Favourite this Match

Arezzo 2 - 3 Como

14.03.2010 - 09:30

Stadium: Stadio Città di Arezzo

Finished

Both Teams to Score

# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Pescara Team Logo

Pescara

38 16 42%
2
Hellas Verona Team Logo

Hellas Verona

38 13 34%
3
Benevento Team Logo

Benevento

36 20 56%
4
Perugia Team Logo

Perugia

34 15 44%
5
Ternana Team Logo

Ternana

34 11 32%
6
Novara Team Logo

Novara

34 18 53%
7
SPAL Team Logo

SPAL

34 16 47%
8
Virtus Lanciano Team Logo

Virtus Lanciano

34 14 41%
9
Como Team Logo

Como

34 13 38%
10
Varese Team Logo

Varese

38 21 55%
11
Foggia Team Logo

Foggia

36 15 42%
12
Cremonese Team Logo

Cremonese

38 23 61%
13
Paganese Team Logo

Paganese

36 19 53%
14
Arezzo Team Logo

Arezzo

36 19 53%
15
US Alessandria Team Logo

US Alessandria

34 18 53%
16
Cosenza Team Logo

Cosenza

34 21 62%
17
Reggiana Team Logo

Reggiana

36 19 53%
18
Monza Team Logo

Monza

34 20 59%
19
Ravenna Team Logo

Ravenna

34 20 59%
20
Taranto Team Logo

Taranto

34 11 32%
21
Lumezzane Team Logo

Lumezzane

34 18 53%
22
Pro Patria Team Logo

Pro Patria

36 24 67%
23
Rimini Team Logo

Rimini

36 14 39%
24
Viareggio Team Logo

Viareggio

36 15 42%
25
Lecco Team Logo

Lecco

34 17 50%
26
Foligno Team Logo

Foligno

34 23 68%
27
Cavese Team Logo

Cavese

34 11 32%
28
Real Marcianise Team Logo

Real Marcianise

34 15 44%
29
Pergocrema Team Logo

Pergocrema

36 20 56%
30
Figline Team Logo

Figline

34 17 50%
31
AS Pescina Team Logo

AS Pescina

36 17 47%
32
Real Giulianova Ssd Team Logo

Real Giulianova Ssd

36 18 50%
33
Sorrento Calcio Team Logo

Sorrento Calcio

34 20 59%
34
Portosummaga Team Logo

Portosummaga

34 16 47%
35
Andria BAT Team Logo

Andria BAT

36 17 47%
36
Potenza Team Logo

Potenza

34 16 47%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Pescara Team Logo

Pescara

19 6 32%
2
Hellas Verona Team Logo

Hellas Verona

19 10 53%
3
Benevento Team Logo

Benevento

18 9 50%
4
Perugia Team Logo

Perugia

17 8 47%
5
Ternana Team Logo

Ternana

17 5 29%
6
Novara Team Logo

Novara

17 9 53%
7
SPAL Team Logo

SPAL

17 7 41%
8
Virtus Lanciano Team Logo

Virtus Lanciano

17 7 41%
9
Como Team Logo

Como

17 8 47%
10
Varese Team Logo

Varese

19 11 58%
11
Foggia Team Logo

Foggia

18 9 50%
12
Cremonese Team Logo

Cremonese

19 11 58%
13
Paganese Team Logo

Paganese

18 11 61%
14
Arezzo Team Logo

Arezzo

18 10 56%
15
US Alessandria Team Logo

US Alessandria

17 9 53%
16
Cosenza Team Logo

Cosenza

17 9 53%
17
Reggiana Team Logo

Reggiana

18 8 44%
18
Monza Team Logo

Monza

17 10 59%
19
Ravenna Team Logo

Ravenna

17 12 71%
20
Taranto Team Logo

Taranto

17 5 29%
21
Lumezzane Team Logo

Lumezzane

17 5 29%
22
Pro Patria Team Logo

Pro Patria

18 11 61%
23
Rimini Team Logo

Rimini

18 8 44%
24
Viareggio Team Logo

Viareggio

18 6 33%
25
Lecco Team Logo

Lecco

17 9 53%
26
Foligno Team Logo

Foligno

17 11 65%
27
Cavese Team Logo

Cavese

17 7 41%
28
Real Marcianise Team Logo

Real Marcianise

17 8 47%
29
Pergocrema Team Logo

Pergocrema

18 11 61%
30
Figline Team Logo

Figline

17 9 53%
31
AS Pescina Team Logo

AS Pescina

18 10 56%
32
Real Giulianova Ssd Team Logo

Real Giulianova Ssd

18 10 56%
33
Sorrento Calcio Team Logo

Sorrento Calcio

17 12 71%
34
Portosummaga Team Logo

Portosummaga

17 7 41%
35
Andria BAT Team Logo

Andria BAT

18 5 28%
36
Potenza Team Logo

Potenza

17 7 41%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Pescara Team Logo

Pescara

19 10 53%
2
Hellas Verona Team Logo

Hellas Verona

19 3 16%
3
Benevento Team Logo

Benevento

18 11 61%
4
Perugia Team Logo

Perugia

17 7 41%
5
Ternana Team Logo

Ternana

17 6 35%
6
Novara Team Logo

Novara

17 9 53%
7
SPAL Team Logo

SPAL

17 9 53%
8
Virtus Lanciano Team Logo

Virtus Lanciano

17 7 41%
9
Como Team Logo

Como

17 5 29%
10
Varese Team Logo

Varese

19 10 53%
11
Foggia Team Logo

Foggia

18 6 33%
12
Cremonese Team Logo

Cremonese

19 12 63%
13
Paganese Team Logo

Paganese

18 8 44%
14
Arezzo Team Logo

Arezzo

18 9 50%
15
US Alessandria Team Logo

US Alessandria

17 9 53%
16
Cosenza Team Logo

Cosenza

17 12 71%
17
Reggiana Team Logo

Reggiana

18 11 61%
18
Monza Team Logo

Monza

17 10 59%
19
Ravenna Team Logo

Ravenna

17 8 47%
20
Taranto Team Logo

Taranto

17 6 35%
21
Lumezzane Team Logo

Lumezzane

17 13 76%
22
Pro Patria Team Logo

Pro Patria

18 13 72%
23
Rimini Team Logo

Rimini

18 6 33%
24
Viareggio Team Logo

Viareggio

18 9 50%
25
Lecco Team Logo

Lecco

17 8 47%
26
Foligno Team Logo

Foligno

17 12 71%
27
Cavese Team Logo

Cavese

17 4 24%
28
Real Marcianise Team Logo

Real Marcianise

17 7 41%
29
Pergocrema Team Logo

Pergocrema

18 9 50%
30
Figline Team Logo

Figline

17 8 47%
31
AS Pescina Team Logo

AS Pescina

18 7 39%
32
Real Giulianova Ssd Team Logo

Real Giulianova Ssd

18 8 44%
33
Sorrento Calcio Team Logo

Sorrento Calcio

17 8 47%
34
Portosummaga Team Logo

Portosummaga

17 9 53%
35
Andria BAT Team Logo

Andria BAT

18 12 67%
36
Potenza Team Logo

Potenza

17 9 53%

This section shows the statistics on how many times Arezzo and Como have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Serie C.

The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.

Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:

  • In 36 matches played in the Serie C, Arezzo has scored and conceded goals in 19 matches. In other words, 53% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 56% at home, while it is 50% away from home.
  • Meanwhile, Como has scored and conceded in 13 of their 34 matches so far in the Serie C, giving them a BTTS rate of 38%. Both teams have scored in 8 of Como’s 17 home matches, and it has happened 5 times in 17 matches as the away side.

It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.

And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets