Season
2025
Country
China
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
15 | 27% | 13% | 7% |
2 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
16 | 38% | 19% | 0% |
3 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
16 | 44% | 38% | 19% |
4 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
16 | 38% | 19% | 6% |
5 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
15 | 40% | 40% | 13% |
6 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
16 | 31% | 19% | 6% |
7 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
15 | 47% | 40% | 20% |
8 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
16 | 63% | 44% | 19% |
9 |
![]() Nanjing City |
16 | 63% | 56% | 13% |
10 |
![]() Dongguan United |
16 | 44% | 31% | 6% |
11 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
16 | 50% | 19% | 13% |
12 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
16 | 38% | 6% | 6% |
13 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
15 | 47% | 40% | 27% |
14 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
16 | 44% | 31% | 6% |
15 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
15 | 47% | 47% | 20% |
16 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
15 | 47% | 40% | 13% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
15 | 27% | 13% | 0% |
2 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
16 | 38% | 19% | 0% |
3 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
16 | 50% | 31% | 0% |
4 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
16 | 31% | 13% | 0% |
5 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
15 | 53% | 40% | 20% |
6 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
16 | 44% | 25% | 6% |
7 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
15 | 67% | 33% | 13% |
8 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
16 | 69% | 38% | 13% |
9 |
![]() Nanjing City |
16 | 75% | 25% | 13% |
10 |
![]() Dongguan United |
16 | 56% | 13% | 13% |
11 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
16 | 56% | 31% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
16 | 25% | 13% | 6% |
13 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
15 | 33% | 27% | 0% |
14 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
16 | 50% | 31% | 19% |
15 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
15 | 47% | 27% | 7% |
16 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
15 | 47% | 27% | 13% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
15 | 40% | 20% | 13% |
2 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
16 | 38% | 13% | 0% |
3 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
16 | 50% | 25% | 6% |
4 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
16 | 50% | 25% | 0% |
5 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
15 | 40% | 13% | 0% |
6 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
16 | 31% | 13% | 0% |
7 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
15 | 47% | 27% | 7% |
8 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
16 | 56% | 31% | 19% |
9 |
![]() Nanjing City |
16 | 50% | 31% | 13% |
10 |
![]() Dongguan United |
16 | 38% | 25% | 6% |
11 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
16 | 44% | 31% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
16 | 63% | 19% | 0% |
13 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
15 | 73% | 47% | 27% |
14 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
16 | 31% | 25% | 0% |
15 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
15 | 60% | 33% | 20% |
16 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
15 | 60% | 27% | 13% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Qingdao Red Lions’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 38% of their games played so far in the China League One 2025.
And on the other side of the ball, Qingdao Red Lions’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 56% of their China League One matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Qingdao Red Lions this season in the China League One:
You can follow the Qingdao Red Lions’s card situation in China League One all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.