# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Figueirense |
19 | 7 | 37% |
2 |
![]() América RN |
19 | 6 | 32% |
3 |
![]() Náutico |
19 | 10 | 53% |
4 |
![]() Paysandu |
25 | 13 | 52% |
5 |
![]() Volta Redonda |
25 | 12 | 48% |
6 |
![]() Botafogo-PB |
25 | 18 | 72% |
7 |
![]() Confiança |
19 | 9 | 47% |
8 |
![]() CSA |
19 | 8 | 42% |
9 |
![]() Remo |
19 | 11 | 58% |
10 |
![]() Ypiranga Erechim |
19 | 9 | 47% |
11 |
![]() EC São José |
25 | 16 | 64% |
12 |
![]() Brusque |
27 | 9 | 33% |
13 |
![]() Altos |
19 | 10 | 53% |
14 |
![]() Operário PR |
25 | 10 | 40% |
15 |
![]() Aparecidense |
19 | 8 | 42% |
16 |
![]() São Bernardo |
25 | 11 | 44% |
17 |
![]() Manaus |
19 | 6 | 32% |
18 |
![]() Floresta |
19 | 7 | 37% |
19 |
![]() Amazonas |
27 | 12 | 44% |
20 |
![]() Pouso Alegre |
19 | 8 | 42% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Figueirense |
10 | 4 | 40% |
2 |
![]() América RN |
9 | 5 | 56% |
3 |
![]() Náutico |
10 | 3 | 30% |
4 |
![]() Paysandu |
13 | 8 | 62% |
5 |
![]() Volta Redonda |
13 | 5 | 38% |
6 |
![]() Botafogo-PB |
13 | 12 | 92% |
7 |
![]() Confiança |
9 | 5 | 56% |
8 |
![]() CSA |
10 | 4 | 40% |
9 |
![]() Remo |
9 | 7 | 78% |
10 |
![]() Ypiranga Erechim |
10 | 4 | 40% |
11 |
![]() EC São José |
12 | 8 | 67% |
12 |
![]() Brusque |
14 | 5 | 36% |
13 |
![]() Altos |
9 | 5 | 56% |
14 |
![]() Operário PR |
13 | 3 | 23% |
15 |
![]() Aparecidense |
10 | 4 | 40% |
16 |
![]() São Bernardo |
12 | 6 | 50% |
17 |
![]() Manaus |
9 | 4 | 44% |
18 |
![]() Floresta |
9 | 3 | 33% |
19 |
![]() Amazonas |
13 | 3 | 23% |
20 |
![]() Pouso Alegre |
9 | 2 | 22% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Figueirense |
9 | 3 | 33% |
2 |
![]() América RN |
10 | 1 | 10% |
3 |
![]() Náutico |
9 | 7 | 78% |
4 |
![]() Paysandu |
12 | 5 | 42% |
5 |
![]() Volta Redonda |
12 | 7 | 58% |
6 |
![]() Botafogo-PB |
12 | 6 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Confiança |
10 | 4 | 40% |
8 |
![]() CSA |
9 | 4 | 44% |
9 |
![]() Remo |
10 | 4 | 40% |
10 |
![]() Ypiranga Erechim |
9 | 5 | 56% |
11 |
![]() EC São José |
13 | 8 | 62% |
12 |
![]() Brusque |
13 | 4 | 31% |
13 |
![]() Altos |
10 | 5 | 50% |
14 |
![]() Operário PR |
12 | 7 | 58% |
15 |
![]() Aparecidense |
9 | 4 | 44% |
16 |
![]() São Bernardo |
13 | 5 | 38% |
17 |
![]() Manaus |
10 | 2 | 20% |
18 |
![]() Floresta |
10 | 4 | 40% |
19 |
![]() Amazonas |
14 | 9 | 64% |
20 |
![]() Pouso Alegre |
10 | 6 | 60% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Botafogo-PB and EC São José have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Serie C.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.