Favourite this Match

Casatese 2 - 1 Tritium

16.05.2021 - 10:00

Finished

Both Teams to Score

# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Seregno Team Logo

Seregno

34 15 44%
2
Pontisola Team Logo

Pontisola

34 20 59%
3
Tritium Team Logo

Tritium

34 22 65%
4
Fanfulla Team Logo

Fanfulla

34 16 47%
5
Caravaggio Team Logo

Caravaggio

34 24 71%
6
Virtus Ciserano Bergamo Team Logo

Virtus Ciserano Bergamo

34 18 53%
7
Nibionnoggiono Team Logo

Nibionnoggiono

34 17 50%
8
Scanzorosciate Team Logo

Scanzorosciate

34 13 38%
9
Brusaporto Team Logo

Brusaporto

34 22 65%
10
Villa Valle Team Logo

Villa Valle

34 26 76%
11
Crema Team Logo

Crema

34 25 74%
12
Breno Team Logo

Breno

34 19 56%
13
Franciacorta Team Logo

Franciacorta

34 18 53%
14
Sona Team Logo

Sona

34 22 65%
15
Desenzano Calvina Team Logo

Desenzano Calvina

34 20 59%
16
Casatese Team Logo

Casatese

34 18 53%
17
Real Calepina Team Logo

Real Calepina

34 17 50%
18
Vis Nova Giussano Team Logo

Vis Nova Giussano

34 20 59%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Seregno Team Logo

Seregno

17 10 59%
2
Pontisola Team Logo

Pontisola

17 10 59%
3
Tritium Team Logo

Tritium

17 11 65%
4
Fanfulla Team Logo

Fanfulla

17 7 41%
5
Caravaggio Team Logo

Caravaggio

17 14 82%
6
Virtus Ciserano Bergamo Team Logo

Virtus Ciserano Bergamo

17 8 47%
7
Nibionnoggiono Team Logo

Nibionnoggiono

17 9 53%
8
Scanzorosciate Team Logo

Scanzorosciate

17 7 41%
9
Brusaporto Team Logo

Brusaporto

17 10 59%
10
Villa Valle Team Logo

Villa Valle

17 12 71%
11
Crema Team Logo

Crema

17 13 76%
12
Breno Team Logo

Breno

17 9 53%
13
Franciacorta Team Logo

Franciacorta

17 7 41%
14
Sona Team Logo

Sona

17 10 59%
15
Desenzano Calvina Team Logo

Desenzano Calvina

17 12 71%
16
Casatese Team Logo

Casatese

17 10 59%
17
Real Calepina Team Logo

Real Calepina

17 7 41%
18
Vis Nova Giussano Team Logo

Vis Nova Giussano

17 10 59%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Seregno Team Logo

Seregno

17 5 29%
2
Pontisola Team Logo

Pontisola

17 10 59%
3
Tritium Team Logo

Tritium

17 11 65%
4
Fanfulla Team Logo

Fanfulla

17 9 53%
5
Caravaggio Team Logo

Caravaggio

17 10 59%
6
Virtus Ciserano Bergamo Team Logo

Virtus Ciserano Bergamo

17 10 59%
7
Nibionnoggiono Team Logo

Nibionnoggiono

17 8 47%
8
Scanzorosciate Team Logo

Scanzorosciate

17 6 35%
9
Brusaporto Team Logo

Brusaporto

17 12 71%
10
Villa Valle Team Logo

Villa Valle

17 14 82%
11
Crema Team Logo

Crema

17 12 71%
12
Breno Team Logo

Breno

17 10 59%
13
Franciacorta Team Logo

Franciacorta

17 11 65%
14
Sona Team Logo

Sona

17 12 71%
15
Desenzano Calvina Team Logo

Desenzano Calvina

17 8 47%
16
Casatese Team Logo

Casatese

17 8 47%
17
Real Calepina Team Logo

Real Calepina

17 10 59%
18
Vis Nova Giussano Team Logo

Vis Nova Giussano

17 10 59%

This section shows the statistics on how many times Casatese and Tritium have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Serie D Group B.

The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.

Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:

  • In 34 matches played in the Serie D Group B, Casatese has scored and conceded goals in 18 matches. In other words, 53% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 59% at home, while it is 47% away from home.
  • Meanwhile, Tritium has scored and conceded in 22 of their 34 matches so far in the Serie D Group B, giving them a BTTS rate of 65%. Both teams have scored in 11 of Tritium’s 17 home matches, and it has happened 11 times in 17 matches as the away side.

It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.

And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets