Tritium Corners Per Game

Team Info

Season

Country

2023/24

Italy

Competition

Italy

Serie D Group B

Summary Matches Corners Stats

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Caravaggio	38	61%	55%	53%	50%	34%	24%	18%	11.72
2	Caldiero Terme	38	61%	53%	47%	39%	37%	26%	21%	10.78
3	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	38	45%	42%	37%	29%	24%	13%	11%	10.67
4	Castellanzese	38	50%	47%	39%	37%	26%	18%	16%	10.29
5	Club Milano	38	66%	55%	39%	26%	18%	5%	5%	10.11
6	Piacenza	38	61%	50%	39%	32%	26%	21%	13%	10.1
7	Arconatese	38	55%	53%	34%	29%	21%	21%	13%	10.04
8	Villa Valle	38	61%	47%	42%	32%	16%	8%	5%	10
9	Real Calepina	38	37%	32%	26%	18%	18%	13%	13%	9.9
10	Clivense	38	66%	61%	42%	32%	21%	16%	8%	9.74
11	Pontisola	38	53%	42%	37%	26%	24%	16%	13%	9.73
12	Brusaporto	38	55%	50%	42%	32%	26%	18%	18%	9.69
13	Legnano	38	47%	47%	29%	24%	18%	8%	5%	9.46
14	Folgore Caratese	38	47%	32%	29%	18%	11%	5%	5%	9.2
15	Desenzano Calvina	38	50%	45%	29%	21%	18%	8%	8%	9.16
16	Varesina	38	45%	37%	26%	24%	21%	11%	5%	9.08
17	Pro Palazzolo	38	47%	39%	21%	13%	11%	8%	5%	9.08
18	Crema	38	24%	21%	13%	8%	5%	5%	5%	8.93
19	Casatese	38	37%	32%	24%	16%	11%	3%	3%	8.8
20	Tritium	38	45%	34%	24%	21%	13%	5%	3%	8.73

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Caldiero Terme	19	74%	68%	63%	58%	53%	37%	32%	12.13
2	Castellanzese	19	63%	63%	58%	53%	42%	32%	26%	11.73
3	Piacenza	19	84%	68%	63%	58%	47%	37%	21%	11.47
4	Caravaggio	19	47%	47%	47%	47%	32%	21%	16%	11.46
5	Arconatese	19	63%	58%	37%	26%	21%	21%	21%	11
6	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	19	32%	32%	32%	26%	21%	5%	0%	10.57
7	Villa Valle	19	63%	47%	42%	42%	26%	11%	5%	10.47
8	Real Calepina	19	32%	32%	26%	11%	11%	11%	11%	10.26
9	Varesina	19	47%	42%	32%	32%	26%	21%	11%	9.64
10	Legnano	19	53%	53%	32%	26%	21%	5%	5%	9.5
11	Pontisola	19	42%	37%	37%	21%	16%	11%	11%	9.14
12	Clivense	19	68%	63%	47%	26%	16%	5%	5%	9.12
13	Club Milano	19	63%	53%	21%	5%	0%	0%	0%	8.92
14	Desenzano Calvina	19	47%	42%	26%	16%	16%	11%	11%	8.88
15	Pro Palazzolo	19	53%	42%	26%	16%	11%	5%	0%	8.86
16	Brusaporto	19	47%	37%	32%	26%	16%	16%	16%	8.67
17	Casatese	19	37%	26%	16%	11%	11%	5%	5%	8.6
18	Folgore Caratese	19	42%	26%	21%	11%	11%	0%	0%	8.29
19	Tritium	19	42%	32%	16%	16%	5%	0%	0%	8.17
20	Crema	19	11%	5%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	7.25

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Caravaggio	19	74%	63%	58%	53%	37%	26%	21%	11.93
2	Club Milano	19	68%	58%	58%	47%	37%	11%	11%	11.22
3	Brusaporto	19	63%	63%	53%	37%	37%	21%	21%	11
4	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	19	58%	53%	42%	32%	26%	21%	21%	10.72
5	Clivense	19	63%	58%	37%	37%	26%	26%	11%	10.5
6	Pontisola	19	63%	47%	37%	32%	32%	21%	16%	10.26
7	Folgore Caratese	19	53%	37%	37%	26%	11%	11%	11%	10.25
8	Real Calepina	19	42%	32%	26%	26%	26%	16%	16%	9.67
9	Crema	19	37%	37%	26%	16%	11%	11%	11%	9.55
10	Villa Valle	19	58%	47%	42%	21%	5%	5%	5%	9.54
11	Desenzano Calvina	19	53%	47%	32%	26%	21%	5%	5%	9.5
12	Legnano	19	42%	42%	26%	21%	16%	11%	5%	9.42
13	Pro Palazzolo	19	42%	37%	16%	11%	11%	11%	11%	9.4
14	Caldiero Terme	19	47%	37%	32%	21%	21%	16%	11%	9.33
15	Tritium	19	47%	37%	32%	26%	21%	11%	5%	9.22
16	Arconatese	19	47%	47%	32%	32%	21%	21%	5%	9.14
17	Casatese	19	37%	37%	32%	21%	11%	0%	0%	9
18	Castellanzese	19	37%	32%	21%	21%	11%	5%	5%	8.5
19	Varesina	19	42%	32%	21%	16%	16%	0%	0%	8.46
20	Piacenza	19	37%	32%	16%	5%	5%	5%	5%	8.31

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Caldiero Terme	38	74%	66%	53%	42%	34%	21%	18%	6.13
3	Pro Palazzolo	38	58%	53%	34%	32%	26%	16%	11%	5.79
4	Piacenza	38	71%	58%	47%	34%	26%	18%	11%	5.63
5	Casatese	38	45%	39%	34%	26%	16%	11%	11%	5.5
6	Brusaporto	38	74%	63%	53%	34%	26%	16%	13%	5.47
7	Castellanzese	38	61%	55%	42%	34%	24%	13%	8%	5.44
8	Clivense	38	74%	58%	53%	37%	16%	11%	8%	5.32
9	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	38	47%	42%	32%	29%	16%	11%	8%	5.29
10	Caravaggio	38	61%	45%	34%	29%	24%	13%	5%	5.24
11	Villa Valle	38	63%	55%	47%	29%	16%	3%	3%	5.15
12	Club Milano	38	53%	45%	39%	32%	18%	8%	3%	4.74
13	Desenzano Calvina	38	66%	50%	39%	21%	13%	5%	3%	4.43
14	Legnano	38	55%	37%	32%	26%	11%	5%	5%	4.42
15	Varesina	38	58%	42%	29%	21%	11%	5%	5%	4.41
16	Arconatese	38	53%	39%	32%	21%	16%	8%	5%	4.3
17	Pontisola	38	50%	42%	32%	21%	16%	11%	5%	4.21
18	Folgore Caratese	38	55%	50%	26%	11%	11%	3%	3%	4.12
19	Real Calepina	38	37%	32%	21%	13%	11%	5%	0%	4.1
20	Tritium	38	53%	32%	21%	11%	11%	0%	0%	3.77
21	Crema	38	29%	21%	3%	3%	3%	3%	3%	3.53

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Caldiero Terme	19	79%	79%	63%	53%	47%	37%	32%	7.25
3	Piacenza	19	89%	74%	74%	53%	47%	32%	21%	6.88
4	Castellanzese	19	68%	63%	53%	42%	37%	16%	11%	6
5	Pro Palazzolo	19	68%	63%	37%	37%	32%	26%	16%	5.93
6	Casatese	19	47%	47%	37%	26%	16%	11%	11%	5.9
7	Caravaggio	19	47%	37%	37%	32%	26%	16%	11%	5.64
8	Villa Valle	19	63%	58%	58%	37%	21%	5%	5%	5.62
9	Arconatese	19	58%	47%	37%	26%	21%	11%	11%	5.15
10	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	19	32%	26%	26%	21%	5%	5%	5%	5.14
11	Clivense	19	79%	63%	58%	37%	16%	11%	5%	5.12
12	Brusaporto	19	79%	63%	58%	37%	21%	16%	11%	5.11
13	Legnano	19	63%	53%	42%	32%	16%	11%	11%	5
14	Varesina	19	68%	53%	37%	26%	11%	5%	5%	5
15	Desenzano Calvina	19	74%	53%	47%	32%	21%	11%	5%	4.88
16	Pontisola	19	53%	47%	37%	26%	16%	11%	5%	4.5
17	Real Calepina	19	32%	26%	21%	11%	5%	5%	0%	4.38
18	Folgore Caratese	19	63%	53%	26%	11%	11%	5%	5%	4.29
19	Tritium	19	42%	37%	32%	16%	16%	0%	0%	4.17
20	Crema	19	21%	11%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3.5
21	Club Milano	19	37%	32%	21%	11%	5%	0%	0%	3.46

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Brusaporto	19	68%	63%	47%	32%	32%	16%	16%	5.93
3	Club Milano	19	68%	58%	58%	53%	32%	16%	5%	5.93
4	Pro Palazzolo	19	47%	42%	32%	26%	21%	5%	5%	5.6
5	Clivense	19	68%	53%	47%	37%	16%	11%	11%	5.57
6	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	19	63%	58%	37%	37%	26%	16%	11%	5.36
7	Casatese	19	42%	32%	32%	26%	16%	11%	11%	5.1
8	Caravaggio	19	74%	53%	32%	26%	21%	11%	0%	4.93
9	Caldiero Terme	19	68%	53%	42%	32%	21%	5%	5%	4.93
10	Castellanzese	19	53%	47%	32%	26%	11%	11%	5%	4.75
11	Villa Valle	19	63%	53%	37%	21%	11%	0%	0%	4.69
12	Piacenza	19	53%	42%	21%	16%	5%	5%	0%	4
13	Pontisola	19	47%	37%	26%	16%	16%	11%	5%	3.93
14	Desenzano Calvina	19	58%	47%	32%	11%	5%	0%	0%	3.93
15	Folgore Caratese	19	47%	47%	26%	11%	11%	0%	0%	3.92
16	Real Calepina	19	42%	37%	21%	16%	16%	5%	0%	3.92
17	Varesina	19	47%	32%	21%	16%	11%	5%	5%	3.77
18	Legnano	19	47%	21%	21%	21%	5%	0%	0%	3.75
19	Crema	19	37%	32%	5%	5%	5%	5%	5%	3.55
20	Arconatese	19	47%	32%	26%	16%	11%	5%	0%	3.5
21	Tritium	19	63%	26%	11%	5%	5%	0%	0%	3.43

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Caravaggio	38	63%	55%	47%	39%	37%	21%	16%	6.48
3	Real Calepina	38	42%	37%	26%	24%	21%	16%	11%	5.8
4	Arconatese	38	66%	63%	47%	29%	18%	13%	13%	5.74
5	Pontisola	38	68%	58%	45%	37%	24%	11%	8%	5.52
6	Crema	38	37%	29%	26%	16%	11%	5%	5%	5.4
7	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	38	53%	42%	32%	21%	18%	8%	8%	5.38
8	Club Milano	38	68%	55%	47%	34%	21%	8%	5%	5.37
9	Folgore Caratese	38	63%	50%	37%	26%	18%	8%	5%	5.08
10	Legnano	38	55%	47%	34%	26%	16%	13%	8%	5.04
11	Tritium	38	47%	47%	34%	26%	16%	13%	13%	4.96
12	Castellanzese	38	55%	47%	37%	26%	24%	16%	5%	4.85
13	Villa Valle	38	58%	50%	42%	34%	13%	0%	0%	4.85
14	Desenzano Calvina	38	63%	53%	34%	26%	18%	13%	8%	4.73
15	Varesina	38	50%	45%	32%	29%	13%	11%	8%	4.67
16	Caldiero Terme	38	71%	53%	42%	29%	21%	8%	3%	4.65
17	Piacenza	38	63%	50%	34%	21%	16%	8%	5%	4.47
18	Clivense	38	68%	50%	39%	24%	16%	5%	0%	4.42
19	Brusaporto	38	63%	47%	39%	26%	13%	5%	5%	4.22
20	Casatese	38	34%	24%	13%	5%	5%	3%	0%	3.3
21	Pro Palazzolo	38	45%	21%	13%	5%	3%	0%	0%	3.29

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Real Calepina	19	26%	26%	21%	21%	21%	16%	11%	5.88
3	Arconatese	19	68%	68%	42%	32%	21%	11%	11%	5.85
4	Caravaggio	19	58%	42%	32%	26%	26%	11%	11%	5.82
5	Castellanzese	19	74%	68%	58%	42%	37%	21%	5%	5.73
6	Club Milano	19	68%	53%	42%	37%	26%	5%	5%	5.46
7	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	19	37%	26%	21%	16%	16%	5%	5%	5.43
8	Caldiero Terme	19	79%	68%	47%	32%	21%	5%	0%	4.88
9	Villa Valle	19	58%	47%	37%	37%	16%	0%	0%	4.85
10	Pontisola	19	63%	53%	37%	26%	16%	5%	0%	4.64
11	Varesina	19	53%	42%	26%	26%	16%	11%	11%	4.64
12	Piacenza	19	68%	47%	47%	32%	21%	11%	5%	4.59
13	Legnano	19	58%	47%	32%	26%	16%	11%	5%	4.5
14	Tritium	19	32%	32%	16%	16%	11%	11%	11%	4
15	Folgore Caratese	19	63%	37%	26%	21%	5%	0%	0%	4
16	Desenzano Calvina	19	68%	58%	26%	16%	5%	5%	0%	4
17	Clivense	19	68%	47%	37%	16%	16%	5%	0%	4
18	Crema	19	16%	16%	11%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3.75
19	Brusaporto	19	63%	42%	32%	26%	5%	5%	5%	3.56
20	Pro Palazzolo	19	53%	21%	5%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.93
21	Casatese	19	32%	21%	11%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.7

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Caravaggio	19	68%	68%	63%	53%	47%	32%	21%	7
3	Pontisola	19	74%	63%	53%	47%	32%	16%	16%	6.33
4	Folgore Caratese	19	63%	63%	47%	32%	32%	16%	11%	6.33
5	Crema	19	58%	42%	42%	32%	21%	11%	11%	6
6	Tritium	19	63%	63%	53%	37%	21%	16%	16%	5.79
7	Real Calepina	19	58%	47%	32%	26%	21%	16%	11%	5.75
8	Legnano	19	53%	47%	37%	26%	16%	16%	11%	5.67
9	Arconatese	19	63%	58%	53%	26%	16%	16%	16%	5.64
10	Desenzano Calvina	19	58%	47%	42%	37%	32%	21%	16%	5.57
11	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	19	68%	58%	42%	26%	21%	11%	11%	5.36
12	Club Milano	19	68%	58%	53%	32%	16%	11%	5%	5.29
13	Brusaporto	19	63%	53%	47%	26%	21%	5%	5%	5.07
14	Clivense	19	68%	53%	42%	32%	16%	5%	0%	4.93
15	Villa Valle	19	58%	53%	47%	32%	11%	0%	0%	4.85
16	Varesina	19	47%	47%	37%	32%	11%	11%	5%	4.69
17	Caldiero Terme	19	63%	37%	37%	26%	21%	11%	5%	4.4
18	Piacenza	19	58%	53%	21%	11%	11%	5%	5%	4.31
19	Casatese	19	37%	26%	16%	11%	11%	5%	0%	3.9
20	Pro Palazzolo	19	37%	21%	21%	11%	5%	0%	0%	3.8
21	Castellanzese	19	37%	26%	16%	11%	11%	11%	5%	3.75

Corner Statistics for Tritium: Averages, Trends, and Betting Numbers

On this page, you’ll find detailed corner statistics for Tritium across the 2023/24 season, with data designed to support corner betting analysis.

At the top of the table, you can switch competitions to compare corner averages from other tournaments and identify the best betting angles.

Tritium Corner Averages (Serie D Group B)

As shown at the top of the page, the corner averages for Tritium provide a clear snapshot of the team’s corner trends. Below, we break down the numbers in a practical and easy-to-use format for betting purposes.

Here are the key corner statistics and averages for Tritium, based on the most up-to-date data from the Serie D Group B:

Matches involving Tritium average 8.73 total corners per game, combining corners won, and corners conceded - an important metric for over and under corner bets.
23.68% of matches featuring Tritium in this competition finished with over 9.5 corners, highlighting strong potential for high-corner markets.
On average, Tritium records 3.77 corners per match in their favour, showing how frequently the team applies attacking pressure.
In 10.53% of games, Tritium registered 5 or more corners, a useful benchmark for team corner lines.
Defensively, Tritium concedes an average of 4.96 corners per match, which can be valuable when evaluating opponent corner totals.

This section also allows you to analyse corner averages for Tritium in home and away matches, along with over and under rates for corners for and against - key factors when refining corner betting strategies.

Corner Betting Insights

Beyond presenting all corner averages for Tritium, APWin also provides dedicated resources for users who focus on corner betting.

You’ll find a specialised section for under corner predictions and another entirely focused on over corner bets, helping you identify value based on statistical trends.

Frequently Asked Questions

Below are the most common questions from users looking to understand corner betting data for this team.

What is the average number of corners for Tritium?

According to the data, Tritium averages 3.77 corners in their favor per match.

On average, how many corners are there in Tritium matches?

In the Serie D Group B, matches involving Tritium average 8.73 total corners per game.