# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
10 | 67% |
2 |
![]() Naples |
9 | 60% |
3 |
![]() One Knoxville |
7 | 58% |
4 |
![]() Westchester SC |
8 | 57% |
5 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
8 | 57% |
6 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
8 | 53% |
7 |
![]() Texoma |
7 | 44% |
8 |
![]() Union Omaha |
6 | 43% |
9 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
6 | 40% |
10 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
6 | 40% |
11 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
5 | 36% |
12 |
![]() Forward Madison |
5 | 36% |
13 |
![]() Alta |
5 | 33% |
14 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
4 | 25% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() One Knoxville |
3 | 100% |
2 |
![]() Westchester SC |
5 | 71% |
3 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
5 | 71% |
4 |
![]() Texoma |
6 | 60% |
5 |
![]() Forward Madison |
4 | 57% |
6 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
5 | 56% |
7 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
4 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
3 | 43% |
9 |
![]() Naples |
3 | 38% |
10 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
2 | 33% |
11 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
3 | 33% |
12 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
2 | 25% |
13 |
![]() Union Omaha |
1 | 25% |
14 |
![]() Alta |
2 | 22% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Naples |
6 | 86% |
2 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
5 | 83% |
3 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
5 | 71% |
4 |
![]() Alta |
3 | 50% |
5 |
![]() Union Omaha |
5 | 50% |
6 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
3 | 50% |
7 |
![]() One Knoxville |
4 | 44% |
8 |
![]() Westchester SC |
3 | 43% |
9 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
3 | 38% |
10 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
3 | 38% |
11 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
2 | 29% |
12 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
2 | 25% |
13 |
![]() Texoma |
1 | 17% |
14 |
![]() Forward Madison |
1 | 14% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
12 | 75% |
2 |
![]() Alta |
10 | 66% |
3 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
9 | 64% |
4 |
![]() Forward Madison |
9 | 64% |
5 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
9 | 60% |
6 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
9 | 60% |
7 |
![]() Union Omaha |
8 | 57% |
8 |
![]() Texoma |
9 | 56% |
9 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
7 | 46% |
10 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
6 | 42% |
11 |
![]() Westchester SC |
6 | 42% |
12 |
![]() One Knoxville |
5 | 41% |
13 |
![]() Naples |
6 | 40% |
14 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
5 | 33% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Alta |
7 | 77% |
2 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
6 | 75% |
3 |
![]() Union Omaha |
3 | 75% |
4 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
6 | 66% |
5 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
4 | 66% |
6 |
![]() Naples |
5 | 62% |
7 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
4 | 57% |
8 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
4 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
4 | 44% |
10 |
![]() Forward Madison |
3 | 42% |
11 |
![]() Texoma |
4 | 40% |
12 |
![]() Westchester SC |
2 | 28% |
13 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
2 | 28% |
14 |
![]() One Knoxville |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Forward Madison |
6 | 85% |
2 |
![]() Texoma |
5 | 83% |
3 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
6 | 75% |
4 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
5 | 71% |
5 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
5 | 62% |
6 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
5 | 62% |
7 |
![]() Westchester SC |
4 | 57% |
8 |
![]() One Knoxville |
5 | 55% |
9 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
3 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Alta |
3 | 50% |
11 |
![]() Union Omaha |
5 | 50% |
12 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
2 | 28% |
13 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
1 | 16% |
14 |
![]() Naples |
1 | 14% |
This section of the APWin football statistics platform shows the times in which Texoma scored before the opponent as well as the times in which they conceded the first goal of the match in the USL League One 2025.
Through this stat, we can see whether Texoma is often the one in charge of matches and gets ahead most of the time, or if they are the ones playing catchup.
In the USL League One, Texoma has scored before the opponent in 44% of the games played. On the other hand, the percentage of times they have conceded the first goal is 56%.
This data helps give a clearer view of Texoma’s habits on both offence and defence.
If the percentage of scoring first is high, it likely points to Texoma being the more aggressive of the two sides with more control of the match. And if the percentage of conceding the first goal is higher, then it points to a club that is not among the best and has some defensive deficiencies.
If you want to dive even deeper into this statistic, you can also use the filters to see the score first/concede first rates in home and away games during the season.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.