Xinjiang Tianshan corners per game

Team Info

Season

Country

Venue

2022

China

Hongshan Stadium

Competition

China

China League One

Summary Matches Corners Stats Top Scorers & Assists Squads

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	65 %	56 %	47 %	38 %	18 %	12 %	6 %	9.06
2	Nanjing City	34	59 %	53 %	35 %	32 %	21 %	12 %	3 %	8.94
3	Kunshan	34	62 %	56 %	44 %	35 %	21 %	9 %	6 %	8.79
4	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	56 %	41 %	38 %	35 %	21 %	18 %	12 %	8.7
5	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	59 %	56 %	41 %	32 %	21 %	15 %	3 %	8.63
6	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	62 %	53 %	38 %	32 %	24 %	9 %	6 %	8.62
7	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	53 %	47 %	41 %	32 %	29 %	18 %	12 %	8.55
8	Suzhou Dongwu	34	59 %	50 %	38 %	26 %	21 %	6 %	0 %	8.44
9	Shenyang Urban	34	56 %	41 %	29 %	26 %	18 %	18 %	9 %	8.37
10	Hebei Kungfu	34	53 %	44 %	29 %	26 %	24 %	12 %	12 %	8.25
11	Nantong Zhiyun	34	56 %	47 %	24 %	18 %	12 %	12 %	6 %	8.14
12	Guangxi Baoyun	34	47 %	41 %	29 %	26 %	12 %	6 %	3 %	8.03
13	Shanghai Jiading	34	41 %	35 %	32 %	24 %	18 %	9 %	3 %	7.84
14	Qingdao Jonoon	34	50 %	35 %	29 %	18 %	12 %	6 %	3 %	7.82
15	Beijing BG	34	47 %	35 %	18 %	15 %	12 %	6 %	6 %	7.65
16	Zibo Cuju	34	44 %	35 %	18 %	15 %	6 %	3 %	0 %	7.54
17	BIT	34	38 %	35 %	29 %	15 %	12 %	6 %	6 %	7.44
18	Qingdao Youth Island	34	35 %	26 %	21 %	12 %	3 %	3 %	0 %	6.92

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	76 %	47 %	47 %	41 %	18 %	18 %	12 %	9.76
2	Nanjing City	17	59 %	59 %	47 %	41 %	29 %	18 %	6 %	9.3
3	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	71 %	71 %	59 %	53 %	12 %	6 %	0 %	9.23
4	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	59 %	59 %	47 %	35 %	29 %	24 %	0 %	8.83
5	Shenyang Urban	17	65 %	41 %	35 %	35 %	18 %	18 %	12 %	8.82
6	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	65 %	53 %	41 %	29 %	29 %	12 %	6 %	8.77
7	Qingdao Jonoon	17	65 %	47 %	41 %	24 %	18 %	6 %	6 %	8.77
8	Kunshan	17	53 %	47 %	35 %	35 %	24 %	6 %	0 %	8.62
9	Nantong Zhiyun	17	59 %	53 %	29 %	24 %	12 %	12 %	6 %	8.53
10	Shanghai Jiading	17	53 %	41 %	41 %	29 %	24 %	6 %	6 %	8.51
11	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	47 %	41 %	29 %	24 %	24 %	12 %	6 %	8.12
12	Suzhou Dongwu	17	47 %	41 %	35 %	12 %	6 %	0 %	0 %	7.76
13	Guangxi Baoyun	17	47 %	35 %	18 %	18 %	12 %	6 %	6 %	7.69
14	Zibo Cuju	17	47 %	41 %	18 %	12 %	12 %	6 %	0 %	7.53
15	Beijing BG	17	41 %	35 %	18 %	18 %	18 %	12 %	12 %	7.47
16	BIT	17	35 %	29 %	18 %	12 %	6 %	6 %	6 %	6.88
17	Hebei Kungfu	17	29 %	29 %	18 %	12 %	12 %	12 %	12 %	6.6
18	Qingdao Youth Island	17	24 %	18 %	6 %	6 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	6.36

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Hebei Kungfu	17	76 %	59 %	41 %	41 %	35 %	12 %	12 %	9.7
2	Suzhou Dongwu	17	71 %	59 %	41 %	41 %	35 %	12 %	0 %	9.12
3	Kunshan	17	71 %	65 %	53 %	35 %	18 %	12 %	12 %	8.95
4	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	59 %	53 %	53 %	41 %	35 %	24 %	18 %	8.94
5	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	59 %	41 %	35 %	24 %	24 %	18 %	12 %	8.88
6	Nanjing City	17	59 %	47 %	24 %	24 %	12 %	6 %	0 %	8.56
7	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	59 %	53 %	35 %	35 %	18 %	6 %	6 %	8.47
8	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	59 %	53 %	35 %	29 %	12 %	6 %	6 %	8.44
9	Guangxi Baoyun	17	47 %	47 %	41 %	35 %	12 %	6 %	0 %	8.38
10	BIT	17	41 %	41 %	41 %	18 %	18 %	6 %	6 %	8
11	Shenyang Urban	17	47 %	41 %	24 %	18 %	18 %	18 %	6 %	7.94
12	Beijing BG	17	53 %	35 %	18 %	12 %	6 %	0 %	0 %	7.82
13	Nantong Zhiyun	17	53 %	41 %	18 %	12 %	12 %	12 %	6 %	7.76
14	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	35 %	35 %	29 %	29 %	24 %	18 %	12 %	7.64
15	Zibo Cuju	17	41 %	29 %	18 %	18 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	7.56
16	Qingdao Youth Island	17	47 %	35 %	35 %	18 %	6 %	6 %	0 %	7.47
17	Shanghai Jiading	17	29 %	29 %	24 %	18 %	12 %	12 %	0 %	7.24
18	Qingdao Jonoon	17	35 %	24 %	18 %	12 %	6 %	6 %	0 %	6.73

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	79%	68%	56%	47%	32%	26%	21%	5.41
3	Nantong Zhiyun	34	88%	71%	56%	44%	32%	18%	12%	5.29
4	Kunshan	34	82%	71%	53%	41%	35%	21%	9%	5.27
5	Nanjing City	34	85%	56%	53%	35%	26%	21%	12%	5
6	Qingdao Jonoon	34	74%	62%	59%	41%	24%	12%	6%	4.91
7	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	65%	62%	47%	26%	21%	21%	18%	4.61
8	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	65%	56%	44%	41%	24%	18%	9%	4.5
9	Suzhou Dongwu	34	76%	62%	53%	24%	12%	9%	6%	4.47
10	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	76%	65%	47%	32%	12%	3%	3%	4.3
11	Guangxi Baoyun	34	65%	47%	35%	24%	18%	9%	6%	4.03
12	Hebei Kungfu	34	62%	44%	32%	26%	15%	9%	3%	3.72
13	Qingdao Youth Island	34	56%	44%	35%	26%	15%	9%	3%	3.68
14	Shenyang Urban	34	68%	47%	32%	18%	9%	6%	3%	3.67
15	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	62%	38%	24%	12%	9%	9%	6%	3.48
16	Shanghai Jiading	34	53%	35%	29%	18%	12%	6%	3%	3.39
17	Zibo Cuju	34	53%	41%	24%	12%	6%	6%	0%	3.18
18	Beijing BG	34	44%	32%	18%	6%	0%	0%	0%	2.47
19	BIT	34	47%	21%	21%	6%	6%	3%	0%	2.41

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	94%	76%	59%	47%	35%	35%	24%	6
3	Nantong Zhiyun	17	94%	82%	59%	47%	35%	18%	18%	5.71
4	Qingdao Jonoon	17	82%	71%	71%	53%	35%	18%	12%	5.53
5	Kunshan	17	76%	65%	53%	41%	41%	24%	6%	5.31
6	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	65%	59%	53%	53%	29%	29%	18%	5.24
7	Nanjing City	17	82%	59%	59%	41%	35%	29%	12%	5.18
8	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	76%	76%	65%	41%	18%	6%	6%	4.88
9	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	65%	59%	41%	24%	18%	18%	18%	4.56
10	Shanghai Jiading	17	59%	59%	47%	24%	18%	6%	6%	4.13
11	Shenyang Urban	17	76%	47%	41%	18%	6%	0%	0%	3.88
12	Suzhou Dongwu	17	71%	59%	53%	18%	6%	0%	0%	3.88
13	Guangxi Baoyun	17	59%	35%	29%	24%	18%	12%	6%	3.63
14	Qingdao Youth Island	17	47%	41%	35%	29%	6%	6%	0%	3.24
15	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	59%	29%	12%	6%	6%	6%	6%	3.12
16	Hebei Kungfu	17	41%	24%	12%	12%	12%	6%	0%	2.53
17	Beijing BG	17	41%	29%	18%	6%	0%	0%	0%	2.47
18	Zibo Cuju	17	47%	29%	6%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.41
19	BIT	17	41%	24%	24%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.13

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Kunshan	17	88%	76%	53%	41%	29%	18%	12%	5.24
3	Suzhou Dongwu	17	82%	65%	53%	29%	18%	18%	12%	5.06
4	Nantong Zhiyun	17	82%	59%	53%	41%	29%	18%	6%	4.88
5	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	65%	59%	53%	47%	29%	18%	18%	4.82
6	Nanjing City	17	88%	53%	47%	29%	18%	12%	12%	4.81
7	Hebei Kungfu	17	82%	65%	53%	41%	18%	12%	6%	4.76
8	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	65%	65%	53%	29%	24%	24%	18%	4.65
9	Guangxi Baoyun	17	71%	59%	41%	24%	18%	6%	6%	4.44
10	Qingdao Jonoon	17	65%	53%	47%	29%	12%	6%	0%	4.2
11	Qingdao Youth Island	17	65%	47%	35%	24%	24%	12%	6%	4.12
12	Zibo Cuju	17	59%	53%	41%	24%	12%	12%	0%	4
13	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	65%	47%	35%	18%	12%	12%	6%	3.88
14	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	65%	53%	35%	29%	18%	6%	0%	3.76
15	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	76%	53%	29%	24%	6%	0%	0%	3.69
16	Shenyang Urban	17	59%	47%	24%	18%	12%	12%	6%	3.47
17	Shanghai Jiading	17	47%	12%	12%	12%	6%	6%	0%	2.71
18	BIT	17	53%	18%	18%	12%	12%	6%	0%	2.69
19	Beijing BG	17	47%	35%	18%	6%	0%	0%	0%	2.47

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Beijing BG	34	74%	71%	56%	44%	38%	26%	12%	5.18
3	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	82%	68%	53%	47%	26%	24%	12%	5.15
4	BIT	34	71%	62%	50%	38%	26%	15%	15%	5.03
5	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	82%	65%	56%	32%	18%	9%	6%	4.76
6	Shenyang Urban	34	71%	50%	44%	35%	26%	24%	12%	4.7
7	Hebei Kungfu	34	68%	44%	38%	32%	26%	21%	15%	4.53
8	Shanghai Jiading	34	76%	53%	44%	29%	15%	9%	6%	4.45
9	Zibo Cuju	34	71%	56%	47%	26%	21%	12%	6%	4.36
10	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	65%	53%	44%	35%	15%	9%	6%	4.12
11	Guangxi Baoyun	34	62%	53%	41%	26%	15%	9%	3%	4
12	Suzhou Dongwu	34	65%	53%	50%	26%	21%	9%	3%	3.97
13	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	59%	41%	29%	21%	18%	15%	12%	3.94
14	Nanjing City	34	68%	53%	35%	26%	9%	3%	3%	3.94
15	Kunshan	34	65%	53%	29%	9%	6%	6%	3%	3.52
16	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	65%	38%	26%	15%	12%	3%	0%	3.29
17	Qingdao Youth Island	34	62%	44%	26%	15%	6%	3%	0%	3.24
18	Qingdao Jonoon	34	50%	32%	26%	6%	3%	3%	0%	2.91
19	Nantong Zhiyun	34	47%	32%	21%	15%	6%	6%	6%	2.85

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	88%	71%	59%	59%	35%	29%	24%	5.71
3	Zibo Cuju	17	76%	71%	59%	41%	29%	24%	12%	5.12
4	Beijing BG	17	71%	65%	47%	35%	29%	24%	18%	5
5	Shenyang Urban	17	76%	59%	53%	35%	24%	24%	6%	4.94
6	BIT	17	71%	59%	47%	35%	18%	12%	12%	4.75
7	Shanghai Jiading	17	71%	53%	47%	35%	12%	6%	6%	4.38
8	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	82%	59%	47%	24%	18%	12%	6%	4.35
9	Nanjing City	17	71%	59%	41%	29%	18%	6%	6%	4.12
10	Hebei Kungfu	17	59%	41%	35%	29%	24%	12%	6%	4.07
11	Guangxi Baoyun	17	71%	59%	47%	18%	12%	6%	0%	4.06
12	Suzhou Dongwu	17	71%	53%	47%	29%	18%	6%	0%	3.88
13	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	71%	47%	29%	18%	18%	6%	0%	3.76
14	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	59%	29%	18%	18%	12%	12%	6%	3.56
15	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	59%	41%	29%	29%	12%	0%	0%	3.53
16	Kunshan	17	59%	53%	24%	6%	6%	6%	0%	3.31
17	Qingdao Jonoon	17	59%	35%	29%	6%	6%	6%	0%	3.24
18	Qingdao Youth Island	17	65%	41%	24%	18%	0%	0%	0%	3.12
19	Nantong Zhiyun	17	47%	24%	18%	12%	6%	6%	6%	2.82

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Beijing BG	17	76%	76%	65%	53%	47%	29%	6%	5.35
3	BIT	17	71%	65%	53%	41%	35%	18%	18%	5.31
4	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	82%	71%	65%	41%	18%	6%	6%	5.19
5	Hebei Kungfu	17	76%	47%	41%	35%	29%	29%	24%	4.94
6	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	71%	65%	59%	41%	18%	18%	12%	4.71
7	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	76%	65%	47%	35%	18%	18%	0%	4.56
8	Shanghai Jiading	17	82%	53%	41%	24%	18%	12%	6%	4.53
9	Shenyang Urban	17	65%	41%	35%	35%	29%	24%	18%	4.47
10	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	59%	53%	41%	24%	24%	18%	18%	4.29
11	Suzhou Dongwu	17	59%	53%	53%	24%	24%	12%	6%	4.06
12	Guangxi Baoyun	17	53%	47%	35%	35%	18%	12%	6%	3.94
13	Nanjing City	17	65%	47%	29%	24%	0%	0%	0%	3.75
14	Kunshan	17	71%	53%	35%	12%	6%	6%	6%	3.71
15	Zibo Cuju	17	65%	41%	35%	12%	12%	0%	0%	3.56
16	Qingdao Youth Island	17	59%	47%	29%	12%	12%	6%	0%	3.35
17	Nantong Zhiyun	17	47%	41%	24%	18%	6%	6%	6%	2.88
18	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	59%	29%	24%	12%	6%	0%	0%	2.82
19	Qingdao Jonoon	17	41%	29%	24%	6%	0%	0%	0%	2.53

Xinjiang Tianshan corner statistics

The number of corner kicks a team takes and surrenders provides insight into a team’s attacking ambition during games. It can also display their defensive strategy and how much they are allowing their opponents to attack.

Here are the Xinjiang Tianshan’s main corner kick numbers and averages in the China League 1:

Xinjiang Tianshan games have an average of 8.63 corners (between corners won and awarded to the opponent).
41% of Xinjiang Tianshan’s matches in this championship have had more than 9.5 corners.
Xinjiang Tianshan has an average of 3.48 corners won per game this season.
On 12% of occasions, Xinjiang Tianshan had 5 or more corners in their favour in their games.
Regarding corners given up, Xinjiang Tianshan usually concedes an average of 5.15 corners per match.

You can also check out Xinjiang Tianshan’s average number of corners during home and away games, along with the over/under rates for corners for and against, for additional information.

And at APWin, you can also check out corner statistics daily and find which matches around the world are most likely to see a lot of corners.