# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ha Noi | 24 | 71% |
2 | Hai Phong | 24 | 67% |
3 | Binh Dinh | 24 | 58% |
4 | Da Nang | 24 | 50% |
5 | FLC Thanh Hoa | 24 | 50% |
6 | Song Lam Nghe An | 24 | 50% |
7 | Hoang Anh Gia Lai | 24 | 46% |
8 | Viettel | 24 | 46% |
9 | Binh Duong | 24 | 42% |
10 | Nam Dinh | 24 | 38% |
11 | Hà Nội II | 24 | 33% |
12 | Sai Gon | 24 | 33% |
13 | Ho Chi Minh City | 24 | 21% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ha Noi | 12 | 75% |
2 | Binh Dinh | 12 | 67% |
3 | Hai Phong | 12 | 67% |
4 | Song Lam Nghe An | 12 | 58% |
5 | FLC Thanh Hoa | 12 | 58% |
6 | Viettel | 12 | 58% |
7 | Hoang Anh Gia Lai | 12 | 50% |
8 | Hà Nội II | 12 | 50% |
9 | Da Nang | 12 | 50% |
10 | Sai Gon | 12 | 42% |
11 | Nam Dinh | 12 | 33% |
12 | Binh Duong | 12 | 33% |
13 | Ho Chi Minh City | 12 | 33% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hai Phong | 12 | 67% |
2 | Ha Noi | 12 | 67% |
3 | Da Nang | 12 | 50% |
4 | Binh Duong | 12 | 50% |
5 | Binh Dinh | 12 | 50% |
6 | FLC Thanh Hoa | 12 | 42% |
7 | Hoang Anh Gia Lai | 12 | 42% |
8 | Nam Dinh | 12 | 42% |
9 | Song Lam Nghe An | 12 | 42% |
10 | Viettel | 12 | 33% |
11 | Sai Gon | 12 | 25% |
12 | Hà Nội II | 12 | 17% |
13 | Ho Chi Minh City | 12 | 8% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Sai Gon | 24 | 67% |
2 | Ho Chi Minh City | 24 | 63% |
3 | Nam Dinh | 24 | 58% |
4 | Hà Nội II | 24 | 58% |
5 | Binh Duong | 24 | 54% |
6 | Song Lam Nghe An | 24 | 46% |
7 | FLC Thanh Hoa | 24 | 46% |
8 | Da Nang | 24 | 42% |
9 | Hoang Anh Gia Lai | 24 | 42% |
10 | Viettel | 24 | 42% |
11 | Binh Dinh | 24 | 33% |
12 | Hai Phong | 24 | 29% |
13 | Ha Noi | 24 | 25% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ho Chi Minh City | 12 | 58% |
2 | Binh Duong | 12 | 58% |
3 | Sai Gon | 12 | 58% |
4 | Nam Dinh | 12 | 58% |
5 | Hà Nội II | 12 | 42% |
6 | FLC Thanh Hoa | 12 | 42% |
7 | Hoang Anh Gia Lai | 12 | 42% |
8 | Da Nang | 12 | 33% |
9 | Hai Phong | 12 | 33% |
10 | Viettel | 12 | 33% |
11 | Song Lam Nghe An | 12 | 33% |
12 | Binh Dinh | 12 | 25% |
13 | Ha Noi | 12 | 17% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hà Nội II | 12 | 75% |
2 | Sai Gon | 12 | 75% |
3 | Ho Chi Minh City | 12 | 67% |
4 | Nam Dinh | 12 | 58% |
5 | Song Lam Nghe An | 12 | 58% |
6 | Da Nang | 12 | 50% |
7 | Binh Duong | 12 | 50% |
8 | Viettel | 12 | 50% |
9 | FLC Thanh Hoa | 12 | 50% |
10 | Hoang Anh Gia Lai | 12 | 42% |
11 | Binh Dinh | 12 | 42% |
12 | Ha Noi | 12 | 33% |
13 | Hai Phong | 12 | 25% |
This section of the APWin football statistics platform shows the times in which Sai Gon scored before the opponent as well as the times in which they conceded the first goal of the match in the V.League 1 2022.
Through this stat, we can see whether Sai Gon is often the one in charge of matches and gets ahead most of the time, or if they are the ones playing catchup.
In the V.League 1, Sai Gon has scored before the opponent in 33% of the games played. On the other hand, the percentage of times they have conceded the first goal is 67%.
This data helps give a clearer view of Sai Gon’s habits on both offence and defence.
If the percentage of scoring first is high, it likely points to Sai Gon being the more aggressive of the two sides with more control of the match. And if the percentage of conceding the first goal is higher, then it points to a club that is not among the best and has some defensive deficiencies.
If you want to dive even deeper into this statistic, you can also use the filters to see the score first/concede first rates in home and away games during the season.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.