BTTS: Angoulême 0 - 1 Bordeaux
Sat, 09 December 2023 - 08:00
Stadium: Stade Lebon (Angoulême)
Finished
Both Teams to Score
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Entente Itancourt-Neu. |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 2 |
Feurs |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 3 |
Chantilly |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 4 |
Biesheim |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 5 |
Chaumont |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 6 |
Pontarlier |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 7 |
US Liffré |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 8 |
Volvic |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 9 |
Stade Poitevin |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 10 |
Mâcon |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 11 |
APM Metz |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 12 |
Dives-Cabourg |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 13 |
Longueau |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 14 |
Panazol |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 15 |
Pirae |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 16 |
Noisy-le-Sec |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 17 |
Bourgoin-Jallieu |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 18 |
Dinan Léhon |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 19 |
US Revel |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 20 |
Aubagne |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 21 |
Domerat |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 22 |
Hombourg-Haut |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 23 |
Jura Dolois |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 24 |
Torcy |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 25 |
Ergué-Gaberic |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 26 |
Union Cosnoise |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 27 |
Toulouse Métropole |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 28 |
Thionville Lusitanos |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 29 |
ASPTT Dijon |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 30 |
Provin |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 31 |
Saint-Michel 91 |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 32 |
JS Douvres |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 33 |
St-Aubin Guérande |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 34 |
Châteaugiron |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 35 |
Morlaas Est-Bearn |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 36 |
Schweighouse s/Moder |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 37 |
Loon-Plage |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 38 |
Chauray |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 39 |
Villerupt Thil ES |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 40 |
Bassin d'Arcachon Sud |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 41 |
Auch |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 42 |
AG Caennaise |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 43 |
PSG |
6 | 4 | 67% |
| 44 |
Montpellier |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 45 |
Metz |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 46 |
Toulouse |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 47 |
Nantes |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 48 |
Lille |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 49 |
Rennes |
5 | 3 | 60% |
| 50 |
Saint-Denis |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Entente Itancourt-Neu. |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 2 |
Feurs |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 3 |
Chantilly |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 4 |
Biesheim |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 5 |
Chaumont |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 6 |
Pontarlier |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 7 |
US Liffré |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 8 |
Volvic |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 9 |
Stade Poitevin |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 10 |
Mâcon |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 11 |
APM Metz |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 12 |
Dives-Cabourg |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 13 |
Longueau |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 14 |
Panazol |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 15 |
Pirae |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 16 |
Noisy-le-Sec |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 17 |
Bourgoin-Jallieu |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 18 |
Dinan Léhon |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 19 |
US Revel |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 20 |
Aubagne |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 21 |
Domerat |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 22 |
Hombourg-Haut |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 23 |
Jura Dolois |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 24 |
Torcy |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 25 |
Ergué-Gaberic |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 26 |
Union Cosnoise |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 27 |
Toulouse Métropole |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 28 |
Thionville Lusitanos |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 29 |
ASPTT Dijon |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 30 |
Provin |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 31 |
Saint-Michel 91 |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 32 |
JS Douvres |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 33 |
St-Aubin Guérande |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 34 |
Châteaugiron |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 35 |
Morlaas Est-Bearn |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 36 |
Schweighouse s/Moder |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 37 |
Loon-Plage |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 38 |
Chauray |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 39 |
Villerupt Thil ES |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 40 |
Bassin d'Arcachon Sud |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 41 |
Auch |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 42 |
AG Caennaise |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 43 |
PSG |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 44 |
Montpellier |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 45 |
Metz |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 46 |
Toulouse |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 47 |
Nantes |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 48 |
Lille |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 49 |
Rennes |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 50 |
Saint-Denis |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Entente Itancourt-Neu. |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 2 |
Feurs |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 3 |
Chantilly |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 4 |
Biesheim |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 5 |
Chaumont |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 6 |
Pontarlier |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 7 |
US Liffré |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 8 |
Volvic |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 9 |
Stade Poitevin |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 10 |
Mâcon |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 11 |
APM Metz |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 12 |
Dives-Cabourg |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 13 |
Longueau |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 14 |
Panazol |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 15 |
Pirae |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 16 |
Noisy-le-Sec |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 17 |
Bourgoin-Jallieu |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 18 |
Dinan Léhon |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 19 |
US Revel |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 20 |
Aubagne |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 21 |
Domerat |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 22 |
Hombourg-Haut |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 23 |
Jura Dolois |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 24 |
Torcy |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 25 |
Ergué-Gaberic |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 26 |
Union Cosnoise |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 27 |
Toulouse Métropole |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 28 |
Thionville Lusitanos |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 29 |
ASPTT Dijon |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 30 |
Provin |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 31 |
Saint-Michel 91 |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 32 |
JS Douvres |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 33 |
St-Aubin Guérande |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 34 |
Châteaugiron |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 35 |
Morlaas Est-Bearn |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 36 |
Schweighouse s/Moder |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 37 |
Loon-Plage |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 38 |
Chauray |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 39 |
Villerupt Thil ES |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 40 |
Bassin d'Arcachon Sud |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 41 |
Auch |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 42 |
AG Caennaise |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 43 |
PSG |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 44 |
Montpellier |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 45 |
Metz |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 46 |
Toulouse |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 47 |
Nantes |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 48 |
Lille |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 49 |
Rennes |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 50 |
Saint-Denis |
1 | 1 | 100% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Angoulême and Bordeaux have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Coupe de France.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
- In 2 matches played in the French Cup, Angoulême has scored and conceded goals in 0 matches. In other words, 0% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 0% at home, while it is 0% away from home.
- Meanwhile, Bordeaux has scored and conceded in 3 of their 4 matches so far in the France Cup, giving them a BTTS rate of 75%. Both teams have scored in 1 of Bordeaux’s 1 home matches, and it has happened 2 times in 3 matches as the away side.
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets