Season
Country
2025
China
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
28 | 46% | 36% | 18% |
| 2 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
28 | 46% | 32% | 7% |
| 3 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
28 | 57% | 43% | 25% |
| 4 |
Shenyang Urban |
28 | 46% | 25% | 14% |
| 5 |
Dalian Huayi |
28 | 46% | 36% | 21% |
| 6 |
Shanghai Jiading |
28 | 36% | 18% | 4% |
| 7 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
28 | 57% | 43% | 25% |
| 8 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
28 | 61% | 46% | 21% |
| 9 |
Nanjing City |
28 | 64% | 54% | 14% |
| 10 |
Dongguan United |
28 | 50% | 36% | 11% |
| 11 |
Yanbian Longding |
28 | 68% | 36% | 21% |
| 12 |
Hebei Kungfu |
28 | 54% | 36% | 25% |
| 13 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
28 | 57% | 43% | 21% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
28 | 57% | 36% | 18% |
| 15 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
28 | 54% | 36% | 14% |
| 16 |
Shaanxi Union |
28 | 71% | 39% | 11% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
28 | 46% | 18% | 0% |
| 2 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
28 | 50% | 21% | 0% |
| 3 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
28 | 57% | 32% | 14% |
| 4 |
Shenyang Urban |
28 | 46% | 21% | 7% |
| 5 |
Dalian Huayi |
28 | 64% | 46% | 14% |
| 6 |
Shanghai Jiading |
28 | 46% | 18% | 4% |
| 7 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
28 | 68% | 39% | 21% |
| 8 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
28 | 50% | 29% | 11% |
| 9 |
Nanjing City |
28 | 82% | 39% | 14% |
| 10 |
Dongguan United |
28 | 54% | 25% | 18% |
| 11 |
Yanbian Longding |
28 | 68% | 39% | 11% |
| 12 |
Hebei Kungfu |
28 | 43% | 25% | 18% |
| 13 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
28 | 43% | 32% | 4% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
28 | 61% | 32% | 18% |
| 15 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
28 | 54% | 21% | 11% |
| 16 |
Shaanxi Union |
28 | 68% | 36% | 14% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
28 | 54% | 36% | 18% |
| 2 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
28 | 54% | 21% | 4% |
| 3 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
28 | 61% | 25% | 11% |
| 4 |
Shenyang Urban |
28 | 50% | 21% | 4% |
| 5 |
Dalian Huayi |
28 | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 6 |
Shanghai Jiading |
28 | 39% | 14% | 0% |
| 7 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
28 | 64% | 36% | 7% |
| 8 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
28 | 68% | 39% | 29% |
| 9 |
Nanjing City |
28 | 50% | 29% | 11% |
| 10 |
Dongguan United |
28 | 46% | 25% | 7% |
| 11 |
Yanbian Longding |
28 | 57% | 43% | 11% |
| 12 |
Hebei Kungfu |
28 | 61% | 39% | 21% |
| 13 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
28 | 71% | 46% | 29% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
28 | 61% | 32% | 4% |
| 15 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
28 | 64% | 25% | 14% |
| 16 |
Shaanxi Union |
28 | 68% | 25% | 7% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Shaanxi Union’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 36% of their games played so far in the China League One 2025.
And on the other side of the ball, Shaanxi Union’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 68% of their China League One matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Shaanxi Union this season in the China League 1:
You can follow the Shaanxi Union’s card situation in Chinese Division 1 all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.