Football statistics for Tampines Rovers
Team Info
Season
2021
Country
Asia
Stadium
Jurong West Stadium
Competition
Both Teams to Score
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Johor Darul Ta'zim |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 2 |
Melbourne City FC |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 3 |
Brisbane Roar |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 4 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
6 | 1 | 17% |
| 5 |
Shanghai SIPG |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 7 |
Cerezo Osaka |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 8 |
Nagoya Grampus |
8 | 3 | 38% |
| 9 |
Gamba Osaka |
6 | 5 | 83% |
| 10 |
Kawasaki Frontale |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 11 |
Ratchaburi |
6 | 0 | 0% |
| 12 |
Port FC |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 13 |
Bangkok Glass |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 14 |
Chiangrai United |
6 | 4 | 67% |
| 15 |
Kitchee |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 16 |
Tampines Rovers |
6 | 1 | 17% |
| 17 |
Ceres |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 18 |
Kaya |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 19 |
Daegu |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 20 |
Pohang Steelers |
10 | 3 | 30% |
| 21 |
Ulsan |
9 | 3 | 33% |
| 22 |
Jeonbuk Motors |
8 | 6 | 75% |
| 23 |
Viettel |
6 | 1 | 17% |
| 24 |
Al Duhail |
6 | 5 | 83% |
| 25 |
Al Gharafa |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 26 |
Al Rayyan |
6 | 4 | 67% |
| 27 |
Al Sadd |
6 | 4 | 67% |
| 28 |
Al Ain |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 29 |
Shabab Al Ahli Dubai |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 30 |
Al Wahda |
9 | 4 | 44% |
| 31 |
Al Sharjah |
7 | 4 | 57% |
| 32 |
Al Ahli |
6 | 4 | 67% |
| 33 |
Al Hilal |
10 | 4 | 40% |
| 34 |
Al Nassr |
9 | 6 | 67% |
| 35 |
Al Wahda |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 36 |
Goa |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 37 |
Al Wihdat |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 38 |
Esteghlal |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 39 |
Tractor Sazi |
7 | 1 | 14% |
| 40 |
Pakhtakor |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 41 |
Persepolis |
8 | 3 | 38% |
| 42 |
Shan United |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 43 |
Foolad |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 44 |
AGMK |
7 | 5 | 71% |
| 45 |
Al Quwa Al Jawiya |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 46 |
Istiqlol |
7 | 4 | 57% |
| 47 |
Al Zawra'a |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 48 |
Al Shorta |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Johor Darul Ta'zim |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 2 |
Melbourne City FC |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 3 |
Brisbane Roar |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 4 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 5 |
Shanghai SIPG |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 7 |
Cerezo Osaka |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 8 |
Nagoya Grampus |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 9 |
Gamba Osaka |
3 | 3 | 100% |
| 10 |
Kawasaki Frontale |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 11 |
Ratchaburi |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 12 |
Port FC |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 13 |
Bangkok Glass |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 14 |
Chiangrai United |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 15 |
Kitchee |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 16 |
Tampines Rovers |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 17 |
Ceres |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 18 |
Kaya |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 19 |
Daegu |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 20 |
Pohang Steelers |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 21 |
Ulsan |
5 | 2 | 40% |
| 22 |
Jeonbuk Motors |
5 | 4 | 80% |
| 23 |
Viettel |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 24 |
Al Duhail |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 25 |
Al Gharafa |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 26 |
Al Rayyan |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 27 |
Al Sadd |
3 | 3 | 100% |
| 28 |
Al Ain |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 29 |
Shabab Al Ahli Dubai |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 30 |
Al Wahda |
5 | 3 | 60% |
| 31 |
Al Sharjah |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 32 |
Al Ahli |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 33 |
Al Hilal |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 34 |
Al Nassr |
5 | 3 | 60% |
| 35 |
Al Wahda |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 36 |
Goa |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 37 |
Al Wihdat |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 38 |
Esteghlal |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 39 |
Tractor Sazi |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 40 |
Pakhtakor |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 41 |
Persepolis |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 42 |
Shan United |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 43 |
Foolad |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 44 |
AGMK |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 45 |
Al Quwa Al Jawiya |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 46 |
Istiqlol |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 47 |
Al Zawra'a |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 48 |
Al Shorta |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Johor Darul Ta'zim |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 2 |
Melbourne City FC |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 3 |
Brisbane Roar |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 4 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 5 |
Shanghai SIPG |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 7 |
Cerezo Osaka |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 8 |
Nagoya Grampus |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 9 |
Gamba Osaka |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 10 |
Kawasaki Frontale |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 11 |
Ratchaburi |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 12 |
Port FC |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 13 |
Bangkok Glass |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 14 |
Chiangrai United |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 15 |
Kitchee |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 16 |
Tampines Rovers |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 17 |
Ceres |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 18 |
Kaya |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 19 |
Daegu |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 20 |
Pohang Steelers |
6 | 1 | 17% |
| 21 |
Ulsan |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 22 |
Jeonbuk Motors |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 23 |
Viettel |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 24 |
Al Duhail |
3 | 3 | 100% |
| 25 |
Al Gharafa |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 26 |
Al Rayyan |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 27 |
Al Sadd |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 28 |
Al Ain |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 29 |
Shabab Al Ahli Dubai |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 30 |
Al Wahda |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 31 |
Al Sharjah |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 32 |
Al Ahli |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 33 |
Al Hilal |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 34 |
Al Nassr |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 35 |
Al Wahda |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 36 |
Goa |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 37 |
Al Wihdat |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 38 |
Esteghlal |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 39 |
Tractor Sazi |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 40 |
Pakhtakor |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 41 |
Persepolis |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 42 |
Shan United |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 43 |
Foolad |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 44 |
AGMK |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 45 |
Al Quwa Al Jawiya |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 46 |
Istiqlol |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 47 |
Al Zawra'a |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 48 |
Al Shorta |
3 | 1 | 33% |
Tampines Rovers BTTS matches in the season
The both teams scoring stat is the number of times a team has both scored and conceded a goal in a match. This stat is helpful in determining whether a match has the potential to be a high-scoring affair.
And in Tampines Rovers’s case, their BTTS statistics in the AFC Champions League 2021 provide some interesting insights about their offence and defence. Here are the relevant BTTS stats on Tampines Rovers in the competition:
- In 6 matches to date, Tampines Rovers has scored and conceded in the same game 1 times
- In terms of percentage, Tampines Rovers has had both teams score in 17% of their matches in AFC Champions League.
You can also see Tampines Rovers’s BTTS stats filtered in terms of where they play, whether it’s at home or away, as well as overall, for a more comprehensive view of the stat all season long.