 
                    Season
Country
2025
China
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |   Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 28 | 46% | 36% | 18% | 
| 2 |   Nantong Zhiyun | 28 | 46% | 32% | 7% | 
| 3 |   Guangxi Baoyun | 28 | 54% | 43% | 25% | 
| 4 |   Shenyang Urban | 28 | 46% | 25% | 14% | 
| 5 |   Dalian Huayi | 28 | 46% | 36% | 21% | 
| 6 |   Shanghai Jiading | 28 | 36% | 18% | 4% | 
| 7 |   Suzhou Dongwu | 28 | 57% | 43% | 25% | 
| 8 |   Qingdao Red Lions | 28 | 61% | 46% | 21% | 
| 9 |   Nanjing City | 28 | 64% | 54% | 14% | 
| 10 |   Dongguan United | 28 | 50% | 36% | 11% | 
| 11 |   Yanbian Longding | 28 | 64% | 36% | 21% | 
| 12 |   Hebei Kungfu | 28 | 54% | 36% | 25% | 
| 13 |   Chongqing Tongliang Long | 28 | 57% | 43% | 21% | 
| 14 |   Shenzhen Juniors | 28 | 57% | 36% | 18% | 
| 15 |   Guangzhou E-Power | 28 | 54% | 36% | 14% | 
| 16 |   Shaanxi Union | 28 | 71% | 39% | 11% | 
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |   Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 28 | 46% | 18% | 0% | 
| 2 |   Nantong Zhiyun | 28 | 50% | 21% | 0% | 
| 3 |   Guangxi Baoyun | 28 | 54% | 32% | 14% | 
| 4 |   Shenyang Urban | 28 | 46% | 21% | 7% | 
| 5 |   Dalian Huayi | 28 | 64% | 46% | 14% | 
| 6 |   Shanghai Jiading | 28 | 46% | 18% | 4% | 
| 7 |   Suzhou Dongwu | 28 | 68% | 39% | 21% | 
| 8 |   Qingdao Red Lions | 28 | 50% | 29% | 11% | 
| 9 |   Nanjing City | 28 | 82% | 39% | 14% | 
| 10 |   Dongguan United | 28 | 54% | 25% | 18% | 
| 11 |   Yanbian Longding | 28 | 64% | 39% | 11% | 
| 12 |   Hebei Kungfu | 28 | 43% | 25% | 18% | 
| 13 |   Chongqing Tongliang Long | 28 | 43% | 32% | 4% | 
| 14 |   Shenzhen Juniors | 28 | 61% | 32% | 18% | 
| 15 |   Guangzhou E-Power | 28 | 54% | 21% | 11% | 
| 16 |   Shaanxi Union | 28 | 68% | 36% | 14% | 
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |   Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 28 | 54% | 36% | 18% | 
| 2 |   Nantong Zhiyun | 28 | 54% | 21% | 4% | 
| 3 |   Guangxi Baoyun | 28 | 57% | 25% | 11% | 
| 4 |   Shenyang Urban | 28 | 50% | 21% | 4% | 
| 5 |   Dalian Huayi | 28 | 32% | 18% | 4% | 
| 6 |   Shanghai Jiading | 28 | 39% | 14% | 0% | 
| 7 |   Suzhou Dongwu | 28 | 64% | 36% | 7% | 
| 8 |   Qingdao Red Lions | 28 | 68% | 39% | 29% | 
| 9 |   Nanjing City | 28 | 50% | 29% | 11% | 
| 10 |   Dongguan United | 28 | 46% | 25% | 7% | 
| 11 |   Yanbian Longding | 28 | 54% | 43% | 11% | 
| 12 |   Hebei Kungfu | 28 | 61% | 39% | 21% | 
| 13 |   Chongqing Tongliang Long | 28 | 71% | 46% | 29% | 
| 14 |   Shenzhen Juniors | 28 | 61% | 32% | 4% | 
| 15 |   Guangzhou E-Power | 28 | 64% | 25% | 14% | 
| 16 |   Shaanxi Union | 28 | 68% | 25% | 7% | 
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Qingdao Red Lions’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 29% of their games played so far in the China League One 2025.
And on the other side of the ball, Qingdao Red Lions’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 68% of their China League One matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Qingdao Red Lions this season in the China League 1:
You can follow the Qingdao Red Lions’s card situation in Chinese Division 1 all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.