# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF | 32 | 19 | 59% |
2 | ![]() Sporting Covilhã | 32 | 17 | 53% |
3 | ![]() Sporting CP II | 28 | 10 | 36% |
4 | ![]() Varzim | 32 | 12 | 38% |
5 | ![]() Sporting Braga II | 32 | 13 | 41% |
6 | ![]() Canelas 2010 | 28 | 14 | 50% |
7 | ![]() Felgueiras 1932 | 32 | 12 | 38% |
8 | ![]() Sanjoanense | 28 | 18 | 64% |
9 | ![]() Caldas | 28 | 21 | 75% |
10 | ![]() CD Trofense | 28 | 15 | 54% |
11 | ![]() Pêro Pinheiro | 28 | 14 | 50% |
12 | ![]() 1 Dezembro | 28 | 10 | 36% |
13 | ![]() Anadia | 28 | 12 | 43% |
14 | ![]() Fafe | 28 | 9 | 32% |
15 | ![]() Lusitania Lourosa | 32 | 17 | 53% |
16 | ![]() Oliveira Hospital | 28 | 12 | 43% |
17 | ![]() Vianense | 28 | 12 | 43% |
18 | ![]() Atlético CP | 32 | 18 | 56% |
19 | ![]() Alverca | 32 | 17 | 53% |
20 | ![]() Amora | 28 | 12 | 43% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF | 16 | 6 | 38% |
2 | ![]() Sporting Covilhã | 16 | 9 | 56% |
3 | ![]() Sporting CP II | 14 | 6 | 43% |
4 | ![]() Varzim | 16 | 7 | 44% |
5 | ![]() Sporting Braga II | 16 | 7 | 44% |
6 | ![]() Canelas 2010 | 14 | 8 | 57% |
7 | ![]() Felgueiras 1932 | 16 | 5 | 31% |
8 | ![]() Sanjoanense | 14 | 8 | 57% |
9 | ![]() Caldas | 14 | 11 | 79% |
10 | ![]() CD Trofense | 14 | 6 | 43% |
11 | ![]() Pêro Pinheiro | 14 | 9 | 64% |
12 | ![]() 1 Dezembro | 14 | 5 | 36% |
13 | ![]() Anadia | 14 | 6 | 43% |
14 | ![]() Fafe | 14 | 5 | 36% |
15 | ![]() Lusitania Lourosa | 16 | 10 | 63% |
16 | ![]() Oliveira Hospital | 14 | 7 | 50% |
17 | ![]() Vianense | 14 | 6 | 43% |
18 | ![]() Atlético CP | 16 | 6 | 38% |
19 | ![]() Alverca | 16 | 7 | 44% |
20 | ![]() Amora | 14 | 8 | 57% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF | 16 | 13 | 81% |
2 | ![]() Sporting Covilhã | 16 | 8 | 50% |
3 | ![]() Sporting CP II | 14 | 4 | 29% |
4 | ![]() Varzim | 16 | 5 | 31% |
5 | ![]() Sporting Braga II | 16 | 6 | 38% |
6 | ![]() Canelas 2010 | 14 | 6 | 43% |
7 | ![]() Felgueiras 1932 | 16 | 7 | 44% |
8 | ![]() Sanjoanense | 14 | 10 | 71% |
9 | ![]() Caldas | 14 | 10 | 71% |
10 | ![]() CD Trofense | 14 | 9 | 64% |
11 | ![]() Pêro Pinheiro | 14 | 5 | 36% |
12 | ![]() 1 Dezembro | 14 | 5 | 36% |
13 | ![]() Anadia | 14 | 6 | 43% |
14 | ![]() Fafe | 14 | 4 | 29% |
15 | ![]() Lusitania Lourosa | 16 | 7 | 44% |
16 | ![]() Oliveira Hospital | 14 | 5 | 36% |
17 | ![]() Vianense | 14 | 6 | 43% |
18 | ![]() Atlético CP | 16 | 12 | 75% |
19 | ![]() Alverca | 16 | 10 | 63% |
20 | ![]() Amora | 14 | 4 | 29% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Atlético CP and 1 Dezembro have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Liga 3.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.