Season
2023
Country
USA
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Indy Eleven | 35 | 17 | 49% |
2 | Miami FC | 34 | 17 | 50% |
3 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 35 | 18 | 51% |
4 | Phoenix Rising | 38 | 24 | 63% |
5 | Las Vegas Lights | 34 | 22 | 65% |
6 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 34 | 23 | 68% |
7 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 35 | 16 | 46% |
8 | Sacramento Republic | 37 | 17 | 46% |
9 | Rio Grande Valley | 34 | 19 | 56% |
10 | Charleston Battery | 38 | 20 | 53% |
11 | Colorado Springs | 35 | 17 | 49% |
12 | Louisville City | 37 | 18 | 49% |
13 | Orange County SC | 36 | 15 | 42% |
14 | San Antonio | 36 | 22 | 61% |
15 | New Mexico United | 35 | 22 | 63% |
16 | Memphis 901 | 35 | 23 | 66% |
17 | Loudoun United | 34 | 20 | 59% |
18 | Hartford Athletic | 34 | 21 | 62% |
19 | Birmingham Legion | 36 | 21 | 58% |
20 | El Paso Locomotive | 35 | 18 | 51% |
21 | Detroit City FC | 36 | 10 | 28% |
22 | San Diego Loyal | 35 | 21 | 60% |
23 | Oakland Roots | 34 | 20 | 59% |
24 | Monterey Bay | 34 | 19 | 56% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Indy Eleven | 17 | 7 | 41% |
2 | Miami FC | 17 | 10 | 59% |
3 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 18 | 10 | 56% |
4 | Phoenix Rising | 17 | 12 | 71% |
5 | Las Vegas Lights | 17 | 12 | 71% |
6 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 17 | 11 | 65% |
7 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 18 | 9 | 50% |
8 | Sacramento Republic | 20 | 8 | 40% |
9 | Rio Grande Valley | 17 | 9 | 53% |
10 | Charleston Battery | 21 | 9 | 43% |
11 | Colorado Springs | 17 | 8 | 47% |
12 | Louisville City | 18 | 9 | 50% |
13 | Orange County SC | 19 | 8 | 42% |
14 | San Antonio | 18 | 11 | 61% |
15 | New Mexico United | 17 | 11 | 65% |
16 | Memphis 901 | 18 | 12 | 67% |
17 | Loudoun United | 17 | 11 | 65% |
18 | Hartford Athletic | 17 | 8 | 47% |
19 | Birmingham Legion | 17 | 11 | 65% |
20 | El Paso Locomotive | 17 | 11 | 65% |
21 | Detroit City FC | 17 | 4 | 24% |
22 | San Diego Loyal | 18 | 12 | 67% |
23 | Oakland Roots | 17 | 8 | 47% |
24 | Monterey Bay | 17 | 9 | 53% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Indy Eleven | 18 | 10 | 56% |
2 | Miami FC | 17 | 7 | 41% |
3 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 17 | 8 | 47% |
4 | Phoenix Rising | 21 | 12 | 57% |
5 | Las Vegas Lights | 17 | 10 | 59% |
6 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 17 | 12 | 71% |
7 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 17 | 7 | 41% |
8 | Sacramento Republic | 17 | 9 | 53% |
9 | Rio Grande Valley | 17 | 10 | 59% |
10 | Charleston Battery | 17 | 11 | 65% |
11 | Colorado Springs | 18 | 9 | 50% |
12 | Louisville City | 19 | 9 | 47% |
13 | Orange County SC | 17 | 7 | 41% |
14 | San Antonio | 18 | 11 | 61% |
15 | New Mexico United | 18 | 11 | 61% |
16 | Memphis 901 | 17 | 11 | 65% |
17 | Loudoun United | 17 | 9 | 53% |
18 | Hartford Athletic | 17 | 13 | 76% |
19 | Birmingham Legion | 19 | 10 | 53% |
20 | El Paso Locomotive | 18 | 7 | 39% |
21 | Detroit City FC | 19 | 6 | 32% |
22 | San Diego Loyal | 17 | 9 | 53% |
23 | Oakland Roots | 17 | 12 | 71% |
24 | Monterey Bay | 17 | 10 | 59% |
The both teams scoring stat is the number of times a team has both scored and conceded a goal in a match. This stat is helpful in determining whether a match has the potential to be a high-scoring affair.
And in San Diego Loyal’s case, their BTTS statistics in the USL Championship 2023 provide some interesting insights about their offence and defence. Here are the relevant BTTS stats on San Diego Loyal in the competition:
You can also see San Diego Loyal’s BTTS stats filtered in terms of where they play, whether it’s at home or away, as well as overall, for a more comprehensive view of the stat all season long.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.