Football statistics for Qingdao Youth Island
Team Info
Season
2025
Country
China
Competition
Over Under Goals
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 13 | 76% | 67% | 88% |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
16 | 12 | 75% | 100% | 50% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
16 | 11 | 69% | 86% | 56% |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 9 | 56% | 50% | 63% |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 11 | 65% | 56% | 75% |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
16 | 11 | 69% | 63% | 75% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 12 | 75% | 88% | 63% |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
16 | 10 | 63% | 43% | 78% |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 13 | 81% | 100% | 57% |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
16 | 6 | 38% | 38% | 38% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
16 | 10 | 63% | 75% | 50% |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
16 | 9 | 56% | 38% | 75% |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
16 | 12 | 75% | 75% | 75% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
16 | 8 | 50% | 44% | 57% |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
16 | 5 | 31% | 25% | 38% |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
16 | 8 | 50% | 43% | 56% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 0.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 17 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
16 | 15 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 16 | 94% | 89% | 100% |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
16 | 15 | 94% | 88% | 100% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
16 | 15 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
16 | 14 | 88% | 78% | 100% |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
16 | 14 | 88% | 100% | 78% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 17 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
16 | 12 | 75% | 100% | 50% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
16 | 15 | 94% | 100% | 89% |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 14 | 88% | 75% | 100% |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 14 | 82% | 67% | 100% |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
16 | 13 | 81% | 75% | 88% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 14 | 88% | 100% | 75% |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
16 | 12 | 75% | 57% | 89% |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 15 | 94% | 100% | 86% |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
16 | 11 | 69% | 75% | 63% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
16 | 15 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
16 | 13 | 81% | 75% | 88% |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
16 | 13 | 81% | 88% | 75% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
16 | 11 | 69% | 67% | 71% |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
16 | 13 | 81% | 63% | 100% |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
16 | 12 | 75% | 86% | 67% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 9 | 53% | 33% | 75% |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
16 | 9 | 56% | 88% | 25% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
16 | 7 | 44% | 57% | 33% |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 6 | 38% | 25% | 50% |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 4 | 24% | 11% | 38% |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
16 | 9 | 56% | 50% | 63% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 8 | 50% | 63% | 38% |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
16 | 5 | 31% | 43% | 22% |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 9 | 56% | 67% | 43% |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
16 | 4 | 25% | 13% | 38% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
16 | 7 | 44% | 63% | 25% |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
16 | 5 | 31% | 13% | 50% |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
16 | 8 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
16 | 7 | 44% | 44% | 43% |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
16 | 3 | 19% | 13% | 25% |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
16 | 6 | 38% | 29% | 44% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 3 | 18% | 0% | 38% |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
16 | 3 | 19% | 38% | 0% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
16 | 3 | 19% | 14% | 22% |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 2 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
16 | 6 | 38% | 25% | 50% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 2 | 13% | 25% | 0% |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
16 | 2 | 13% | 14% | 11% |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 1 | 6% | 11% | 0% |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
16 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
16 | 1 | 6% | 13% | 0% |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
16 | 2 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
16 | 2 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
16 | 3 | 19% | 22% | 14% |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
16 | 2 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
16 | 4 | 25% | 29% | 22% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
16 | 1 | 6% | 13% | 0% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
16 | 2 | 13% | 14% | 11% |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 2 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
16 | 4 | 25% | 13% | 38% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
16 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 11% |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 1 | 6% | 11% | 0% |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
16 | 1 | 6% | 13% | 0% |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
16 | 1 | 6% | 13% | 0% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
16 | 2 | 13% | 22% | 0% |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
16 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 11% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 4 | 24% | 33% | 13% |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
16 | 4 | 25% | 0% | 50% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
16 | 5 | 31% | 14% | 44% |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 7 | 44% | 50% | 38% |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 6 | 35% | 44% | 25% |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
16 | 5 | 31% | 38% | 25% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 4 | 25% | 13% | 38% |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
16 | 6 | 38% | 57% | 22% |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 3 | 19% | 0% | 43% |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
16 | 10 | 63% | 63% | 63% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
16 | 6 | 38% | 25% | 50% |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
16 | 7 | 44% | 63% | 25% |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
16 | 4 | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
16 | 8 | 50% | 56% | 43% |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
16 | 11 | 69% | 75% | 63% |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
16 | 8 | 50% | 57% | 44% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
16 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 1 | 6% | 11% | 0% |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
16 | 1 | 6% | 13% | 0% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
16 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
16 | 2 | 13% | 22% | 0% |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
16 | 2 | 13% | 0% | 22% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
16 | 4 | 25% | 0% | 50% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
16 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 11% |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 2 | 13% | 25% | 0% |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 3 | 18% | 33% | 0% |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
16 | 3 | 19% | 25% | 13% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 2 | 13% | 0% | 25% |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
16 | 4 | 25% | 43% | 11% |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 14% |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
16 | 5 | 31% | 25% | 38% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
16 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
16 | 3 | 19% | 25% | 13% |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
16 | 3 | 19% | 13% | 25% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
16 | 5 | 31% | 33% | 29% |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
16 | 3 | 19% | 38% | 0% |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
16 | 4 | 25% | 14% | 33% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 8 | 47% | 67% | 25% |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
16 | 7 | 44% | 13% | 75% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
16 | 9 | 56% | 43% | 67% |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 10 | 63% | 75% | 50% |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 13 | 76% | 89% | 63% |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
16 | 7 | 44% | 50% | 38% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 8 | 50% | 38% | 63% |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
16 | 11 | 69% | 57% | 78% |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 7 | 44% | 33% | 57% |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
16 | 12 | 75% | 88% | 63% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
16 | 9 | 56% | 38% | 75% |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
16 | 11 | 69% | 88% | 50% |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
16 | 8 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
16 | 9 | 56% | 56% | 57% |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
16 | 13 | 81% | 88% | 75% |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
16 | 10 | 63% | 71% | 56% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 14 | 82% | 100% | 63% |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
16 | 13 | 81% | 63% | 100% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
16 | 13 | 81% | 86% | 78% |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 14 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 16 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
16 | 10 | 63% | 75% | 50% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 14 | 88% | 75% | 100% |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
16 | 14 | 88% | 86% | 89% |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 15 | 94% | 89% | 100% |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
16 | 15 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
16 | 15 | 94% | 88% | 100% |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
16 | 14 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
16 | 14 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
16 | 13 | 81% | 78% | 86% |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
16 | 14 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
16 | 12 | 75% | 71% | 78% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 16 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
16 | 15 | 94% | 88% | 100% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
16 | 14 | 88% | 86% | 89% |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 14 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 16 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
16 | 12 | 75% | 88% | 63% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
16 | 15 | 94% | 100% | 89% |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 15 | 94% | 89% | 100% |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
16 | 15 | 94% | 88% | 100% |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
16 | 15 | 94% | 88% | 100% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
16 | 14 | 88% | 78% | 100% |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
16 | 15 | 94% | 100% | 89% |
Average goals scored and conceded: Qingdao Youth Island
Knowing Qingdao Youth Island’s averages in terms of goals scored and conceded is instrumental in understanding how the team is performing in the Chinese Super League 2025 on both ends of the pitch.
Check out some of the Qingdao Youth Island’s over/under numbers and goal rates below:
- 50% of Qingdao Youth Island games in the league have had 3 or more goals (Qingdao Youth Island and opponent goals, combined). The percentage of games where matches have had 2 or fewer goals is 50%.
This page can filter the number of goals, from above or below 0.5 goals to 5.5 goals. You can also sort them in ascending and descending order based on the number of times it has occurred, as well as their frequency at home, away from home, and overall in Chinese Super League.
All of this information can help determine how Qingdao Youth Island’s offence and defence are performing throughout the season. If the goal rate during matches is high, it is important to determine the cause of such a lot of goals going in.
However, it is important to remember that goal percentage statistics cannot be analysed in isolation. Instead, they should be considered alongside several other factors, such as tactics, personnel moves, and others.