Média de gols de Seattle Sounders Res.
Informações do time
Temporada
2014
País
Estados Unidos
Competição
Mais / Menos gols
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Geral | Casa | Fora |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Orlando City | 29 | 14 | 48% | 60% | 36% |
| 2 |  Phoenix Rising | 28 | 16 | 57% | 64% | 50% |
| 3 |  Penn FC | 31 | 19 | 61% | 64% | 59% |
| 4 |  Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 28 | 15 | 54% | 43% | 64% |
| 5 |  OKC Energy | 28 | 11 | 39% | 21% | 57% |
| 6 |  LA Galaxy II | 30 | 21 | 70% | 80% | 60% |
| 7 |  Sacramento Republic | 31 | 19 | 61% | 65% | 57% |
| 8 |  Charleston Battery | 29 | 13 | 45% | 50% | 40% |
| 9 |  Richmond Kickers | 30 | 18 | 60% | 69% | 50% |
| 10 |  Orange County SC | 28 | 17 | 61% | 64% | 57% |
| 11 |  Rochester Rhinos | 29 | 9 | 31% | 21% | 40% |
| 12 |  Wilmington Hammerheads | 29 | 13 | 45% | 43% | 47% |
| 13 |  Charlotte Eagles | 28 | 13 | 46% | 50% | 43% |
| 14 |  Dayton Dutch Lions | 28 | 17 | 61% | 57% | 64% |
| 15 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 7 | 2 | 29% | 25% | 33% |
| 16 |  Chivas USA Res. | 7 | 4 | 57% | 67% | 50% |
| 17 |  Colorado Rapids Res. | 6 | 3 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 18 |  Real Salt Lake Res. | 7 | 2 | 29% | 25% | 33% |
| 19 |  Montreal Impact Res. | 8 | 2 | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| 20 |  New York RB Res. | 8 | 5 | 63% | 67% | 60% |
| 21 |  Chicago Fire Res. | 9 | 5 | 56% | 40% | 75% |
| 22 |  Dallas Res. | 8 | 4 | 50% | 20% | 100% |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 0.5 | Geral | Casa | Fora |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orlando City | 29 | 27 | 93% | 100% | 86% |
| 2 | Phoenix Rising | 28 | 27 | 96% | 100% | 93% |
| 3 | Penn FC | 31 | 28 | 90% | 86% | 94% |
| 4 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 28 | 26 | 93% | 93% | 93% |
| 5 | OKC Energy | 28 | 27 | 96% | 93% | 100% |
| 6 | LA Galaxy II | 30 | 30 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 | Sacramento Republic | 31 | 29 | 94% | 94% | 93% |
| 8 | Charleston Battery | 29 | 26 | 90% | 93% | 87% |
| 9 | Richmond Kickers | 30 | 27 | 90% | 94% | 86% |
| 10 | Orange County SC | 28 | 28 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 | Rochester Rhinos | 29 | 25 | 86% | 86% | 87% |
| 12 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 29 | 23 | 79% | 64% | 93% |
| 13 | Charlotte Eagles | 28 | 27 | 96% | 100% | 93% |
| 14 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 28 | 28 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 15 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 7 | 6 | 86% | 100% | 67% |
| 16 | Chivas USA Res. | 7 | 7 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 17 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 6 | 6 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 18 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 7 | 5 | 71% | 75% | 67% |
| 19 | Montreal Impact Res. | 8 | 8 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 20 | New York RB Res. | 8 | 8 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 21 | Chicago Fire Res. | 9 | 8 | 89% | 80% | 100% |
| 22 | Dallas Res. | 8 | 8 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 1.5 | Geral | Casa | Fora |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orlando City | 29 | 21 | 72% | 80% | 64% |
| 2 | Phoenix Rising | 28 | 22 | 79% | 79% | 79% |
| 3 | Penn FC | 31 | 22 | 71% | 71% | 71% |
| 4 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 28 | 20 | 71% | 64% | 79% |
| 5 | OKC Energy | 28 | 18 | 64% | 57% | 71% |
| 6 | LA Galaxy II | 30 | 26 | 87% | 93% | 80% |
| 7 | Sacramento Republic | 31 | 25 | 81% | 82% | 79% |
| 8 | Charleston Battery | 29 | 20 | 69% | 79% | 60% |
| 9 | Richmond Kickers | 30 | 25 | 83% | 88% | 79% |
| 10 | Orange County SC | 28 | 21 | 75% | 93% | 57% |
| 11 | Rochester Rhinos | 29 | 16 | 55% | 43% | 67% |
| 12 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 29 | 19 | 66% | 57% | 73% |
| 13 | Charlotte Eagles | 28 | 22 | 79% | 71% | 86% |
| 14 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 28 | 23 | 82% | 86% | 79% |
| 15 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 7 | 4 | 57% | 50% | 67% |
| 16 | Chivas USA Res. | 7 | 6 | 86% | 67% | 100% |
| 17 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 6 | 6 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 18 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 7 | 4 | 57% | 75% | 33% |
| 19 | Montreal Impact Res. | 8 | 4 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 20 | New York RB Res. | 8 | 6 | 75% | 67% | 80% |
| 21 | Chicago Fire Res. | 9 | 7 | 78% | 60% | 100% |
| 22 | Dallas Res. | 8 | 7 | 88% | 80% | 100% |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 1.5 | Geral | Casa | Fora |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orlando City | 29 | 11 | 38% | 47% | 29% |
| 2 | Phoenix Rising | 28 | 8 | 29% | 29% | 29% |
| 3 | Penn FC | 31 | 16 | 52% | 64% | 41% |
| 4 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 28 | 13 | 46% | 36% | 57% |
| 5 | OKC Energy | 28 | 7 | 25% | 7% | 43% |
| 6 | LA Galaxy II | 30 | 12 | 40% | 53% | 27% |
| 7 | Sacramento Republic | 31 | 7 | 23% | 29% | 14% |
| 8 | Charleston Battery | 29 | 9 | 31% | 29% | 33% |
| 9 | Richmond Kickers | 30 | 13 | 43% | 44% | 43% |
| 10 | Orange County SC | 28 | 9 | 32% | 29% | 36% |
| 11 | Rochester Rhinos | 29 | 5 | 17% | 14% | 20% |
| 12 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 29 | 10 | 34% | 36% | 33% |
| 13 | Charlotte Eagles | 28 | 7 | 25% | 36% | 14% |
| 14 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 28 | 9 | 32% | 21% | 43% |
| 15 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 7 | 2 | 29% | 25% | 33% |
| 16 | Chivas USA Res. | 7 | 3 | 43% | 67% | 25% |
| 17 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 6 | 2 | 33% | 50% | 25% |
| 18 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 7 | 2 | 29% | 25% | 33% |
| 19 | Montreal Impact Res. | 8 | 1 | 13% | 25% | 0% |
| 20 | New York RB Res. | 8 | 3 | 38% | 33% | 40% |
| 21 | Chicago Fire Res. | 9 | 3 | 33% | 0% | 75% |
| 22 | Dallas Res. | 8 | 2 | 25% | 20% | 33% |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 1.5 | Geral | Casa | Fora |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orlando City | 29 | 6 | 21% | 20% | 21% |
| 2 | Phoenix Rising | 28 | 4 | 14% | 7% | 21% |
| 3 | Penn FC | 31 | 9 | 29% | 43% | 18% |
| 4 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 28 | 5 | 18% | 7% | 29% |
| 5 | OKC Energy | 28 | 4 | 14% | 7% | 21% |
| 6 | LA Galaxy II | 30 | 7 | 23% | 40% | 7% |
| 7 | Sacramento Republic | 31 | 5 | 16% | 24% | 7% |
| 8 | Charleston Battery | 29 | 2 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 9 | Richmond Kickers | 30 | 5 | 17% | 13% | 21% |
| 10 | Orange County SC | 28 | 6 | 21% | 21% | 21% |
| 11 | Rochester Rhinos | 29 | 2 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 12 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 29 | 4 | 14% | 7% | 20% |
| 13 | Charlotte Eagles | 28 | 3 | 11% | 14% | 7% |
| 14 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 28 | 5 | 18% | 7% | 29% |
| 15 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 7 | 2 | 29% | 25% | 33% |
| 16 | Chivas USA Res. | 7 | 1 | 14% | 33% | 0% |
| 17 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 6 | 1 | 17% | 0% | 25% |
| 18 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 7 | 1 | 14% | 25% | 0% |
| 19 | Montreal Impact Res. | 8 | 1 | 13% | 25% | 0% |
| 20 | New York RB Res. | 8 | 2 | 25% | 33% | 20% |
| 21 | Chicago Fire Res. | 9 | 2 | 22% | 0% | 50% |
| 22 | Dallas Res. | 8 | 1 | 13% | 20% | 0% |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 1.5 | Geral | Casa | Fora |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orlando City | 29 | 1 | 3% | 7% | 0% |
| 2 | Phoenix Rising | 28 | 2 | 7% | 0% | 14% |
| 3 | Penn FC | 31 | 3 | 10% | 14% | 6% |
| 4 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 28 | 3 | 11% | 7% | 14% |
| 5 | OKC Energy | 28 | 2 | 7% | 0% | 14% |
| 6 | LA Galaxy II | 30 | 4 | 13% | 27% | 0% |
| 7 | Sacramento Republic | 31 | 2 | 6% | 6% | 7% |
| 8 | Charleston Battery | 29 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 | Richmond Kickers | 30 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 7% |
| 10 | Orange County SC | 28 | 2 | 7% | 14% | 0% |
| 11 | Rochester Rhinos | 29 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 12 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 29 | 3 | 10% | 7% | 13% |
| 13 | Charlotte Eagles | 28 | 1 | 4% | 7% | 0% |
| 14 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 28 | 5 | 18% | 7% | 29% |
| 15 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 7 | 1 | 14% | 25% | 0% |
| 16 | Chivas USA Res. | 7 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 17 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 6 | 1 | 17% | 0% | 25% |
| 18 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 7 | 1 | 14% | 25% | 0% |
| 19 | Montreal Impact Res. | 8 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 20 | New York RB Res. | 8 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 21 | Chicago Fire Res. | 9 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 22 | Dallas Res. | 8 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Geral | Casa | Fora |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orlando City | 29 | 15 | 52% | 40% | 64% |
| 2 | Phoenix Rising | 28 | 12 | 43% | 36% | 50% |
| 3 | Penn FC | 31 | 12 | 39% | 36% | 41% |
| 4 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 28 | 13 | 46% | 57% | 36% |
| 5 | OKC Energy | 28 | 17 | 61% | 79% | 43% |
| 6 | LA Galaxy II | 30 | 9 | 30% | 20% | 40% |
| 7 | Sacramento Republic | 31 | 12 | 39% | 35% | 43% |
| 8 | Charleston Battery | 29 | 16 | 55% | 50% | 60% |
| 9 | Richmond Kickers | 30 | 12 | 40% | 31% | 50% |
| 10 | Orange County SC | 28 | 11 | 39% | 36% | 43% |
| 11 | Rochester Rhinos | 29 | 20 | 69% | 79% | 60% |
| 12 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 29 | 16 | 55% | 57% | 53% |
| 13 | Charlotte Eagles | 28 | 15 | 54% | 50% | 57% |
| 14 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 28 | 11 | 39% | 43% | 36% |
| 15 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 7 | 5 | 71% | 75% | 67% |
| 16 | Chivas USA Res. | 7 | 3 | 43% | 33% | 50% |
| 17 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 6 | 3 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 18 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 7 | 5 | 71% | 75% | 67% |
| 19 | Montreal Impact Res. | 8 | 6 | 75% | 75% | 75% |
| 20 | New York RB Res. | 8 | 3 | 38% | 33% | 40% |
| 21 | Chicago Fire Res. | 9 | 4 | 44% | 60% | 25% |
| 22 | Dallas Res. | 8 | 4 | 50% | 80% | 0% |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Geral | Casa | Fora |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orlando City | 29 | 2 | 7% | 0% | 14% |
| 2 | Phoenix Rising | 28 | 1 | 4% | 0% | 7% |
| 3 | Penn FC | 31 | 3 | 10% | 14% | 6% |
| 4 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 28 | 2 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 5 | OKC Energy | 28 | 1 | 4% | 7% | 0% |
| 6 | LA Galaxy II | 30 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 | Sacramento Republic | 31 | 2 | 6% | 6% | 7% |
| 8 | Charleston Battery | 29 | 3 | 10% | 7% | 13% |
| 9 | Richmond Kickers | 30 | 3 | 10% | 6% | 14% |
| 10 | Orange County SC | 28 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 | Rochester Rhinos | 29 | 4 | 14% | 14% | 13% |
| 12 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 29 | 6 | 21% | 36% | 7% |
| 13 | Charlotte Eagles | 28 | 1 | 4% | 0% | 7% |
| 14 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 28 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 15 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 7 | 1 | 14% | 0% | 33% |
| 16 | Chivas USA Res. | 7 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 17 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 6 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 18 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 7 | 2 | 29% | 25% | 33% |
| 19 | Montreal Impact Res. | 8 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 20 | New York RB Res. | 8 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 21 | Chicago Fire Res. | 9 | 1 | 11% | 20% | 0% |
| 22 | Dallas Res. | 8 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Geral | Casa | Fora |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orlando City | 29 | 8 | 28% | 20% | 36% |
| 2 | Phoenix Rising | 28 | 6 | 21% | 21% | 21% |
| 3 | Penn FC | 31 | 9 | 29% | 29% | 29% |
| 4 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 28 | 8 | 29% | 36% | 21% |
| 5 | OKC Energy | 28 | 10 | 36% | 43% | 29% |
| 6 | LA Galaxy II | 30 | 4 | 13% | 7% | 20% |
| 7 | Sacramento Republic | 31 | 6 | 19% | 18% | 21% |
| 8 | Charleston Battery | 29 | 9 | 31% | 21% | 40% |
| 9 | Richmond Kickers | 30 | 5 | 17% | 13% | 21% |
| 10 | Orange County SC | 28 | 7 | 25% | 7% | 43% |
| 11 | Rochester Rhinos | 29 | 13 | 45% | 57% | 33% |
| 12 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 29 | 10 | 34% | 43% | 27% |
| 13 | Charlotte Eagles | 28 | 6 | 21% | 29% | 14% |
| 14 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 28 | 5 | 18% | 14% | 21% |
| 15 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 7 | 3 | 43% | 50% | 33% |
| 16 | Chivas USA Res. | 7 | 1 | 14% | 33% | 0% |
| 17 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 6 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 18 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 7 | 3 | 43% | 25% | 67% |
| 19 | Montreal Impact Res. | 8 | 4 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 20 | New York RB Res. | 8 | 2 | 25% | 33% | 20% |
| 21 | Chicago Fire Res. | 9 | 2 | 22% | 40% | 0% |
| 22 | Dallas Res. | 8 | 1 | 13% | 20% | 0% |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Geral | Casa | Fora |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orlando City | 29 | 18 | 62% | 53% | 71% |
| 2 | Phoenix Rising | 28 | 20 | 71% | 71% | 71% |
| 3 | Penn FC | 31 | 15 | 48% | 36% | 59% |
| 4 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 28 | 15 | 54% | 64% | 43% |
| 5 | OKC Energy | 28 | 21 | 75% | 93% | 57% |
| 6 | LA Galaxy II | 30 | 18 | 60% | 47% | 73% |
| 7 | Sacramento Republic | 31 | 24 | 77% | 71% | 86% |
| 8 | Charleston Battery | 29 | 20 | 69% | 71% | 67% |
| 9 | Richmond Kickers | 30 | 17 | 57% | 56% | 57% |
| 10 | Orange County SC | 28 | 19 | 68% | 71% | 64% |
| 11 | Rochester Rhinos | 29 | 24 | 83% | 86% | 80% |
| 12 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 29 | 19 | 66% | 64% | 67% |
| 13 | Charlotte Eagles | 28 | 21 | 75% | 64% | 86% |
| 14 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 28 | 19 | 68% | 79% | 57% |
| 15 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 7 | 5 | 71% | 75% | 67% |
| 16 | Chivas USA Res. | 7 | 4 | 57% | 33% | 75% |
| 17 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 6 | 4 | 67% | 50% | 75% |
| 18 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 7 | 5 | 71% | 75% | 67% |
| 19 | Montreal Impact Res. | 8 | 7 | 88% | 75% | 100% |
| 20 | New York RB Res. | 8 | 5 | 63% | 67% | 60% |
| 21 | Chicago Fire Res. | 9 | 6 | 67% | 100% | 25% |
| 22 | Dallas Res. | 8 | 6 | 75% | 80% | 67% |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Geral | Casa | Fora |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orlando City | 29 | 23 | 79% | 80% | 79% |
| 2 | Phoenix Rising | 28 | 24 | 86% | 93% | 79% |
| 3 | Penn FC | 31 | 22 | 71% | 57% | 82% |
| 4 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 28 | 23 | 82% | 93% | 71% |
| 5 | OKC Energy | 28 | 24 | 86% | 93% | 79% |
| 6 | LA Galaxy II | 30 | 23 | 77% | 60% | 93% |
| 7 | Sacramento Republic | 31 | 26 | 84% | 76% | 93% |
| 8 | Charleston Battery | 29 | 27 | 93% | 93% | 93% |
| 9 | Richmond Kickers | 30 | 25 | 83% | 88% | 79% |
| 10 | Orange County SC | 28 | 22 | 79% | 79% | 79% |
| 11 | Rochester Rhinos | 29 | 27 | 93% | 93% | 93% |
| 12 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 29 | 25 | 86% | 93% | 80% |
| 13 | Charlotte Eagles | 28 | 25 | 89% | 86% | 93% |
| 14 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 28 | 23 | 82% | 93% | 71% |
| 15 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 7 | 5 | 71% | 75% | 67% |
| 16 | Chivas USA Res. | 7 | 6 | 86% | 67% | 100% |
| 17 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 6 | 5 | 83% | 100% | 75% |
| 18 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 7 | 6 | 86% | 75% | 100% |
| 19 | Montreal Impact Res. | 8 | 7 | 88% | 75% | 100% |
| 20 | New York RB Res. | 8 | 6 | 75% | 67% | 80% |
| 21 | Chicago Fire Res. | 9 | 7 | 78% | 100% | 50% |
| 22 | Dallas Res. | 8 | 7 | 88% | 80% | 100% |
| # | Equipe | J | Acima de 2.5 | Geral | Casa | Fora |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orlando City | 29 | 28 | 97% | 93% | 100% |
| 2 | Phoenix Rising | 28 | 26 | 93% | 100% | 86% |
| 3 | Penn FC | 31 | 28 | 90% | 86% | 94% |
| 4 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 28 | 25 | 89% | 93% | 86% |
| 5 | OKC Energy | 28 | 26 | 93% | 100% | 86% |
| 6 | LA Galaxy II | 30 | 26 | 87% | 73% | 100% |
| 7 | Sacramento Republic | 31 | 29 | 94% | 94% | 93% |
| 8 | Charleston Battery | 29 | 29 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 | Richmond Kickers | 30 | 29 | 97% | 100% | 93% |
| 10 | Orange County SC | 28 | 26 | 93% | 86% | 100% |
| 11 | Rochester Rhinos | 29 | 29 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 12 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 29 | 26 | 90% | 93% | 87% |
| 13 | Charlotte Eagles | 28 | 27 | 96% | 93% | 100% |
| 14 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 28 | 23 | 82% | 93% | 71% |
| 15 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 7 | 6 | 86% | 75% | 100% |
| 16 | Chivas USA Res. | 7 | 7 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 17 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 6 | 5 | 83% | 100% | 75% |
| 18 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 7 | 6 | 86% | 75% | 100% |
| 19 | Montreal Impact Res. | 8 | 8 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 20 | New York RB Res. | 8 | 8 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 21 | Chicago Fire Res. | 9 | 9 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 22 | Dallas Res. | 8 | 8 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Média de gols marcados e sofridos: Seattle Sounders Res.
Saber a média de gols de Seattle Sounders Res. na competição USL Championship 2014 pode ajudar a entender como o sistema ofensivo (e até mesmo o defensivo) deste time está trabalhando nesta temporada.
Confira abaixo alguns números e taxas de gols da equipe:
- 29% dos jogos de Seattle Sounders Res. no campeonato tiveram 3 ou mais gols (somando os gols de Seattle Sounders Res. e também do adversário, ou seja, os gols do jogo). Já a porcentagem dos jogos onde as partidas tiveram 2 ou menos gols é de 71%.
Nesta página também é possível filtrar desde 1 gol por jogo até 6 ou mais gols - em forma crescente e decrescente. Assim, o interessado pode compreender vários fatores dos jogos que envolvem Seattle Sounders Res. nesta temporada em USL Championship.
Com essas informações, o usuário que analisa as estatísticas da APWin tem insights de como o ataque e a defesa do time em questão estão trabalhando ao longo da temporada. Se a taxa de gols dos jogos de Seattle Sounders Res. for muito alta, você pode investigar se isso se dá pelo fato do time marcar muitos gols ou se está pecando na parte defensiva.
No entanto, é necessário frisar que as estatísticas de percentagem de gols não pode ser analisada de maneira isolada e é necessário verificar todos os fatores que levam a esse número, como: tática adotada, contratações recentes que aprimoraram ou pioraram os sistemas de jogo, mentalidade da equipe e outras variáveis.