Favourite this Match

Anzio 2 - 0 CynthiAlbalonga

21.01.2024 - 08:30

Finished

Both Teams to Score

# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Ischia Team Logo

Ischia

34 14 41%
2
Nocerina Team Logo

Nocerina

34 12 35%
3
Trastevere Team Logo

Trastevere

34 15 44%
4
Cavese Team Logo

Cavese

34 16 47%
5
Flaminia Team Logo

Flaminia

34 17 50%
6
Cassino Team Logo

Cassino

34 12 35%
7
Ostia Mare Lidocalcio Team Logo

Ostia Mare Lidocalcio

34 16 47%
8
Budoni Team Logo

Budoni

34 15 44%
9
Latte Dolce Team Logo

Latte Dolce

34 15 44%
10
Gladiator Team Logo

Gladiator

34 16 47%
11
Anzio Team Logo

Anzio

34 20 59%
12
CynthiAlbalonga Team Logo

CynthiAlbalonga

34 14 41%
13
Atletico Uri Team Logo

Atletico Uri

34 14 41%
14
Sarrabus Ogliastra Team Logo

Sarrabus Ogliastra

34 18 53%
15
Boreale Team Logo

Boreale

34 13 38%
16
San Marzano Team Logo

San Marzano

34 12 35%
17
Ardea Team Logo

Ardea

34 16 47%
18
Romana Team Logo

Romana

34 17 50%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Ischia Team Logo

Ischia

17 6 35%
2
Nocerina Team Logo

Nocerina

17 5 29%
3
Trastevere Team Logo

Trastevere

17 7 41%
4
Cavese Team Logo

Cavese

17 7 41%
5
Flaminia Team Logo

Flaminia

17 5 29%
6
Cassino Team Logo

Cassino

17 7 41%
7
Ostia Mare Lidocalcio Team Logo

Ostia Mare Lidocalcio

17 7 41%
8
Budoni Team Logo

Budoni

17 9 53%
9
Latte Dolce Team Logo

Latte Dolce

17 8 47%
10
Gladiator Team Logo

Gladiator

17 6 35%
11
Anzio Team Logo

Anzio

17 13 76%
12
CynthiAlbalonga Team Logo

CynthiAlbalonga

17 6 35%
13
Atletico Uri Team Logo

Atletico Uri

17 9 53%
14
Sarrabus Ogliastra Team Logo

Sarrabus Ogliastra

17 10 59%
15
Boreale Team Logo

Boreale

17 4 24%
16
San Marzano Team Logo

San Marzano

17 8 47%
17
Ardea Team Logo

Ardea

17 9 53%
18
Romana Team Logo

Romana

17 10 59%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Ischia Team Logo

Ischia

17 8 47%
2
Nocerina Team Logo

Nocerina

17 7 41%
3
Trastevere Team Logo

Trastevere

17 8 47%
4
Cavese Team Logo

Cavese

17 9 53%
5
Flaminia Team Logo

Flaminia

17 12 71%
6
Cassino Team Logo

Cassino

17 5 29%
7
Ostia Mare Lidocalcio Team Logo

Ostia Mare Lidocalcio

17 9 53%
8
Budoni Team Logo

Budoni

17 6 35%
9
Latte Dolce Team Logo

Latte Dolce

17 7 41%
10
Gladiator Team Logo

Gladiator

17 10 59%
11
Anzio Team Logo

Anzio

17 7 41%
12
CynthiAlbalonga Team Logo

CynthiAlbalonga

17 8 47%
13
Atletico Uri Team Logo

Atletico Uri

17 5 29%
14
Sarrabus Ogliastra Team Logo

Sarrabus Ogliastra

17 8 47%
15
Boreale Team Logo

Boreale

17 9 53%
16
San Marzano Team Logo

San Marzano

17 4 24%
17
Ardea Team Logo

Ardea

17 7 41%
18
Romana Team Logo

Romana

17 7 41%

This section shows the statistics on how many times Anzio and CynthiAlbalonga have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Serie D Group G.

The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.

Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:

  • In 34 matches played in the Serie D Group G, Anzio has scored and conceded goals in 20 matches. In other words, 59% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 76% at home, while it is 41% away from home.
  • Meanwhile, CynthiAlbalonga has scored and conceded in 14 of their 34 matches so far in the Serie D Group G, giving them a BTTS rate of 41%. Both teams have scored in 6 of CynthiAlbalonga’s 17 home matches, and it has happened 8 times in 17 matches as the away side.

It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.

And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets