Season
Country
Stadium
2025
USA
City Stadium
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
16 | 62% |
2 |
![]() One Knoxville |
16 | 62% |
3 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
15 | 56% |
4 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
14 | 52% |
5 |
![]() Union Omaha |
14 | 52% |
6 |
![]() Naples |
14 | 52% |
7 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
13 | 48% |
8 |
![]() Westchester SC |
13 | 48% |
9 |
![]() Texoma |
12 | 44% |
10 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
11 | 42% |
11 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
10 | 38% |
12 |
![]() AV Alta |
10 | 37% |
13 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
10 | 37% |
14 |
![]() Forward Madison |
10 | 37% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() One Knoxville |
10 | 91% |
2 |
![]() Texoma |
9 | 64% |
3 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
8 | 62% |
4 |
![]() Union Omaha |
8 | 62% |
5 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
8 | 57% |
6 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
8 | 57% |
7 |
![]() Naples |
7 | 54% |
8 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
7 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
7 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
6 | 50% |
11 |
![]() Forward Madison |
7 | 50% |
12 |
![]() Westchester SC |
7 | 50% |
13 |
![]() AV Alta |
7 | 50% |
14 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
6 | 46% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
8 | 67% |
2 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
8 | 62% |
3 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
7 | 54% |
4 |
![]() Naples |
7 | 50% |
5 |
![]() Westchester SC |
6 | 46% |
6 |
![]() Union Omaha |
6 | 43% |
7 |
![]() One Knoxville |
6 | 40% |
8 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
5 | 36% |
9 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
4 | 29% |
10 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
4 | 29% |
11 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
3 | 25% |
12 |
![]() AV Alta |
3 | 23% |
13 |
![]() Texoma |
3 | 23% |
14 |
![]() Forward Madison |
3 | 23% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
17 | 62% |
2 |
![]() Forward Madison |
17 | 62% |
3 |
![]() AV Alta |
17 | 62% |
4 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
16 | 61% |
5 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
15 | 57% |
6 |
![]() Texoma |
15 | 55% |
7 |
![]() Westchester SC |
14 | 51% |
8 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
14 | 51% |
9 |
![]() Union Omaha |
13 | 48% |
10 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
13 | 48% |
11 |
![]() Naples |
13 | 48% |
12 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
12 | 44% |
13 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
10 | 38% |
14 |
![]() One Knoxville |
10 | 38% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
7 | 53% |
2 |
![]() Westchester SC |
7 | 50% |
3 |
![]() Forward Madison |
7 | 50% |
4 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
7 | 50% |
5 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
6 | 50% |
6 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
7 | 50% |
7 |
![]() AV Alta |
7 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Naples |
6 | 46% |
9 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
6 | 42% |
10 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
6 | 42% |
11 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
5 | 38% |
12 |
![]() Union Omaha |
5 | 38% |
13 |
![]() Texoma |
5 | 35% |
14 |
![]() One Knoxville |
1 | 9% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() AV Alta |
10 | 76% |
2 |
![]() Texoma |
10 | 76% |
3 |
![]() Forward Madison |
10 | 76% |
4 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
9 | 75% |
5 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
10 | 71% |
6 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
10 | 71% |
7 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
9 | 64% |
8 |
![]() One Knoxville |
9 | 60% |
9 |
![]() Union Omaha |
8 | 57% |
10 |
![]() Westchester SC |
7 | 53% |
11 |
![]() Naples |
7 | 50% |
12 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
6 | 46% |
13 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
5 | 38% |
14 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
4 | 33% |
This section of the APWin football statistics platform shows the times in which Richmond Kickers scored before the opponent as well as the times in which they conceded the first goal of the match in the USL League One 2025.
Through this stat, we can see whether Richmond Kickers is often the one in charge of matches and gets ahead most of the time, or if they are the ones playing catchup.
In the USL League One, Richmond Kickers has scored before the opponent in 42% of the games played. On the other hand, the percentage of times they have conceded the first goal is 57%.
This data helps give a clearer view of Richmond Kickers’s habits on both offence and defence.
If the percentage of scoring first is high, it likely points to Richmond Kickers being the more aggressive of the two sides with more control of the match. And if the percentage of conceding the first goal is higher, then it points to a club that is not among the best and has some defensive deficiencies.
If you want to dive even deeper into this statistic, you can also use the filters to see the score first/concede first rates in home and away games during the season.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.