# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() New Orleans Jesters |
10 | 10% | 0% | 0% |
2 |
![]() FC Motown |
13 | 8% | 8% | 8% |
3 |
![]() El Farolito |
14 | 29% | 21% | 21% |
4 |
![]() Laredo Heat |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 |
![]() West Chester United |
14 | 21% | 14% | 0% |
6 |
![]() Duluth FC |
14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
7 |
![]() Erie Commodores |
12 | 8% | 8% | 8% |
8 |
![]() FCM Portland |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 |
![]() Napa Valley 1839 FC |
13 | 23% | 15% | 15% |
10 |
![]() FC Arizona |
12 | 8% | 8% | 8% |
11 |
![]() Northern Virginia United |
10 | 30% | 30% | 10% |
12 |
![]() Tulsa Athletic |
16 | 19% | 6% | 0% |
13 |
![]() Hartford City FC |
13 | 31% | 23% | 23% |
14 |
![]() Med City FC |
15 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
15 |
![]() Torch FC |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 |
![]() Aris |
12 | 17% | 8% | 8% |
17 |
![]() Sacramento Gold |
11 | 27% | 27% | 27% |
18 |
![]() Hershey FC |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 |
![]() Atlantic City FC |
11 | 9% | 0% | 0% |
20 |
![]() Georgia Revolution |
12 | 33% | 17% | 17% |
21 |
![]() Milwaukee Torrent |
11 | 9% | 9% | 9% |
22 |
![]() Syracuse FC |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
23 |
![]() Fort Worth Vaqueros |
11 | 9% | 9% | 0% |
24 |
![]() Demize NPSL |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
25 |
![]() Sioux Falls Thunder |
12 | 8% | 8% | 8% |
26 |
![]() Electric City Shock |
10 | 10% | 10% | 0% |
27 |
![]() Naples United FC |
11 | 9% | 9% | 9% |
28 |
![]() FC Frederick |
10 | 20% | 20% | 10% |
29 |
![]() Kingston Stockade FC |
11 | 18% | 0% | 0% |
30 |
![]() Cleveland SC |
14 | 14% | 14% | 14% |
31 |
![]() Sonoma County Sol |
11 | 9% | 9% | 9% |
32 |
![]() St. Louis Club Atletico |
10 | 10% | 10% | 0% |
33 |
![]() Minnesota Twin Stars FC |
13 | 38% | 31% | 23% |
34 |
![]() FC Columbus |
12 | 8% | 8% | 8% |
35 |
![]() FC Davis |
12 | 33% | 17% | 17% |
36 |
![]() FC Monmouth |
10 | 10% | 10% | 0% |
37 |
![]() Virginia Beach City |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
38 |
![]() FC Brownsville |
14 | 7% | 7% | 0% |
39 |
![]() Katy 1895 FC |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
40 |
![]() Dakota Fusion FC |
13 | 8% | 8% | 8% |
41 |
![]() Jacksonville Armada II |
11 | 9% | 9% | 0% |
42 |
![]() San Ramon FC |
11 | 45% | 27% | 27% |
43 |
![]() Denton Diablos |
11 | 27% | 27% | 9% |
44 |
![]() Crossfire Redmond |
13 | 8% | 0% | 0% |
45 |
![]() Las Vegas Legends FC |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
46 |
![]() Tallahassee |
11 | 9% | 0% | 0% |
47 |
![]() Pensacola |
12 | 42% | 25% | 0% |
48 |
![]() Carpathia |
12 | 17% | 17% | 17% |
49 |
![]() Arkansas Wolves |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
50 |
![]() Reign |
10 | 10% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Virginia Beach City |
10 | 10% | 0% | 0% |
2 |
![]() Florida Roots |
10 | 10% | 10% | 10% |
3 |
![]() Irving |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 |
![]() Jackson Lions |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 |
![]() OSA Seattle |
10 | 20% | 0% | 0% |
6 |
![]() Philadelphia Ukrainians |
10 | 10% | 10% | 10% |
7 |
![]() West Texas |
12 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 |
![]() New Orleans Jesters |
10 | 10% | 10% | 0% |
9 |
![]() FC Motown |
13 | 8% | 8% | 8% |
10 |
![]() El Farolito |
14 | 43% | 21% | 14% |
11 |
![]() Laredo Heat |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Napa Valley 1839 FC |
13 | 15% | 8% | 8% |
13 |
![]() FC Arizona |
12 | 8% | 8% | 0% |
14 |
![]() Northern Virginia United |
10 | 30% | 20% | 20% |
15 |
![]() Tulsa Athletic |
16 | 13% | 0% | 0% |
16 |
![]() Syracuse FC |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 |
![]() Fort Worth Vaqueros |
11 | 9% | 9% | 9% |
18 |
![]() Demize NPSL |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 |
![]() Electric City Shock |
10 | 10% | 0% | 0% |
20 |
![]() Cleveland SC |
14 | 14% | 0% | 0% |
21 |
![]() Sonoma County Sol |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
22 |
![]() Minnesota Twin Stars FC |
13 | 38% | 31% | 23% |
23 |
![]() Hartford City FC |
13 | 23% | 23% | 15% |
24 |
![]() Las Vegas Legends FC |
10 | 10% | 10% | 0% |
25 |
![]() Tallahassee |
11 | 9% | 0% | 0% |
26 |
![]() Pensacola |
12 | 17% | 0% | 0% |
27 |
![]() Brave Lions |
10 | 20% | 20% | 20% |
28 |
![]() Sunflower State |
10 | 10% | 0% | 0% |
29 |
![]() Apotheos |
16 | 19% | 13% | 6% |
30 |
![]() Lubbock Matadors |
13 | 8% | 0% | 0% |
31 |
![]() Akron City |
12 | 8% | 0% | 0% |
32 |
![]() Pennsylvania Classics |
10 | 10% | 0% | 0% |
33 |
![]() California Odyssey |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
34 |
![]() Philadelphia Union III |
10 | 10% | 10% | 0% |
35 |
![]() Greenville United |
11 | 9% | 0% | 0% |
36 |
![]() Kansas City Sol |
11 | 9% | 9% | 9% |
37 |
![]() Duluth FC |
14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
38 |
![]() Atlantic City FC |
11 | 9% | 0% | 0% |
39 |
![]() Georgia Revolution |
12 | 33% | 17% | 8% |
40 |
![]() Crossfire Redmond |
13 | 8% | 8% | 8% |
41 |
![]() Arkansas Wolves |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
42 |
![]() Reign |
10 | 20% | 0% | 0% |
43 |
![]() Oklahoma City 1889 |
12 | 17% | 17% | 8% |
44 |
![]() Georgia Storm |
10 | 30% | 10% | 10% |
45 |
![]() Southern States |
14 | 7% | 7% | 0% |
46 |
![]() New York Shockers |
11 | 27% | 9% | 0% |
47 |
![]() First State |
10 | 30% | 10% | 10% |
48 |
![]() Joy St. Louis Park |
12 | 25% | 25% | 17% |
49 |
![]() FC Frederick |
10 | 20% | 10% | 0% |
50 |
![]() Kingston Stockade FC |
11 | 9% | 9% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() New Orleans Jesters |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 |
![]() FC Motown |
13 | 8% | 8% | 0% |
3 |
![]() El Farolito |
14 | 21% | 14% | 14% |
4 |
![]() Laredo Heat |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 |
![]() West Chester United |
14 | 21% | 7% | 7% |
6 |
![]() Duluth FC |
14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
7 |
![]() Erie Commodores |
12 | 8% | 8% | 8% |
8 |
![]() FCM Portland |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 |
![]() Napa Valley 1839 FC |
13 | 23% | 15% | 8% |
10 |
![]() FC Arizona |
12 | 8% | 8% | 0% |
11 |
![]() Northern Virginia United |
10 | 20% | 20% | 20% |
12 |
![]() Tulsa Athletic |
16 | 25% | 13% | 6% |
13 |
![]() Hartford City FC |
13 | 31% | 15% | 0% |
14 |
![]() Med City FC |
15 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
15 |
![]() Torch FC |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 |
![]() Aris |
12 | 8% | 0% | 0% |
17 |
![]() Sacramento Gold |
11 | 36% | 36% | 27% |
18 |
![]() Hershey FC |
11 | 18% | 9% | 0% |
19 |
![]() Atlantic City FC |
11 | 9% | 0% | 0% |
20 |
![]() Georgia Revolution |
12 | 25% | 8% | 8% |
21 |
![]() Milwaukee Torrent |
11 | 18% | 0% | 0% |
22 |
![]() Syracuse FC |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
23 |
![]() Fort Worth Vaqueros |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
24 |
![]() Demize NPSL |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
25 |
![]() Sioux Falls Thunder |
12 | 8% | 8% | 8% |
26 |
![]() Electric City Shock |
10 | 10% | 10% | 0% |
27 |
![]() Naples United FC |
11 | 9% | 9% | 9% |
28 |
![]() FC Frederick |
10 | 30% | 20% | 20% |
29 |
![]() Kingston Stockade FC |
11 | 9% | 9% | 0% |
30 |
![]() Cleveland SC |
14 | 14% | 14% | 14% |
31 |
![]() Sonoma County Sol |
11 | 27% | 9% | 9% |
32 |
![]() St. Louis Club Atletico |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
33 |
![]() Minnesota Twin Stars FC |
13 | 31% | 23% | 0% |
34 |
![]() FC Columbus |
12 | 8% | 0% | 0% |
35 |
![]() FC Davis |
12 | 25% | 17% | 8% |
36 |
![]() FC Monmouth |
10 | 10% | 10% | 10% |
37 |
![]() Virginia Beach City |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
38 |
![]() FC Brownsville |
14 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
39 |
![]() Katy 1895 FC |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
40 |
![]() Dakota Fusion FC |
13 | 8% | 8% | 8% |
41 |
![]() Jacksonville Armada II |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
42 |
![]() San Ramon FC |
11 | 45% | 36% | 27% |
43 |
![]() Denton Diablos |
11 | 27% | 18% | 18% |
44 |
![]() Crossfire Redmond |
13 | 8% | 0% | 0% |
45 |
![]() Las Vegas Legends FC |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
46 |
![]() Tallahassee |
11 | 9% | 0% | 0% |
47 |
![]() Pensacola |
12 | 42% | 33% | 17% |
48 |
![]() Carpathia |
12 | 33% | 17% | 0% |
49 |
![]() Arkansas Wolves |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
50 |
![]() Reign |
10 | 10% | 0% | 0% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of FCM Portland’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 0% of their games played so far in the NPSL 2023.
And on the other side of the ball, FCM Portland’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 0% of their NPSL matches.
Here are two more card statistics for FCM Portland this season in the NPSL:
You can follow the FCM Portland’s card situation in NPSL all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.