# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Minnesota United | 31 | 15 | 12 | 4 | 27 | 14 | +13 | 57 | 1.84 |
2 | North Carolina FC | 30 | 14 | 8 | 8 | 30 | 24 | +6 | 50 | 1.67 |
3 | Jacksonville Armada | 30 | 9 | 12 | 9 | 16 | 19 | -3 | 39 | 1.3 |
4 | Indy Eleven | 30 | 8 | 11 | 11 | 16 | 18 | -2 | 35 | 1.17 |
5 | NY Cosmos | 32 | 9 | 11 | 12 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 38 | 1.19 |
6 | Edmonton | 30 | 6 | 14 | 10 | 14 | 20 | -6 | 32 | 1.07 |
7 | Fort Lauderdale Strikers | 31 | 9 | 15 | 7 | 21 | 19 | +2 | 42 | 1.35 |
8 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 30 | 6 | 14 | 10 | 16 | 18 | -2 | 32 | 1.07 |
9 | Ottawa Fury | 32 | 10 | 13 | 9 | 14 | 12 | +2 | 43 | 1.34 |
10 | San Antonio Scorpions | 30 | 6 | 16 | 8 | 17 | 22 | -5 | 34 | 1.13 |
11 | Atlanta Silverbacks | 30 | 6 | 14 | 10 | 12 | 17 | -5 | 32 | 1.07 |
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Minnesota United | 15 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 11 | 3 | +8 | 30 | 2 |
2 | North Carolina FC | 15 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 17 | 9 | +8 | 30 | 2 |
3 | Jacksonville Armada | 15 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 13 | 6 | +7 | 30 | 2 |
4 | Indy Eleven | 15 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 10 | 7 | +3 | 22 | 1.47 |
5 | NY Cosmos | 17 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 17 | 9 | +8 | 29 | 1.71 |
6 | Edmonton | 15 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 11 | 5 | +6 | 24 | 1.6 |
7 | Fort Lauderdale Strikers | 15 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 12 | 7 | +5 | 25 | 1.67 |
8 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 15 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 9 | 6 | +3 | 22 | 1.47 |
9 | Ottawa Fury | 16 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 7 | 5 | +2 | 23 | 1.44 |
10 | San Antonio Scorpions | 15 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 16 | 1.07 |
11 | Atlanta Silverbacks | 15 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 17 | 1.13 |
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Minnesota United | 16 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 16 | 11 | +5 | 27 | 1.69 |
2 | North Carolina FC | 15 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 20 | 1.33 |
3 | Jacksonville Armada | 15 | 1 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 13 | -10 | 9 | 0.6 |
4 | Indy Eleven | 15 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 13 | 0.87 |
5 | NY Cosmos | 15 | 1 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 10 | -8 | 9 | 0.6 |
6 | Edmonton | 15 | 0 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 15 | -12 | 8 | 0.53 |
7 | Fort Lauderdale Strikers | 16 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 17 | 1.06 |
8 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 15 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 10 | 0.67 |
9 | Ottawa Fury | 16 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 20 | 1.25 |
10 | San Antonio Scorpions | 15 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 18 | 1.2 |
11 | Atlanta Silverbacks | 15 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 15 | 1 |
It can be quite helpful to take a closer look at a team’s performance only in the first half of football games. Whether it’s the tactics of the coach or the comparison of their performance with other teams, they provide a glimpse into their overall play.
So if we only look at the first half of the match, we can see how San Antonio Scorpions has performed compared to other teams in the NASL in terms of their initial tactics over the first 45 minutes.
Below are some deeper insights on how San Antonio Scorpions has played in the 1st half of their games in NASL 2015:
You can also check out San Antonio Scorpions’s first half statistics for both home and away matches in the NASL 2015.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.