Shenzhen 2 - 2 Shandong Taishan
14.05.2021 - 07:00
Local: Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center Central Stadium (Guangzhou)
Finalizados
Escanteios
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Acima de 9.5 | Acima de 10.5 | Acima de 11.5 | Acima de 12.5 | Acima de 13.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shenzhen |
22 | 82% | 73% | 59% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 14% | 10.81 |
| 2 |
Shanghai Port |
22 | 86% | 68% | 59% | 50% | 32% | 18% | 9% | 10.43 |
| 3 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
22 | 64% | 59% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 14% | 9.91 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
22 | 73% | 59% | 50% | 50% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9.9 |
| 5 |
Hebei CFFC |
22 | 64% | 59% | 59% | 41% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9.81 |
| 6 |
Guangzhou R&F |
22 | 68% | 59% | 55% | 45% | 14% | 14% | 9% | 9.52 |
| 7 |
Shandong Taishan |
22 | 77% | 68% | 50% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 9.33 |
| 8 |
Dalian Yifang |
22 | 64% | 55% | 41% | 32% | 18% | 14% | 9% | 9.19 |
| 9 |
Changchun Yatai |
22 | 64% | 59% | 50% | 41% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 9.14 |
| 10 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
22 | 55% | 50% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 14% | 0% | 9 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Zall |
22 | 68% | 59% | 41% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 5% | 8.9 |
| 12 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
22 | 64% | 50% | 27% | 23% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 8.68 |
| 13 |
Tianjin Tiger |
22 | 68% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 8.66 |
| 14 |
Henan |
22 | 50% | 36% | 27% | 23% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 8.4 |
| 15 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
22 | 55% | 41% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 8.34 |
| 16 |
Cangzhou Mighty Lions |
22 | 45% | 41% | 27% | 14% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 7.5 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Acima de 9.5 | Acima de 10.5 | Acima de 11.5 | Acima de 12.5 | Acima de 13.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shenzhen |
11 | 82% | 73% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 11.1 |
| 2 |
Shanghai Port |
11 | 73% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 10.2 |
| 3 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
11 | 64% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 10 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
11 | 73% | 73% | 73% | 73% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 10.45 |
| 5 |
Hebei CFFC |
11 | 82% | 82% | 82% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 11 |
| 6 |
Guangzhou R&F |
11 | 45% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 8.2 |
| 7 |
Shandong Taishan |
11 | 73% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 8.73 |
| 8 |
Dalian Yifang |
11 | 64% | 55% | 36% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9.28 |
| 9 |
Changchun Yatai |
11 | 64% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9.4 |
| 10 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
11 | 55% | 55% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 9.34 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Zall |
11 | 73% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 8.64 |
| 12 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
11 | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 8.09 |
| 13 |
Tianjin Tiger |
11 | 73% | 45% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 14 |
Henan |
11 | 64% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 8.7 |
| 15 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
11 | 55% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 8.63 |
| 16 |
Cangzhou Mighty Lions |
11 | 55% | 55% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.91 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Acima de 9.5 | Acima de 10.5 | Acima de 11.5 | Acima de 12.5 | Acima de 13.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shenzhen |
11 | 82% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 10.55 |
| 2 |
Shanghai Port |
11 | 100% | 73% | 64% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 10.64 |
| 3 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
11 | 64% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9.82 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
11 | 73% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9.3 |
| 5 |
Hebei CFFC |
11 | 45% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 8.5 |
| 6 |
Guangzhou R&F |
11 | 91% | 82% | 73% | 64% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 10.73 |
| 7 |
Shandong Taishan |
11 | 82% | 73% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 10 |
| 8 |
Dalian Yifang |
11 | 64% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9.1 |
| 9 |
Changchun Yatai |
11 | 64% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 8.91 |
| 10 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
11 | 55% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 0% | 8.73 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Zall |
11 | 64% | 64% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9.18 |
| 12 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
11 | 73% | 64% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9.28 |
| 13 |
Tianjin Tiger |
11 | 64% | 64% | 45% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9.4 |
| 14 |
Henan |
11 | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 8.1 |
| 15 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
11 | 55% | 36% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 8 |
| 16 |
Cangzhou Mighty Lions |
11 | 36% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 7.09 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
22 | 73% | 68% | 55% | 32% | 23% | 23% | 9% | 4.86 |
| 2 |
Cangzhou Mighty Lions |
22 | 59% | 41% | 27% | 14% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 3.32 |
| 3 |
Shanghai Port |
22 | 95% | 82% | 73% | 59% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 6.95 |
| 4 |
Henan |
22 | 64% | 55% | 18% | 9% | 5% | 5% | 0% | 3.45 |
| 5 |
Beijing Guoan |
22 | 82% | 68% | 55% | 41% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 5.14 |
| 6 |
Hebei CFFC |
22 | 73% | 64% | 45% | 32% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 4.1 |
| 7 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
22 | 59% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 3.32 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
22 | 55% | 50% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 3.76 |
| 9 |
Shandong Taishan |
22 | 77% | 68% | 68% | 59% | 45% | 23% | 9% | 5.71 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
22 | 50% | 27% | 14% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.57 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
22 | 86% | 82% | 64% | 50% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 5.9 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Tiger |
22 | 59% | 50% | 45% | 23% | 14% | 9% | 5% | 4.14 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
22 | 82% | 68% | 59% | 45% | 36% | 23% | 14% | 5.38 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
22 | 91% | 77% | 77% | 59% | 41% | 41% | 27% | 7.19 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
22 | 77% | 36% | 27% | 23% | 23% | 9% | 5% | 3.95 |
| 16 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
22 | 50% | 36% | 32% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 3.23 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
11 | 82% | 73% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 5.27 |
| 2 |
Cangzhou Mighty Lions |
11 | 73% | 55% | 36% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.55 |
| 3 |
Shanghai Port |
11 | 91% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 36% | 6.8 |
| 4 |
Henan |
11 | 82% | 82% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 4.4 |
| 5 |
Beijing Guoan |
11 | 91% | 82% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 5.27 |
| 6 |
Hebei CFFC |
11 | 82% | 82% | 55% | 36% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 4.36 |
| 7 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
11 | 55% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
11 | 45% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 3.3 |
| 9 |
Shandong Taishan |
11 | 73% | 64% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 0% | 5.18 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
11 | 45% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.2 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
11 | 73% | 73% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 0% | 5.67 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Tiger |
11 | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 3.91 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
11 | 82% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 5.64 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
11 | 91% | 73% | 73% | 64% | 55% | 55% | 27% | 7.9 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
11 | 91% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 4.64 |
| 16 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
11 | 64% | 45% | 45% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.91 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
11 | 64% | 64% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 4.4 |
| 2 |
Cangzhou Mighty Lions |
11 | 45% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 3.09 |
| 3 |
Shanghai Port |
11 | 100% | 91% | 82% | 73% | 55% | 36% | 36% | 7.09 |
| 4 |
Henan |
11 | 45% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.5 |
| 5 |
Beijing Guoan |
11 | 73% | 55% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 5 |
| 6 |
Hebei CFFC |
11 | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 3.8 |
| 7 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
11 | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.64 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
11 | 64% | 64% | 64% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 4.18 |
| 9 |
Shandong Taishan |
11 | 82% | 73% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 6.3 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
11 | 55% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.91 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
11 | 100% | 91% | 82% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 6.09 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Tiger |
11 | 55% | 55% | 55% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 4.4 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
11 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 5.1 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
11 | 91% | 82% | 82% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 6.55 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
11 | 64% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 3.27 |
| 16 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
11 | 36% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.55 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
22 | 50% | 32% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 14% | 9% | 3.48 |
| 2 |
Cangzhou Mighty Lions |
22 | 82% | 64% | 41% | 18% | 9% | 5% | 5% | 4.18 |
| 3 |
Shanghai Port |
22 | 59% | 32% | 32% | 23% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 3.48 |
| 4 |
Henan |
22 | 64% | 50% | 45% | 32% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 4.95 |
| 5 |
Beijing Guoan |
22 | 77% | 55% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 23% | 9% | 4.76 |
| 6 |
Hebei CFFC |
22 | 91% | 77% | 55% | 50% | 32% | 23% | 18% | 5.71 |
| 7 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
22 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 41% | 32% | 23% | 14% | 5.36 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
22 | 73% | 68% | 50% | 32% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 5.38 |
| 9 |
Shandong Taishan |
22 | 68% | 45% | 27% | 14% | 5% | 5% | 0% | 3.62 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
22 | 82% | 73% | 68% | 64% | 36% | 23% | 23% | 5.95 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
22 | 36% | 32% | 23% | 14% | 9% | 9% | 5% | 3.1 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Tiger |
22 | 77% | 64% | 50% | 36% | 23% | 5% | 5% | 4.52 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
22 | 55% | 45% | 41% | 18% | 9% | 5% | 5% | 3.81 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
22 | 64% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 0% | 3.62 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
22 | 77% | 77% | 59% | 41% | 32% | 27% | 9% | 4.95 |
| 16 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
22 | 95% | 86% | 77% | 50% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 6.68 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
11 | 55% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 3.36 |
| 2 |
Cangzhou Mighty Lions |
11 | 91% | 73% | 55% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 4.36 |
| 3 |
Shanghai Port |
11 | 55% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.4 |
| 4 |
Henan |
11 | 64% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 4.3 |
| 5 |
Beijing Guoan |
11 | 91% | 64% | 64% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 5.18 |
| 6 |
Hebei CFFC |
11 | 100% | 100% | 73% | 73% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 6.64 |
| 7 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
11 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 5.09 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
11 | 73% | 73% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 6.1 |
| 9 |
Shandong Taishan |
11 | 55% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.55 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
11 | 64% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 5 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
11 | 36% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 3.67 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Tiger |
11 | 73% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 4.09 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
11 | 55% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 3.64 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
11 | 36% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 3.2 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
11 | 64% | 64% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 4 |
| 16 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
11 | 91% | 82% | 73% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 6.09 |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Acima de 3.5 | Acima de 4.5 | Acima de 5.5 | Acima de 6.5 | Acima de 7.5 | Acima de 8.5 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
11 | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 3.6 |
| 2 |
Cangzhou Mighty Lions |
11 | 73% | 55% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 4 |
| 3 |
Shanghai Port |
11 | 64% | 36% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.55 |
| 4 |
Henan |
11 | 64% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 5.6 |
| 5 |
Beijing Guoan |
11 | 64% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 4.3 |
| 6 |
Hebei CFFC |
11 | 82% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 4.7 |
| 7 |
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
11 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 5.64 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
11 | 73% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 4.73 |
| 9 |
Shandong Taishan |
11 | 82% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 3.7 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
11 | 100% | 91% | 82% | 82% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 6.82 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
11 | 36% | 36% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.64 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Tiger |
11 | 82% | 82% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 5 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
11 | 55% | 45% | 36% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 4 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
11 | 91% | 73% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
11 | 91% | 91% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 9% | 5.91 |
| 16 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
11 | 100% | 91% | 82% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 7.27 |
Saber as média de escanteios para Shenzhen x Shandong Taishan pode fazer uma tremenda diferença para sua análise, principalmente se você gosta de esmiuçar números para entender como o jogo pode se desenrolar dentro dos 90 minutos.
Os jogos do Shenzhen tem, em média, 10.81 escanteios por jogo. Dessa média, 7.19 são a favor. Ou seja, com essa informação você pode saber qual é o poder ofensivo da equipe para este jogo.
Também vale destacar que Shenzhen concede ao adversário, em média, 3.62 por jogo.
Agora, falando de Shandong Taishan, a situação é a seguinte:
- Média de escanteios em jogos envolvendo Shandong Taishan: 9.33
- Média de cantos a favor: 5.71
- Média de escanteios concedidos: 3.62
Os escanteios representam oportunidades valiosas de marcar gols e desequilibrar uma partida. Ao examinar a média de escanteios para Shenzhen x Shandong Taishan, é possível avaliar a capacidade de criar jogadas ofensivas de ambos os clubes a partir dessa situação específica.
Além disso, as estatísticas de cantos (como alguns chamam os escanteios) também podem fornecer insights sobre a defesa de uma determinada equipe. Ao avaliar quantos escanteios uma equipe concede, é possível ter uma noção de sua solidez na zona defensiva e sua capacidade de evitar jogadas perigosas para o adversário.