Suzhou Dongwu corners per game

Team Info

Season

Country

2025

China

Competition

China

China League One

Summary Matches Corners Stats Top Scorers & Assists Squads

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Chongqing Tongliang Long	30	87 %	77 %	70 %	57 %	53 %	47 %	40 %	11.57
2	Guangzhou E-Power	30	87 %	87 %	70 %	40 %	30 %	30 %	27 %	10.83
3	Nanjing City	30	73 %	60 %	47 %	47 %	37 %	27 %	17 %	9.96
4	Shenzhen Juniors	30	70 %	67 %	47 %	43 %	23 %	13 %	7 %	9.6
5	Shanghai Jiading	30	70 %	57 %	43 %	27 %	20 %	10 %	10 %	9.53
6	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	30	73 %	60 %	43 %	20 %	10 %	7 %	7 %	9.35
7	Nantong Zhiyun	30	73 %	67 %	57 %	43 %	20 %	10 %	10 %	9.33
8	Suzhou Dongwu	30	60 %	43 %	37 %	37 %	27 %	23 %	17 %	9.2
9	Shenyang Urban	30	67 %	60 %	47 %	37 %	30 %	10 %	7 %	9.14
10	Qingdao Red Lions	30	67 %	57 %	47 %	27 %	23 %	13 %	7 %	9.03
11	Shaanxi Union	30	70 %	50 %	47 %	27 %	17 %	13 %	10 %	8.83
12	Dongguan United	30	60 %	50 %	43 %	30 %	23 %	7 %	7 %	8.74
13	Guangxi Baoyun	30	53 %	47 %	33 %	17 %	17 %	10 %	10 %	8.46
14	Dalian Huayi	30	53 %	47 %	30 %	20 %	20 %	13 %	10 %	8
15	Hebei Kungfu	30	43 %	43 %	30 %	23 %	20 %	13 %	10 %	7.75
16	Yanbian Longding	30	47 %	37 %	30 %	20 %	17 %	0 %	0 %	7.66

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Chongqing Tongliang Long	15	93 %	80 %	67 %	67 %	67 %	60 %	53 %	12.67
2	Guangzhou E-Power	15	87 %	87 %	73 %	53 %	40 %	40 %	33 %	11.33
3	Suzhou Dongwu	15	60 %	60 %	53 %	53 %	40 %	33 %	27 %	10.46
4	Shenzhen Juniors	15	80 %	73 %	60 %	53 %	27 %	13 %	7 %	10.07
5	Nantong Zhiyun	15	80 %	67 %	60 %	40 %	20 %	13 %	13 %	9.67
6	Shenyang Urban	15	73 %	67 %	53 %	47 %	40 %	7 %	7 %	9.66
7	Shanghai Jiading	15	67 %	67 %	47 %	20 %	20 %	7 %	7 %	9.4
8	Nanjing City	15	67 %	47 %	40 %	40 %	27 %	20 %	7 %	9.2
9	Shaanxi Union	15	73 %	53 %	53 %	33 %	20 %	13 %	7 %	9.2
10	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	15	73 %	47 %	40 %	13 %	7 %	0 %	0 %	9.08
11	Dongguan United	15	53 %	40 %	33 %	27 %	27 %	13 %	13 %	8.54
12	Qingdao Red Lions	15	67 %	60 %	47 %	20 %	13 %	0 %	0 %	8.4
13	Dalian Huayi	15	53 %	47 %	27 %	13 %	13 %	13 %	13 %	7.8
14	Hebei Kungfu	15	47 %	47 %	33 %	27 %	20 %	13 %	7 %	7.47
15	Yanbian Longding	15	40 %	33 %	27 %	7 %	7 %	0 %	0 %	7.14
16	Guangxi Baoyun	15	40 %	33 %	7 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	6.86

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Nanjing City	15	80 %	73 %	53 %	53 %	47 %	33 %	27 %	10.73
2	Chongqing Tongliang Long	15	80 %	73 %	73 %	47 %	40 %	33 %	27 %	10.47
3	Guangzhou E-Power	15	87 %	87 %	67 %	27 %	20 %	20 %	20 %	10.33
4	Guangxi Baoyun	15	67 %	60 %	60 %	33 %	33 %	20 %	20 %	10.07
5	Shanghai Jiading	15	73 %	47 %	40 %	33 %	20 %	13 %	13 %	9.67
6	Qingdao Red Lions	15	67 %	53 %	47 %	33 %	33 %	27 %	13 %	9.66
7	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	15	73 %	73 %	47 %	27 %	13 %	13 %	13 %	9.6
8	Shenzhen Juniors	15	60 %	60 %	33 %	33 %	20 %	13 %	7 %	9.13
9	Nantong Zhiyun	15	67 %	67 %	53 %	47 %	20 %	7 %	7 %	9
10	Dongguan United	15	67 %	60 %	53 %	33 %	20 %	0 %	0 %	8.94
11	Shenyang Urban	15	60 %	53 %	40 %	27 %	20 %	13 %	7 %	8.57
12	Shaanxi Union	15	67 %	47 %	40 %	20 %	13 %	13 %	13 %	8.47
13	Dalian Huayi	15	53 %	47 %	33 %	27 %	27 %	13 %	7 %	8.2
14	Yanbian Longding	15	53 %	40 %	33 %	33 %	27 %	0 %	0 %	8.2
15	Hebei Kungfu	15	40 %	40 %	27 %	20 %	20 %	13 %	13 %	8.07
16	Suzhou Dongwu	15	60 %	27 %	20 %	20 %	13 %	13 %	7 %	7.93

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Chongqing Tongliang Long	30	93%	83%	77%	70%	57%	50%	43%	7.87
3	Guangzhou E-Power	30	90%	77%	70%	53%	40%	30%	13%	5.83
4	Suzhou Dongwu	30	90%	70%	53%	37%	33%	27%	23%	5.47
5	Shaanxi Union	30	83%	67%	53%	47%	40%	17%	10%	5.33
6	Shenyang Urban	30	80%	80%	67%	40%	20%	13%	10%	5.14
7	Nantong Zhiyun	30	83%	70%	53%	40%	27%	20%	13%	5.13
8	Qingdao Red Lions	30	77%	63%	57%	50%	30%	17%	0%	4.8
9	Nanjing City	30	77%	57%	43%	40%	27%	17%	7%	4.73
10	Shenzhen Juniors	30	73%	57%	40%	27%	7%	3%	3%	4
11	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	30	70%	50%	33%	20%	13%	7%	0%	3.89
12	Guangxi Baoyun	30	73%	47%	33%	17%	10%	7%	7%	3.89
13	Shanghai Jiading	30	63%	47%	40%	27%	13%	7%	7%	3.73
14	Dalian Huayi	30	67%	50%	33%	17%	10%	3%	3%	3.7
15	Yanbian Longding	30	70%	50%	37%	13%	10%	3%	0%	3.53
16	Hebei Kungfu	30	53%	47%	30%	23%	7%	0%	0%	3.41
17	Dongguan United	30	57%	43%	20%	13%	3%	0%	0%	2.97

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Chongqing Tongliang Long	15	100%	100%	100%	100%	80%	73%	67%	9.87
3	Suzhou Dongwu	15	93%	80%	67%	53%	53%	47%	40%	6.73
4	Guangzhou E-Power	15	93%	87%	80%	73%	53%	47%	20%	6.73
5	Nantong Zhiyun	15	80%	73%	67%	47%	40%	33%	27%	5.87
6	Shaanxi Union	15	100%	73%	60%	53%	47%	20%	7%	5.87
7	Shenyang Urban	15	87%	87%	87%	53%	27%	20%	13%	5.73
8	Qingdao Red Lions	15	73%	53%	53%	53%	40%	33%	0%	4.87
9	Nanjing City	15	67%	60%	53%	53%	33%	20%	0%	4.73
10	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	15	67%	60%	47%	20%	20%	13%	0%	4.62
11	Dalian Huayi	15	87%	60%	40%	20%	7%	7%	7%	4.27
12	Shenzhen Juniors	15	87%	60%	53%	27%	7%	0%	0%	4.27
13	Shanghai Jiading	15	67%	47%	40%	27%	13%	13%	13%	4
14	Hebei Kungfu	15	53%	53%	33%	33%	7%	0%	0%	3.6
15	Guangxi Baoyun	15	80%	33%	33%	7%	7%	0%	0%	3.43
16	Dongguan United	15	60%	47%	20%	13%	7%	0%	0%	3.07
17	Yanbian Longding	15	53%	40%	27%	13%	13%	7%	0%	3.07

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Chongqing Tongliang Long	15	87%	67%	53%	40%	33%	27%	20%	5.87
3	Guangzhou E-Power	15	87%	67%	60%	33%	27%	13%	7%	4.93
4	Shaanxi Union	15	67%	60%	47%	40%	33%	13%	13%	4.8
5	Qingdao Red Lions	15	80%	73%	60%	47%	20%	0%	0%	4.73
6	Nanjing City	15	87%	53%	33%	27%	20%	13%	13%	4.73
7	Shenyang Urban	15	73%	73%	47%	27%	13%	7%	7%	4.5
8	Nantong Zhiyun	15	87%	67%	40%	33%	13%	7%	0%	4.4
9	Guangxi Baoyun	15	67%	60%	33%	27%	13%	13%	13%	4.36
10	Suzhou Dongwu	15	87%	60%	40%	20%	13%	7%	7%	4.2
11	Yanbian Longding	15	87%	60%	47%	13%	7%	0%	0%	4
12	Shenzhen Juniors	15	60%	53%	27%	27%	7%	7%	7%	3.73
13	Shanghai Jiading	15	60%	47%	40%	27%	13%	0%	0%	3.47
14	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	15	73%	40%	20%	20%	7%	0%	0%	3.27
15	Hebei Kungfu	15	53%	40%	27%	13%	7%	0%	0%	3.21
16	Dalian Huayi	15	47%	40%	27%	13%	13%	0%	0%	3.13
17	Dongguan United	15	53%	40%	20%	13%	0%	0%	0%	2.87

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Shanghai Jiading	30	97%	80%	73%	43%	33%	13%	10%	5.8
3	Dongguan United	30	93%	83%	70%	53%	33%	23%	13%	5.77
4	Shenzhen Juniors	30	93%	87%	70%	43%	23%	20%	13%	5.6
5	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	30	77%	63%	53%	47%	33%	27%	13%	5.46
6	Nanjing City	30	87%	70%	50%	40%	33%	17%	10%	5.23
7	Guangzhou E-Power	30	83%	80%	53%	37%	27%	17%	10%	5
8	Guangxi Baoyun	30	70%	53%	40%	33%	10%	10%	10%	4.57
9	Hebei Kungfu	30	73%	53%	37%	27%	23%	13%	7%	4.34
10	Dalian Huayi	30	73%	57%	40%	27%	17%	10%	7%	4.3
11	Qingdao Red Lions	30	73%	50%	33%	27%	13%	13%	7%	4.23
12	Nantong Zhiyun	30	70%	43%	37%	30%	20%	13%	13%	4.2
13	Yanbian Longding	30	73%	60%	43%	23%	20%	10%	7%	4.13
14	Shenyang Urban	30	60%	50%	43%	37%	17%	7%	3%	4
15	Suzhou Dongwu	30	53%	43%	37%	23%	17%	10%	3%	3.73
16	Chongqing Tongliang Long	30	53%	33%	30%	23%	17%	17%	13%	3.7
17	Shaanxi Union	30	70%	50%	30%	20%	10%	0%	0%	3.5

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Shenzhen Juniors	15	100%	93%	67%	53%	20%	20%	13%	5.8
3	Dongguan United	15	93%	73%	67%	40%	20%	13%	13%	5.47
4	Shanghai Jiading	15	93%	73%	67%	33%	20%	7%	7%	5.4
5	Guangzhou E-Power	15	87%	80%	33%	33%	20%	7%	7%	4.6
6	Nanjing City	15	80%	73%	47%	27%	27%	0%	0%	4.47
7	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	15	67%	60%	47%	33%	20%	7%	0%	4.46
8	Yanbian Longding	15	87%	60%	40%	13%	13%	7%	7%	4.07
9	Shenyang Urban	15	67%	53%	40%	40%	13%	0%	0%	3.93
10	Hebei Kungfu	15	67%	47%	33%	27%	20%	7%	7%	3.87
11	Nantong Zhiyun	15	53%	33%	33%	27%	20%	13%	13%	3.8
12	Suzhou Dongwu	15	53%	47%	33%	27%	13%	7%	0%	3.73
13	Dalian Huayi	15	60%	53%	33%	7%	7%	7%	7%	3.53
14	Qingdao Red Lions	15	73%	40%	13%	13%	7%	7%	7%	3.53
15	Guangxi Baoyun	15	60%	40%	27%	20%	0%	0%	0%	3.43
16	Shaanxi Union	15	60%	53%	27%	20%	13%	0%	0%	3.33
17	Chongqing Tongliang Long	15	53%	20%	13%	7%	7%	7%	7%	2.8

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	15	87%	67%	60%	60%	47%	47%	27%	6.33
3	Shanghai Jiading	15	100%	87%	80%	53%	47%	20%	13%	6.2
4	Dongguan United	15	93%	93%	73%	67%	47%	33%	13%	6.07
5	Nanjing City	15	93%	67%	53%	53%	40%	33%	20%	6
6	Guangxi Baoyun	15	80%	67%	53%	47%	20%	20%	20%	5.71
7	Shenzhen Juniors	15	87%	80%	73%	33%	27%	20%	13%	5.4
8	Guangzhou E-Power	15	80%	80%	73%	40%	33%	27%	13%	5.4
9	Dalian Huayi	15	87%	60%	47%	47%	27%	13%	7%	5.07
10	Qingdao Red Lions	15	73%	60%	53%	40%	20%	20%	7%	4.93
11	Hebei Kungfu	15	80%	60%	40%	27%	27%	20%	7%	4.86
12	Nantong Zhiyun	15	87%	53%	40%	33%	20%	13%	13%	4.6
13	Chongqing Tongliang Long	15	53%	47%	47%	40%	27%	27%	20%	4.6
14	Yanbian Longding	15	60%	60%	47%	33%	27%	13%	7%	4.2
15	Shenyang Urban	15	53%	47%	47%	33%	20%	13%	7%	4.07
16	Suzhou Dongwu	15	53%	40%	40%	20%	20%	13%	7%	3.73
17	Shaanxi Union	15	80%	47%	33%	20%	7%	0%	0%	3.67

Suzhou Dongwu corner statistics

The number of corner kicks a team takes and surrenders provides insight into a team’s attacking ambition during games. It can also display their defensive strategy and how much they are allowing their opponents to attack.

Here are the Suzhou Dongwu’s main corner kick numbers and averages in the China League 1:

Suzhou Dongwu games have an average of 9.2 corners (between corners won and awarded to the opponent).
37% of Suzhou Dongwu’s matches in this championship have had more than 9.5 corners.
Suzhou Dongwu has an average of 5.47 corners won per game this season.
On 37% of occasions, Suzhou Dongwu had 5 or more corners in their favour in their games.
Regarding corners given up, Suzhou Dongwu usually concedes an average of 3.73 corners per match.

You can also check out Suzhou Dongwu’s average number of corners during home and away games, along with the over/under rates for corners for and against, for additional information.

And at APWin, you can also check out corner statistics daily and find which matches around the world are most likely to see a lot of corners.