |
32 | 25% | 16% | 13% |
| 5 |
UAI Urquiza |
32 | 22% | 16% | 16% |
| 6 |
Fénix |
32 | 34% | 22% | 16% |
| 7 |
Comunicaciones |
34 | 15% | 12% | 6% |
| 8 |
Talleres Remedios |
34 | 12% | 9% | 3% |
| 9 |
Acassuso |
34 | 12% | 6% | 3% |
| 10 |
Deportivo Armenio |
36 | 17% | 6% | 0% |
| 11 |
Sacachispas |
32 | 19% | 16% | 13% |
| 12 |
San Miguel |
39 | 23% | 21% | 10% |
| 13 |
Ituzaingó |
32 | 9% | 9% | 9% |
| 14 |
Argentino Quilmes |
38 | 29% | 29% | 16% |
| 15 |
Dock Sud |
32 | 16% | 9% | 6% |
| 16 |
Cañuelas |
32 | 16% | 13% | 9% |
| 17 |
Deportivo Merlo |
32 | 13% | 3% | 0% |
| 18 |
Argentino Merlo |
34 | 24% | 12% | 3% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Los Andes |
36 | 22% | 14% | 6% |
| 2 |
Douglas Haig |
1 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
| 3 |
Villa San Carlos |
32 | 31% | 16% | 9% |
| 4 |
Colegiales |
32 | 16% | 13% | 9% |
| 5 |
UAI Urquiza |
32 | 9% | 9% | 6% |
| 6 |
Fénix |
32 | 25% | 13% | 3% |
| 7 |
Comunicaciones |
34 | 18% | 9% | 3% |
| 8 |
Talleres Remedios |
34 | 18% | 9% | 3% |
| 9 |
Acassuso |
34 | 15% | 9% | 9% |
| 10 |
Deportivo Armenio |
36 | 14% | 14% | 11% |
| 11 |
Sacachispas |
32 | 9% | 6% | 0% |
| 12 |
San Miguel |
39 | 31% | 23% | 8% |
| 13 |
Ituzaingó |
32 | 22% | 16% | 16% |
| 14 |
Argentino Quilmes |
38 | 26% | 21% | 16% |
| 15 |
Dock Sud |
32 | 16% | 16% | 13% |
| 16 |
Cañuelas |
32 | 19% | 16% | 6% |
| 17 |
Deportivo Merlo |
32 | 16% | 9% | 9% |
| 18 |
Argentino Merlo |
34 | 15% | 15% | 9% |
Check out all the card statistics for Dock Sud vs Villa San Carlos here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
Card statistics for Dock Sud vs Villa San Carlos bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the Argentina Primeira B Metropolitana, just check out the table above.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.